Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Tlaib takes the word of an old white male Jew over woman of color.

12346»

Comments

  • USMChawk
    USMChawk Member Posts: 1,800
    HHusky said:

    USMChawk said:

    HHusky said:

    USMChawk said:

    HHusky said:

    2001400ex said:

    HHusky said:

    The only twisting is you H

    She was there on her own to support Trump

    Cracker

    They would have let anyone do it.

    Riiiighhht!
    Who would you suggest speak in defense of Trump racism accusations that a black person who has worked directly for him for years and saw no sign of it?

    What happened to Omorosa? Wasn’t she supposed to drop some major shit? She faded away, rather easily.
    You act like you've never known someone who says racist shit to his white buddies but knows not to say that shit in front of Black people.
    If only the U.S. wasn't so racist, oppressed guys like you might have a chance. Right?
    Parading a black employee out to be inspected as evidence isn't close to a rebuttal of a charge of racism. It's fucking transparently stupid and makes that person a prop. Denying she was a prop is just a ridiculous lie.
    HHusky said:

    One is allowed to not like the fact that this woman supports and defends Trump, given ample reasons for people not to like Trump. But calling this woman a Prop, who can't think or act for herself, or own the decision to speak out in Trump's favor is both racist and sexist in the extreme. I think she's well aware of her race, and how it might appear and play to the opposition, but appreciating that fact, she stood up, regardless. And you fuckers who have a problem with this woman purport to give a fuck about equality or women's rights? Fuck Off, you fucking pigs.

    I have a problem with Rep. Meadows using her as a prop. I hope Ms. Patton is cynical enough to ride this train to a healthy payday.
    So you’re saying she was used for identity politics? Identity politics intended to counter the identity politics the Democrats were doing?

    At least USMC has the integrity to agree it was identity politics. He just thinks it was tit for tat.
    Agree? Don’t you see the question marks at the ends of my sentences? I’m asking if that’s your point. I do agree that the racist accusations leveled against Trump are identity politics.

    I haven’t seen today’s hearing (long day at work) so I have no opinion on it.
    Didn't mean to scare you. I think your colleagues are buying it. You'll get to stay in the club.
    Pressing
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    USMChawk said:

    HHusky said:

    USMChawk said:

    HHusky said:

    USMChawk said:

    HHusky said:

    2001400ex said:

    HHusky said:

    The only twisting is you H

    She was there on her own to support Trump

    Cracker

    They would have let anyone do it.

    Riiiighhht!
    Who would you suggest speak in defense of Trump racism accusations that a black person who has worked directly for him for years and saw no sign of it?

    What happened to Omorosa? Wasn’t she supposed to drop some major shit? She faded away, rather easily.
    You act like you've never known someone who says racist shit to his white buddies but knows not to say that shit in front of Black people.
    If only the U.S. wasn't so racist, oppressed guys like you might have a chance. Right?
    Parading a black employee out to be inspected as evidence isn't close to a rebuttal of a charge of racism. It's fucking transparently stupid and makes that person a prop. Denying she was a prop is just a ridiculous lie.
    HHusky said:

    One is allowed to not like the fact that this woman supports and defends Trump, given ample reasons for people not to like Trump. But calling this woman a Prop, who can't think or act for herself, or own the decision to speak out in Trump's favor is both racist and sexist in the extreme. I think she's well aware of her race, and how it might appear and play to the opposition, but appreciating that fact, she stood up, regardless. And you fuckers who have a problem with this woman purport to give a fuck about equality or women's rights? Fuck Off, you fucking pigs.

    I have a problem with Rep. Meadows using her as a prop. I hope Ms. Patton is cynical enough to ride this train to a healthy payday.
    So you’re saying she was used for identity politics? Identity politics intended to counter the identity politics the Democrats were doing?

    At least USMC has the integrity to agree it was identity politics. He just thinks it was tit for tat.
    Agree? Don’t you see the question marks at the ends of my sentences? I’m asking if that’s your point. I do agree that the racist accusations leveled against Trump are identity politics.

    I haven’t seen today’s hearing (long day at work) so I have no opinion on it.
    Didn't mean to scare you. I think your colleagues are buying it. You'll get to stay in the club.
    Pressing
    Stop plagiarism @CuntWaffle
    Embarrassing
  • USMChawk
    USMChawk Member Posts: 1,800

    USMChawk said:

    HHusky said:

    USMChawk said:

    HHusky said:

    USMChawk said:

    HHusky said:

    2001400ex said:

    HHusky said:

    The only twisting is you H

    She was there on her own to support Trump

    Cracker

    They would have let anyone do it.

