Well we knew it was going to happen
Comments
-
In the first attempt the whole world knew that the Russian dossier was fake. In particular the rat leadership knew because their own candidate and dnc paid for the fake dossier. They knew it was fake but rat leaders like swalwell and that low life scum from California schiff lied and said they had proof. They fucking flat out lied to the American people over and over again. This is nothing new from the left. Your side lied over and over again about keeping their doctors and their insurance. Your team wanted to impeach and tried to impeach based upon lies.HHusky said:
Unproven > baselessSFGbob said:What an odd way to report on a story they had no proof in support of right Dazzler? And of course without double standards Dazzler would have no standards. Dazzler's big defense of Biden is that there is no proof he is corrupt and the fact that he surrounded by family members who are corrupt means nothing. But Dazzler was all in on this story despite there being zero evidence to support it.
The second time the Ukraine President went on record telling rat leadership and anyone who would listen that there was no quid pro quo but you and your leadership went ahead with it anyway. Your side said they were going to get rid of Trump even before the fake dossier was introduced and "evidence" that Trump had colluded.
Show some integrity. This isn't a FEELINGS issue HH. -
Bounties: We don't have access to the raw intelligence the reports were based on.SFGbob said:
There was never any evidence to support it. The media reported on it as if it were a fact. It was a smear job that came out of the CIA. There were no facts to support it. The CIA's claim was baseless. Funny how your standards for evidence and proof shift with your desired political outcome.HHusky said:
Unproven > baselessSFGbob said:What an odd way to report on a story they had no proof in support of right Dazzler? And of course without double standards Dazzler would have no standards. Dazzler's big defense of Biden is that there is no proof he is corrupt and the fact that he surrounded by family members who are corrupt means nothing. But Dazzler was all in on this story despite there being zero evidence to support it.
Joe Biden's "corruption": There are no similar constraints. You can release evidence of the "big guy's cut" any time you want. Why haven't you? -
A three year investigation would have, but there wasn't. If there was any accurate raw intelligence reports on bounties they would have been leaked/released. So, know we get there was no evidence and yet you still swallow and work the balls. I pity your clients.HHusky said:
Bounties: We don't have access to the raw intelligence the reports were based on.SFGbob said:
There was never any evidence to support it. The media reported on it as if it were a fact. It was a smear job that came out of the CIA. There were no facts to support it. The CIA's claim was baseless. Funny how your standards for evidence and proof shift with your desired political outcome.HHusky said:
Unproven > baselessSFGbob said:What an odd way to report on a story they had no proof in support of right Dazzler? And of course without double standards Dazzler would have no standards. Dazzler's big defense of Biden is that there is no proof he is corrupt and the fact that he surrounded by family members who are corrupt means nothing. But Dazzler was all in on this story despite there being zero evidence to support it.
Joe Biden's "corruption": There are no similar constraints. You can release evidence of the "big guy's cut" any time you want. Why haven't you? -
The evidence has already been revealed. you and your leaders just chose to ignore it.HHusky said:
Bounties: We don't have access to the raw intelligence the reports were based on.SFGbob said:
There was never any evidence to support it. The media reported on it as if it were a fact. It was a smear job that came out of the CIA. There were no facts to support it. The CIA's claim was baseless. Funny how your standards for evidence and proof shift with your desired political outcome.HHusky said:
Unproven > baselessSFGbob said:What an odd way to report on a story they had no proof in support of right Dazzler? And of course without double standards Dazzler would have no standards. Dazzler's big defense of Biden is that there is no proof he is corrupt and the fact that he surrounded by family members who are corrupt means nothing. But Dazzler was all in on this story despite there being zero evidence to support it.
Joe Biden's "corruption": There are no similar constraints. You can release evidence of the "big guy's cut" any time you want. Why haven't you? -
So how much did Joe get?Bendintheriver said:
The evidence has already been revealed. you and your leaders just chose to ignore it.HHusky said:
Bounties: We don't have access to the raw intelligence the reports were based on.SFGbob said:
There was never any evidence to support it. The media reported on it as if it were a fact. It was a smear job that came out of the CIA. There were no facts to support it. The CIA's claim was baseless. Funny how your standards for evidence and proof shift with your desired political outcome.HHusky said:
Unproven > baselessSFGbob said:What an odd way to report on a story they had no proof in support of right Dazzler? And of course without double standards Dazzler would have no standards. Dazzler's big defense of Biden is that there is no proof he is corrupt and the fact that he surrounded by family members who are corrupt means nothing. But Dazzler was all in on this story despite there being zero evidence to support it.
