Maybe Durham's a whore, as blob suggested
Horowitz said he met with Durham in November to discuss the inspector general’s findings in his review of the Russia probe.
According to Horowitz’ account of the discussion, Durham disagreed with the Horowitz finding that there was an adequate basis to open a full investigation into the Trump campaign and Russia’s election interference. However, according to Horowitz, Durham conceded that there was an adequate predicate to open a preliminary investigation into the matter.
Durham’s statement Monday was ambiguous about where he disagreed with Horowitz.
In his testimony Wednesday, Horowitz said that there nothing that Barr and Durham offered him in their discussions before the report was released that led him to alter his findings.
Comments
-
Rough day for you guys. Worried about CD.
-
Talking points memo?
How precious
We can wait for Durham to speak for himself
Like he did -
Which fact do you quarrel with?RaceBannon said:Talking points memo?
How precious
We can wait for Durham to speak for himself
Like he did
Durham could let his report talk specifically. Not what he chose to do. Just another in a long list of people who once had good reputations they sacrificed in fealty to Daddy? -
Yawn
We waited this long for horrible talking points like this?
Sad -
I know you girls hate our norms and conventions as well as our institutions, but prosecutors keep their fucking mouths shut while conducting investigations . . . unless they're self-important hacks of course. (And this is why Comey should have done so too.)
-
You can watch Comey and Schiff run their mouth Sunday on the Chris Wallace showHHusky said:I know you girls hate our norms and conventions as well as our institutions, but prosecutors keep their fucking mouths shut while conducting investigations . . . unless they're self-important hacks of course. (And this is why Comey should have done so too.)
A little late to get religion now
Is it a norm and convention to launch an investigation on lies?
Fuck off -
Barr and Durham are saying "we're not Obama loyalists" just letting everyone know the truth will come out.
-
Hillary found your question very ironic when I mentioned it to her.RaceBannon said:
Is it a norm and convention to launch an investigation on lies?HHusky said:I know you girls hate our norms and conventions as well as our institutions, but prosecutors keep their fucking mouths shut while conducting investigations . . . unless they're self-important hacks of course. (And this is why Comey should have done so too.)
-
Benghazi bore fruit and Comey had to admit she broke the law on emailsHHusky said:
Hillary found your question very ironic when I mentioned it to her.RaceBannon said:
Is it a norm and convention to launch an investigation on lies?HHusky said:I know you girls hate our norms and conventions as well as our institutions, but prosecutors keep their fucking mouths shut while conducting investigations . . . unless they're self-important hacks of course. (And this is why Comey should have done so too.)
No irony to be found. Nor any legitimate comparison
Ask for better talking points -
Drip drip drip . . . I know.Sledog said:Barr and Durham are saying "we're not Obama loyalists" just letting everyone know the truth will come out.
I’ve heard it before. Hell, I heard it in connection with the IG’s report too.
-
The bar is so fucking low to open an investigation of course there was adequate predication to open one. That never been a claim I've ever denied. The question is did they have enough information to go forward and did they have enough solid evidence to secure a FISA warrant. Go fucking yourself O'Keefed,
-
Funny, does anyone recall this Kunt objecting when Mueller released his letter in response to Barr's statement?HHusky said:I know you girls hate our norms and conventions as well as our institutions, but prosecutors keep their fucking mouths shut while conducting investigations . . . unless they're self-important hacks of course. (And this is why Comey should have done so too.)
-
That was post investigation, madam, not mid investigation.SFGbob said:
Funny, does anyone recall this Kunt objecting when Mueller released his letter in response to Barr's statement?HHusky said:I know you girls hate our norms and conventions as well as our institutions, but prosecutors keep their fucking mouths shut while conducting investigations . . . unless they're self-important hacks of course. (And this is why Comey should have done so too.)
-
No it wasn't, suck harder.HHusky said:
That was post investigation, madam, not mid investigation.SFGbob said:
Funny, does anyone recall this Kunt objecting when Mueller released his letter in response to Barr's statement?HHusky said:I know you girls hate our norms and conventions as well as our institutions, but prosecutors keep their fucking mouths shut while conducting investigations . . . unless they're self-important hacks of course. (And this is why Comey should have done so too.)
-
Barr’s statement summarizing Mueller’s Report was post investigation. That’s how this whole chronological time concept works. I blame the U of O.SFGbob said:
No it wasn't, suck harder.HHusky said:
That was post investigation, madam, not mid investigation.SFGbob said:
Funny, does anyone recall this Kunt objecting when Mueller released his letter in response to Barr's statement?HHusky said:I know you girls hate our norms and conventions as well as our institutions, but prosecutors keep their fucking mouths shut while conducting investigations . . . unless they're self-important hacks of course. (And this is why Comey should have done so too.)
-
Stone's trial hadn't even started yet. Suck harder.HHusky said:
Barr’s statement summarizing Mueller’s Report was post investigation. That’s how this whole chronological time concept works. I blame the U of O.SFGbob said:
No it wasn't, suck harder.HHusky said:
That was post investigation, madam, not mid investigation.SFGbob said:
Funny, does anyone recall this Kunt objecting when Mueller released his letter in response to Barr's statement?HHusky said:I know you girls hate our norms and conventions as well as our institutions, but prosecutors keep their fucking mouths shut while conducting investigations . . . unless they're self-important hacks of course. (And this is why Comey should have done so too.)
-
IG report is exactly what it was supposed to be. An Obama appointee softening the blow as much as possible. But he can't hide all the facts.HHusky said:
Drip drip drip . . . I know.Sledog said:Barr and Durham are saying "we're not Obama loyalists" just letting everyone know the truth will come out.
I’ve heard it before. Hell, I heard it in connection with the IG’s report too.
I laughed when he was asked about whistle blowers on a compartmentalized investigation conducted by hand picked Trump haters.
Horowitz and Barr will prosecute people.
