Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Ok Libs' , are we going to ban knife ' s now?

124»

Comments

  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,488 Standard Supporter

    Swaye said:

    It makes me sad that so many people in America are actually willing to give away (or allow regulation of) RIGHTS, for a little personal safety. Rights are not granted by the government. They are owned by us. The government doesn't get to give me permission to defend my life.

    Not in my lifetime, thank God, but someday, in the future, we will have gone so pussy as to disarm ourselves, and then complain when Big Brother rams whatever it wants up our collective asses. Pathetic really.

    We will all be Sounders fans in 50 years, when the NFL has been banned for being barbaric, guns are gone because we wanted to feel safe, and the meat is murder crowd has us all eating tofu. Sounds fun, if you are a latte drinking metrosexual faggot.

    On that note, I am now going to shave my face with a bowie knife and spit, drive my V-8 powered pollution spewing Jeep to the forest, and lash out at nature with an instrument of death - the 12 gauge. While in the forest I will have a 10MM holstered just in case a bear tries to rape my face. It feels good to be an American, even if only for a little while longer. Some of you should try it, when your balls drop.

    I had a guy yesterday explaining how great it was that the city of Portland taxes every adult to fund art. The tax is simply based on the fact the person is living in Portland. He felt the end justified the government taking money by force. I asked him if he believed in it so passionately, how much did he give to the arts before the government forced everyone to do it.. of course it was zero. I then asked if it was such a good deal, why don't people give voluntarily? He said if it wasn't a tax, people wouldn't donate enough. I said it sounded like it's not that important to people then... crickets...then.."well, I pay it gladly". It should be noted this person's kids play Lacrosse and they are big Timbers fans.
    Say whatever you want about Portland socialists or soccer, but if you're going to start bashing lacrosse I'm out.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    As long as the government has guns, the people should have guns. It's that fucking simple.

    Let me know how that works out for you when the government comes with tanks and helicopters.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZbG9i1oGPA

    This guy only lasted one day with a freaking bulldozer tank. Unless you can construe the 2nd amendment to mean that the average American should be able to field F-18's, M1A1'a and tactical nukes, it looks like the battle's already been lost. Any of these guys still alive?
    I certainly have libertarian leaning when it comes to the cops, but really what can you do outside of martyring yourself to the pigs? Best course is still to affect the system from the inside.
    So you're saying since the government is so well armed that the citizens should be unarmed? Huh? When I say the government I don't mean just the military. The local cops and state patrol are bullies with guns.

    In a large scale rebellion, of course individuals are out armed. We have the best equipped military in the history or the world. That scenario would require part of the military to side with the rebellion. It's happened before, here and elsewhere.

    OBK doesn't seem to think so..........
    OBL (RIP) >>> OBK
  • AZDuckAZDuck Member Posts: 15,381
    Most kids should be armed these days.
    /thread
  • puppylove_sugarsteelpuppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133

    Now a kid is being labeled a HERO for pulling the fire alarm, and a principal for tackling the 16 year old perp. That doesn't make you a hero bitch, that's doing your job. How hard is it for a grown man to tackle a scrawny 16 - year old?

    I'm growing tired of this "hero" label being thrown around. Fuck man, a hero runs into a burning fire to save a baby. American firefighters won't even do that anymore.

    Since when is tackling a kid stabbing people part of the principal's job? Also how big was the principal vs how big was the kid who had a weapon?

    He should be called a hero as it is deserved. Why are you so damn angry all the time?
    Why are you such a cunt all the time? A grown man, 2× the size of a 16 year old with a fucking kitchen knife, should be able to tackle the little kiddy and beat him to a pulp.

    Being that you are 40 and 135lbs with skinny jeans excludes you from the equation. That 16 year-old would kick your ass more_cunt, so step out of the debate. This is for grown men.

    But "hero" nobody was. It's just being a fucking american. Being called a hero for pulling a fire alarm is a disgrace. I'm pissed and embarrased. HERO ' S are my current and long lost family members who fought in World Wars, and every other war that protected our liberties and freedom in this country. Not some little pucker head like more_time who pulled a fire alarm

    The term Hero gets thrown around too loosely nowdays. All the "HERO FIRE FIGHTERS " from 9-11 are now suing the local and federal government. No true 'heros'" do that shit. Fuck you more_cock-n-balls. You are a pathetic american, and it shows in your posts you piece of cunt.

    I don't post on the football bored much anymore, nor does anybody else with bored cred. Why? Because of your worthless over-contribution. Hopefully you voluntarily pack up your shit and leave again. You're the only one that takes this place personally. Fuck man, most of us come to talk football; like maybe who got booted or who's coming back from suspension.

    You're whole miserable day revolves around this shit pile You and slice buried this joint. Good day, fuck off!
  • oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288

    As long as the government has guns, the people should have guns. It's that fucking simple.

    Let me know how that works out for you when the government comes with tanks and helicopters.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZbG9i1oGPA

    This guy only lasted one day with a freaking bulldozer tank. Unless you can construe the 2nd amendment to mean that the average American should be able to field F-18's, M1A1'a and tactical nukes, it looks like the battle's already been lost. Any of these guys still alive?
    I certainly have libertarian leaning when it comes to the cops, but really what can you do outside of martyring yourself to the pigs? Best course is still to affect the system from the inside.
    So you're saying since the government is so well armed that the citizens should be unarmed? Huh? When I say the government I don't mean just the military. The local cops and state patrol are bullies with guns.

    In a large scale rebellion, of course individuals are out armed. We have the best equipped military in the history or the world. That scenario would require part of the military to side with the rebellion. It's happened before, here and elsewhere.

    OBK doesn't seem to think so..........
    OBL (RIP) >>> OBK
    Only three >>>. Does this mean I'm closing the gap?
  • oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288

    As long as the government has guns, the people should have guns. It's that fucking simple.

    Let me know how that works out for you when the government comes with tanks and helicopters.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZbG9i1oGPA

    This guy only lasted one day with a freaking bulldozer tank. Unless you can construe the 2nd amendment to mean that the average American should be able to field F-18's, M1A1'a and tactical nukes, it looks like the battle's already been lost. Any of these guys still alive?
    I certainly have libertarian leaning when it comes to the cops, but really what can you do outside of martyring yourself to the pigs? Best course is still to affect the system from the inside.
    So you're saying since the government is so well armed that the citizens should be unarmed? Huh? When I say the government I don't mean just the military. The local cops and state patrol are bullies with guns.

    In a large scale rebellion, of course individuals are out armed. We have the best equipped military in the history or the world. That scenario would require part of the military to side with the rebellion. It's happened before, here and elsewhere.

    OBK doesn't seem to think so..........
    Disagree. We have the best equipped cuntry. But that doesn't mean we overwhelm Russia as if We were Alabama and they were Cal. We don't have the best equipped economy.
  • oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    edited April 2014
    I think the little cunt should be put up on a giant circus target board and let the families of the victims hurl knives at him until their desire for vengeance is slaked.
  • oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    Kip Kinkel's silence in this thread speaks volumes.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    edited April 2014

    The only pro gun argument that holds any weight with me is that you need them in case the government tries some Hitler shit. Other than that, they do way more harm than good.

    I assume you believe if we outright ban them then no way criminals will be able to get a hold of them correct?
    I don't want to ban guns for the reason I laid out in my first post. I know it's unlikely, but you can't have the government owning all the guns in case some Hitler shit happens.

    To hypothetically answer your question, if guns were banned, make it a minimum 50 year sentence for possession.

