Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

Dazzler, do you ever get tired having shit blow up in your face?

SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,920
First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
Standard Supporter
edited June 2022 in Tug Tavern


Raskin is every bit the piece of shit that Schiff is, shocked that you so willingly fell for this complete piece of garbage's show trial Dazzler. Note that this is friendly, and sympathetic questions Raskin is being confronted with. Imagine what would happen if this wasn't a fucking show trial and they allowed witnesses and committee members to be cross-examined.
«1

Comments

  • Options
    Bob_CBob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,882
    Photogenic First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment
    Founders Club
    Lol nothing to contradict it. That’s probably true because they never asked SS about it. Lawyer talk for we have no idea.
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,920
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    Bob_C said:

    Lol nothing to contradict it. That’s probably true because they never asked SS about it. Lawyer talk for we have no idea.

    They either never asked the SS agents about it, which is doubtful, or Raskin never bothered to read what they said because he was already informed that they refuted her allegations. When you intentionally keep your head up your ass it's amazing what you can claim you have no knowledge of.
  • Options
    46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment
    The guy who tried to block Trump electors certifying his 2016 win, is saving our DeMoCrAcY!

    You couldn’t write this shit if you tried.
  • Options
    Bob_CBob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,882
    Photogenic First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment
    Founders Club
    SFGbob said:

    Bob_C said:

    Lol nothing to contradict it. That’s probably true because they never asked SS about it. Lawyer talk for we have no idea.

    They either never asked the SS agents about it, which is doubtful, or Raskin never bothered to read what they said because he was already informed that they refuted her allegations. When you intentionally keep your head up your ass it's amazing what you can claim you have no knowledge of.
    I think it’s more likely that she came up with it out of whole cloth and this there was nothing g to corroborate, or heard it not directly from the SS and took out that intermediary and then embellished it to seem closer to the action.

    In any case, it’s a black eye for the committee and they should be disbanded over this.
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,920
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    Bob_C said:

    SFGbob said:

    Bob_C said:

    Lol nothing to contradict it. That’s probably true because they never asked SS about it. Lawyer talk for we have no idea.

    They either never asked the SS agents about it, which is doubtful, or Raskin never bothered to read what they said because he was already informed that they refuted her allegations. When you intentionally keep your head up your ass it's amazing what you can claim you have no knowledge of.
    I think it’s more likely that she came up with it out of whole cloth and this there was nothing g to corroborate, or heard it not directly from the SS and took out that intermediary and then embellished it to seem closer to the action.

    In any case, it’s a black eye for the committee and they should be disbanded over this.
    But she was such a "credible" witness.
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,200
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    Tapper is an ultra maga fox news guy though
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,126
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    Bob_C said:

    Lol nothing to contradict it. That’s probably true because they never asked SS about it. Lawyer talk for we have no idea.

    It's not the sort of story the SS would volunteer for obvious reasons. The persons involved can be asked about it directly now. I'll wait.

    Meanwhile, the actual point--that Daddy wanted to attend his own coup--is corroborated by everyone.

    Picking at the margins of a story based upon alleged "willingness" of others to contradict particular details isn't quite the explosion you girls imagine it is.
  • Options
    Bob_CBob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,882
    Photogenic First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment
    Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    Lol nothing to contradict it. That’s probably true because they never asked SS about it. Lawyer talk for we have no idea.

    It's not the sort of story the SS would volunteer for obvious reasons. The persons involved can be asked about it directly now. I'll wait.

    Meanwhile, the actual point--that Daddy wanted to attend his own coup--is corroborated by everyone.

    Picking at the margins of a story based upon alleged "willingness" of others to contradict particular details isn't quite the explosion you girls imagine it is.
    So if we don’t see them testifying on national tv does that means they weren’t willing to do so, or the committee isn’t willing to allow them on tv to do so?

    Committee fucked this one up badly.
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,200
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    Lol nothing to contradict it. That’s probably true because they never asked SS about it. Lawyer talk for we have no idea.

    It's not the sort of story the SS would volunteer for obvious reasons. The persons involved can be asked about it directly now. I'll wait.

    Meanwhile, the actual point--that Daddy wanted to attend his own coup--is corroborated by everyone.

    Picking at the margins of a story based upon alleged "willingness" of others to contradict particular details isn't quite the explosion you girls imagine it is.
    It's not alleged

    They contradict her made up story

    This is nothing new. 5 years of this shit and you keep falling for it

    Moron
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,920
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    Appears the Secret Service was now in on the coup.
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,126
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    Lol nothing to contradict it. That’s probably true because they never asked SS about it. Lawyer talk for we have no idea.

    It's not the sort of story the SS would volunteer for obvious reasons. The persons involved can be asked about it directly now. I'll wait.

    Meanwhile, the actual point--that Daddy wanted to attend his own coup--is corroborated by everyone.

    Picking at the margins of a story based upon alleged "willingness" of others to contradict particular details isn't quite the explosion you girls imagine it is.
    So if we don’t see them testifying on national tv does that means they weren’t willing to do so, or the committee isn’t willing to allow them on tv to do so?

    Committee fucked this one up badly.
    The SS would always prefer not to speak and not to speak about much. It has to do with the nature of its mission.
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,200
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    Lol nothing to contradict it. That’s probably true because they never asked SS about it. Lawyer talk for we have no idea.

    It's not the sort of story the SS would volunteer for obvious reasons. The persons involved can be asked about it directly now. I'll wait.

