Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Dazzler, do you ever get tired having shit blow up in your face?

SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,048
edited June 2022 in Tug Tavern


Raskin is every bit the piece of shit that Schiff is, shocked that you so willingly fell for this complete piece of garbage's show trial Dazzler. Note that this is friendly, and sympathetic questions Raskin is being confronted with. Imagine what would happen if this wasn't a fucking show trial and they allowed witnesses and committee members to be cross-examined.
«1

Comments

  • Bob_CBob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 10,923 Swaye's Wigwam
    Lol nothing to contradict it. That’s probably true because they never asked SS about it. Lawyer talk for we have no idea.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,048
    Bob_C said:

    Lol nothing to contradict it. That’s probably true because they never asked SS about it. Lawyer talk for we have no idea.

    They either never asked the SS agents about it, which is doubtful, or Raskin never bothered to read what they said because he was already informed that they refuted her allegations. When you intentionally keep your head up your ass it's amazing what you can claim you have no knowledge of.
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    The guy who tried to block Trump electors certifying his 2016 win, is saving our DeMoCrAcY!

    You couldn’t write this shit if you tried.
  • Bob_CBob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 10,923 Swaye's Wigwam
    SFGbob said:

    Bob_C said:

    Lol nothing to contradict it. That’s probably true because they never asked SS about it. Lawyer talk for we have no idea.

    They either never asked the SS agents about it, which is doubtful, or Raskin never bothered to read what they said because he was already informed that they refuted her allegations. When you intentionally keep your head up your ass it's amazing what you can claim you have no knowledge of.
    I think it’s more likely that she came up with it out of whole cloth and this there was nothing g to corroborate, or heard it not directly from the SS and took out that intermediary and then embellished it to seem closer to the action.

    In any case, it’s a black eye for the committee and they should be disbanded over this.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,048
    Bob_C said:

    SFGbob said:

    Bob_C said:

    Lol nothing to contradict it. That’s probably true because they never asked SS about it. Lawyer talk for we have no idea.

    They either never asked the SS agents about it, which is doubtful, or Raskin never bothered to read what they said because he was already informed that they refuted her allegations. When you intentionally keep your head up your ass it's amazing what you can claim you have no knowledge of.
    I think it’s more likely that she came up with it out of whole cloth and this there was nothing g to corroborate, or heard it not directly from the SS and took out that intermediary and then embellished it to seem closer to the action.

    In any case, it’s a black eye for the committee and they should be disbanded over this.
    But she was such a "credible" witness.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,689 Founders Club
    Tapper is an ultra maga fox news guy though
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,625
    Bob_C said:

    Lol nothing to contradict it. That’s probably true because they never asked SS about it. Lawyer talk for we have no idea.

    It's not the sort of story the SS would volunteer for obvious reasons. The persons involved can be asked about it directly now. I'll wait.

    Meanwhile, the actual point--that Daddy wanted to attend his own coup--is corroborated by everyone.

    Picking at the margins of a story based upon alleged "willingness" of others to contradict particular details isn't quite the explosion you girls imagine it is.
  • Bob_CBob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 10,923 Swaye's Wigwam
    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    Lol nothing to contradict it. That’s probably true because they never asked SS about it. Lawyer talk for we have no idea.

    It's not the sort of story the SS would volunteer for obvious reasons. The persons involved can be asked about it directly now. I'll wait.

    Meanwhile, the actual point--that Daddy wanted to attend his own coup--is corroborated by everyone.

    Picking at the margins of a story based upon alleged "willingness" of others to contradict particular details isn't quite the explosion you girls imagine it is.
    So if we don’t see them testifying on national tv does that means they weren’t willing to do so, or the committee isn’t willing to allow them on tv to do so?

    Committee fucked this one up badly.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,689 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    Lol nothing to contradict it. That’s probably true because they never asked SS about it. Lawyer talk for we have no idea.

    It's not the sort of story the SS would volunteer for obvious reasons. The persons involved can be asked about it directly now. I'll wait.

    Meanwhile, the actual point--that Daddy wanted to attend his own coup--is corroborated by everyone.

    Picking at the margins of a story based upon alleged "willingness" of others to contradict particular details isn't quite the explosion you girls imagine it is.
    It's not alleged

    They contradict her made up story

    This is nothing new. 5 years of this shit and you keep falling for it

    Moron
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,048
    Appears the Secret Service was now in on the coup.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,625
    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    Lol nothing to contradict it. That’s probably true because they never asked SS about it. Lawyer talk for we have no idea.

    It's not the sort of story the SS would volunteer for obvious reasons. The persons involved can be asked about it directly now. I'll wait.

    Meanwhile, the actual point--that Daddy wanted to attend his own coup--is corroborated by everyone.

    Picking at the margins of a story based upon alleged "willingness" of others to contradict particular details isn't quite the explosion you girls imagine it is.
    So if we don’t see them testifying on national tv does that means they weren’t willing to do so, or the committee isn’t willing to allow them on tv to do so?

    Committee fucked this one up badly.
    The SS would always prefer not to speak and not to speak about much. It has to do with the nature of its mission.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,689 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    Lol nothing to contradict it. That’s probably true because they never asked SS about it. Lawyer talk for we have no idea.

    It's not the sort of story the SS would volunteer for obvious reasons. The persons involved can be asked about it directly now. I'll wait.

    Meanwhile, the actual point--that Daddy wanted to attend his own coup--is corroborated by everyone.