    A lot of the pro-gun arguments are really fucking stupid. What if my house gets broken in? Most robberies happen 9-5 when they know the home owners are at work. Even if you have a gun in a safe, you probably won't have time if an armed robber comes in at night.
    You are such a cunt Roadie. You're bordering on cockus and slice territory. You three go live on an island somewhere where guns aren't needed. Even there, I guarantee you tardo's that ya'll wished you had one at some point. This is america jack. If you don't want a gun fine. But don't publicly crucify the majority- the others want and need them.

    Most kids should be armed these days. I'd hate to be your son. I'd demand my dad dad take me through a hunting safety firearm class. Then when i turned 18 I'd be responsible and educated enough to carry my own.

    And when joe CRIPP OR BLOOD comes to steel my $60k duramax at a stoplight, I'd politely blow his fucking brains out....While you would just hand over the keys like the pussy you are. Good luck with that cell phone, Mr Blood would take that too.
    You can't drive. Or fire a gun. Or live anywhere near a blood or crip. Other than that...solid poast.

    HTH.
    I drive and fire just fine . You still buy that wheelchair bullshit? . thats why you're still flapping seat covers up at Lowes<</b>

    You are either lying now or you are a giant piece of shit for having everyone believe that you were a quadriplegic. Either way you are a liar.
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,614
    edited April 2014

    The only pro gun argument that holds any weight with me is that you need them in case the government tries some Hitler shit. Other than that, they do way more harm than good.

    I assume you believe if we outright ban them then no way criminals will be able to get a hold of them correct?
    I don't want to ban guns for the reason I laid out in my first post. I know it's unlikely, but you can't have the government owning all the guns in case some Hitler shit happens.

    To hypothetically answer your question, if guns were banned, make it a minimum 50 year sentence for possession.

    A lot of the pro-gun arguments are really fucking stupid. What if my house gets broken in? Most robberies happen 9-5 when they know the home owners are at work. Even if you have a gun in a safe, you probably won't have time if an armed robber comes in at night.
    You are such a cunt Roadie. You're bordering on cockus and slice territory. You three go live on an island somewhere where guns aren't needed. Even there, I guarantee you tardo's that ya'll wished you had one at some point. This is america jack. If you don't want a gun fine. But don't publicly crucify the majority- the others want and need them.

    Most kids should be armed these days. I'd hate to be your son. I'd demand my dad dad take me through a hunting safety firearm class. Then when i turned 18 I'd be responsible and educated enough to carry my own.

    And when joe CRIPP OR BLOOD comes to steel my $60k duramax at a stoplight, I'd politely blow his fucking brains out....While you would just hand over the keys like the pussy you are. Good luck with that cell phone, Mr Blood would take that too.
    You can't drive. Or fire a gun. Or live anywhere near a blood or crip. Other than that...solid poast.

    HTH.
    I drive and fire just fine . You still buy that wheelchair bullshit? . thats why you're still flapping seat covers up at Lowes

    You are either lying now or you are a giant piece of shit for having everyone believe that you were a quadriplegic. Either way you are a liar it will be interesting.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 11,453

    Now a kid is being labeled a HERO for pulling the fire alarm, and a principal for tackling the 16 year old perp. That doesn't make you a hero bitch, that's doing your job. How hard is it for a grown man to tackle a scrawny 16 - year old?

    I'm growing tired of this "hero" label being thrown around. Fuck man, a hero runs into a burning fire to save a baby. American firefighters won't even do that anymore.

    Since when is tackling a kid stabbing people part of the principal's job? Also how big was the principal vs how big was the kid who had a weapon?

    He should be called a hero as it is deserved. Why are you so damn angry all the time?


    Being that you are 40 and 135lbs with skinny jeans excludes you from the equation.

    I don't post on the football bored much anymore, nor does anybody else with bored cred.

    /blockquote>

    So now I'm 40 years old? I thought I was too young to remember the Lambo years? At least attempt to stay consistent in your incoherent rants.

    You don't post on the football bored because you got tired of getting your ass handed to you. Nobody worth a shit has stopped posting on the football bored.