    Meanwhile, the actual point--that Daddy wanted to attend his own coup--is corroborated by everyone.

    Picking at the margins of a story based upon alleged "willingness" of others to contradict particular details isn't quite the explosion you girls imagine it is.
    So if we don’t see them testifying on national tv does that means they weren’t willing to do so, or the committee isn’t willing to allow them on tv to do so?

    Committee fucked this one up badly.
    The SS would always prefer not to speak and not to speak about much. It has to do with the nature of its mission.
    How convenient for the lying pieces of shit you support

    Too bad they are commenting and she lied

    And you bought it again
  • Options
    greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,278
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment Combo Breaker
    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    Lol nothing to contradict it. That’s probably true because they never asked SS about it. Lawyer talk for we have no idea.

    It's not the sort of story the SS would volunteer for obvious reasons. The persons involved can be asked about it directly now. I'll wait.

    Meanwhile, the actual point--that Daddy wanted to attend his own coup--is corroborated by everyone.

    Picking at the margins of a story based upon alleged "willingness" of others to contradict particular details isn't quite the explosion you girls imagine it is.
    So if we don’t see them testifying on national tv does that means they weren’t willing to do so, or the committee isn’t willing to allow them on tv to do so?

    Committee fucked this one up badly.
    The SS would always prefer not to speak and not to speak about much. It has to do with the nature of its mission.
    But they are speaking, champ. Please keep up
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,126
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    Lol nothing to contradict it. That’s probably true because they never asked SS about it. Lawyer talk for we have no idea.

    It's not the sort of story the SS would volunteer for obvious reasons. The persons involved can be asked about it directly now. I'll wait.

    Meanwhile, the actual point--that Daddy wanted to attend his own coup--is corroborated by everyone.

    Picking at the margins of a story based upon alleged "willingness" of others to contradict particular details isn't quite the explosion you girls imagine it is.
    It's not alleged

    They contradict her made up story

    This is nothing new. 5 years of this shit and you keep falling for it

    Moron
    Sworn testimony, gRace?

    I'll wait.
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,126
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    Lol nothing to contradict it. That’s probably true because they never asked SS about it. Lawyer talk for we have no idea.

    It's not the sort of story the SS would volunteer for obvious reasons. The persons involved can be asked about it directly now. I'll wait.

    Meanwhile, the actual point--that Daddy wanted to attend his own coup--is corroborated by everyone.

    Picking at the margins of a story based upon alleged "willingness" of others to contradict particular details isn't quite the explosion you girls imagine it is.
    So if we don’t see them testifying on national tv does that means they weren’t willing to do so, or the committee isn’t willing to allow them on tv to do so?

    Committee fucked this one up badly.
    The SS would always prefer not to speak and not to speak about much. It has to do with the nature of its mission.
    But they are speaking, champ. Please keep up
    under oath > "sources report"
  • Options
    Bob_CBob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,882
    Photogenic First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment
    Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    Lol nothing to contradict it. That’s probably true because they never asked SS about it. Lawyer talk for we have no idea.

    It's not the sort of story the SS would volunteer for obvious reasons. The persons involved can be asked about it directly now. I'll wait.

    Meanwhile, the actual point--that Daddy wanted to attend his own coup--is corroborated by everyone.

    Picking at the margins of a story based upon alleged "willingness" of others to contradict particular details isn't quite the explosion you girls imagine it is.
    So if we don’t see them testifying on national tv does that means they weren’t willing to do so, or the committee isn’t willing to allow them on tv to do so?

    Committee fucked this one up badly.
    The SS would always prefer not to speak and not to speak about much. It has to do with the nature of its mission.
    It’s okay to agree that this is a major fuck up on the PR front and still maintain your TDS.
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,200
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    Lol nothing to contradict it. That’s probably true because they never asked SS about it. Lawyer talk for we have no idea.

    It's not the sort of story the SS would volunteer for obvious reasons. The persons involved can be asked about it directly now. I'll wait.

    Meanwhile, the actual point--that Daddy wanted to attend his own coup--is corroborated by everyone.

    Picking at the margins of a story based upon alleged "willingness" of others to contradict particular details isn't quite the explosion you girls imagine it is.
    It's not alleged

    They contradict her made up story

    This is nothing new. 5 years of this shit and you keep falling for it

    Moron
    Sworn testimony, gRace?

    I'll wait.
    Cross examination?

    I won't wait

    Sucker

    The way you assholes lie under oath nothing is believed
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,200
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    If there is no penalty for lying under oath in a kangaroo court the oath is meaningless

    It's to fool the stupid

    Like H
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,126
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    Lol nothing to contradict it. That’s probably true because they never asked SS about it. Lawyer talk for we have no idea.

    It's not the sort of story the SS would volunteer for obvious reasons. The persons involved can be asked about it directly now. I'll wait.

    Meanwhile, the actual point--that Daddy wanted to attend his own coup--is corroborated by everyone.

    Picking at the margins of a story based upon alleged "willingness" of others to contradict particular details isn't quite the explosion you girls imagine it is.
    It's not alleged

    They contradict her made up story

    This is nothing new. 5 years of this shit and you keep falling for it

    Moron
    Sworn testimony, gRace?

    I'll wait.
    Cross examination?

    I won't wait

    Sucker

    The way you assholes lie under oath nothing is believed
    After saying they wanted to be on it, your team didn't want to participate. Kevin had checked to see which way the wind was blowing and decided to appoint a couple of the prime suspects to the panel. #choices
Sign In or Register to comment.