Tlaib takes the word of an old white male Jew over woman of color.
Comments
-
PressingHHusky said:
Didn't mean to scare you. I think your colleagues are buying it. You'll get to stay in the club.USMChawk said:
Agree? Don’t you see the question marks at the ends of my sentences? I’m asking if that’s your point. I do agree that the racist accusations leveled against Trump are identity politics.HHusky said:
At least USMC has the integrity to agree it was identity politics. He just thinks it was tit for tat.USMChawk said:HHusky said:
Parading a black employee out to be inspected as evidence isn't close to a rebuttal of a charge of racism. It's fucking transparently stupid and makes that person a prop. Denying she was a prop is just a ridiculous lie.TurdBuffer said:
If only the U.S. wasn't so racist, oppressed guys like you might have a chance. Right?2001400ex said:
You act like you've never known someone who says racist shit to his white buddies but knows not to say that shit in front of Black people.MikeDamone said:
Who would you suggest speak in defense of Trump racism accusations that a black person who has worked directly for him for years and saw no sign of it?HHusky said:
They would have let anyone do it.RaceBannon said:The only twisting is you H
She was there on her own to support Trump
Cracker
Riiiighhht!
What happened to Omorosa? Wasn’t she supposed to drop some major shit? She faded away, rather easily.
So you’re saying she was used for identity politics? Identity politics intended to counter the identity politics the Democrats were doing?HHusky said:
I have a problem with Rep. Meadows using her as a prop. I hope Ms. Patton is cynical enough to ride this train to a healthy payday.TurdBuffer said:One is allowed to not like the fact that this woman supports and defends Trump, given ample reasons for people not to like Trump. But calling this woman a Prop, who can't think or act for herself, or own the decision to speak out in Trump's favor is both racist and sexist in the extreme. I think she's well aware of her race, and how it might appear and play to the opposition, but appreciating that fact, she stood up, regardless. And you fuckers who have a problem with this woman purport to give a fuck about equality or women's rights? Fuck Off, you fucking pigs.
I haven’t seen today’s hearing (long day at work) so I have no opinion on it. -
Stop plagiarism @CuntWaffleUSMChawk said:
PressingHHusky said:
Didn't mean to scare you. I think your colleagues are buying it. You'll get to stay in the club.USMChawk said:
Agree? Don’t you see the question marks at the ends of my sentences? I’m asking if that’s your point. I do agree that the racist accusations leveled against Trump are identity politics.HHusky said:
At least USMC has the integrity to agree it was identity politics. He just thinks it was tit for tat.USMChawk said:HHusky said:
Parading a black employee out to be inspected as evidence isn't close to a rebuttal of a charge of racism. It's fucking transparently stupid and makes that person a prop. Denying she was a prop is just a ridiculous lie.TurdBuffer said:
If only the U.S. wasn't so racist, oppressed guys like you might have a chance. Right?2001400ex said:
You act like you've never known someone who says racist shit to his white buddies but knows not to say that shit in front of Black people.MikeDamone said:
Who would you suggest speak in defense of Trump racism accusations that a black person who has worked directly for him for years and saw no sign of it?HHusky said:
They would have let anyone do it.RaceBannon said:The only twisting is you H
She was there on her own to support Trump
Cracker
Riiiighhht!
What happened to Omorosa? Wasn’t she supposed to drop some major shit? She faded away, rather easily.
So you’re saying she was used for identity politics? Identity politics intended to counter the identity politics the Democrats were doing?HHusky said:
I have a problem with Rep. Meadows using her as a prop. I hope Ms. Patton is cynical enough to ride this train to a healthy payday.TurdBuffer said:One is allowed to not like the fact that this woman supports and defends Trump, given ample reasons for people not to like Trump. But calling this woman a Prop, who can't think or act for herself, or own the decision to speak out in Trump's favor is both racist and sexist in the extreme. I think she's well aware of her race, and how it might appear and play to the opposition, but appreciating that fact, she stood up, regardless. And you fuckers who have a problem with this woman purport to give a fuck about equality or women's rights? Fuck Off, you fucking pigs.