Joe Biden's "corruption": There are no similar constraints. You can release evidence of the "big guy's cut" any time you want. Why haven't you? -
There was evidence released, you ignored it. Called it a "pant load" and Russian disinformation. Fuck off.HHusky said:
Bounties: We don't have access to the raw intelligence the reports were based on.SFGbob said:
There was never any evidence to support it. The media reported on it as if it were a fact. It was a smear job that came out of the CIA. There were no facts to support it. The CIA's claim was baseless. Funny how your standards for evidence and proof shift with your desired political outcome.HHusky said:
Unproven > baselessSFGbob said:What an odd way to report on a story they had no proof in support of right Dazzler? And of course without double standards Dazzler would have no standards. Dazzler's big defense of Biden is that there is no proof he is corrupt and the fact that he surrounded by family members who are corrupt means nothing. But Dazzler was all in on this story despite there being zero evidence to support it.
Joe Biden's "corruption": There are no similar constraints. You can release evidence of the "big guy's cut" any time you want. Why haven't you? -
So how much did the Big Guy get?SFGbob said:
There was evidence released, you ignored it. Called it a "pant load" and Russian disinformation. Fuck off.HHusky said:
Bounties: We don't have access to the raw intelligence the reports were based on.SFGbob said:
There was never any evidence to support it. The media reported on it as if it were a fact. It was a smear job that came out of the CIA. There were no facts to support it. The CIA's claim was baseless. Funny how your standards for evidence and proof shift with your desired political outcome.HHusky said:
Unproven > baselessSFGbob said:What an odd way to report on a story they had no proof in support of right Dazzler? And of course without double standards Dazzler would have no standards. Dazzler's big defense of Biden is that there is no proof he is corrupt and the fact that he surrounded by family members who are corrupt means nothing. But Dazzler was all in on this story despite there being zero evidence to support it.
Joe Biden's "corruption": There are no similar constraints. You can release evidence of the "big guy's cut" any time you want. Why haven't you? -
I don't know. When his son said he was tired of supporting him he didn't give dollar amounts. WHen their business partner stepped forward and told evidently everyone but you and your leaders and press that biden was knee deep in the shit he didn't give a dollar amount either. If I said 1 million to you, it still wouldn't make a difference. You seem to like to look the other way when it is a rat.HHusky said:
So how much did Joe get?Bendintheriver said:
The evidence has already been revealed. you and your leaders just chose to ignore it.HHusky said:
Bounties: We don't have access to the raw intelligence the reports were based on.SFGbob said:
There was never any evidence to support it. The media reported on it as if it were a fact. It was a smear job that came out of the CIA. There were no facts to support it. The CIA's claim was baseless. Funny how your standards for evidence and proof shift with your desired political outcome.HHusky said:
Unproven > baselessSFGbob said:What an odd way to report on a story they had no proof in support of right Dazzler? And of course without double standards Dazzler would have no standards. Dazzler's big defense of Biden is that there is no proof he is corrupt and the fact that he surrounded by family members who are corrupt means nothing. But Dazzler was all in on this story despite there being zero evidence to support it.
Joe Biden's "corruption": There are no similar constraints. You can release evidence of the "big guy's cut" any time you want. Why haven't you? -
You can start by taking your motherfucking mask off and burning it in front of a major corporation or a store.Bendintheriver said:The rats are now trying to take over the Supreme Court starting today. We knew it was going to happen. We knew that idiot biden was a liar.
This is fascism. Real fascism in action.
We already know that pelosi is trying to overturn a MI election. We see their movement towards totalitarian capitalism which is in many cases a tenet of fascism. A reverse and perverse racialism (everyone white is a racist except of course the elitist white liberal leaders). The repopulation of our country with a illegal aliens who form a consistent dependent voting block. A complete control of the media. The forcing of corporate control through punishment of independent actions and behaviors. A huge handout to further enslave people thus ensuring they will never vote for anyone who might even hint that they need to exercise personal responsibility. Efforts to take away rights for gun ownership and the freedom of speech. The incitement and then the acceptance of murder, beatings, looting, burning and terrorism against any and all who disagree. And finally the take over of our supreme court through stacking.
