Trump Ordered Officials to Give Jared Kushner a Security Clearance

RaceBannon said:

Vehemently?

Sorry that I asked you guys to back up your assertions because I knew you couldn't

Thanks for more mindless speculation from the Intercept though

Imagine you defending the CIA

gimme my 5.3

Now we?re trusting anonymous sources in Saudi Arabia, the one Middle Eastern country Dems didn't like before 2016.

insinceredawg said:

RaceBannon said:

insinceredawg said:

RaceBannon said:

insinceredawg said:

RaceBannon said:

“In 2018, White House and security clearance officials affirmed that Mr. Kushner’s security clearance was handled in the regular process with no pressure from anyone. That was conveyed to the media at the time, and new stories, if accurate, do not change what was affirmed at the time.”

The decision last year to grant Mr. Kushner a top-secret clearance upgraded him from earlier temporary and interim status. He never received a higher-level designation that would have given him access to need-to-know intelligence known as sensitive compartmented information.

@insinceredawg can you tell us in your own words why this is an issue?

The first half of your post is a quote from Kushner's lawyer.

If Trump's own Chief of Staff and WH lawyer along with the CIA were concerned with Kushner receiving security clearance (even if it's not the highest level designation) than it is an issue. If it wasn't an issue, why would Trump have to go out of his way to demand he receive it and then lie about it?

How far is Trump's dick up all your asses to continue to dismiss every story that comes out about him?

I asked you what I should be concerned about

I didn't think you could answer

Why is Kushner a security risk?

Go ask the CIA.

Let me ask you, in your own opinion why do you think Kushner should have security clearance?

Because POTUS wants him to. As the CIC that's his prerogative

So all you have is an anonymous CIA source? No reason? This is the same bullshit the Times has been peddling since Trump won

So once again you take Fat Boy's judgement over the CIA. In your mind, has Trump ever been wrong on anything?

You mean the very people and agency actively involved in the coup of a sitting US president?

GrundleStiltzkin said:

Trump's serial nepotism is troubling. The way these things blow up, it's probably become a feedback loop, reinforcing Trump that these are the only people he can trust.

Once again, this national security kerfuffle amuses me, as Trump has Dems so twisted up that they reflexively BACK the formerly evil CIA, NSA, FBI, NRO and any other sinister 3 letter agency you can think of.

So let’s trust KJU, Putin and MBS instead. Got it.

insinceredawg said:

RaceBannon said:

insinceredawg said:

RaceBannon said:

“In 2018, White House and security clearance officials affirmed that Mr. Kushner’s security clearance was handled in the regular process with no pressure from anyone. That was conveyed to the media at the time, and new stories, if accurate, do not change what was affirmed at the time.”

The decision last year to grant Mr. Kushner a top-secret clearance upgraded him from earlier temporary and interim status. He never received a higher-level designation that would have given him access to need-to-know intelligence known as sensitive compartmented information.

@insinceredawg can you tell us in your own words why this is an issue?

The first half of your post is a quote from Kushner's lawyer.

If Trump's own Chief of Staff and WH lawyer along with the CIA were concerned with Kushner receiving security clearance (even if it's not the highest level designation) than it is an issue. If it wasn't an issue, why would Trump have to go out of his way to demand he receive it and then lie about it?

How far is Trump's dick up all your asses to continue to dismiss every story that comes out about him?

I asked you what I should be concerned about

I didn't think you could answer

Why is Kushner a security risk?

Go ask the CIA.

Let me ask you, in your own opinion why do you think Kushner should have security clearance?

Because he's not a Kunt, like John Brennan.

insinceredawg said:

RaceBannon said:

insinceredawg said:

RaceBannon said:

“In 2018, White House and security clearance officials affirmed that Mr. Kushner’s security clearance was handled in the regular process with no pressure from anyone. That was conveyed to the media at the time, and new stories, if accurate, do not change what was affirmed at the time.”

The decision last year to grant Mr. Kushner a top-secret clearance upgraded him from earlier temporary and interim status. He never received a higher-level designation that would have given him access to need-to-know intelligence known as sensitive compartmented information.

@insinceredawg can you tell us in your own words why this is an issue?

The first half of your post is a quote from Kushner's lawyer.

