Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

When you've lost Butterball . . .

1…89101214

Comments

  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,515 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    TurdBomber said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Did ballot harvesting take place in the 2020 election in states where it isn't legal? Is it easier to engage in ballot havesting with mail in ballots? The election was lost when the decision was made to paper the states with mail in ballots. My opinion on mail in ballots and Barr's opinion on mail in ballots is the same. So is Barr telling the truth here Dazzler or is he a corrupt liar again?

    https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2020/09/02/bill-barr-intv-playing-with-fire-absentee-mail-in-voting-election-tsr-sot-vpx.cnn

    Barr's testimony about ballot harvesting was featured today. You should have watched.
    Some of us aren't fat girls who watch TV all day, like you @HHusky.
    Dazzler wasted his life on the Mueller hearings too. Then he cried.
    Dazzle watched the Meuller hearing and then just lied about what Meuller and his report actually said.

    “insufficient evidence to charge a broader conspiracy” superiority guy heard from.
    Insufficient could also be NO EVIDENCE. Thanks for proving yourself as usual dipshit.
    But as you well know from your thorough reading of the report and your examination of Mueller's testimony, that isn't what "insufficient" meant in this case.
    You see he couldn't find any type of a crime in 2 years of investigation including taxes because that's the first place shitty lawyers head. You know that's what you'd do as your shitty.

    To say insufficient is hilarious. None, bupkis or a little bullshit is all he could find with 32 million dollars and over 2 years and a team of crack investigators.

    You're stupidity truly is boundless!
    With the exception of:

    1. Trump was receptive to a Campaign national security adviser’s (George Papadopoulos) pursuit of a back channel to Putin.

    2. Kremlin operatives provided the Campaign a preview of the Russian plan to distribute stolen emails.

    3. The Trump Campaign chairman and deputy chairman (Paul Manafort and Rick Gates) knowingly shared internal polling data and information on battleground states with a Russian spy; and the Campaign chairman worked with the Russian spy on a pro-Russia “peace” plan for Ukraine.

    4. The Trump Campaign chairman periodically shared internal polling data with the Russian spy with the expectation it would be shared with Putin-linked oligarch, Oleg Deripaska.

    5. Trump Campaign chairman Manafort expected Trump’s winning the presidency would mean Deripaska would want to use Manafort to advance Deripaska’s interests in the United States and elsewhere.

    6. Trump Tower meeting: (1) On receiving an email offering derogatory information on Clinton coming from a Russian government official, Donald Trump Jr. “appears to have accepted that offer;” (2) members of the Campaign discussed the Trump Tower meeting beforehand; (3) Donald Trump Jr. told the Russians during the meeting that Trump could revisit the issue of the Magnitsky Act if elected.

    7. A Trump Campaign official told the Special Counsel he “felt obliged to object” to a GOP Platform change on Ukraine because it contradicted Trump’s wishes; however, the investigation did not establish that Gordon was directed by Trump.

    8. Russian military hackers may have followed Trump’s July 27, 2016 public statement “Russia if you’re listening …” within hours by targeting Clinton’s personal office for the first time.

    9. Trump requested campaign affiliates to get Clinton’s emails, which resulted in an individual apparently acting in coordination with the Campaign claiming to have successfully contacted Russian hackers.

    10. The Trump Campaign—and Trump personally—appeared to have advanced knowledge of future WikiLeaks releases.

    11. The Trump Campaign coordinated campaign-related public communications based on future WikiLeaks releases.

    12. Michael Cohen, on behalf of the Trump Organization, brokered a secret deal for a Trump Tower Moscow project directly involving Putin’s inner circle, at least until June 2016.

    13. During the presidential transition, Jared Kushner and Eric Prince engaged in secret back channel communications with Russian agents. (1) Kushner suggested to the Russian Ambassador that they use a secure communication line from within the Russian Embassy to speak with Russian Generals; and (2) Prince and Kushner’s friend Rick Gerson conducted secret back channel meetings with a Putin agent to develop a plan for U.S.-Russian relations.

    14. During the presidential transition, in coordination with other members of the Transition Team, Michael Flynn spoke with the Russian Ambassador to prevent a tit for tat Russian response to the Obama administration’s imposition of sanctions for election interference; the Russians agreed not to retaliate saying they wanted a good relationship with the incoming administration.



    But other than that, absolutely no evidence.
    How did you make it past 'evidentiary standard' in law school?

    Serious question.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    pawz said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    TurdBomber said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Did ballot harvesting take place in the 2020 election in states where it isn't legal? Is it easier to engage in ballot havesting with mail in ballots? The election was lost when the decision was made to paper the states with mail in ballots. My opinion on mail in ballots and Barr's opinion on mail in ballots is the same. So is Barr telling the truth here Dazzler or is he a corrupt liar again?

    https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2020/09/02/bill-barr-intv-playing-with-fire-absentee-mail-in-voting-election-tsr-sot-vpx.cnn

    Barr's testimony about ballot harvesting was featured today. You should have watched.
    Some of us aren't fat girls who watch TV all day, like you @HHusky.
    Dazzler wasted his life on the Mueller hearings too. Then he cried.
    Dazzle watched the Meuller hearing and then just lied about what Meuller and his report actually said.