    HTH
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,488 Standard Supporter
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 11,453

    Great HTML as always, @He_Needs_More_Tags

    Don't put that shit on me. That's on PLSS. Every time anyone goes to quote him it's all fucked up since he fucks it all up.

    Some of you need to learn the difference.
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,488 Standard Supporter

    Great HTML as always, @He_Needs_More_Tags

    Don't put that shit on me. That's on PLSS. Every time anyone goes to quote him it's all fucked up since he fucks it all up.

    Some of you need to learn the difference.
    I'll just wait until you get your own code in there.
  • Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,564 Founders Club
    edited April 2014

    The only pro gun argument that holds any weight with me is that you need them in case the government tries some Hitler shit. Other than that, they do way more harm than good.

    That whole second amendment thing is overrated.

    It is, and it still will be even if they outlawed them completely. I do think the system in general needs to be tightened up but to just get rid of guns outright isn't going to do anything.
    we shouldn't completely get rid of guns but it will do something. Gun death and violence in other countries is way lower.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    As long as the government has guns, the people should have guns. It's that fucking simple.

    Let me know how that works out for you when the government comes with tanks and helicopters.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZbG9i1oGPA

    This guy only lasted one day with a freaking bulldozer tank. Unless you can construe the 2nd amendment to mean that the average American should be able to field F-18's, M1A1'a and tactical nukes, it looks like the battle's already been lost. Any of these guys still alive?
    I certainly have libertarian leaning when it comes to the cops, but really what can you do outside of martyring yourself to the pigs? Best course is still to affect the system from the inside.
    So you're saying since the government is so well armed that the citizens should be unarmed? Huh? When I say the government I don't mean just the military. The local cops and state patrol are bullies with guns.

    In a large scale rebellion, of course individuals are out armed. We have the best equipped military in the history or the world. That scenario would require part of the military to side with the rebellion. It's happened before, here and elsewhere.

    OBK doesn't seem to think so..........
    OBL (RIP) >>> OBK
    Only three >>>. Does this mean I'm closing the gap?
    Your efforts have been great lately.
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 25,564 Swaye's Wigwam

    As long as the government has guns, the people should have guns. It's that fucking simple.

    Let me know how that works out for you when the government comes with tanks and helicopters.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZbG9i1oGPA

    This guy only lasted one day with a freaking bulldozer tank. Unless you can construe the 2nd amendment to mean that the average American should be able to field F-18's, M1A1'a and tactical nukes, it looks like the battle's already been lost. Any of these guys still alive?
    I certainly have libertarian leaning when it comes to the cops, but really what can you do outside of martyring yourself to the pigs? Best course is still to affect the system from the inside.
    So you're saying since the government is so well armed that the citizens should be unarmed? Huh? When I say the government I don't mean just the military. The local cops and state patrol are bullies with guns.

    In a large scale rebellion, of course individuals are out armed. We have the best equipped military in the history or the world. That scenario would require part of the military to side with the rebellion. It's happened before, here and elsewhere.

    OBK doesn't seem to think so..........
    We don't have the best equipped economy.
    Yes we do, and it's not even close. Die in a fire or move back to your Russian motherland; just stop leaching off American society.
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,849

    The only pro gun argument that holds any weight with me is that you need them in case the government tries some Hitler shit. Other than that, they do way more harm than good.


    Agreed. When someone breaks into your house, simply use reason with them. Chances are they will see the error of their ways. And you might make a new friend. Someone to mentor in the future.
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    edited April 2014
    salemcoog said:

    The only pro gun argument that holds any weight with me is that you need them in case the government tries some Hitler shit. Other than that, they do way more harm than good.


    Agreed. When someone breaks into your house, simply use reason with them. Chances are they will see the error of their ways. And you might make a new friend. Someone to mentor in the future.
    You missed the point. I have no issue with someone having a gun to protect themselves at their home.
Sign In or Register to comment.