Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

We beat them without our leading receiver.

135

Comments

  • lawsandl
    lawsandl Member Posts: 1,555
    BearsWiin said:

    lawsandl said:

    BearsWiin said:

    They beat Cal by ten at Autzen when we? had no Garbers

    Looking forward to derstroying their repeat hopes in Berkeley next fall

    Look at you...a cheez it bowl win and you’re flexing.
    Redbox motherfucker
    Ha!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,282
    PandaOrangeChiknDuck said:

    Redd was good this year, but Pittman is the same player with better hands. In all honesty, replacing Redd with Pittman was a slight upgrade.

    Not until it happens. Redd has 10X the number of big plays Pittman has. It's not real until it's real.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ntxduck
    ntxduck Member Posts: 6,231
    BearsWiin said:

    ntxduck said:

    BearsWiin said:

    They beat Cal by ten at Autzen when we? had no Garbers

    Looking forward to derstroying their repeat hopes in Berkeley next fall

    You guys suck are undefeated with garbers.
    Usc beat your ass and he played half the game. Good next year without that cherub cheeked fatboy
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BearsWiin
    BearsWiin Member Posts: 5,076
    ntxduck said:

    BearsWiin said:

    ntxduck said:

    BearsWiin said:

    They beat Cal by ten at Autzen when we? had no Garbers

    Looking forward to derstroying their repeat hopes in Berkeley next fall

    You guys suck are undefeated with garbers.
    Usc beat your ass and he played half the game. Good next year without that cherub cheeked fatboy
    Cal lost the two games where he left with an injury. Cal won every game (7) that he started and finished
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ntxduck
    ntxduck Member Posts: 6,231
    edited January 2020
    BearsWiin said:

    ntxduck said:

    BearsWiin said:

    ntxduck said:

    BearsWiin said:

    They beat Cal by ten at Autzen when we? had no Garbers

    Looking forward to derstroying their repeat hopes in Berkeley next fall

    You guys suck are undefeated with garbers.
    Usc beat your ass and he played half the game. Good next year without that cherub cheeked fatboy
    Cal lost the two games where he left with an injury. Cal won every game (7) that he started and finished
    Must be nice to not count games you leave with an injury in as losses.

    Let’s hang the 2007 natty banner.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BearsWiin
    BearsWiin Member Posts: 5,076
    Dixon wasn't coming back after 2007. It's not unreasonable for Cal fans to be optimistic about next year because we? were significuntly better with our returning QB than without him.

    Funny you should mention 2007.

    https://youtu.be/1MV3c7VEQxU
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ntxduck
    ntxduck Member Posts: 6,231
    ntxduck said:

    BearsWiin said:

    ntxduck said:

    BearsWiin said:

    ntxduck said:

    BearsWiin said:

    They beat Cal by ten at Autzen when we? had no Garbers

    Looking forward to derstroying their repeat hopes in Berkeley next fall

    You guys suck are undefeated with garbers.
    Usc beat your ass and he played half the game. Good next year without that cherub cheeked fatboy
    Cal lost the two games where he left with an injury. Cal won every game (7) that he started and finished
    Must be nice to not count games you leave with an injury in as losses.
    BearsWiin said:

    Dixon wasn't coming back after 2007. It's not unreasonable for Cal fans to be optimistic about next year because we? were significuntly better with our returning QB than without him.

    Funny you should mention 2007.

    https://youtu.be/1MV3c7VEQxU

    You’re better with him. And by better, maybe 8-4 instead of 7-5 or whatever the fuck meaningless season you cobbled together this year. So maybe you’ll make the sun bowl
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dtd
    dtd Member Posts: 5,599 Standard Supporter
    PandaOrangeChiknDuck said:

    Redd was good this year, but Pittman is the same player with better hands. In all honesty, replacing Redd with Pittman was a slight upgrade.

    FFS, Pittman runs like he has sand bags on his ankles compared to Redd. Redd is the ONLY speed threat on the entire offense.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,282
    BearsWiin said:

    ntxduck said:

    BearsWiin said:

    ntxduck said:

    BearsWiin said:

    They beat Cal by ten at Autzen when we? had no Garbers

    Looking forward to derstroying their repeat hopes in Berkeley next fall

    You guys suck are undefeated with garbers.
    Usc beat your ass and he played half the game. Good next year without that cherub cheeked fatboy
    Cal lost the two games where he left with an injury. Cal won every game (7) that he started and finished
    JFC.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PandaOrangeChiknDuck
    PandaOrangeChiknDuck Member Posts: 545
    dtd said:

    PandaOrangeChiknDuck said:

    Redd was good this year, but Pittman is the same player with better hands. In all honesty, replacing Redd with Pittman was a slight upgrade.

    FFS, Pittman runs like he has sand bags on his ankles compared to Redd. Redd is the ONLY speed threat on the entire offense.
    Pittman is deceptively illusion. Plus, I trust him to make the catch. Redd has had great moments, but Pittman is the best pass catcher on the team.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter