Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

That old time green gaia religion

WestlinnDuck
WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 18,098 Standard Supporter
AOC clearly has no phu*cking clue as to how the real world works including math, science, history and economics. The government can’t build a new bridge over the Columbia River after more than a decade of thinking and planning for it. But take a poorly educated bartender and stuff her full of a wad of feelings and let her run your life. What could go wrong other than freezing in the dark.

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2019/02/the-green-new-deal-and-gerundive-government.php

The Green New Deal and Gerundive Government
I doubt America’s industrial capacity is sufficient to produce all of the Green Weenie Awards that the Green New Deal, unveiled today in Washington, will deserve. Before getting to some of the details (or lack thereof) I want to take note of the style of this “legislation” as an example of the modern liberal mind at work.
The modern liberal mind runs on gerunds—verbs made into nouns with the “-ing” ending. The Green New Deal resolution introduced today is full of gerundive commands for all of the great capacities that will be brought to bear to achieve our brave new green utopia: “mitigating and managing”; “investing, supporting” and (of course) “sustaining”: “building and overhauling”; “upgrading and spurring”; “working and removing”; “cleaning, identifying, and promoting”; “removing and identifying”; “leveraging and ensuring”; “making and directing”; “guaranteeing, strengthening and enforcing”; “enacting and obtaining.” I missed “facilitating,” which is my favorite liberal gerund. All in just 14 double-spaced, large-print pages.
Where do liberals learn to write like this? Probably the same places they learn to think like this.
I’ll perhaps comment on some of the technical aspects of this wish list on some other occasion, but will simply note for now one interesting small detail (one of the very few concrete policy details at all) of the bill that says we should achieve “net-zero emissions” of greenhouse gases by 2030, instead of simply “zero emissions,” which had been the term previously in use. This language seems to leave the door open to carbon capture and other technologies that might enable some continued fossil fuel use even in the sunny green uplands of our new utopia. But carbon capture is anathema to most deep greens.
But never fear, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is here! In her FAQ about the Green New Deal, she helpfully explains:
We set a goal to get to net-zero, rather than zero emissions, in 10 years because we aren’t sure that we’ll be able to fully get rid of farting cows and airplanes that fast.
Follow up question for AOC: Are you planning for a mass genocide of cattle? Have you checked with PETA on this? Or maybe cows will be sterilized and placed on Social Security so they can live out their flatulent golden years in peace?
And: Get rid of airplanes? Turns out AOC is just warming up:
Totally overhaul transportation by massively expanding electric vehicle manufacturing, build charging stations everywhere, build out high- speed rail at a scale where air travel stops becoming necessary, create affordable public transit available to all, with goal to replace every combustion-engine vehicle.
«13

Comments

  • allpurpleallgold
    allpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    You know your argument is strong when it focuses on a joke in the faq.

    The American government and people have accomplished many amazing things. Your choice to embrace crony capitalism to drag us down and then using it as an example of how government doesn’t work, while clever, won’t fool us.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    You know your argument is strong when it focuses on a joke in the faq.

    The American government and people have accomplished many amazing things. Your choice to embrace crony capitalism to drag us down and then using it as an example of how government doesn’t work, while clever, won’t fool us.

    I assume you are excluding Bob, sledog, Race, and Damone from this?
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,941 Standard Supporter
    AOC says if you believe you can fly you can and 12 years is plenty of time to get your arms in shape!
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 49,015 Standard Supporter
    Fuck off with this green shit. The US is sooooo far ahead of other industrialized countries relative to pollutants and being attentive to the environment. Meanwhile China and India are billowing shit into the air and water and not giving a fuck.

    Instead of fucking around throwing money down green ratholes, pour it into technology and infrastructure. High speed 9G+ fast internet and bullet trains. Fix up the shitty crumbling bridges, too.

    Do that for 12 years and let the rest of the world catch up to us? relative to saving the planet.

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,380 Founders Club
    Progressives want to get rid of jets and ride trains

    But Bob and I are fooled

    Please run on this nonsense

    Let's settle it
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    Progressives want to get rid of jets and ride trains

    But Bob and I are fooled

    Please run on this nonsense

    Let's settle it

    Funny how you bag on trains then think a wall is the best solution.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,380 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    Progressives want to get rid of jets and ride trains

    But Bob and I are fooled

    Please run on this nonsense

    Let's settle it

    Funny how you bag on trains then think a wall is the best solution.
    Funny how you fuck strawman ass in every thread (hi Bob)

    Walls work

    We got rid of trains a century ago

    Let's get you on record - you want to get rid of jets and go back to trains, right?
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    Progressives want to get rid of jets and ride trains

    But Bob and I are fooled

    Please run on this nonsense

    Let's settle it

    Funny how you bag on trains then think a wall is the best solution.
    Funny how you fuck strawman ass in every thread (hi Bob)

    Walls work

    We got rid of trains a century ago

    Let's get you on record - you want to get rid of jets and go back to trains, right?
    I think trains are fairly fucktarded at this point. Things like the light rail in Seattle and Portland and San Diego work great (truthfully Seattle isn't good right now). Investing in LA to San Fran or Albuquerque to Sante Fe is a waste of time and money.

    Just like trains are old technology. Same with a wall. A wall at this point is a symbol for simple minded people to chant about to think they will feel safer.
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,469

    2001400ex said:

    Progressives want to get rid of jets and ride trains

    But Bob and I are fooled

    Please run on this nonsense

    Let's settle it

    Funny how you bag on trains then think a wall is the best solution.
    Funny how you fuck strawman ass in every thread (hi Bob)

    Walls work

    We got rid of trains a century ago

    Let's get you on record - you want to get rid of jets and go back to trains, right?
    [creepy, the crestfallen fanboy of Racebannon.gif]