I haven’t seen today’s hearing (long day at work) so I have no opinion on it.
Embarrassing
-
TriggeredCirrhosisDawg said:
Stop plagiarism @CuntWaffleUSMChawk said:
PressingHHusky said:
Didn't mean to scare you. I think your colleagues are buying it. You'll get to stay in the club.USMChawk said:
Agree? Don’t you see the question marks at the ends of my sentences? I’m asking if that’s your point. I do agree that the racist accusations leveled against Trump are identity politics.HHusky said:
At least USMC has the integrity to agree it was identity politics. He just thinks it was tit for tat.USMChawk said:HHusky said:
Parading a black employee out to be inspected as evidence isn't close to a rebuttal of a charge of racism. It's fucking transparently stupid and makes that person a prop. Denying she was a prop is just a ridiculous lie.TurdBuffer said:
If only the U.S. wasn't so racist, oppressed guys like you might have a chance. Right?2001400ex said:
You act like you've never known someone who says racist shit to his white buddies but knows not to say that shit in front of Black people.MikeDamone said:
Who would you suggest speak in defense of Trump racism accusations that a black person who has worked directly for him for years and saw no sign of it?HHusky said:
They would have let anyone do it.RaceBannon said:The only twisting is you H
She was there on her own to support Trump
Cracker
Riiiighhht!
What happened to Omorosa? Wasn’t she supposed to drop some major shit? She faded away, rather easily.
So you’re saying she was used for identity politics? Identity politics intended to counter the identity politics the Democrats were doing?HHusky said:
I have a problem with Rep. Meadows using her as a prop. I hope Ms. Patton is cynical enough to ride this train to a healthy payday.TurdBuffer said:One is allowed to not like the fact that this woman supports and defends Trump, given ample reasons for people not to like Trump. But calling this woman a Prop, who can't think or act for herself, or own the decision to speak out in Trump's favor is both racist and sexist in the extreme. I think she's well aware of her race, and how it might appear and play to the opposition, but appreciating that fact, she stood up, regardless. And you fuckers who have a problem with this woman purport to give a fuck about equality or women's rights? Fuck Off, you fucking pigs.
I haven’t seen today’s hearing (long day at work) so I have no opinion on it.
Embarrassing -
Yeah, that’s a staple of his one-word rhetorical arsenal too, but not as frequent as “pressing” and embarrassing.” Correct observation though.USMChawk said:
TriggeredCirrhosisDawg said:
Stop plagiarism @CuntWaffleUSMChawk said:
PressingHHusky said:
Didn't mean to scare you. I think your colleagues are buying it. You'll get to stay in the club.USMChawk said:
Agree? Don’t you see the question marks at the ends of my sentences? I’m asking if that’s your point. I do agree that the racist accusations leveled against Trump are identity politics.HHusky said:
At least USMC has the integrity to agree it was identity politics. He just thinks it was tit for tat.USMChawk said:HHusky said:
Parading a black employee out to be inspected as evidence isn't close to a rebuttal of a charge of racism. It's fucking transparently stupid and makes that person a prop. Denying she was a prop is just a ridiculous lie.TurdBuffer said:
If only the U.S. wasn't so racist, oppressed guys like you might have a chance. Right?2001400ex said:
You act like you've never known someone who says racist shit to his white buddies but knows not to say that shit in front of Black people.MikeDamone said:
Who would you suggest speak in defense of Trump racism accusations that a black person who has worked directly for him for years and saw no sign of it?HHusky said:
They would have let anyone do it.RaceBannon said:The only twisting is you H
She was there on her own to support Trump
Cracker
Riiiighhht!
What happened to Omorosa? Wasn’t she supposed to drop some major shit? She faded away, rather easily.
So you’re saying she was used for identity politics? Identity politics intended to counter the identity politics the Democrats were doing?HHusky said:
I have a problem with Rep. Meadows using her as a prop. I hope Ms. Patton is cynical enough to ride this train to a healthy payday.TurdBuffer said:One is allowed to not like the fact that this woman supports and defends Trump, given ample reasons for people not to like Trump. But calling this woman a Prop, who can't think or act for herself, or own the decision to speak out in Trump's favor is both racist and sexist in the extreme. I think she's well aware of her race, and how it might appear and play to the opposition, but appreciating that fact, she stood up, regardless. And you fuckers who have a problem with this woman purport to give a fuck about equality or women's rights? Fuck Off, you fucking pigs.
