CBS rejects pro-flag, anti-Kaepernick ‘Just Stand’ Super Bowl ad
Comments
-
The Communist Braoadcasting System didn't like the flag. Seems odd.
-
Who gives a shit, their right
-
where did I say they didn't have the right. I'm posting things that I think will spur dialogue. This thread has been a thud, but they can't all be winners.GrundleStiltzkin said:Who gives a shit, their right
-
TT!DerekJohnson said:
where did I say they didn't have the right. I'm posting things that I think will spur dialogue. This thread has been a thud, but they can't all be winners.GrundleStiltzkin said:Who gives a shit, their right
-
Seems dumb to turn down advertising.
It also seems dumb to produce an ad that's going to get turned down.
The world is like a great big stupid contest. -
The ad wouldn't have been turned down if it fit the latest SJW narrative.dflea said:Seems dumb to turn down advertising.
It also seems dumb to produce an ad that's going to get turned down.
The world is like a great big stupid contest. -
Let's see what they do allow
Its turned into a virtue signaling contest in recent years -
They aren’t right, but they aren’t wrong either. They are a business and have the freedom to choose their advertisers.GrundleStiltzkin said:Who gives a shit, their right
-
The company only has $25 million in revenue and wants to spend a couple million on an ad? I'm not sure, but it also could be dumb to run an ad you'll never get paid on.dflea said:Seems dumb to turn down advertising.
It also seems dumb to produce an ad that's going to get turned down.
The world is like a great big stupid contest. -
If CBS held the courage of their convictions, they would replace the Super Bowl broadcast with a Woke panel discussion on Toxic Masculinity.
-
As it stands today, that little $25 million company got three times the exposure of a Super Bowl ad for free2001400ex said:
The company only has $25 million in revenue and wants to spend a couple million on an ad? I'm not sure, but it also could be dumb to run an ad you'll never get paid on.dflea said:Seems dumb to turn down advertising.
It also seems dumb to produce an ad that's going to get turned down.
The world is like a great big stupid contest.
and
Christ, now you think Government should dictate who can and can’t promote themselves with their own money? -
Free pub. Exactly. I'm pretty sure that's exactly what this was about.sarktastic said:
As it stands today, that little $25 million company got three times the exposure of a Super Bowl ad for free2001400ex said:
The company only has $25 million in revenue and wants to spend a couple million on an ad? I'm not sure, but it also could be dumb to run an ad you'll never get paid on.dflea said:Seems dumb to turn down advertising.
It also seems dumb to produce an ad that's going to get turned down.
The world is like a great big stupid contest.
and
Christ, now you think Government should dictate who can and can’t promote themselves with their own money?
Who said anything about the government? -
Hondo: praises and criticizes small company in same thread yet doesn’t realize it.
-
Nine Line is good stuff from good people. Could have requested payment in advance if that was the concern. CBS just doesn't want it.
I bet they'll have some SJW Kapertwit kneeling commercial don't know who's paying for it. Rumor. Maybe CBS. -
Only if you don't know how to read.sarktastic said:Hondo: praises and criticizes small company in same thread yet doesn’t realize it.
-
Cinemax could counter-program with the AOC sex tape.sarktastic said:If CBS held the courage of their convictions, they would replace the Super Bowl broadcast with a Woke panel discussion on Toxic Masculinity.
