Home› Tug Tavern

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

If you watch the MSM you're either misinformed or uninformed

SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,926
in Tug Tavern

3/5 compromise was an effort to reduce the political representation of the slave holding states. The slave holding states would have loved to have counted every slave as a whole person in order to expand their political power. This is one of those claims that has been lied about by the left for 30 years and people have now heard it so many times they believe it.

· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,662 Standard Supporter
    SFGbob said:


    3/5 compromise was an effort to reduce the political representation of the slave holding states. The slave holding states would have loved to have counted every slave as a whole person in order to expand their political power. This is one of those claims that has been lied about by the left for 30 years and people have now heard it so many times they believe it.

    Both misinformed and uniformed and to make it worse, leftards are proudly both and wear their ignorance as a badge of honor.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,926
    WestlinnDuck said:

    SFGbob said:


    3/5 compromise was an effort to reduce the political representation of the slave holding states. The slave holding states would have loved to have counted every slave as a whole person in order to expand their political power. This is one of those claims that has been lied about by the left for 30 years and people have now heard it so many times they believe it.

    Both misinformed and uniformed and to make it worse, leftards are proudly both and wear their ignorance as a badge of honor.
    Watch the videos at the link and look how smug they are in their ignorance.

    Here's the big brain Ibram X. Kendi sticking his head up his ass on this very topic.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,765 Standard Supporter
    edited May 2021
    SFGbob said:

    WestlinnDuck said:

    SFGbob said:


    3/5 compromise was an effort to reduce the political representation of the slave holding states. The slave holding states would have loved to have counted every slave as a whole person in order to expand their political power. This is one of those claims that has been lied about by the left for 30 years and people have now heard it so many times they believe it.

    Both misinformed and uniformed and to make it worse, leftards are proudly both and wear their ignorance as a badge of honor.
    Watch the videos at the link and look how smug they are in their ignorance.

    Here's the big brain Ibram X. Kendi sticking his head up his ass on this very topic.

    Jesus Christ. The 3/5 compromise was to unite the North and the South into one common republic. That's why it was called a fucking compromise.

    Do these dumb fucking CRT dipships not understand that if there had been a Northern United States and a Southern United States, it's possible there still could be slavery? Remote possibility but it sure as fuck wouldn't have been eradicated in North America as soon as it was with a UNITED States of America. And odds are some form of English monarchy would still be in place?

    This is Man in the High Tower shit. The permutations of how things could have gone down without the 3/5 Compromise are mind-boggling.

    Like we say, fuck off, CRT dipshits.





    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,926
    edited May 2021
    The first time I ever heard this ignorance being spouted was on MTV's Real World in the early 90s. The black racist they had on the show was trying to brow beat the white Southern girl by telling her about what a racist country America is because the original Constitution didn't even count him as a whole person.




    That was nearly 30 years ago. This garbage have been pushed on people for all these years so that they now believe that a compromise, intended to limit the power of the slave holding states was really a "pro" slavery compromise.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,765 Standard Supporter
    SFGbob said:

    The first time I ever heard this ignorance being spouted was on MTV's Real World in the early 90s. The black racist they had on the show was trying to brow beat the white Southern girl be telling her about what a racist country America is because the original Constitution didn't even count him as a whole person.




    That was nearly 30 years ago. This garbage have been pushed on people for all these years so that they now believe that a compromise, intended to limit the power of the slave holding states was really a "pro" slavery compromise.

    Kevin was a cunt. Wood Julie.

    Puck would have kicked Kevin's ass if they'd been on the show together.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,926
    PurpleThrobber said:

    SFGbob said:

    WestlinnDuck said:

    SFGbob said:


    3/5 compromise was an effort to reduce the political representation of the slave holding states. The slave holding states would have loved to have counted every slave as a whole person in order to expand their political power. This is one of those claims that has been lied about by the left for 30 years and people have now heard it so many times they believe it.

    Both misinformed and uniformed and to make it worse, leftards are proudly both and wear their ignorance as a badge of honor.
    Watch the videos at the link and look how smug they are in their ignorance.

    Here's the big brain Ibram X. Kendi sticking his head up his ass on this very topic.

    Jesus Christ. The 3/5 compromise was to unite the North and the South into one common republic. That's why it was called a fucking compromise.

    Do these dumb fucking CRT dipships not understand that if there had been a Northern United States and a Southern United States, it's possible there still could be slavery? Remote possibility but it sure as fuck wouldn't have been eradicated in North America as soon as it was with a UNITED States of America. And odds are some form of English monarchy would still be in place?

    This is Man in the High Tower shit. The permutations of how things could have gone down without the 3/5 Compromise are mind-boggling.

    Like we say, fuck off, CRT dipshits.





    Slavery as an institution would have easily existed in the Southern US for another 30 to 40 years and possibly longer, if there would have been two countries instead of one.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogiedoogie Member Posts: 15,072
    Proper term is Educated.
    Such as:


    Thanks to Jay Inslee’s bold action, Washington School students will finally be educated.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • alumni94alumni94 Member Posts: 4,858
    People often bring this up to point out that the Constitution in racist. But remember; 1. Not all slaves were black, 2. Not all blacks were slaves. Native American's were also slaves, and many of the black people in the north were free.
    It had nothing to with race, but slavery. Stop trying to say otherwise.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited May 2021
    SFGbob said:


    3/5 compromise was an effort to reduce the political representation of the slave holding states. The slave holding states would have loved to have counted every slave as a whole person in order to expand their political power. This is one of those claims that has been lied about by the left for 30 years and people have now heard it so many times they believe it.

    What part of compromise don’t they understand. JFC. Rewriting history. It’s embarrassing and frightening. It’s like we now how 24 year olds in charge of the news.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,926
    MikeDamone said:

    SFGbob said:


    3/5 compromise was an effort to reduce the political representation of the slave holding states. The slave holding states would have loved to have counted every slave as a whole person in order to expand their political power. This is one of those claims that has been lied about by the left for 30 years and people have now heard it so many times they believe it.

    What part of compromise don’t they understand. JFC. Rewriting history. It’s embarrassing and frightening. It’s like we now how 24 year olds in charge of the news.
    Yeah but it was a pro-slavery "compromise!!!" How did you like Ibram's kunt logic that of course the 3/5 Compromise was a pro-slavery position, why do you think so many of the first President's were slaveholders?

    And he is considered to be one of the left's deeeeep thinkers on issues of race.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    alumni94 said:

    People often bring this up to point out that the Constitution in racist. But remember; 1. Not all slaves were black, 2. Not all blacks were slaves. Native American's were also slaves, and many of the black people in the north were free.
    It had nothing to with race, but slavery. Stop trying to say otherwise.

    Here’s a good book it. Written by “Uncle” Thomas Sowell.

    https://www.amazon.com/Black-Rednecks-Liberals-Thomas-Sowell/dp/1594031436/ref=nodl_
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,407 Standard Supporter
    Gosh I wonder if slave owners could have influenced their slaves votes......
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.