I haven’t seen today’s hearing (long day at work) so I have no opinion on it.
Embarrassing -
Because Cohen was lying to get a reduced sentence for lying.2001400ex said:I'm curious why the whole line of questioning was painted to discredit Cohen and nothing to defend Trump. Anyone?
How could Trump or anyone convince you? HTH -
So you are saying the person who is going to jail for lying. His strategy is to lie again to get a reduced sentence?Sledog said:
Because Cohen was lying to get a reduced sentence for lying.2001400ex said:I'm curious why the whole line of questioning was painted to discredit Cohen and nothing to defend Trump. Anyone?
How could Trump or anyone convince you? HTH
That's a bold strategy cotton. -
We know you don't have friends.HHusky said:
I'm pretty rough. I asked him what his family thinks.MikeDamone said:
No. You took a shot at his family and you’re an absolute piece of shit. And a racist.HHusky said:
There's a line that prevents me from asking what people of color thought was going on?SFGbob said:
Dude, you are crossing a fucking line.HHusky said:
So Race, how does the family view your embrace of tokenism? Just curious.RaceBannon said:
And so what? Why is this one so offensive to you and the multiple other examples linked in this thread don't bother you at allHHusky said:
Could be. Maybe she's happy to be a prop and lying about it now. I don't care though. Meadows' purpose was OBVIOUS.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Ever think they shared a motivation?HHusky said:HHusky said:
Matthews: "I asked Lynn to come today . . ."RaceBannon said:
Who is they? She was a guest of Meadows. The place was packed. All races and yet you only have an issue with one of them due to her colorHHusky said:
They would have let anyone do it.RaceBannon said:The only twisting is you H
She was there on her own to support Trump
Cracker
Riiiighhht!
Textbook racism
This is good!MikeDamone said:
Or maybe an issue with Black people in general thinking for themselves.RaceBannon said:Its quite common but H has an issue with a Black woman who supports Trump
Racist as fuck
This is where you girls pretend it was up to her whether she got to appear and that we're talking about her motivation instead of Meadows' motivation.
Just this one has brought your latent racism to the surface in an ugly display of hate
Might as well buy a MAGA hat
I can't be racist though. I have black friends. -
Yes, already info out there contrary to his testimony. So you think a liar isn't going to lie again to get something he desperate;y wants? I bet you're a great businessman.2001400ex said:
So you are saying the person who is going to jail for lying. His strategy is to lie again to get a reduced sentence?Sledog said:
Because Cohen was lying to get a reduced sentence for lying.2001400ex said:I'm curious why the whole line of questioning was painted to discredit Cohen and nothing to defend Trump. Anyone?
How could Trump or anyone convince you? HTH
That's a bold strategy cotton. -
Ok. So you must think Trump needs to go to jail for lying to then. Right?Sledog said:
Yes, already info out there contrary to his testimony. So you think a liar isn't going to lie again to get something he desperate;y wants? I bet you're a great businessman.2001400ex said:
So you are saying the person who is going to jail for lying. His strategy is to lie again to get a reduced sentence?Sledog said:
Because Cohen was lying to get a reduced sentence for lying.2001400ex said:I'm curious why the whole line of questioning was painted to discredit Cohen and nothing to defend Trump. Anyone?
How could Trump or anyone convince you? HTH
That's a bold strategy cotton. -
Under oath?2001400ex said:
Ok. So you must think Trump needs to go to jail for lying to then. Right?Sledog said:
Yes, already info out there contrary to his testimony. So you think a liar isn't going to lie again to get something he desperate;y wants? I bet you're a great businessman.2001400ex said:
So you are saying the person who is going to jail for lying. His strategy is to lie again to get a reduced sentence?Sledog said:
Because Cohen was lying to get a reduced sentence for lying.2001400ex said:I'm curious why the whole line of questioning was painted to discredit Cohen and nothing to defend Trump. Anyone?