I don't know about all of you, but I have had enough. I am going to find a way to get involved. This is sickening to watch.
If you have a more cowardly temperament and prefer a lighter approach, and absolutely must wear a muzzle,
make yourself a sign, something like - Covid 1984 = Nazi Germany, hang it around your neck, as a fuck you
not only to your government, but to every store and corporation you enter. It may wake some bitches up.
The Mask, the "Vax" and the 5g towers are the most visible symbols of their Nazism. All of these things have
been forced on you without your consent.
-
So this massive "cut" has no dollar value attached.Bendintheriver said:
I don't know. When his son said he was tired of supporting him he didn't give dollar amounts. WHen their business partner stepped forward and told evidently everyone but you and your leaders and press that biden was knee deep in the shit he didn't give a dollar amount either. If I said 1 million to you, it still wouldn't make a difference. You seem to like to look the other way when it is a rat.HHusky said:
So how much did Joe get?Bendintheriver said:
The evidence has already been revealed. you and your leaders just chose to ignore it.HHusky said:
Bounties: We don't have access to the raw intelligence the reports were based on.SFGbob said:
There was never any evidence to support it. The media reported on it as if it were a fact. It was a smear job that came out of the CIA. There were no facts to support it. The CIA's claim was baseless. Funny how your standards for evidence and proof shift with your desired political outcome.HHusky said:
Unproven > baselessSFGbob said:What an odd way to report on a story they had no proof in support of right Dazzler? And of course without double standards Dazzler would have no standards. Dazzler's big defense of Biden is that there is no proof he is corrupt and the fact that he surrounded by family members who are corrupt means nothing. But Dazzler was all in on this story despite there being zero evidence to support it.
Joe Biden's "corruption": There are no similar constraints. You can release evidence of the "big guy's cut" any time you want. Why haven't you?
big -
One of your more pathetic effortsHHusky said:
So this massive "cut" has no dollar value attached.Bendintheriver said:
I don't know. When his son said he was tired of supporting him he didn't give dollar amounts. WHen their business partner stepped forward and told evidently everyone but you and your leaders and press that biden was knee deep in the shit he didn't give a dollar amount either. If I said 1 million to you, it still wouldn't make a difference. You seem to like to look the other way when it is a rat.HHusky said:
So how much did Joe get?Bendintheriver said:
The evidence has already been revealed. you and your leaders just chose to ignore it.HHusky said:
Bounties: We don't have access to the raw intelligence the reports were based on.SFGbob said:
There was never any evidence to support it. The media reported on it as if it were a fact. It was a smear job that came out of the CIA. There were no facts to support it. The CIA's claim was baseless. Funny how your standards for evidence and proof shift with your desired political outcome.HHusky said:
Unproven > baselessSFGbob said:What an odd way to report on a story they had no proof in support of right Dazzler? And of course without double standards Dazzler would have no standards. Dazzler's big defense of Biden is that there is no proof he is corrupt and the fact that he surrounded by family members who are corrupt means nothing. But Dazzler was all in on this story despite there being zero evidence to support it.
Joe Biden's "corruption": There are no similar constraints. You can release evidence of the "big guy's cut" any time you want. Why haven't you?
big
Which is saying something -
It appears Race is off work for the day.RaceBannon said:
One of your more pathetic effortsHHusky said:
So this massive "cut" has no dollar value attached.Bendintheriver said:
I don't know. When his son said he was tired of supporting him he didn't give dollar amounts. WHen their business partner stepped forward and told evidently everyone but you and your leaders and press that biden was knee deep in the shit he didn't give a dollar amount either. If I said 1 million to you, it still wouldn't make a difference. You seem to like to look the other way when it is a rat.HHusky said:
So how much did Joe get?Bendintheriver said:
The evidence has already been revealed. you and your leaders just chose to ignore it.HHusky said:
Bounties: We don't have access to the raw intelligence the reports were based on.SFGbob said:
There was never any evidence to support it. The media reported on it as if it were a fact. It was a smear job that came out of the CIA. There were no facts to support it. The CIA's claim was baseless. Funny how your standards for evidence and proof shift with your desired political outcome.HHusky said:
Unproven > baselessSFGbob said:What an odd way to report on a story they had no proof in support of right Dazzler? And of course without double standards Dazzler would have no standards. Dazzler's big defense of Biden is that there is no proof he is corrupt and the fact that he surrounded by family members who are corrupt means nothing. But Dazzler was all in on this story despite there being zero evidence to support it.