    “insufficient evidence to charge a broader conspiracy” superiority guy heard from.
    Insufficient could also be NO EVIDENCE. Thanks for proving yourself as usual dipshit.
    But as you well know from your thorough reading of the report and your examination of Mueller's testimony, that isn't what "insufficient" meant in this case.
    You see he couldn't find any type of a crime in 2 years of investigation including taxes because that's the first place shitty lawyers head. You know that's what you'd do as your shitty.

    To say insufficient is hilarious. None, bupkis or a little bullshit is all he could find with 32 million dollars and over 2 years and a team of crack investigators.

    You're stupidity truly is boundless!
    With the exception of:

    1. Trump was receptive to a Campaign national security adviser’s (George Papadopoulos) pursuit of a back channel to Putin.

    2. Kremlin operatives provided the Campaign a preview of the Russian plan to distribute stolen emails.

    3. The Trump Campaign chairman and deputy chairman (Paul Manafort and Rick Gates) knowingly shared internal polling data and information on battleground states with a Russian spy; and the Campaign chairman worked with the Russian spy on a pro-Russia “peace” plan for Ukraine.

    4. The Trump Campaign chairman periodically shared internal polling data with the Russian spy with the expectation it would be shared with Putin-linked oligarch, Oleg Deripaska.

    5. Trump Campaign chairman Manafort expected Trump’s winning the presidency would mean Deripaska would want to use Manafort to advance Deripaska’s interests in the United States and elsewhere.

    6. Trump Tower meeting: (1) On receiving an email offering derogatory information on Clinton coming from a Russian government official, Donald Trump Jr. “appears to have accepted that offer;” (2) members of the Campaign discussed the Trump Tower meeting beforehand; (3) Donald Trump Jr. told the Russians during the meeting that Trump could revisit the issue of the Magnitsky Act if elected.

    7. A Trump Campaign official told the Special Counsel he “felt obliged to object” to a GOP Platform change on Ukraine because it contradicted Trump’s wishes; however, the investigation did not establish that Gordon was directed by Trump.

    8. Russian military hackers may have followed Trump’s July 27, 2016 public statement “Russia if you’re listening …” within hours by targeting Clinton’s personal office for the first time.

    9. Trump requested campaign affiliates to get Clinton’s emails, which resulted in an individual apparently acting in coordination with the Campaign claiming to have successfully contacted Russian hackers.

    10. The Trump Campaign—and Trump personally—appeared to have advanced knowledge of future WikiLeaks releases.

    11. The Trump Campaign coordinated campaign-related public communications based on future WikiLeaks releases.

    12. Michael Cohen, on behalf of the Trump Organization, brokered a secret deal for a Trump Tower Moscow project directly involving Putin’s inner circle, at least until June 2016.

    13. During the presidential transition, Jared Kushner and Eric Prince engaged in secret back channel communications with Russian agents. (1) Kushner suggested to the Russian Ambassador that they use a secure communication line from within the Russian Embassy to speak with Russian Generals; and (2) Prince and Kushner’s friend Rick Gerson conducted secret back channel meetings with a Putin agent to develop a plan for U.S.-Russian relations.

    14. During the presidential transition, in coordination with other members of the Transition Team, Michael Flynn spoke with the Russian Ambassador to prevent a tit for tat Russian response to the Obama administration’s imposition of sanctions for election interference; the Russians agreed not to retaliate saying they wanted a good relationship with the incoming administration.



    But other than that, absolutely no evidence.
    How did you make it past 'evidentiary standard' in law school?

    Serious question.

    Dazzler?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    I wonder what lunatic leftist site Dazzler copied that screed from?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    46XiJCAB said:

    I wonder what lunatic leftist site Dazzler copied that screed from?

    https://www.messagemedia.co/aitkin/opinion/other_opinions/the-truth-about-the-mueller-report/article_9166ee18-afbb-11e9-860f-e3fbf323c0fe.html
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,633 Standard Supporter
    "The evidence is what I say it is". The Dazzler in law school.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,588 Standard Supporter
    Sledog said:

    "The evidence is what I say it is". The Dazzler in law school.

    "if it wasn't at Nuremberg, it doesn't count"

    - The Dazzler.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,051 Standard Supporter
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    TurdBomber said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Did ballot harvesting take place in the 2020 election in states where it isn't legal? Is it easier to engage in ballot havesting with mail in ballots? The election was lost when the decision was made to paper the states with mail in ballots. My opinion on mail in ballots and Barr's opinion on mail in ballots is the same. So is Barr telling the truth here Dazzler or is he a corrupt liar again?

    https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2020/09/02/bill-barr-intv-playing-with-fire-absentee-mail-in-voting-election-tsr-sot-vpx.cnn

    Barr's testimony about ballot harvesting was featured today. You should have watched.
    Some of us aren't fat girls who watch TV all day, like you @HHusky.
    Dazzler wasted his life on the Mueller hearings too. Then he cried.
    Dazzle watched the Meuller hearing and then just lied about what Meuller and his report actually said.