How could Trump or anyone convince you? HTH
That's a bold strategy cotton. -
It'll be a spectacle to watch if he gets there.Sledog said:
Under oath?2001400ex said:
Ok. So you must think Trump needs to go to jail for lying to then. Right?Sledog said:
Yes, already info out there contrary to his testimony. So you think a liar isn't going to lie again to get something he desperate;y wants? I bet you're a great businessman.2001400ex said:
So you are saying the person who is going to jail for lying. His strategy is to lie again to get a reduced sentence?Sledog said:
Because Cohen was lying to get a reduced sentence for lying.2001400ex said:I'm curious why the whole line of questioning was painted to discredit Cohen and nothing to defend Trump. Anyone?
How could Trump or anyone convince you? HTH
That's a bold strategy cotton. -
He won't because he hasn't done anything to get there for. Collusion! #Resist!2001400ex said:
It'll be a spectacle to watch if he gets there.Sledog said:
Under oath?2001400ex said:
Ok. So you must think Trump needs to go to jail for lying to then. Right?Sledog said:
Yes, already info out there contrary to his testimony. So you think a liar isn't going to lie again to get something he desperate;y wants? I bet you're a great businessman.2001400ex said:
So you are saying the person who is going to jail for lying. His strategy is to lie again to get a reduced sentence?Sledog said:
Because Cohen was lying to get a reduced sentence for lying.2001400ex said:I'm curious why the whole line of questioning was painted to discredit Cohen and nothing to defend Trump. Anyone?
How could Trump or anyone convince you? HTH
That's a bold strategy cotton. -
Clinton got there for placement of a cigar in a willing participant.Sledog said:
He won't because he hasn't done anything to get there for. Collusion! #Resist!2001400ex said:
It'll be a spectacle to watch if he gets there.Sledog said:
Under oath?2001400ex said:
Ok. So you must think Trump needs to go to jail for lying to then. Right?Sledog said:
Yes, already info out there contrary to his testimony. So you think a liar isn't going to lie again to get something he desperate;y wants? I bet you're a great businessman.2001400ex said:
So you are saying the person who is going to jail for lying. His strategy is to lie again to get a reduced sentence?Sledog said:
Because Cohen was lying to get a reduced sentence for lying.2001400ex said:I'm curious why the whole line of questioning was painted to discredit Cohen and nothing to defend Trump. Anyone?
How could Trump or anyone convince you? HTH
That's a bold strategy cotton. -
He lied about it2001400ex said:
Clinton got there for placement of a cigar in a willing participant.Sledog said:
He won't because he hasn't done anything to get there for. Collusion! #Resist!2001400ex said:
It'll be a spectacle to watch if he gets there.Sledog said:
Under oath?2001400ex said:
Ok. So you must think Trump needs to go to jail for lying to then. Right?Sledog said:
Yes, already info out there contrary to his testimony. So you think a liar isn't going to lie again to get something he desperate;y wants? I bet you're a great businessman.2001400ex said:
So you are saying the person who is going to jail for lying. His strategy is to lie again to get a reduced sentence?Sledog said:
Because Cohen was lying to get a reduced sentence for lying.2001400ex said:I'm curious why the whole line of questioning was painted to discredit Cohen and nothing to defend Trump. Anyone?
How could Trump or anyone convince you? HTH
That's a bold strategy cotton.
I for sure didn't care what he did but when I saw him wag his finger and deny it to the people I turned to my boyfriend and said, he's fucked
Even at that he served two terms
Again this is the definition of a pathological liar. -
And lied about it under oath. Oh! you forgot that part.2001400ex said:
Clinton got there for placement of a cigar in a willing participant.Sledog said:
He won't because he hasn't done anything to get there for. Collusion! #Resist!2001400ex said:
It'll be a spectacle to watch if he gets there.Sledog said:
Under oath?2001400ex said:
Ok. So you must think Trump needs to go to jail for lying to then. Right?Sledog said:
Yes, already info out there contrary to his testimony. So you think a liar isn't going to lie again to get something he desperate;y wants? I bet you're a great businessman.2001400ex said:
So you are saying the person who is going to jail for lying. His strategy is to lie again to get a reduced sentence?Sledog said:
Because Cohen was lying to get a reduced sentence for lying.2001400ex said:I'm curious why the whole line of questioning was painted to discredit Cohen and nothing to defend Trump. Anyone?
