Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Kali loves the pedo's

13

Comments

  • Houhusky
    Houhusky Member Posts: 5,537
    edited September 2020
    dnc said:

    Doogles said:

    The spin i'm seeing on my social media is that it's about equality of rights. If you are a guy who bangs an underage chick, there are considerations a judge can make based on the situation that wouldn't automatically force you to register as a sex offender (think boyfriend goes to college and comes back home on thanksgiving break to the high school party and something happens).

    Then make the rule a 4 year gap.

    10 is absolutely fucked.
    The general socially acceptable rule that works for most ages is "your age"/2 + 7

    I think I only ever went to one high school party once I for college, I was back in town and drove my younger sibling to the party, ended up banging the hot mom obviously still trying to live out her popular high school days, the lay was pretty mediocre, the party sucked, left early and never went back.

    The only guy I ever knew that frequented high school parties after leaving for college ended up being arrested on sexual assault and sex with a minor charges a few years ago.

  • HustlinOwl
    HustlinOwl Member Posts: 953
    Sledog said:

    That a 21 year old can bang an 11 year old makes no sense what so ever! But then we're talking democrats and the guy writing it is probably a pedophile.

    I haven't read the bill, but doesn't sound like it makes the 21 year olds actions legal. There's a better than reasonable chance the 21 year old is murdered while serving his 20 year prison sentence, so no need to register as a sex offender if you're dead.
  • GreenRiverGatorz
    GreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,168
    Sledog said:

    That a 21 year old can bang an 11 year old makes no sense what so ever! But then we're talking democrats and the guy writing it is probably a pedophile.

    It doesn't make sense. It's also still not legal and irrelevant to this bill.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,788 Standard Supporter
    edited September 2020

    Sledog said:

    That a 21 year old can bang an 11 year old makes no sense what so ever! But then we're talking democrats and the guy writing it is probably a pedophile.

    I haven't read the bill, but doesn't sound like it makes the 21 year olds actions legal. There's a better than reasonable chance the 21 year old is murdered while serving his 20 year prison sentence, so no need to register as a sex offender if you're dead.
    Up to a 10 year difference in age. You can manage that math? THAT MEANS AN 18 YEAR OLD CAN MOLEST AN 8 YEAR OLD AND NOT BE A SEX OFFENDER! A liberal judge (Kali is loaded with them) can not name them a sex offender. If it doesn't make it legal exactly what does it make it? Why do they need a bill if banging kids is OK already?

    I'll wait.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,215
    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    That a 21 year old can bang an 11 year old makes no sense what so ever! But then we're talking democrats and the guy writing it is probably a pedophile.

    I haven't read the bill, but doesn't sound like it makes the 21 year olds actions legal. There's a better than reasonable chance the 21 year old is murdered while serving his 20 year prison sentence, so no need to register as a sex offender if you're dead.
    Up to a 10 year difference in age. You can manage that math? THAT MEANS AN 18 YEAR OLD CAN MOLEST AN 8 YEAR OLD AND NOT BE A SEX OFFENDER! A liberal judge (Kali is loaded with them) can not name them a sex offender. If it doesn't make it legal exactly what does it make it? Why do they need a bill if banging kids is OK already?

    I'll wait.
    I think there is a provision that all bets are off if the underage person is less than 14 years old. Still, a 15 year old and a 25 year old are not exactly on equal footing.
  • GreenRiverGatorz
    GreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,168
    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    That a 21 year old can bang an 11 year old makes no sense what so ever! But then we're talking democrats and the guy writing it is probably a pedophile.

    I haven't read the bill, but doesn't sound like it makes the 21 year olds actions legal. There's a better than reasonable chance the 21 year old is murdered while serving his 20 year prison sentence, so no need to register as a sex offender if you're dead.
    Up to a 10 year difference in age. You can manage that math? THAT MEANS AN 18 YEAR OLD CAN MOLEST AN 8 YEAR OLD AND NOT BE A SEX OFFENDER! A liberal judge (Kali is loaded with them) can not name them a sex offender. If it doesn't make it legal exactly what does it make it? Why do they need a bill if banging kids is OK already?

