Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Shaq Thompson and Lavon Coleman impressing Petersen

2»

Comments

  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 26,796 Swaye's Wigwam

    Sure is a lot of talk about offensive skill position players when that is one of the smallest problems UW has had in the past few seasons.

    Fucking this.

    The lines win or lose games
  • CuntWaffleCuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    Sark always had/brought in good skill players. However, as PGOS mentioned his line (for both sides of the ball) was so fucking drecky that it also hindered what the skill players could do.
  • Dawgfan406Dawgfan406 Member Posts: 192
    edited April 2014
    AZDuck said:

    PL_SS:

    Running back by Committee doesn't replace Sankey. The question is are there any backs on the roster that scare opposing defensive coordinators? Can't say that yet, so your generalizations show your ignorance you son of a cunt. Maybe your daddy didn't explain that to you at all those games he took you to (that none of us went to). Keep chugging along there sweettits, this football thing will catch on eventually.
    Worked for us at RB:

    image

    Doog

    In 2011 the ducks were blowing most teams out. It wasn't fucking "RB by committee" A lot of those scrubs got carries in garbage time. A couple backup QB's on your list. The ducks had 2 solid RB's and a speedster in Deanthony thomas.

    In their biggest game, the 2012 rose bowl they only used said 3 rb's and their qb to rush the ball.

    http://scores.espn.go.com/ncf/boxscore?gameId=320022483

    http://www.fbschedules.com/ncaa-11/pac-10/2011-oregon-ducks-football-schedule.php
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 11,453

    Sure is a lot of talk about offensive skill position players when that is one of the smallest problems UW has had in the past few seasons.


    Well up above I did mention all five starting OL are back. They also have a real OL coach instead of a guy you don't want to see get mad.

    The entire DL is back as well as the LB's which is why I'm excited for this upcoming year.

    Conversely, in 2015 UW will return most of their skill guys but lose the entire DL, bulk of the OL(With no real replacements) and their LB's so that could be a transition year.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    This team also ran a RB by committee as well........

    http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/schools/washington/1991.html

    That team also had to replace a Doak Walker award winner at RB. I'm sure PLSSFS was worried back then too.
  • AtomicDawgAtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,233 Standard Supporter

    Adam Jude ‏@A_Jude 32m
    I think it's safe to say Shaq at running back is no longer an experiment. It's happening.


    Adam Jude ‏@A_Jude 33m
    Shaq Thompson (@ST7_ERA) has had 2 carries in this UW scrimmage. First was an easy 20-yard gain. Second went 76 yards for a touchdown.


    I think Shaq could be our Myles Jack this year and he could be that impact guy.

    Petersen will do it the right way. Ucla was too gimmicky with miles jack. No way uw does that. It's just a fad.
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123

    Adam Jude ‏@A_Jude 32m
    I think it's safe to say Shaq at running back is no longer an experiment. It's happening.


    Adam Jude ‏@A_Jude 33m
    Shaq Thompson (@ST7_ERA) has had 2 carries in this UW scrimmage. First was an easy 20-yard gain. Second went 76 yards for a touchdown.


    I think Shaq could be our Myles Jack this year and he could be that impact guy.

    Petersen will do it the right way. Ucla was too gimmicky with miles jack. No way uw does that. It's just a fad.
    Kim would never admit it but he'd hate to see a Petersen vs Mora for the Pac-12 title. He'd act fake happy for Petersen but it would burn him. He'd pull a PLSS with Lambo and just give all the credit to Sark.

    I've said it before. It's so personal when it comes to Petersen and Mora for Kim. It burns him because most everyone here thinks highly of them and knows Sark sucks. He doesn't care about the program at all.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 11,453

    Adam Jude ‏@A_Jude 32m
    I think it's safe to say Shaq at running back is no longer an experiment. It's happening.


    Adam Jude ‏@A_Jude 33m
    Shaq Thompson (@ST7_ERA) has had 2 carries in this UW scrimmage. First was an easy 20-yard gain. Second went 76 yards for a touchdown.


    I think Shaq could be our Myles Jack this year and he could be that impact guy.

    Petersen will do it the right way. Ucla was too gimmicky with miles jack. No way uw does that. It's just a fad.
    Kim would never admit it but he'd hate to see a Petersen vs Mora for the Pac-12 title. He'd act fake happy for Petersen but it would burn him. He'd pull a PLSS with Lambo and just give all the credit to Sark.

    I've said it before. It's so personal when it comes to Petersen and Mora for Kim. It burns him because most everyone here thinks highly of them and knows Sark sucks. He doesn't care about the program at all.
    It's very obvious it's personal too that he wanted Nuss over Petersen. He won't ever give Petersen credit. Like I said in previews he always makes sure to point out how much talent Sark left behind.

    If Sark fails at USC he'll have an excuse quick on hand. He'll also be a bitch and go "But how does that prove he failed at UW ?".
  • DooglesDoogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,616 Founders Club

    Adam Jude ‏@A_Jude 32m
    I think it's safe to say Shaq at running back is no longer an experiment. It's happening.


    Adam Jude ‏@A_Jude 33m
    Shaq Thompson (@ST7_ERA) has had 2 carries in this UW scrimmage. First was an easy 20-yard gain. Second went 76 yards for a touchdown.


    I think Shaq could be our Myles Jack this year and he could be that impact guy.

    Sweatpants boner doubling.
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,939
    We all forget that Shaq was an underclassman learning a new position the last couple of years ... and he still performed at a relatively high level.

    Now, he's an upperclassman playing a position that he should now have complete control of.

    The expectation would be for him to be a dominant player as an upperclassman ... we're seeing that right now in practice.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    Tequilla said:

    We all forget that Shaq was an underclassman learning a new position the last couple of years ... and he still performed at a relatively high level.

    Now, he's an upperclassman playing a position that he should now have complete control of.

    The expectation would be for him to be a dominant player as an upperclassman ... we're seeing that right now in practice.

    We didn't forget that at all. Myles Jack was a freshman last year and made a major impact for UCLA. Shaq made a major impact for the Huskies as a freshman while as a sophomore was very mediocre.

    With a real coaching staff I don't think that will be the problem.

    Sark brought in three five stars in his career and not one lived up to the hype. ASJ was better as a freshman than he was a junior. Kasen is a solid possession WR but nothing more.

    With real coaches you'll actually see this "great" talent that Kim always brags about being put to actual use.
Sign In or Register to comment.