How could Trump or anyone convince you? HTH
That's a bold strategy cotton. -
You totally miss the point. Again. Like you aren't in the ballpark of the point. I wasn't talking about his impeachment here. I'm talking about what got him under oath. Which is much less than what Democrats have on Trump to get him under oath.RaceBannon said:
He lied about it2001400ex said:
Clinton got there for placement of a cigar in a willing participant.Sledog said:
He won't because he hasn't done anything to get there for. Collusion! #Resist!2001400ex said:
It'll be a spectacle to watch if he gets there.Sledog said:
Under oath?2001400ex said:
Ok. So you must think Trump needs to go to jail for lying to then. Right?Sledog said:
Yes, already info out there contrary to his testimony. So you think a liar isn't going to lie again to get something he desperate;y wants? I bet you're a great businessman.2001400ex said:
So you are saying the person who is going to jail for lying. His strategy is to lie again to get a reduced sentence?Sledog said:
Because Cohen was lying to get a reduced sentence for lying.2001400ex said:I'm curious why the whole line of questioning was painted to discredit Cohen and nothing to defend Trump. Anyone?
How could Trump or anyone convince you? HTH
That's a bold strategy cotton.
I for sure didn't care what he did but when I saw him wag his finger and deny it to the people I turned to my boyfriend and said, he's fucked
Even at that he served two terms
Again this is the definition of a pathological liar.
This whole Russian thing is solely to get Trump under oath. Period -
You don't even know what the fuck is going on in this thread.Sledog said:
And lied about it under oath. Oh! you forgot that part.2001400ex said:
Clinton got there for placement of a cigar in a willing participant.Sledog said:
He won't because he hasn't done anything to get there for. Collusion! #Resist!2001400ex said:
It'll be a spectacle to watch if he gets there.Sledog said:
Under oath?2001400ex said:
Ok. So you must think Trump needs to go to jail for lying to then. Right?Sledog said:
Yes, already info out there contrary to his testimony. So you think a liar isn't going to lie again to get something he desperate;y wants? I bet you're a great businessman.2001400ex said:
So you are saying the person who is going to jail for lying. His strategy is to lie again to get a reduced sentence?Sledog said:
Because Cohen was lying to get a reduced sentence for lying.2001400ex said:I'm curious why the whole line of questioning was painted to discredit Cohen and nothing to defend Trump. Anyone?
How could Trump or anyone convince you? HTH
That's a bold strategy cotton. -
This is fucking stupid even for you2001400ex said:
You totally miss the point. Again. Like you aren't in the ballpark of the point. I wasn't talking about his impeachment here. I'm talking about what got him under oath. Which is much less than what Democrats have on Trump to get him under oath.RaceBannon said:
He lied about it2001400ex said:
Clinton got there for placement of a cigar in a willing participant.Sledog said:
He won't because he hasn't done anything to get there for. Collusion! #Resist!2001400ex said:
It'll be a spectacle to watch if he gets there.Sledog said:
Under oath?2001400ex said:
Ok. So you must think Trump needs to go to jail for lying to then. Right?Sledog said:
Yes, already info out there contrary to his testimony. So you think a liar isn't going to lie again to get something he desperate;y wants? I bet you're a great businessman.2001400ex said:
So you are saying the person who is going to jail for lying. His strategy is to lie again to get a reduced sentence?Sledog said:
Because Cohen was lying to get a reduced sentence for lying.2001400ex said:I'm curious why the whole line of questioning was painted to discredit Cohen and nothing to defend Trump. Anyone?
How could Trump or anyone convince you? HTH
That's a bold strategy cotton.