    Riiiighhht!
    Who would you suggest speak in defense of Trump racism accusations that a black person who has worked directly for him for years and saw no sign of it?

    What happened to Omorosa? Wasn’t she supposed to drop some major shit? She faded away, rather easily.
    You act like you've never known someone who says racist shit to his white buddies but knows not to say that shit in front of Black people.
    If only the U.S. wasn't so racist, oppressed guys like you might have a chance. Right?
    Parading a black employee out to be inspected as evidence isn't close to a rebuttal of a charge of racism. It's fucking transparently stupid and makes that person a prop. Denying she was a prop is just a ridiculous lie.
    HHusky said:

    One is allowed to not like the fact that this woman supports and defends Trump, given ample reasons for people not to like Trump. But calling this woman a Prop, who can't think or act for herself, or own the decision to speak out in Trump's favor is both racist and sexist in the extreme. I think she's well aware of her race, and how it might appear and play to the opposition, but appreciating that fact, she stood up, regardless. And you fuckers who have a problem with this woman purport to give a fuck about equality or women's rights? Fuck Off, you fucking pigs.

    I have a problem with Rep. Meadows using her as a prop. I hope Ms. Patton is cynical enough to ride this train to a healthy payday.
    So you’re saying she was used for identity politics? Identity politics intended to counter the identity politics the Democrats were doing?

    At least USMC has the integrity to agree it was identity politics. He just thinks it was tit for tat.
    Agree? Don’t you see the question marks at the ends of my sentences? I’m asking if that’s your point. I do agree that the racist accusations leveled against Trump are identity politics.

    I haven’t seen today’s hearing (long day at work) so I have no opinion on it.
    Didn't mean to scare you. I think your colleagues are buying it. You'll get to stay in the club.
    Pressing
    Stop plagiarism @CuntWaffle
    Embarrassing
    Triggered
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    USMChawk said:

    USMChawk said:

    HHusky said:

    USMChawk said:

    HHusky said:

    USMChawk said:

    HHusky said:

    2001400ex said:

    HHusky said:

    The only twisting is you H

    She was there on her own to support Trump

    Cracker

    They would have let anyone do it.

    Riiiighhht!
    Who would you suggest speak in defense of Trump racism accusations that a black person who has worked directly for him for years and saw no sign of it?

    What happened to Omorosa? Wasn’t she supposed to drop some major shit? She faded away, rather easily.
    You act like you've never known someone who says racist shit to his white buddies but knows not to say that shit in front of Black people.
    If only the U.S. wasn't so racist, oppressed guys like you might have a chance. Right?
    Parading a black employee out to be inspected as evidence isn't close to a rebuttal of a charge of racism. It's fucking transparently stupid and makes that person a prop. Denying she was a prop is just a ridiculous lie.
    HHusky said:

    One is allowed to not like the fact that this woman supports and defends Trump, given ample reasons for people not to like Trump. But calling this woman a Prop, who can't think or act for herself, or own the decision to speak out in Trump's favor is both racist and sexist in the extreme. I think she's well aware of her race, and how it might appear and play to the opposition, but appreciating that fact, she stood up, regardless. And you fuckers who have a problem with this woman purport to give a fuck about equality or women's rights? Fuck Off, you fucking pigs.

    I have a problem with Rep. Meadows using her as a prop. I hope Ms. Patton is cynical enough to ride this train to a healthy payday.
    So you’re saying she was used for identity politics? Identity politics intended to counter the identity politics the Democrats were doing?

    At least USMC has the integrity to agree it was identity politics. He just thinks it was tit for tat.
    Agree? Don’t you see the question marks at the ends of my sentences? I’m asking if that’s your point. I do agree that the racist accusations leveled against Trump are identity politics.

    I haven’t seen today’s hearing (long day at work) so I have no opinion on it.
    Didn't mean to scare you. I think your colleagues are buying it. You'll get to stay in the club.
    Pressing
    Stop plagiarism @CuntWaffle
    Embarrassing
    Triggered
    Yeah, that’s a staple of his one-word rhetorical arsenal too, but not as frequent as “pressing” and embarrassing.” Correct observation though.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,826 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    I'm curious why the whole line of questioning was painted to discredit Cohen and nothing to defend Trump. Anyone?

    Because Cohen was lying to get a reduced sentence for lying.