    Picking at the margins of a story based upon alleged "willingness" of others to contradict particular details isn't quite the explosion you girls imagine it is.
    So if we don’t see them testifying on national tv does that means they weren’t willing to do so, or the committee isn’t willing to allow them on tv to do so?

    Committee fucked this one up badly.
    The SS would always prefer not to speak and not to speak about much. It has to do with the nature of its mission.
    How convenient for the lying pieces of shit you support

    Too bad they are commenting and she lied

    And you bought it again
  • greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,520
    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    Lol nothing to contradict it. That’s probably true because they never asked SS about it. Lawyer talk for we have no idea.

    It's not the sort of story the SS would volunteer for obvious reasons. The persons involved can be asked about it directly now. I'll wait.

    Meanwhile, the actual point--that Daddy wanted to attend his own coup--is corroborated by everyone.

    Picking at the margins of a story based upon alleged "willingness" of others to contradict particular details isn't quite the explosion you girls imagine it is.
    So if we don’t see them testifying on national tv does that means they weren’t willing to do so, or the committee isn’t willing to allow them on tv to do so?

    Committee fucked this one up badly.
    The SS would always prefer not to speak and not to speak about much. It has to do with the nature of its mission.
    But they are speaking, champ. Please keep up
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,625

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    Lol nothing to contradict it. That’s probably true because they never asked SS about it. Lawyer talk for we have no idea.

    It's not the sort of story the SS would volunteer for obvious reasons. The persons involved can be asked about it directly now. I'll wait.

    Meanwhile, the actual point--that Daddy wanted to attend his own coup--is corroborated by everyone.

    Picking at the margins of a story based upon alleged "willingness" of others to contradict particular details isn't quite the explosion you girls imagine it is.
    It's not alleged

    They contradict her made up story

    This is nothing new. 5 years of this shit and you keep falling for it

    Moron
    Sworn testimony, gRace?

    I'll wait.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,625

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    Lol nothing to contradict it. That’s probably true because they never asked SS about it. Lawyer talk for we have no idea.

    It's not the sort of story the SS would volunteer for obvious reasons. The persons involved can be asked about it directly now. I'll wait.

    Meanwhile, the actual point--that Daddy wanted to attend his own coup--is corroborated by everyone.

    Picking at the margins of a story based upon alleged "willingness" of others to contradict particular details isn't quite the explosion you girls imagine it is.
    So if we don’t see them testifying on national tv does that means they weren’t willing to do so, or the committee isn’t willing to allow them on tv to do so?

    Committee fucked this one up badly.
    The SS would always prefer not to speak and not to speak about much. It has to do with the nature of its mission.
    But they are speaking, champ. Please keep up
    under oath > "sources report"
  • Bob_CBob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 10,923 Swaye's Wigwam
    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    Lol nothing to contradict it. That’s probably true because they never asked SS about it. Lawyer talk for we have no idea.

    It's not the sort of story the SS would volunteer for obvious reasons. The persons involved can be asked about it directly now. I'll wait.

    Meanwhile, the actual point--that Daddy wanted to attend his own coup--is corroborated by everyone.

    Picking at the margins of a story based upon alleged "willingness" of others to contradict particular details isn't quite the explosion you girls imagine it is.
    So if we don’t see them testifying on national tv does that means they weren’t willing to do so, or the committee isn’t willing to allow them on tv to do so?

    Committee fucked this one up badly.
    The SS would always prefer not to speak and not to speak about much. It has to do with the nature of its mission.
    It’s okay to agree that this is a major fuck up on the PR front and still maintain your TDS.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,689 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    Lol nothing to contradict it. That’s probably true because they never asked SS about it. Lawyer talk for we have no idea.

    It's not the sort of story the SS would volunteer for obvious reasons. The persons involved can be asked about it directly now. I'll wait.

    Meanwhile, the actual point--that Daddy wanted to attend his own coup--is corroborated by everyone.

    Picking at the margins of a story based upon alleged "willingness" of others to contradict particular details isn't quite the explosion you girls imagine it is.
    It's not alleged

    They contradict her made up story

    This is nothing new. 5 years of this shit and you keep falling for it

    Moron
    Sworn testimony, gRace?

    I'll wait.
    Cross examination?

    I won't wait

    Sucker

    The way you assholes lie under oath nothing is believed
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,689 Founders Club
    If there is no penalty for lying under oath in a kangaroo court the oath is meaningless

    It's to fool the stupid

    Like H
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,625

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    Lol nothing to contradict it. That’s probably true because they never asked SS about it. Lawyer talk for we have no idea.

    It's not the sort of story the SS would volunteer for obvious reasons. The persons involved can be asked about it directly now. I'll wait.

    Meanwhile, the actual point--that Daddy wanted to attend his own coup--is corroborated by everyone.

    Picking at the margins of a story based upon alleged "willingness" of others to contradict particular details isn't quite the explosion you girls imagine it is.
    It's not alleged

    They contradict her made up story

    This is nothing new. 5 years of this shit and you keep falling for it

    Moron
    Sworn testimony, gRace?

    I'll wait.
    Cross examination?

    I won't wait

    Sucker

    The way you assholes lie under oath nothing is believed
    After saying they wanted to be on it, your team didn't want to participate. Kevin had checked to see which way the wind was blowing and decided to appoint a couple of the prime suspects to the panel. #choices
Sign In or Register to comment.