Their hate doesn't end
Comments
-
Yet you want to teach in schools that a family should only have 2 married straight parents.MikeDamone said:
Because you know what’s best for other people and like to use the force and violence of government so individuals will comply with your good ideas.allpurpleallgold said:
Because I hate libertarians.Blu82 said:
So why try to take this into the weeds by bringing it up?allpurpleallgold said:
No, we don’t. Because libertarians can’t win elections.Blu82 said:
We have a lot of them, don't we?allpurpleallgold said:
And this is how you justify whites only restaurants.MikeDamone said:
An individual being forced to do art for someone for any reason is aggression on that individual. Not surprised the leftists have no issue with it.greenblood said:I agree with APAG here. I find the banning of the hat childish and quite frankly cowardly. But, there is a difference between discriminating against somebody's sexual preference and somebody's political affiliation, in that one is federally protected and the other isn't.
-
HondoFucking Stupid.2001400ex said:
Yet you want to teach in schools that a family should only have 2 married straight parents.MikeDamone said:
Because you know what’s best for other people and like to use the force and violence of government so individuals will comply with your good ideas.allpurpleallgold said:
Because I hate libertarians.Blu82 said:
So why try to take this into the weeds by bringing it up?allpurpleallgold said:
No, we don’t. Because libertarians can’t win elections.Blu82 said:
We have a lot of them, don't we?allpurpleallgold said:
And this is how you justify whites only restaurants.MikeDamone said:
An individual being forced to do art for someone for any reason is aggression on that individual. Not surprised the leftists have no issue with it.greenblood said:I agree with APAG here. I find the banning of the hat childish and quite frankly cowardly. But, there is a difference between discriminating against somebody's sexual preference and somebody's political affiliation, in that one is federally protected and the other isn't.
-
What is this force and violence stuff? Is this about fucking taxes?MikeDamone said:
Because you know what’s best for other people and like to use the force and violence of government so individuals will comply with your good ideas.allpurpleallgold said:
Because I hate libertarians.Blu82 said:
So why try to take this into the weeds by bringing it up?allpurpleallgold said:
No, we don’t. Because libertarians can’t win elections.Blu82 said:
We have a lot of them, don't we?allpurpleallgold said:
And this is how you justify whites only restaurants.MikeDamone said:
An individual being forced to do art for someone for any reason is aggression on that individual. Not surprised the leftists have no issue with it.greenblood said:I agree with APAG here. I find the banning of the hat childish and quite frankly cowardly. But, there is a difference between discriminating against somebody's sexual preference and somebody's political affiliation, in that one is federally protected and the other isn't.
-
Not if you don't want to bake cakes.allpurpleallgold said:It’s a private business that can do what it wants, no?
-
As God meant it to be. HTH2001400ex said:
Yet you want to teach in schools that a family should only have 2 married straight parents.MikeDamone said:
Because you know what’s best for other people and like to use the force and violence of government so individuals will comply with your good ideas.allpurpleallgold said:
Because I hate libertarians.Blu82 said:
So why try to take this into the weeds by bringing it up?allpurpleallgold said:
No, we don’t. Because libertarians can’t win elections.Blu82 said:
We have a lot of them, don't we?allpurpleallgold said:
And this is how you justify whites only restaurants.MikeDamone said:
An individual being forced to do art for someone for any reason is aggression on that individual. Not surprised the leftists have no issue with it.greenblood said:I agree with APAG here. I find the banning of the hat childish and quite frankly cowardly. But, there is a difference between discriminating against somebody's sexual preference and somebody's political affiliation, in that one is federally protected and the other isn't.
-
Again...Hondo making stuff up. Find my quote you bitch. Thats not what I said...2001400ex said:
Yet you want to teach in schools that a family should only have 2 married straight parents.MikeDamone said:
Because you know what’s best for other people and like to use the force and violence of government so individuals will comply with your good ideas.allpurpleallgold said:
Because I hate libertarians.Blu82 said:
So why try to take this into the weeds by bringing it up?allpurpleallgold said:
No, we don’t. Because libertarians can’t win elections.Blu82 said:
We have a lot of them, don't we?allpurpleallgold said:
And this is how you justify whites only restaurants.MikeDamone said:
An individual being forced to do art for someone for any reason is aggression on that individual. Not surprised the leftists have no issue with it.greenblood said:I agree with APAG here. I find the banning of the hat childish and quite frankly cowardly. But, there is a difference between discriminating against somebody's sexual preference and somebody's political affiliation, in that one is federally protected and the other isn't.
But you did say Newsom was buying Reagans old house.. El Oh Fucking El... -
What I am hearing is the restaurant will gladly cater a wedding for the minority groups that he won't serve at his business
-
You argue like Gaybob. "I didn't say that!!! I'm not lying!!!" Then mentions an obvious mistake I made. As if that changes your argument or the stupid shit you just said.MikeDamone said:
Again...Hondo making stuff up. Find my quote you bitch. Thats not what I said...2001400ex said:
Yet you want to teach in schools that a family should only have 2 married straight parents.MikeDamone said:
Because you know what’s best for other people and like to use the force and violence of government so individuals will comply with your good ideas.allpurpleallgold said:
Because I hate libertarians.Blu82 said:
So why try to take this into the weeds by bringing it up?allpurpleallgold said:
No, we don’t. Because libertarians can’t win elections.Blu82 said:
We have a lot of them, don't we?allpurpleallgold said:
And this is how you justify whites only restaurants.MikeDamone said:
An individual being forced to do art for someone for any reason is aggression on that individual. Not surprised the leftists have no issue with it.greenblood said:I agree with APAG here. I find the banning of the hat childish and quite frankly cowardly. But, there is a difference between discriminating against somebody's sexual preference and somebody's political affiliation, in that one is federally protected and the other isn't.
But you did say Newsom was buying Reagans old house.. El Oh Fucking El... -
Find the quote then bitch.2001400ex said:
You argue like Gaybob. "I didn't say that!!! I'm not lying!!!" Then mentions an obvious mistake I made. As if that changes your argument or the stupid shit you just said.MikeDamone said:
Again...Hondo making stuff up. Find my quote you bitch. Thats not what I said...2001400ex said:
Yet you want to teach in schools that a family should only have 2 married straight parents.MikeDamone said:
Because you know what’s best for other people and like to use the force and violence of government so individuals will comply with your good ideas.allpurpleallgold said:
Because I hate libertarians.Blu82 said:
So why try to take this into the weeds by bringing it up?allpurpleallgold said:
No, we don’t. Because libertarians can’t win elections.Blu82 said:
We have a lot of them, don't we?allpurpleallgold said:
And this is how you justify whites only restaurants.MikeDamone said:
An individual being forced to do art for someone for any reason is aggression on that individual. Not surprised the leftists have no issue with it.greenblood said:I agree with APAG here. I find the banning of the hat childish and quite frankly cowardly. But, there is a difference between discriminating against somebody's sexual preference and somebody's political affiliation, in that one is federally protected and the other isn't.
But you did say Newsom was buying Reagans old house.. El Oh Fucking El...
Only a leftist would find informing kids that staying in school, don’t have kids before you’re married, and don’t commit crimes gives them a better chance to out of poverty to be offensive and “forcing values” on them.
Didn’t you say something about a “system that works” earlier?
Dumbfuck
Brb. I’m looking at listings of Reagan’s houses for sale. El oh fucking el. Ok!