    How could Trump or anyone convince you? HTH
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    I'm curious why the whole line of questioning was painted to discredit Cohen and nothing to defend Trump. Anyone?

    Because Cohen was lying to get a reduced sentence for lying.

    How could Trump or anyone convince you? HTH
    So you are saying the person who is going to jail for lying. His strategy is to lie again to get a reduced sentence?

    That's a bold strategy cotton.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,826 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    The only twisting is you H

    She was there on her own to support Trump

    Cracker

    They would have let anyone do it.

    Riiiighhht!
    Who is they? She was a guest of Meadows. The place was packed. All races and yet you only have an issue with one of them due to her color

    Textbook racism
    Matthews: "I asked Lynn to come today . . ."

    Its quite common but H has an issue with a Black woman who supports Trump

    Racist as fuck

    Or maybe an issue with Black people in general thinking for themselves.


    This is good!

    This is where you girls pretend it was up to her whether she got to appear and that we're talking about her motivation instead of Meadows' motivation.
    Ever think they shared a motivation?
    Could be. Maybe she's happy to be a prop and lying about it now. I don't care though. Meadows' purpose was OBVIOUS.
    And so what? Why is this one so offensive to you and the multiple other examples linked in this thread don't bother you at all

    Just this one has brought your latent racism to the surface in an ugly display of hate

    Might as well buy a MAGA hat
    So Race, how does the family view your embrace of tokenism? Just curious.
    Dude, you are crossing a fucking line.
    There's a line that prevents me from asking what people of color thought was going on?
    No. You took a shot at his family and you’re an absolute piece of shit. And a racist.
    I'm pretty rough. I asked him what his family thinks.

    I can't be racist though. I have black friends.
    We know you don't have friends.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,826 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    I'm curious why the whole line of questioning was painted to discredit Cohen and nothing to defend Trump. Anyone?

    Because Cohen was lying to get a reduced sentence for lying.

    How could Trump or anyone convince you? HTH
    So you are saying the person who is going to jail for lying. His strategy is to lie again to get a reduced sentence?

    That's a bold strategy cotton.
    Yes, already info out there contrary to his testimony. So you think a liar isn't going to lie again to get something he desperate;y wants? I bet you're a great businessman.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    I'm curious why the whole line of questioning was painted to discredit Cohen and nothing to defend Trump. Anyone?

    Because Cohen was lying to get a reduced sentence for lying.

    How could Trump or anyone convince you? HTH
    So you are saying the person who is going to jail for lying. His strategy is to lie again to get a reduced sentence?

    That's a bold strategy cotton.
    Yes, already info out there contrary to his testimony. So you think a liar isn't going to lie again to get something he desperate;y wants? I bet you're a great businessman.
    Ok. So you must think Trump needs to go to jail for lying to then. Right?
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,826 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    I'm curious why the whole line of questioning was painted to discredit Cohen and nothing to defend Trump. Anyone?

    Because Cohen was lying to get a reduced sentence for lying.

    How could Trump or anyone convince you? HTH
    So you are saying the person who is going to jail for lying. His strategy is to lie again to get a reduced sentence?

    That's a bold strategy cotton.
    Yes, already info out there contrary to his testimony. So you think a liar isn't going to lie again to get something he desperate;y wants? I bet you're a great businessman.
    Ok. So you must think Trump needs to go to jail for lying to then. Right?
    Under oath?
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    I'm curious why the whole line of questioning was painted to discredit Cohen and nothing to defend Trump. Anyone?

    Because Cohen was lying to get a reduced sentence for lying.

    How could Trump or anyone convince you? HTH
    So you are saying the person who is going to jail for lying. His strategy is to lie again to get a reduced sentence?

    That's a bold strategy cotton.
    Yes, already info out there contrary to his testimony. So you think a liar isn't going to lie again to get something he desperate;y wants? I bet you're a great businessman.
    Ok. So you must think Trump needs to go to jail for lying to then. Right?
    Under oath?
    It'll be a spectacle to watch if he gets there.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,826 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    I'm curious why the whole line of questioning was painted to discredit Cohen and nothing to defend Trump. Anyone?

    Because Cohen was lying to get a reduced sentence for lying.

    How could Trump or anyone convince you? HTH
    So you are saying the person who is going to jail for lying. His strategy is to lie again to get a reduced sentence?

    That's a bold strategy cotton.
    Yes, already info out there contrary to his testimony. So you think a liar isn't going to lie again to get something he desperate;y wants? I bet you're a great businessman.
    Ok. So you must think Trump needs to go to jail for lying to then. Right?
    Under oath?
    It'll be a spectacle to watch if he gets there.
    He won't because he hasn't done anything to get there for. Collusion! #Resist!
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    I'm curious why the whole line of questioning was painted to discredit Cohen and nothing to defend Trump. Anyone?

    Because Cohen was lying to get a reduced sentence for lying.

    How could Trump or anyone convince you? HTH
    So you are saying the person who is going to jail for lying. His strategy is to lie again to get a reduced sentence?

    That's a bold strategy cotton.
    Yes, already info out there contrary to his testimony. So you think a liar isn't going to lie again to get something he desperate;y wants? I bet you're a great businessman.
    Ok. So you must think Trump needs to go to jail for lying to then. Right?
    Under oath?
    It'll be a spectacle to watch if he gets there.
    He won't because he hasn't done anything to get there for. Collusion! #Resist!
    Clinton got there for placement of a cigar in a willing participant.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,090 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    I'm curious why the whole line of questioning was painted to discredit Cohen and nothing to defend Trump. Anyone?

    Because Cohen was lying to get a reduced sentence for lying.

    How could Trump or anyone convince you? HTH
    So you are saying the person who is going to jail for lying. His strategy is to lie again to get a reduced sentence?

    That's a bold strategy cotton.
    Yes, already info out there contrary to his testimony. So you think a liar isn't going to lie again to get something he desperate;y wants? I bet you're a great businessman.
    Ok. So you must think Trump needs to go to jail for lying to then. Right?
    Under oath?
    It'll be a spectacle to watch if he gets there.
    He won't because he hasn't done anything to get there for. Collusion! #Resist!
    Clinton got there for placement of a cigar in a willing participant.
    He lied about it

    I for sure didn't care what he did but when I saw him wag his finger and deny it to the people I turned to my boyfriend and said, he's fucked

    Even at that he served two terms

    Again this is the definition of a pathological liar.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,826 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    I'm curious why the whole line of questioning was painted to discredit Cohen and nothing to defend Trump. Anyone?

    Because Cohen was lying to get a reduced sentence for lying.

    How could Trump or anyone convince you? HTH
    So you are saying the person who is going to jail for lying. His strategy is to lie again to get a reduced sentence?

    That's a bold strategy cotton.
    Yes, already info out there contrary to his testimony. So you think a liar isn't going to lie again to get something he desperate;y wants? I bet you're a great businessman.
    Ok. So you must think Trump needs to go to jail for lying to then. Right?
    Under oath?
    It'll be a spectacle to watch if he gets there.
    He won't because he hasn't done anything to get there for. Collusion! #Resist!
    Clinton got there for placement of a cigar in a willing participant.
    And lied about it under oath. Oh! you forgot that part.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    I'm curious why the whole line of questioning was painted to discredit Cohen and nothing to defend Trump. Anyone?

    Because Cohen was lying to get a reduced sentence for lying.

    How could Trump or anyone convince you? HTH
    So you are saying the person who is going to jail for lying. His strategy is to lie again to get a reduced sentence?

    That's a bold strategy cotton.
    Yes, already info out there contrary to his testimony. So you think a liar isn't going to lie again to get something he desperate;y wants? I bet you're a great businessman.
    Ok. So you must think Trump needs to go to jail for lying to then. Right?
    Under oath?
    It'll be a spectacle to watch if he gets there.
    He won't because he hasn't done anything to get there for. Collusion! #Resist!
    Clinton got there for placement of a cigar in a willing participant.
    He lied about it

    I for sure didn't care what he did but when I saw him wag his finger and deny it to the people I turned to my boyfriend and said, he's fucked

    Even at that he served two terms

    Again this is the definition of a pathological liar.
    You totally miss the point. Again. Like you aren't in the ballpark of the point. I wasn't talking about his impeachment here. I'm talking about what got him under oath. Which is much less than what Democrats have on Trump to get him under oath.

    This whole Russian thing is solely to get Trump under oath. Period
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    I'm curious why the whole line of questioning was painted to discredit Cohen and nothing to defend Trump. Anyone?

    Because Cohen was lying to get a reduced sentence for lying.

    How could Trump or anyone convince you? HTH
    So you are saying the person who is going to jail for lying. His strategy is to lie again to get a reduced sentence?

