Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Stanford Looses a ton this year

2»

Comments

  • LawDawg1
    LawDawg1 Member Posts: 3,948
    If there's one thing I've learned from Doogman, it's that you just don't know what you got in the new guys because we have never seen them do it at this level. Look, I love the new guys and hope they will be next man up, but they have a lot to prove still. Don't twist what I'm saying.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,636 Swaye's Wigwam
    Stanford does lose a lot. That is why it was so FS for a writer from si.com to rank them #3. That guy needs to do some fucking homework. I think UW should finish ahead of Stanford. I think they will still be a good team, but 4 of 5 OL and losing a 1700 yard rusher is going to hurt their offense. They lose 2 of the top 3 or 4 players in the Pac 12 on defense with Murphy and Skov. They will still be a tough team, but they could very well lose 4 or 5 games. Right now, they look like a borderline top 25 team to me.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Mosster47 said:

    Mosster47 said:

    Stanford will win 9 games in their sleep.

    When did Harbaugh leave the 49ers to go back to Stanford?
    Sadly they got better under Shaw. It's not hard to reload when you don't need speed or stellar QB play.

    Shaw is their Coker/Carr.

    Accept it now or deal with the reality when Dave Samek writes a profile in courage about it in 2016.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,636 Swaye's Wigwam

    Mosster47 said:

    Mosster47 said:

    Stanford will win 9 games in their sleep.

    When did Harbaugh leave the 49ers to go back to Stanford?
    Sadly they got better under Shaw. It's not hard to reload when you don't need speed or stellar QB play.

    Shaw is their Coker/Carr.

    Accept it now or deal with the reality when Dave Samek writes a profile in courage about it in 2016.
    Disagree. Carr is much better than Coker too. This is a big year for Shaw, but with their style of play, I think they are bound to stay at a pretty high level and win 8+ every year with some 10+ win seasons mixed in.

  • HeretoBeatmyChest
    HeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    Mosster47 said:

    Mosster47 said:

    Stanford will win 9 games in their sleep.

    When did Harbaugh leave the 49ers to go back to Stanford?
    Sadly they got better under Shaw. It's not hard to reload when you don't need speed or stellar QB play.

    Stanford was #1 in SRS at the end of 2010. At the time I didn't know about SRS but I felt Stanford was the best team. Shaw hasn't matched that 12-1 record either. That is when Stanford peaked but Shaw has kept them in the top 5 until this Rose Bowl. They'll fall out of the top 10 this upcoming season.
  • Mosster47 said:

    Mosster47 said:

    Stanford will win 9 games in their sleep.

    When did Harbaugh leave the 49ers to go back to Stanford?
    Sadly they got better under Shaw. It's not hard to reload when you don't need speed or stellar QB play.

    Shaw is their Coker/Carr.

    Accept it now or deal with the reality when Dave Samek writes a profile in courage about it in 2016.
    Black coaches always inherit downtrodden programs.
  • Dennis_DeYoung
    Dennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    Why is it so hard to spell lose?
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,460 Founders Club
    phineas said:

    I cant wait to watch stanford shove their jumbo package up SCs ass. The scoreboard will most definitely not be indicative of the quality of both football teams.

    This is why kids come to USC to play football, to play in big games like this week against Stanford. We're here to compete for a championship. We welcome the buzz around a game like this, Gameday in South Central. What a cool week to be a Trojan man
  • TTJ
    TTJ Member Posts: 4,827
    Stanford's big fall from grace begins in 2014.