No disrespect to the owner of this website, because I like the content in the articles you have posted.
But from what I've seen so far, this board is fucking pathetic. It's basically like the same 5 or 10 guys saying the same fucking thing over and over and over and over. Fire Sark. Talk about beating a dead horse... Just keep talking about how much Sark sucks. I swear that's pretty much the only thing I've ever read from a lot of the posters on this board.
Don't be such a vag about it. Form a compelling argument about why Sark should keep his job. I'll grant you that you won't get a lot of people on this board to change their mind, but the more you flip out about it, the more retarded you're going to look. Just try to figure out some of the inside jokes, don't take the people here (or yourself) too seriously, and if Sark wins the fucking Rose Bowl next year you can tell is all about how right you were on January 2nd, 2014. If you can't handle it, go over to Dawgman and pay $120/year for Kim's opinions and narcissism.
No disrespect to the owner of this website, because I like the content in the articles you have posted.
But from what I've seen so far, this board is fucking pathetic. It's basically like the same 5 or 10 guys saying the same fucking thing over and over and over and over. Fire Sark. Talk about beating a dead horse... Just keep talking about how much Sark sucks. I swear that's pretty much the only thing I've ever read from a lot of the posters on this board.
Don't be such a vag about it. Form a compelling argument about why Sark should keep his job. I'll grant you that you won't get a lot of people on this board to change their mind, but the more you flip out about it, the more retarded you're going to look. Just try to figure out some of the inside jokes, don't take the people here (or yourself) too seriously, and if Sark wins the fucking Rose Bowl next year you can tell is all about how right you were on January 2nd, 2014. If you can't handle it, go over to Dawgman and pay $120/year for Kim's opinions and narcissism.
I figured out the inside joke. You don't talk about football, you guys jerk each other off all day.
No disrespect to the owner of this website, because I like the content in the articles you have posted.
But from what I've seen so far, this board is fucking pathetic. It's basically like the same 5 or 10 guys saying the same fucking thing over and over and over and over. Fire Sark. Talk about beating a dead horse... Just keep talking about how much Sark sucks. I swear that's pretty much the only thing I've ever read from a lot of the posters on this board.
Don't be such a vag about it. Form a compelling argument about why Sark should keep his job. I'll grant you that you won't get a lot of people on this board to change their mind, but the more you flip out about it, the more retarded you're going to look. Just try to figure out some of the inside jokes, don't take the people here (or yourself) too seriously, and if Sark wins the fucking Rose Bowl next year you can tell is all about how right you were on January 2nd, 2014. If you can't handle it, go over to Dawgman and pay $120/year for Kim's opinions and narcissism.
I figured out the inside joke. You don't talk about football, you guys jerk each other off all day.
No disrespect to the owner of this website, because I like the content in the articles you have posted.
But from what I've seen so far, this board is fucking pathetic. It's basically like the same 5 or 10 guys saying the same fucking thing over and over and over and over. Fire Sark. Talk about beating a dead horse... Just keep talking about how much Sark sucks. I swear that's pretty much the only thing I've ever read from a lot of the posters on this board.
Don't be such a vag about it. Form a compelling argument about why Sark should keep his job. I'll grant you that you won't get a lot of people on this board to change their mind, but the more you flip out about it, the more retarded you're going to look. Just try to figure out some of the inside jokes, don't take the people here (or yourself) too seriously, and if Sark wins the fucking Rose Bowl next year you can tell is all about how right you were on January 2nd, 2014. If you can't handle it, go over to Dawgman and pay $120/year for Kim's opinions and narcissism.
I figured out the inside joke. You don't talk about football, you guys jerk each other off all day.
I'm confused, you like the articles on this site and said Sark should be fired if he doesn't get 9 wins? Seems in-line with the vast majority here. Toughen up and next time use twat instead of cunt.
Lack of preparedness, direction, attitude, toughness, player development and accountability. These are coaching problems. I hope I'm wrong, but I don't see things changing until a new head coach takes over.
And after having a 12-1 season as BYU QB, and being a protege under Pete Carroll at USC, Sark knows absolutely nothing about how a winning team is built. He has never seen what a winning team looks like, has he?
So I guess you must have some kind of privileged insider's perspective of the UW program and you see the daily ins and outs of the program that leads you to the conclusion that nothing will change and Sark is not even close to building a winning team?
I watch the games. That's all I need to see to know that Sark is not even close to building a winning team.
HTH
7-6>7-6>7-6. Hope THAT helps.
And if we don't get to at least 9-4 in 2013 then its time to make some changes. But like I said before, I think we'll get 10 wins. We will win out at home this year, yes even beating the Ducks, finally!
You were doing pretty well until the "even beating the Yucks (LOL), finally!
We were playing them pretty good in the Eugene last year until the stupid mistakes killed us and they ran away with it. If we play a smart, physical game we can beat them this year.
Yeah, we sure played them great. It was 21-0 after the first fucking quarter you rotten, yeast infected cunt!
Oh, we got an interception on Oregon's first drive. We played them so tough! We had them right where we wanted them!
Okay you are right, I overstated it when I said we started out good. It truly was a sickening game to watch.
But cool it with the name calling you fucking internet board coward. I guarantee you would not call me that to my face, and if you did I would put you fucking face into the pavement.
NorthLakeDub, what is your name on dawgman? Yeah, Nick Saban had a mediocre record after four years and Frank Beamer was terrible in his first few years at Virginia Tech, but those are exceptions to the norm. Do you realize that?
I am not on Dawgman. I don't pay for any internet subscriptions, including the Seattle Times.
Honestly, no I did not realize that Saban is the exception to the norm. I also see that DJ was 6-5, 5-6, before 10-2 and winning the RB, and then went 7-4 again.
Please give me examples of coaches who took over a program from the depths of where UW was and won a conference title within 4 years. I am not asking that to be a smart ass either, I truly would like to know, to have something to compare our situation with.
And also, basically every situation is unique and different when a coaching hire is made, so I am not too overly concerned with "the norm".
In 4 years he took over a program that had far less talent than even us on our 0'fer year and had them winning a BCS bowl game and going 12-1. With the talent we have on hand, a Saban or Harbaugh type would have us at 9-10 wins next year, and competing for BCS bowls in year 2 imho.
I bet you fuck your ugly wife's fat cunt about once every 6 months, the rest of the time you need viagra and internet porn to get off you fucking pathetic loser.
This shit just got real. Only way to settle this is at the Aurora 7-11.
Comments
Cunt
"This is a new era for Husky football with the new stadium."
"Just because we have sucked the past few years doesn't mean we will this year."
"I think Sark is the guy because I think he's the guy. You guys have fun being negative."
NorthLake- Seriously, try dawgman. You will enjoy it there.
2006: Pre-Harbaugh 1-11
2007: Harbaugh 4-8
2008: 5-7
2009: 8-5
2010: 12-1
In 4 years he took over a program that had far less talent than even us on our 0'fer year and had them winning a BCS bowl game and going 12-1. With the talent we have on hand, a Saban or Harbaugh type would have us at 9-10 wins next year, and competing for BCS bowls in year 2 imho.