Joe Biden's "corruption": There are no similar constraints. You can release evidence of the "big guy's cut" any time you want. Why haven't you?
big
Which is saying something
And likely drinking.
Which means you're fucked, @HHusky. -
One of them was Mitt.HHusky said:
"Fake impeachment" being a charge that 53 US Senators accepted as having been proven. Followed by a "fake impeachment" in which 57 US Senators actually voted to convict.Bendintheriver said:
Yeah, four years of rats lying and trying to take away my vote through a fake impeachment was a real pain.MelloDawg said:
Real pain when people try to do that, huh?Bendintheriver said:The rats are now trying to take over the Supreme Court starting today. We knew it was going to happen. We knew that idiot biden was a liar.
This is fascism. Real fascism in action.
We already know that pelosi is trying to overturn a MI election. We see their movement towards totalitarian capitalism which is in many cases a tenet of fascism. A reverse and perverse racialism (everyone white is a racist except of course the elitist white liberal leaders). The repopulation of our country with a illegal aliens who form a consistent dependent voting block. A complete control of the media. The forcing of corporate control through punishment of independent actions and behaviors. A huge handout to further enslave people thus ensuring they will never vote for anyone who might even hint that they need to exercise personal responsibility. Efforts to take away rights for gun ownership and the freedom of speech. The incitement and then the acceptance of murder, beatings, looting, burning and terrorism against any and all who disagree. And finally the take over of our supreme court through stacking.
I don't know about all of you, but I have had enough. I am going to find a way to get involved. This is sickening to watch.
Now why don't you give us an example of how anyone has tried to take away your vote or change an election like you rats continue to try and do.
That kind of "fake".
Mr Fake himself. -
leftist cocksuckers think everything will be a great utopia when this country is less and less whiteSFGbob said:We were still letting in over a Million legal immigrants a year under Trump but to a leftists that's a "gutted" immigration system.
-
The 2A’s first targets will be the left, so that’s fitting.Sledog said:
The left's first target will be the 2A. History says so.Bendintheriver said:The rats are now trying to take over the Supreme Court starting today. We knew it was going to happen. We knew that idiot biden was a liar.
This is fascism. Real fascism in action.
We already know that pelosi is trying to overturn a MI election. We see their movement towards totalitarian capitalism which is in many cases a tenet of fascism. A reverse and perverse racialism (everyone white is a racist except of course the elitist white liberal leaders). The repopulation of our country with a illegal aliens who form a consistent dependent voting block. A complete control of the media. The forcing of corporate control through punishment of independent actions and behaviors. A huge handout to further enslave people thus ensuring they will never vote for anyone who might even hint that they need to exercise personal responsibility. Efforts to take away rights for gun ownership and the freedom of speech. The incitement and then the acceptance of murder, beatings, looting, burning and terrorism against any and all who disagree. And finally the take over of our supreme court through stacking.
I don't know about all of you, but I have had enough. I am going to find a way to get involved. This is sickening to watch. -
I doubt it. Like the French revolution, the left will eventually eat itself, but the first target will be the non-woke gun owners.EsophagealFeces said:
The 2A’s first targets will be the left, so that’s fitting.Sledog said:
The left's first target will be the 2A. History says so.Bendintheriver said:The rats are now trying to take over the Supreme Court starting today. We knew it was going to happen. We knew that idiot biden was a liar.
This is fascism. Real fascism in action.
We already know that pelosi is trying to overturn a MI election. We see their movement towards totalitarian capitalism which is in many cases a tenet of fascism. A reverse and perverse racialism (everyone white is a racist except of course the elitist white liberal leaders). The repopulation of our country with a illegal aliens who form a consistent dependent voting block. A complete control of the media. The forcing of corporate control through punishment of independent actions and behaviors. A huge handout to further enslave people thus ensuring they will never vote for anyone who might even hint that they need to exercise personal responsibility. Efforts to take away rights for gun ownership and the freedom of speech. The incitement and then the acceptance of murder, beatings, looting, burning and terrorism against any and all who disagree. And finally the take over of our supreme court through stacking.