I for sure didn't care what he did but when I saw him wag his finger and deny it to the people I turned to my boyfriend and said, he's fucked
Even at that he served two terms
Again this is the definition of a pathological liar.
This whole Russian thing is solely to get Trump under oath. Period
And a lie as usual
The Democrats just proved they have nothing
The point is being a pathological liar had nothing to do with him being a good president -
There is some irony2001400ex said:
You don't even know what the fuck is going on in this thread.Sledog said:
And lied about it under oath. Oh! you forgot that part.2001400ex said:
Clinton got there for placement of a cigar in a willing participant.Sledog said:
He won't because he hasn't done anything to get there for. Collusion! #Resist!2001400ex said:
It'll be a spectacle to watch if he gets there.Sledog said:
Under oath?2001400ex said:
Ok. So you must think Trump needs to go to jail for lying to then. Right?Sledog said:
Yes, already info out there contrary to his testimony. So you think a liar isn't going to lie again to get something he desperate;y wants? I bet you're a great businessman.2001400ex said:
So you are saying the person who is going to jail for lying. His strategy is to lie again to get a reduced sentence?Sledog said:
Because Cohen was lying to get a reduced sentence for lying.2001400ex said:I'm curious why the whole line of questioning was painted to discredit Cohen and nothing to defend Trump. Anyone?
How could Trump or anyone convince you? HTH
That's a bold strategy cotton. -
You chasing your tail in this thread has made it the thread of the week. I can’t wait.... ope, popcorns done, to see moar of it.HHusky said:
You haven't met many executives, have you?MikeDamone said:
She is an executive. My guess, like most people who attain positions like that, have the intelligence and personality to make decisions for themselves and are very critical thinkers.HHusky said:HHusky said:
Matthews: "I asked Lynn to come today . . ."RaceBannon said:
Who is they? She was a guest of Meadows. The place was packed. All races and yet you only have an issue with one of them due to her colorHHusky said:
They would have let anyone do it.RaceBannon said:The only twisting is you H
She was there on her own to support Trump
Cracker
Riiiighhht!
Textbook racism
This is good!MikeDamone said:
Or maybe an issue with Black people in general thinking for themselves.RaceBannon said:Its quite common but H has an issue with a Black woman who supports Trump
Racist as fuck
This is where you girls pretend it was up to her whether she got to appear and that we're talking about her motivation instead of Meadows' motivation.
Except the black ones with a vag of course, not them. -
Then we're both having fun.salemcoog said:
You chasing your tail in this thread has made it the thread of the week. I can’t wait.... ope, popcorns done, to see moar of it.HHusky said:
You haven't met many executives, have you?MikeDamone said:
She is an executive. My guess, like most people who attain positions like that, have the intelligence and personality to make decisions for themselves and are very critical thinkers.HHusky said:HHusky said:
Matthews: "I asked Lynn to come today . . ."RaceBannon said:
Who is they? She was a guest of Meadows. The place was packed. All races and yet you only have an issue with one of them due to her colorHHusky said:
They would have let anyone do it.RaceBannon said:The only twisting is you H
She was there on her own to support Trump
Cracker
Riiiighhht!
Textbook racism
This is good!MikeDamone said:
Or maybe an issue with Black people in general thinking for themselves.RaceBannon said:Its quite common but H has an issue with a Black woman who supports Trump
Racist as fuck
This is where you girls pretend it was up to her whether she got to appear and that we're talking about her motivation instead of Meadows' motivation.
Except the black ones with a vag of course, not them. -
Thank you for restating your opinion Mrs Tlaib.2001400ex said:
I didn't claim he was racist, I said he says racist shit. Which is true. Idiot.RaceBannon said:
No I don't2001400ex said:
Right. You only run cover for Trump.RaceBannon said:
Like you?2001400ex said:
You act like you've never known someone who says racist shit to his white buddies but knows not to say that shit in front of Black people.MikeDamone said:
Who would you suggest speak in defense of Trump racism accusations that a black person who has worked directly for him for years and saw no sign of it?HHusky said:
They would have let anyone do it.RaceBannon said:The only twisting is you H
She was there on her own to support Trump
Cracker
Riiiighhht!
