Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
So let's review.........
Bendintheriver
Member Posts: 6,188 
in Tug Tavern
How interesting that the lawyer for the WB is a dem connected operative. He is the worst of the worst of slimy lawyers and that comes as no surprise. When the left is cavorting and supporting people like Avenatti and Zaid you pretty much know what is coming and what is coming is a corrupted shit show from the left.
This POS was handing out copies of the Steele dossier to anyone who would take them in the media. He literally was handing out lies to our MSM.
The Whistle Blower's (WB) lawyer Mr. Zaid said this 19 minutes after the inauguration:
Mark Zaid, one of the attorneys representing the intelligence community whistleblower at the center of the Democrats' ongoing impeachment inquiry, tweeted conspicuously in January 2017 that a "coup has started" and that "impeachment will follow ultimately."
Then this jewel:
Then, in July 2017, Zaid remarked, "I predict @CNN will play a key role in @realDonaldTrump not finishing out his full term as president." Also that month, Zaid tweeted, "We will get rid of him, and this country is strong enough to survive even him and his supporters."
Here he is openly begging for WB's so that he can go after Trump. Clearly he found one such rat soldier. FFS rats, this is so obviously a sham:
Zaid put out something of an open casting call for whistleblowers on Twitter as Trump took office, writing that CIA employees should "come to" his law firm "to lawfully challenge" the new president.
This one is right from the lefts playbook. Their WB worked for one of the current candidates. Again rats, really?
Zaid acknowledged in a statement in October that his client "has come into contact with presidential candidates from both parties" -- but insisted that the contact involved the politicians' roles as "elected officials – not as candidates."
His abrupt disclosure came shortly after The Washington Examiner reported that Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson told lawmakers the whistleblower worked “or had some type of professional relationship” with one of the Democratic presidential candidates, citing three sources familiar with Atkinson’s interview with lawmakers last month.
Zaid and the other whistleblower attorneys did assert that the whistleblower "has never worked for or advised a political candidate, campaign or party" -- leaving open the possibility that the whistleblower did advise a current 2020 Democratic presidential candidate prior to his or her run for office.
This POS was handing out copies of the Steele dossier to anyone who would take them in the media. He literally was handing out lies to our MSM.
The Whistle Blower's (WB) lawyer Mr. Zaid said this 19 minutes after the inauguration:
Mark Zaid, one of the attorneys representing the intelligence community whistleblower at the center of the Democrats' ongoing impeachment inquiry, tweeted conspicuously in January 2017 that a "coup has started" and that "impeachment will follow ultimately."
Then this jewel:
Then, in July 2017, Zaid remarked, "I predict @CNN will play a key role in @realDonaldTrump not finishing out his full term as president." Also that month, Zaid tweeted, "We will get rid of him, and this country is strong enough to survive even him and his supporters."
Here he is openly begging for WB's so that he can go after Trump. Clearly he found one such rat soldier. FFS rats, this is so obviously a sham:
Zaid put out something of an open casting call for whistleblowers on Twitter as Trump took office, writing that CIA employees should "come to" his law firm "to lawfully challenge" the new president.
This one is right from the lefts playbook. Their WB worked for one of the current candidates. Again rats, really?
Zaid acknowledged in a statement in October that his client "has come into contact with presidential candidates from both parties" -- but insisted that the contact involved the politicians' roles as "elected officials – not as candidates."
His abrupt disclosure came shortly after The Washington Examiner reported that Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson told lawmakers the whistleblower worked “or had some type of professional relationship” with one of the Democratic presidential candidates, citing three sources familiar with Atkinson’s interview with lawmakers last month.
Zaid and the other whistleblower attorneys did assert that the whistleblower "has never worked for or advised a political candidate, campaign or party" -- leaving open the possibility that the whistleblower did advise a current 2020 Democratic presidential candidate prior to his or her run for office.