I don't know about all of you, but I have had enough. I am going to find a way to get involved. This is sickening to watch. -
WestlinnDuck said:
I doubt it. Like the French revolution, the left will eventually eat itself, but the first target will be the non-woke gun owners.EsophagealFeces said:
The 2A’s first targets will be the left, so that’s fitting.Sledog said:
The left's first target will be the 2A. History says so.Bendintheriver said:The rats are now trying to take over the Supreme Court starting today. We knew it was going to happen. We knew that idiot biden was a liar.
This is fascism. Real fascism in action.
We already know that pelosi is trying to overturn a MI election. We see their movement towards totalitarian capitalism which is in many cases a tenet of fascism. A reverse and perverse racialism (everyone white is a racist except of course the elitist white liberal leaders). The repopulation of our country with a illegal aliens who form a consistent dependent voting block. A complete control of the media. The forcing of corporate control through punishment of independent actions and behaviors. A huge handout to further enslave people thus ensuring they will never vote for anyone who might even hint that they need to exercise personal responsibility. Efforts to take away rights for gun ownership and the freedom of speech. The incitement and then the acceptance of murder, beatings, looting, burning and terrorism against any and all who disagree. And finally the take over of our supreme court through stacking.
I don't know about all of you, but I have had enough. I am going to find a way to get involved. This is sickening to watch.
that's been ongoing for a while at a community level (my work friend and I used to vote pretty heavily Dimocrat - SJWs we know started to drive us out gradually)WestlinnDuck said:
I doubt it. Like the French revolution, the left will eventually eat itself, but the first target will be the non-woke gun owners.EsophagealFeces said:
The 2A’s first targets will be the left, so that’s fitting.Sledog said:
The left's first target will be the 2A. History says so.Bendintheriver said:The rats are now trying to take over the Supreme Court starting today. We knew it was going to happen. We knew that idiot biden was a liar.
This is fascism. Real fascism in action.
We already know that pelosi is trying to overturn a MI election. We see their movement towards totalitarian capitalism which is in many cases a tenet of fascism. A reverse and perverse racialism (everyone white is a racist except of course the elitist white liberal leaders). The repopulation of our country with a illegal aliens who form a consistent dependent voting block. A complete control of the media. The forcing of corporate control through punishment of independent actions and behaviors. A huge handout to further enslave people thus ensuring they will never vote for anyone who might even hint that they need to exercise personal responsibility. Efforts to take away rights for gun ownership and the freedom of speech. The incitement and then the acceptance of murder, beatings, looting, burning and terrorism against any and all who disagree. And finally the take over of our supreme court through stacking.
I don't know about all of you, but I have had enough. I am going to find a way to get involved. This is sickening to watch.
Now the politicians and corporations have joined in -
The next time you post something of value will be your first. Good Christ just embarassing.HHusky said:
So this massive "cut" has no dollar value attached.Bendintheriver said:
I don't know. When his son said he was tired of supporting him he didn't give dollar amounts. WHen their business partner stepped forward and told evidently everyone but you and your leaders and press that biden was knee deep in the shit he didn't give a dollar amount either. If I said 1 million to you, it still wouldn't make a difference. You seem to like to look the other way when it is a rat.HHusky said:
So how much did Joe get?Bendintheriver said:
The evidence has already been revealed. you and your leaders just chose to ignore it.HHusky said:
Bounties: We don't have access to the raw intelligence the reports were based on.SFGbob said:
There was never any evidence to support it. The media reported on it as if it were a fact. It was a smear job that came out of the CIA. There were no facts to support it. The CIA's claim was baseless. Funny how your standards for evidence and proof shift with your desired political outcome.HHusky said:
Unproven > baselessSFGbob said:What an odd way to report on a story they had no proof in support of right Dazzler? And of course without double standards Dazzler would have no standards. Dazzler's big defense of Biden is that there is no proof he is corrupt and the fact that he surrounded by family members who are corrupt means nothing. But Dazzler was all in on this story despite there being zero evidence to support it.
Joe Biden's "corruption": There are no similar constraints. You can release evidence of the "big guy's cut" any time you want. Why haven't you?
big