What happened to Omorosa? Wasn’t she supposed to drop some major shit? She faded away, rather easily.
I know plenty of people like you. I don't run cover for them though
The next time you show he's a racist will be the first time
You and H dropped the mask
I know your kind well -
Racist!salemcoog said:
Thank you for restating your opinion Mrs Tlaib.2001400ex said:
I didn't claim he was racist, I said he says racist shit. Which is true. Idiot.RaceBannon said:
No I don't2001400ex said:
Right. You only run cover for Trump.RaceBannon said:
Like you?2001400ex said:
You act like you've never known someone who says racist shit to his white buddies but knows not to say that shit in front of Black people.MikeDamone said:
Who would you suggest speak in defense of Trump racism accusations that a black person who has worked directly for him for years and saw no sign of it?HHusky said:
They would have let anyone do it.RaceBannon said:The only twisting is you H
She was there on her own to support Trump
Cracker
Riiiighhht!
What happened to Omorosa? Wasn’t she supposed to drop some major shit? She faded away, rather easily.
I know plenty of people like you. I don't run cover for them though
The next time you show he's a racist will be the first time
You and H dropped the mask
I know your kind well -
What got Clinton under oath was using Monica as a humidor? Do you ever get any facts right Hondo?2001400ex said:
You totally miss the point. Again. Like you aren't in the ballpark of the point. I wasn't talking about his impeachment here. I'm talking about what got him under oath. Which is much less than what Democrats have on Trump to get him under oath.RaceBannon said:
He lied about it2001400ex said:
Clinton got there for placement of a cigar in a willing participant.Sledog said:
He won't because he hasn't done anything to get there for. Collusion! #Resist!2001400ex said:
It'll be a spectacle to watch if he gets there.Sledog said:
Under oath?2001400ex said:
Ok. So you must think Trump needs to go to jail for lying to then. Right?Sledog said:
Yes, already info out there contrary to his testimony. So you think a liar isn't going to lie again to get something he desperate;y wants? I bet you're a great businessman.2001400ex said:
So you are saying the person who is going to jail for lying. His strategy is to lie again to get a reduced sentence?Sledog said:
Because Cohen was lying to get a reduced sentence for lying.2001400ex said:I'm curious why the whole line of questioning was painted to discredit Cohen and nothing to defend Trump. Anyone?
How could Trump or anyone convince you? HTH
That's a bold strategy cotton.
I for sure didn't care what he did but when I saw him wag his finger and deny it to the people I turned to my boyfriend and said, he's fucked
Even at that he served two terms
Again this is the definition of a pathological liar.
This whole Russian thing is solely to get Trump under oath. Period -
There is no Russian thing. None you dumb fuck!2001400ex said:
You totally miss the point. Again. Like you aren't in the ballpark of the point. I wasn't talking about his impeachment here. I'm talking about what got him under oath. Which is much less than what Democrats have on Trump to get him under oath.RaceBannon said:
He lied about it2001400ex said:
Clinton got there for placement of a cigar in a willing participant.Sledog said:
He won't because he hasn't done anything to get there for. Collusion! #Resist!2001400ex said:
It'll be a spectacle to watch if he gets there.Sledog said:
Under oath?2001400ex said:
Ok. So you must think Trump needs to go to jail for lying to then. Right?Sledog said:
Yes, already info out there contrary to his testimony. So you think a liar isn't going to lie again to get something he desperate;y wants? I bet you're a great businessman.2001400ex said:
So you are saying the person who is going to jail for lying. His strategy is to lie again to get a reduced sentence?Sledog said:
Because Cohen was lying to get a reduced sentence for lying.2001400ex said:I'm curious why the whole line of questioning was painted to discredit Cohen and nothing to defend Trump. Anyone?
How could Trump or anyone convince you? HTH
That's a bold strategy cotton.
I for sure didn't care what he did but when I saw him wag his finger and deny it to the people I turned to my boyfriend and said, he's fucked
Even at that he served two terms
Again this is the definition of a pathological liar.
This whole Russian thing is solely to get Trump under oath. Period