Racist Democrat doesn't want to doorknock in a 'N****r District'

MariotaTheGawd said:

MikeDamone said:

RaceBannon said:

MariotaTheGawd said:

RaceBannon said:

MariotaTheGawd said:

RaceBannon said:

MariotaTheGawd said:

remember that one time shepherd smith said something not nice about trump? check mate lib

Remember that one time @MariotaTheGawd brought something interesting here?

Me neither

when was the last time you brought something interesting anywhere? 1993?

I know you are but what am I?

old

Whoosh

He’s been in a whooshicane sense his first post. Hasn’t dialed this place in.

you think fitting in with trash like you is something i care about. i don't. i'm not sure why this is so hard for a super genius like you to comprehend but here we are

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

MariotaTheGawd said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

2001400ex said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

2001400ex said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

2001400ex said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

MariotaTheGawd said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

MariotaTheGawd said:

DerekJohnson said:

I sincerely give credit to the HuffPo for writing that about a liberal. They usually seem to look the other way for those with the "D" next to their name.

This is a trope that hasnt been true for probably a decade

Greg Gutfeld was still writing there in 2008.

Huffington Post's bias was always overstated. People acted like it was the Nation or something, but it was closer to a tabloid for Democrats.

You miss the point. It started turning hard progressive about a decade ago.

But why do you rail on a news source with a progressive tilt not say anything about a news source with a conservative tilt?

Oh Hondo...

Oh you don't like the question?

No, I don't care your question, nor the issue that much. Mariot said HuffPo turned away from "looking the other way" on Dem misdeeds a decade ago, as if to say HuffPo became less strident. I don't know how much HuffPo ignores now or then, but the site was started with help from Andrew Breitbart in 2004-05 as more left-of-centerish answer to Drudge. Greg Gutfeld was still writing there in mid-2008. Other conservatives or libertarians wrote there in that time too, but I don't remember who. My point is that HuffPo turned harder left about 10-11 years ago, as Adriana's politics turned harder left. It didn't moderate, just the opposite. If you take that as railing, that's on you.

As a "policy stance," for lack of a better term, I really don't care much about any media outlet's ideological or partisan bent. The important thing is to recognize all media sources and all individual journalists have a point of view.

Yeah you know more about their history than I do. I have never been to their website, just some of their columns come up in my feed and they are never ones negative about Democrats. I read some of the articles, some are awful.

Well each side plays to their respective base in the media. You might not agree with this, but Conservatives generally want to read more opinionated writing and liberals general want to read more factual based writing (I'm not meaning truth, as you can lie with facts, more meaning the writing style). Especially news sources like Vox, which is liberal but everything is written in a factual context. But you read daily caller and it's more from an emotional context.

That's why it's important to read both sides.

Who told you that?

No one. Just gathered that from reading each respective side. Read a Vox article then read a daily caller article on the same topic. Granted this is TV, but watch Rachel maddow then watch Tucker Carlson. Watch their style in how they present information.

I'm not saying conservative sites aren't factual. Just pay attention to the style on how the information is laid out.

Kunt logic, is there anything it can't do? Lets compare to things that aren't equal and draw some kind of conclusion from that comparison. Read Buzzfeed and then read a Heritage Foundation article on the same topic. Obviously the liberals aren't interested in facts.

Stupid, pathological liar and a Kunt. You're a hell of guy Hondo.

Well heritage foundation did invent Obamacare. So there's that.

Lie but one made out of stupidity and the fact that you're a liberal talking point parrot not malice. Hondo is more interested in fact!!!

The core of Obamacare came out of Heritage in the 90s and was supported by congressional republicans at the time, and then was implemented by Mitt Romney when he was the governor of Massachusetts. Maybe you should take a break for awhile, bob.

Liar or moron?

Take your pick

https://www.heritage.org/health-care-reform/commentary/dont-blame-heritage-obamacare-mandate

Before you shit posted it twice, did you even read it? He says no it's not the basis for Obamacare. Then goes on to explain how it is the basis for Obamacare. Then discusses why his position has evolved.

Fuck you are stupid.