    I'll wait.
    You do understand that something can be illegal, and still include a lengthy prison sentence, without requiring the sex offender designation, right?

    This isn't hard.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,060 Founders Club
    Houhusky said:

    dnc said:

    Doogles said:

    The spin i'm seeing on my social media is that it's about equality of rights. If you are a guy who bangs an underage chick, there are considerations a judge can make based on the situation that wouldn't automatically force you to register as a sex offender (think boyfriend goes to college and comes back home on thanksgiving break to the high school party and something happens).

    Then make the rule a 4 year gap.

    10 is absolutely fucked.
    The general socially acceptable rule that works for most ages is "your age"/2 + 7

    I think I only ever went to one high school party once I for college, I was back in town and drove my younger sibling to the party, ended up banging the hot mom obviously still trying to live out her popular high school days, the lay was pretty mediocre, the party sucked, left early and never went back.

    The only guy I ever knew that frequented high school parties after leaving for college ended up being arrested on sexual assault and sex with a minor charges a few years ago.

    58 divided by 2 = 29 - 7 = 22

    My assistant was 22 when I was 58 and I felt like a dirty old man. The fact that I am is not relevant. But I was married and she would have said no anyway so whatever
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,554 Swaye's Wigwam
    dnc said:

    I was told that the priests were chasing young boys was because the Church prohibited them from marrying hot women. Not sure how that applied to gay as phuck former Portland mayor Sam Adams and his underage intern.



    I mean the celibacy of the priesthood is problematic (lol!) but I think the required singleness attracts those wrestling with homosexual tendencies as much as it produces them.

    That's my very outside perspective. Would love to hear @GrundleStiltzkin's diagnosis.
    100%. It’s a good place for those men to hide, especially ones from Catholic families that probably wouldn’t fully accept them being gay.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,788 Standard Supporter

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    That a 21 year old can bang an 11 year old makes no sense what so ever! But then we're talking democrats and the guy writing it is probably a pedophile.

    I haven't read the bill, but doesn't sound like it makes the 21 year olds actions legal. There's a better than reasonable chance the 21 year old is murdered while serving his 20 year prison sentence, so no need to register as a sex offender if you're dead.
    Up to a 10 year difference in age. You can manage that math? THAT MEANS AN 18 YEAR OLD CAN MOLEST AN 8 YEAR OLD AND NOT BE A SEX OFFENDER! A liberal judge (Kali is loaded with them) can not name them a sex offender. If it doesn't make it legal exactly what does it make it? Why do they need a bill if banging kids is OK already?

    I'll wait.
    You do understand that something can be illegal, and still include a lengthy prison sentence, without requiring the sex offender designation, right?

    This isn't hard.
    And it isn't right!
  • Houhusky
    Houhusky Member Posts: 5,537
    edited September 2020

    Houhusky said:

    dnc said:

    Doogles said:

    The spin i'm seeing on my social media is that it's about equality of rights. If you are a guy who bangs an underage chick, there are considerations a judge can make based on the situation that wouldn't automatically force you to register as a sex offender (think boyfriend goes to college and comes back home on thanksgiving break to the high school party and something happens).

    Then make the rule a 4 year gap.

    10 is absolutely fucked.
    The general socially acceptable rule that works for most ages is "your age"/2 + 7

    I think I only ever went to one high school party once I for college, I was back in town and drove my younger sibling to the party, ended up banging the hot mom obviously still trying to live out her popular high school days, the lay was pretty mediocre, the party sucked, left early and never went back.

    The only guy I ever knew that frequented high school parties after leaving for college ended up being arrested on sexual assault and sex with a minor charges a few years ago.

    58 divided by 2 = 29 - 7 = 22

    My assistant was 22 when I was 58 and I felt like a dirty old man. The fact that I am is not relevant. But I was married and she would have said no anyway so whatever
    Its a "plus" 7

    58/2 + 7 = 36+

    sneaky, trickster, old man... better watch yourself before you get sent to one of the covid community homes.