If Trump's own Chief of Staff and WH lawyer along with the CIA were concerned with Kushner receiving security clearance (even if it's not the highest level designation) than it is an issue. If it wasn't an issue, why would Trump have to go out of his way to demand he receive it and then lie about it?

How far is Trump's dick up all your asses to continue to dismiss every story that comes out about him?

I asked you what I should be concerned about

I didn't think you could answer

Why is Kushner a security risk?

Go ask the CIA.

Let me ask you, in your own opinion why do you think Kushner should have security clearance?

I can explain it as I had a Top Secret (TS) clearance before I retired. It gave me access to the information I needed to properly execute our missions. A TS clearance only gave me access to the info I needed for the missions I was scrubbed in on, and had no access to any other files. Simply knowing when and where a mission would take place (not even what the mission was) is enough to make the info TS. Knowing the President’s schedule would qualify as TS information and Kushner would need the clearance for that alone. The SCI designation means you can access all the TS plans, not just yours.

insinceredawg said:

RaceBannon said:

USMChawk said:

insinceredawg said:

RaceBannon said:

insinceredawg said:

RaceBannon said:

“In 2018, White House and security clearance officials affirmed that Mr. Kushner’s security clearance was handled in the regular process with no pressure from anyone. That was conveyed to the media at the time, and new stories, if accurate, do not change what was affirmed at the time.”

The decision last year to grant Mr. Kushner a top-secret clearance upgraded him from earlier temporary and interim status. He never received a higher-level designation that would have given him access to need-to-know intelligence known as sensitive compartmented information.

@insinceredawg can you tell us in your own words why this is an issue?

The first half of your post is a quote from Kushner's lawyer.

If Trump's own Chief of Staff and WH lawyer along with the CIA were concerned with Kushner receiving security clearance (even if it's not the highest level designation) than it is an issue. If it wasn't an issue, why would Trump have to go out of his way to demand he receive it and then lie about it?

How far is Trump's dick up all your asses to continue to dismiss every story that comes out about him?

I asked you what I should be concerned about

I didn't think you could answer

Why is Kushner a security risk?

Go ask the CIA.

Let me ask you, in your own opinion why do you think Kushner should have security clearance?

I can explain it as I had a Top Secret (TS) clearance before I retired. It gave me access to the information I needed to properly execute our missions. A TS clearance only gave me access to the info I needed for the missions I was scrubbed in on, and had no access to any other files. Simply knowing when and where a mission would take place (not even what the mission was) is enough to make the info TS. Knowing the President’s schedule would qualify as TS information and Kushner would need the clearance for that alone. The SCI designation means you can access all the TS plans, not just yours.

Let's not let facts get in the way of the cock sucking of the CIA by @insinceredawg

And it is a fact that former communist Brennen was Obama's CIA head


The CIA was also involved in the coup. But we are conspiracy nuts and all the idiots here who bought RUSSIA collusion are the sane people

Once Maduro is sent packing the CIA hate can begin again

You take the word of a pathological liar/con man over our own intelligence agencies and you wonder why I think you're a conspiracy nut. How many times does Trump need to be exposed for lying for you to stop trusting him blindly?

I'd find you more sincere if you'd retain skepticism of the CIA too.

Sledog said:

89ute said:

insinceredawg said:

RaceBannon said:

insinceredawg said:

RaceBannon said:

“In 2018, White House and security clearance officials affirmed that Mr. Kushner’s security clearance was handled in the regular process with no pressure from anyone. That was conveyed to the media at the time, and new stories, if accurate, do not change what was affirmed at the time.”

The decision last year to grant Mr. Kushner a top-secret clearance upgraded him from earlier temporary and interim status. He never received a higher-level designation that would have given him access to need-to-know intelligence known as sensitive compartmented information.

@insinceredawg can you tell us in your own words why this is an issue?

The first half of your post is a quote from Kushner's lawyer.

If Trump's own Chief of Staff and WH lawyer along with the CIA were concerned with Kushner receiving security clearance (even if it's not the highest level designation) than it is an issue. If it wasn't an issue, why would Trump have to go out of his way to demand he receive it and then lie about it?

How far is Trump's dick up all your asses to continue to dismiss every story that comes out about him?

I asked you what I should be concerned about

I didn't think you could answer

Why is Kushner a security risk?

Go ask the CIA.

Let me ask you, in your own opinion why do you think Kushner should have security clearance?

Because he's not a Kunt, like John Brennan.

Still can't wrap my head around Brennan, having voted for a communist, being head of the agency. How the fuck did that happen?

RaceBannon said:

USMChawk said:

insinceredawg said:

RaceBannon said:

insinceredawg said:

RaceBannon said:

“In 2018, White House and security clearance officials affirmed that Mr. Kushner’s security clearance was handled in the regular process with no pressure from anyone. That was conveyed to the media at the time, and new stories, if accurate, do not change what was affirmed at the time.”

The decision last year to grant Mr. Kushner a top-secret clearance upgraded him from earlier temporary and interim status. He never received a higher-level designation that would have given him access to need-to-know intelligence known as sensitive compartmented information.

@insinceredawg can you tell us in your own words why this is an issue?

The first half of your post is a quote from Kushner's lawyer.

If Trump's own Chief of Staff and WH lawyer along with the CIA were concerned with Kushner receiving security clearance (even if it's not the highest level designation) than it is an issue. If it wasn't an issue, why would Trump have to go out of his way to demand he receive it and then lie about it?

How far is Trump's dick up all your asses to continue to dismiss every story that comes out about him?

I asked you what I should be concerned about

I didn't think you could answer

Why is Kushner a security risk?

Go ask the CIA.

Let me ask you, in your own opinion why do you think Kushner should have security clearance?

I can explain it as I had a Top Secret (TS) clearance before I retired. It gave me access to the information I needed to properly execute our missions. A TS clearance only gave me access to the info I needed for the missions I was scrubbed in on, and had no access to any other files. Simply knowing when and where a mission would take place (not even what the mission was) is enough to make the info TS. Knowing the President’s schedule would qualify as TS information and Kushner would need the clearance for that alone. The SCI designation means you can access all the TS plans, not just yours.

Let's not let facts get in the way of the cock sucking of the CIA by @insinceredawg

And it is a fact that former communist Brennen was Obama's CIA head


The CIA was also involved in the coup. But we are conspiracy nuts and all the idiots here who bought RUSSIA collusion are the sane people

Once Maduro is sent packing the CIA hate can begin again

That's how a commie got in charge of out intelligence agency. I forgot self admitted commie Obunghole put him there!

CirrhosisDawg said:

USMChawk said:

insinceredawg said:

RaceBannon said:

insinceredawg said:

RaceBannon said:

“In 2018, White House and security clearance officials affirmed that Mr. Kushner’s security clearance was handled in the regular process with no pressure from anyone. That was conveyed to the media at the time, and new stories, if accurate, do not change what was affirmed at the time.”

The decision last year to grant Mr. Kushner a top-secret clearance upgraded him from earlier temporary and interim status. He never received a higher-level designation that would have given him access to need-to-know intelligence known as sensitive compartmented information.

@insinceredawg can you tell us in your own words why this is an issue?

The first half of your post is a quote from Kushner's lawyer.

If Trump's own Chief of Staff and WH lawyer along with the CIA were concerned with Kushner receiving security clearance (even if it's not the highest level designation) than it is an issue. If it wasn't an issue, why would Trump have to go out of his way to demand he receive it and then lie about it?

How far is Trump's dick up all your asses to continue to dismiss every story that comes out about him?

I asked you what I should be concerned about

I didn't think you could answer

Why is Kushner a security risk?

Go ask the CIA.

Let me ask you, in your own opinion why do you think Kushner should have security clearance?

I can explain it as I had a Top Secret (TS) clearance before I retired. It gave me access to the information I needed to properly execute our missions. A TS clearance only gave me access to the info I needed for the missions I was scrubbed in on, and had no access to any other files. Simply knowing when and where a mission would take place (not even what the mission was) is enough to make the info TS. Knowing the President’s schedule would qualify as TS information and Kushner would need the clearance for that alone. The SCI designation means you can access all the TS plans, not just yours.

The US federal government is more fucked up then I imagined. Thanks for supporting dismantling and defunding this shitshow.

Not sure why this is fucked up. Knowing when and where the President will be (especially at unsecured locations), is significant information.