    “insufficient evidence to charge a broader conspiracy” superiority guy heard from.
    Insufficient could also be NO EVIDENCE. Thanks for proving yourself as usual dipshit.
    But as you well know from your thorough reading of the report and your examination of Mueller's testimony, that isn't what "insufficient" meant in this case.
    You see he couldn't find any type of a crime in 2 years of investigation including taxes because that's the first place shitty lawyers head. You know that's what you'd do as your shitty.

    To say insufficient is hilarious. None, bupkis or a little bullshit is all he could find with 32 million dollars and over 2 years and a team of crack investigators.

    You're stupidity truly is boundless!
    But it's his gullibility that takes the cake. Stratospheric.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,500
    Rent free
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    TurdBomber said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Did ballot harvesting take place in the 2020 election in states where it isn't legal? Is it easier to engage in ballot havesting with mail in ballots? The election was lost when the decision was made to paper the states with mail in ballots. My opinion on mail in ballots and Barr's opinion on mail in ballots is the same. So is Barr telling the truth here Dazzler or is he a corrupt liar again?

    https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2020/09/02/bill-barr-intv-playing-with-fire-absentee-mail-in-voting-election-tsr-sot-vpx.cnn

    Barr's testimony about ballot harvesting was featured today. You should have watched.
    Some of us aren't fat girls who watch TV all day, like you @HHusky.
    Dazzler wasted his life on the Mueller hearings too. Then he cried.
    Dazzle watched the Meuller hearing and then just lied about what Meuller and his report actually said.

    “insufficient evidence to charge a broader conspiracy” superiority guy heard from.
    Insufficient could also be NO EVIDENCE. Thanks for proving yourself as usual dipshit.
    But as you well know from your thorough reading of the report and your examination of Mueller's testimony, that isn't what "insufficient" meant in this case.
    You see he couldn't find any type of a crime in 2 years of investigation including taxes because that's the first place shitty lawyers head. You know that's what you'd do as your shitty.

    To say insufficient is hilarious. None, bupkis or a little bullshit is all he could find with 32 million dollars and over 2 years and a team of crack investigators.

    You're stupidity truly is boundless!
    With the exception of:

    1. Trump was receptive to a Campaign national security adviser’s (George Papadopoulos) pursuit of a back channel to Putin.

    2. Kremlin operatives provided the Campaign a preview of the Russian plan to distribute stolen emails.

    3. The Trump Campaign chairman and deputy chairman (Paul Manafort and Rick Gates) knowingly shared internal polling data and information on battleground states with a Russian spy; and the Campaign chairman worked with the Russian spy on a pro-Russia “peace” plan for Ukraine.

    4. The Trump Campaign chairman periodically shared internal polling data with the Russian spy with the expectation it would be shared with Putin-linked oligarch, Oleg Deripaska.

    5. Trump Campaign chairman Manafort expected Trump’s winning the presidency would mean Deripaska would want to use Manafort to advance Deripaska’s interests in the United States and elsewhere.

    6. Trump Tower meeting: (1) On receiving an email offering derogatory information on Clinton coming from a Russian government official, Donald Trump Jr. “appears to have accepted that offer;” (2) members of the Campaign discussed the Trump Tower meeting beforehand; (3) Donald Trump Jr. told the Russians during the meeting that Trump could revisit the issue of the Magnitsky Act if elected.

    7. A Trump Campaign official told the Special Counsel he “felt obliged to object” to a GOP Platform change on Ukraine because it contradicted Trump’s wishes; however, the investigation did not establish that Gordon was directed by Trump.

    8. Russian military hackers may have followed Trump’s July 27, 2016 public statement “Russia if you’re listening …” within hours by targeting Clinton’s personal office for the first time.

    9. Trump requested campaign affiliates to get Clinton’s emails, which resulted in an individual apparently acting in coordination with the Campaign claiming to have successfully contacted Russian hackers.

    10. The Trump Campaign—and Trump personally—appeared to have advanced knowledge of future WikiLeaks releases.

    11. The Trump Campaign coordinated campaign-related public communications based on future WikiLeaks releases.

    12. Michael Cohen, on behalf of the Trump Organization, brokered a secret deal for a Trump Tower Moscow project directly involving Putin’s inner circle, at least until June 2016.

    13. During the presidential transition, Jared Kushner and Eric Prince engaged in secret back channel communications with Russian agents. (1) Kushner suggested to the Russian Ambassador that they use a secure communication line from within the Russian Embassy to speak with Russian Generals; and (2) Prince and Kushner’s friend Rick Gerson conducted secret back channel meetings with a Putin agent to develop a plan for U.S.-Russian relations.

    14. During the presidential transition, in coordination with other members of the Transition Team, Michael Flynn spoke with the Russian Ambassador to prevent a tit for tat Russian response to the Obama administration’s imposition of sanctions for election interference; the Russians agreed not to retaliate saying they wanted a good relationship with the incoming administration.



    But other than that, absolutely no evidence.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,633 Standard Supporter
    Odd no specific criminal charges connected to any of your items. Oh yeah it's all bullshit! Nothing like I said.

    You sure can swallow though! The guys down at the Glory Hole bar are happy.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter