Home› Tug Tavern

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Maybe Durham's a whore, as blob suggested

HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,625
in Tug Tavern
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/horowitz-durham-statement-surprised

Horowitz said he met with Durham in November to discuss the inspector general’s findings in his review of the Russia probe.

According to Horowitz’ account of the discussion, Durham disagreed with the Horowitz finding that there was an adequate basis to open a full investigation into the Trump campaign and Russia’s election interference. However, according to Horowitz, Durham conceded that there was an adequate predicate to open a preliminary investigation into the matter.



Durham’s statement Monday was ambiguous about where he disagreed with Horowitz.




In his testimony Wednesday, Horowitz said that there nothing that Barr and Durham offered him in their discussions before the report was released that led him to alter his findings.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • DooglesDoogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,615 Founders Club
    Rough day for you guys. Worried about CD.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,689 Founders Club
    Talking points memo?

    How precious

    We can wait for Durham to speak for himself

    Like he did
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,625
    RaceBannon said:

    Talking points memo?

    How precious

    We can wait for Durham to speak for himself

    Like he did

    Which fact do you quarrel with?

    Durham could let his report talk specifically. Not what he chose to do. Just another in a long list of people who once had good reputations they sacrificed in fealty to Daddy?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,689 Founders Club
    Yawn


    We waited this long for horrible talking points like this?

    Sad
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,625
    I know you girls hate our norms and conventions as well as our institutions, but prosecutors keep their fucking mouths shut while conducting investigations . . . unless they're self-important hacks of course. (And this is why Comey should have done so too.)
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,689 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    I know you girls hate our norms and conventions as well as our institutions, but prosecutors keep their fucking mouths shut while conducting investigations . . . unless they're self-important hacks of course. (And this is why Comey should have done so too.)

    You can watch Comey and Schiff run their mouth Sunday on the Chris Wallace show

    A little late to get religion now

    Is it a norm and convention to launch an investigation on lies?

    Fuck off
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,458 Standard Supporter
    Barr and Durham are saying "we're not Obama loyalists" just letting everyone know the truth will come out.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,625
    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    I know you girls hate our norms and conventions as well as our institutions, but prosecutors keep their fucking mouths shut while conducting investigations . . . unless they're self-important hacks of course. (And this is why Comey should have done so too.)

    Is it a norm and convention to launch an investigation on lies?

    Hillary found your question very ironic when I mentioned it to her.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,689 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    I know you girls hate our norms and conventions as well as our institutions, but prosecutors keep their fucking mouths shut while conducting investigations . . . unless they're self-important hacks of course. (And this is why Comey should have done so too.)

    Is it a norm and convention to launch an investigation on lies?

    Hillary found your question very ironic when I mentioned it to her.
    Benghazi bore fruit and Comey had to admit she broke the law on emails

    No irony to be found. Nor any legitimate comparison

    Ask for better talking points
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,625
    Sledog said:

    Barr and Durham are saying "we're not Obama loyalists" just letting everyone know the truth will come out.

    Drip drip drip . . . I know.

    I’ve heard it before. Hell, I heard it in connection with the IG’s report too.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,048
    The bar is so fucking low to open an investigation of course there was adequate predication to open one. That never been a claim I've ever denied. The question is did they have enough information to go forward and did they have enough solid evidence to secure a FISA warrant. Go fucking yourself O'Keefed,
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,048
    HHusky said:

    I know you girls hate our norms and conventions as well as our institutions, but prosecutors keep their fucking mouths shut while conducting investigations . . . unless they're self-important hacks of course. (And this is why Comey should have done so too.)

    Funny, does anyone recall this Kunt objecting when Mueller released his letter in response to Barr's statement?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,625
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    I know you girls hate our norms and conventions as well as our institutions, but prosecutors keep their fucking mouths shut while conducting investigations . . . unless they're self-important hacks of course. (And this is why Comey should have done so too.)

    Funny, does anyone recall this Kunt objecting when Mueller released his letter in response to Barr's statement?
    That was post investigation, madam, not mid investigation.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,048
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    I know you girls hate our norms and conventions as well as our institutions, but prosecutors keep their fucking mouths shut while conducting investigations . . . unless they're self-important hacks of course. (And this is why Comey should have done so too.)

    Funny, does anyone recall this Kunt objecting when Mueller released his letter in response to Barr's statement?
    That was post investigation, madam, not mid investigation.
    No it wasn't, suck harder.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,625
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    I know you girls hate our norms and conventions as well as our institutions, but prosecutors keep their fucking mouths shut while conducting investigations . . . unless they're self-important hacks of course. (And this is why Comey should have done so too.)

    Funny, does anyone recall this Kunt objecting when Mueller released his letter in response to Barr's statement?
    That was post investigation, madam, not mid investigation.
    No it wasn't, suck harder.
    Barr’s statement summarizing Mueller’s Report was post investigation. That’s how this whole chronological time concept works. I blame the U of O.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,048
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    I know you girls hate our norms and conventions as well as our institutions, but prosecutors keep their fucking mouths shut while conducting investigations . . . unless they're self-important hacks of course. (And this is why Comey should have done so too.)

    Funny, does anyone recall this Kunt objecting when Mueller released his letter in response to Barr's statement?
    That was post investigation, madam, not mid investigation.
    No it wasn't, suck harder.
    Barr’s statement summarizing Mueller’s Report was post investigation. That’s how this whole chronological time concept works. I blame the U of O.
    Stone's trial hadn't even started yet. Suck harder.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,458 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    Barr and Durham are saying "we're not Obama loyalists" just letting everyone know the truth will come out.

    Drip drip drip . . . I know.

    I’ve heard it before. Hell, I heard it in connection with the IG’s report too.
    IG report is exactly what it was supposed to be. An Obama appointee softening the blow as much as possible. But he can't hide all the facts.

    I laughed when he was asked about whistle blowers on a compartmentalized investigation conducted by hand picked Trump haters.

    Horowitz and Barr will prosecute people.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.