    That's a bold strategy cotton.
    Yes, already info out there contrary to his testimony. So you think a liar isn't going to lie again to get something he desperate;y wants? I bet you're a great businessman.
    Ok. So you must think Trump needs to go to jail for lying to then. Right?
    Under oath?
    It'll be a spectacle to watch if he gets there.
    He won't because he hasn't done anything to get there for. Collusion! #Resist!
    Clinton got there for placement of a cigar in a willing participant.
    And lied about it under oath. Oh! you forgot that part.
    You don't even know what the fuck is going on in this thread.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,090 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    I'm curious why the whole line of questioning was painted to discredit Cohen and nothing to defend Trump. Anyone?

    Because Cohen was lying to get a reduced sentence for lying.

    How could Trump or anyone convince you? HTH
    So you are saying the person who is going to jail for lying. His strategy is to lie again to get a reduced sentence?

    That's a bold strategy cotton.
    Yes, already info out there contrary to his testimony. So you think a liar isn't going to lie again to get something he desperate;y wants? I bet you're a great businessman.
    Ok. So you must think Trump needs to go to jail for lying to then. Right?
    Under oath?
    It'll be a spectacle to watch if he gets there.
    He won't because he hasn't done anything to get there for. Collusion! #Resist!
    Clinton got there for placement of a cigar in a willing participant.
    He lied about it

    I for sure didn't care what he did but when I saw him wag his finger and deny it to the people I turned to my boyfriend and said, he's fucked

    Even at that he served two terms

    Again this is the definition of a pathological liar.
    You totally miss the point. Again. Like you aren't in the ballpark of the point. I wasn't talking about his impeachment here. I'm talking about what got him under oath. Which is much less than what Democrats have on Trump to get him under oath.

    This whole Russian thing is solely to get Trump under oath. Period
    This is fucking stupid even for you

    And a lie as usual

    The Democrats just proved they have nothing

    The point is being a pathological liar had nothing to do with him being a good president
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,090 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    I'm curious why the whole line of questioning was painted to discredit Cohen and nothing to defend Trump. Anyone?

    Because Cohen was lying to get a reduced sentence for lying.

    How could Trump or anyone convince you? HTH
    So you are saying the person who is going to jail for lying. His strategy is to lie again to get a reduced sentence?

    That's a bold strategy cotton.
    Yes, already info out there contrary to his testimony. So you think a liar isn't going to lie again to get something he desperate;y wants? I bet you're a great businessman.
    Ok. So you must think Trump needs to go to jail for lying to then. Right?
    Under oath?
    It'll be a spectacle to watch if he gets there.
    He won't because he hasn't done anything to get there for. Collusion! #Resist!
    Clinton got there for placement of a cigar in a willing participant.
    And lied about it under oath. Oh! you forgot that part.
    You don't even know what the fuck is going on in this thread.
    There is some irony
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    The only twisting is you H

    She was there on her own to support Trump

    Cracker

    They would have let anyone do it.

    Riiiighhht!
    Who is they? She was a guest of Meadows. The place was packed. All races and yet you only have an issue with one of them due to her color

    Textbook racism
    Matthews: "I asked Lynn to come today . . ."

    Its quite common but H has an issue with a Black woman who supports Trump

    Racist as fuck

    Or maybe an issue with Black people in general thinking for themselves.


    This is good!

    This is where you girls pretend it was up to her whether she got to appear and that we're talking about her motivation instead of Meadows' motivation.
    She is an executive. My guess, like most people who attain positions like that, have the intelligence and personality to make decisions for themselves and are very critical thinkers.

    Except the black ones with a vag of course, not them.
    You haven't met many executives, have you?
    You chasing your tail in this thread has made it the thread of the week. I can’t wait.... ope, popcorns done, to see moar of it.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,965
    salemcoog said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    The only twisting is you H

    She was there on her own to support Trump

    Cracker

    They would have let anyone do it.

    Riiiighhht!
    Who is they? She was a guest of Meadows. The place was packed. All races and yet you only have an issue with one of them due to her color

    Textbook racism
    Matthews: "I asked Lynn to come today . . ."

    Its quite common but H has an issue with a Black woman who supports Trump

    Racist as fuck

    Or maybe an issue with Black people in general thinking for themselves.


    This is good!

    This is where you girls pretend it was up to her whether she got to appear and that we're talking about her motivation instead of Meadows' motivation.
    She is an executive. My guess, like most people who attain positions like that, have the intelligence and personality to make decisions for themselves and are very critical thinkers.

    Except the black ones with a vag of course, not them.
    You haven't met many executives, have you?
    You chasing your tail in this thread has made it the thread of the week. I can’t wait.... ope, popcorns done, to see moar of it.
    Then we're both having fun.
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    HHusky said:

    The only twisting is you H

    She was there on her own to support Trump

    Cracker

    They would have let anyone do it.

    Riiiighhht!
    Who would you suggest speak in defense of Trump racism accusations that a black person who has worked directly for him for years and saw no sign of it?

    What happened to Omorosa? Wasn’t she supposed to drop some major shit? She faded away, rather easily.
    You act like you've never known someone who says racist shit to his white buddies but knows not to say that shit in front of Black people.
    Like you?

    I know plenty of people like you. I don't run cover for them though
    Right. You only run cover for Trump.
    No I don't

    The next time you show he's a racist will be the first time

    You and H dropped the mask

    I know your kind well
    I didn't claim he was racist, I said he says racist shit. Which is true. Idiot.
    Thank you for restating your opinion Mrs Tlaib.
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,066
    salemcoog said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    HHusky said:

    The only twisting is you H

    She was there on her own to support Trump

    Cracker

    They would have let anyone do it.

    Riiiighhht!
    Who would you suggest speak in defense of Trump racism accusations that a black person who has worked directly for him for years and saw no sign of it?

    What happened to Omorosa? Wasn’t she supposed to drop some major shit? She faded away, rather easily.
    You act like you've never known someone who says racist shit to his white buddies but knows not to say that shit in front of Black people.
    Like you?

    I know plenty of people like you. I don't run cover for them though
    Right. You only run cover for Trump.
    No I don't

    The next time you show he's a racist will be the first time

    You and H dropped the mask

    I know your kind well
    I didn't claim he was racist, I said he says racist shit. Which is true. Idiot.
    Thank you for restating your opinion Mrs Tlaib.
    Racist!
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    I'm curious why the whole line of questioning was painted to discredit Cohen and nothing to defend Trump. Anyone?

    Because Cohen was lying to get a reduced sentence for lying.

    How could Trump or anyone convince you? HTH
    So you are saying the person who is going to jail for lying. His strategy is to lie again to get a reduced sentence?

    That's a bold strategy cotton.
    Yes, already info out there contrary to his testimony. So you think a liar isn't going to lie again to get something he desperate;y wants? I bet you're a great businessman.
    Ok. So you must think Trump needs to go to jail for lying to then. Right?
    Under oath?
    It'll be a spectacle to watch if he gets there.
    He won't because he hasn't done anything to get there for. Collusion! #Resist!
    Clinton got there for placement of a cigar in a willing participant.
    He lied about it

    I for sure didn't care what he did but when I saw him wag his finger and deny it to the people I turned to my boyfriend and said, he's fucked

    Even at that he served two terms

    Again this is the definition of a pathological liar.
    You totally miss the point. Again. Like you aren't in the ballpark of the point. I wasn't talking about his impeachment here. I'm talking about what got him under oath. Which is much less than what Democrats have on Trump to get him under oath.

    This whole Russian thing is solely to get Trump under oath. Period
    What got Clinton under oath was using Monica as a humidor? Do you ever get any facts right Hondo?
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,826 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    I'm curious why the whole line of questioning was painted to discredit Cohen and nothing to defend Trump. Anyone?

    Because Cohen was lying to get a reduced sentence for lying.

    How could Trump or anyone convince you? HTH
    So you are saying the person who is going to jail for lying. His strategy is to lie again to get a reduced sentence?

    That's a bold strategy cotton.
    Yes, already info out there contrary to his testimony. So you think a liar isn't going to lie again to get something he desperate;y wants? I bet you're a great businessman.
    Ok. So you must think Trump needs to go to jail for lying to then. Right?
    Under oath?
    It'll be a spectacle to watch if he gets there.
    He won't because he hasn't done anything to get there for. Collusion! #Resist!
    Clinton got there for placement of a cigar in a willing participant.
    He lied about it

    I for sure didn't care what he did but when I saw him wag his finger and deny it to the people I turned to my boyfriend and said, he's fucked

    Even at that he served two terms

    Again this is the definition of a pathological liar.
    You totally miss the point. Again. Like you aren't in the ballpark of the point. I wasn't talking about his impeachment here. I'm talking about what got him under oath. Which is much less than what Democrats have on Trump to get him under oath.

    This whole Russian thing is solely to get Trump under oath. Period
    There is no Russian thing. None you dumb fuck!