Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

A whiff of fraudulence around Petersen's Huskies

«134

Comments

  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    edited September 2019

    The loss was a shit loss any way you slice it, but I would've been less suicidal had it come in week 7 after a 6 - 0 start.

    The difference being we'd* know what the team is, while also knowing weird shit happens. As it is, we! are a messy 0-1 team.
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter

    The loss was a shit loss any way you slice it, but I would've been less suicidal had it come in week 7 after a 6 - 0 start.

    The difference being we'd* know what the team is, while also knowing weird shit happens. As it is, we! are a messy 0-1 team.
    I still think we are capable of beating any team left on the schedule. But that's certainly not going to happen and it's going to be a messy year.


    What what we know right now, I disagree. Not USC, Oregon, Utah, Stanford.

    Things change all the tim. LIPO, etc.
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,889 Founders Club

    The loss was a shit loss any way you slice it, but I would've been less suicidal had it come in week 7 after a 6 - 0 start.

    The difference being we'd* know what the team is, while also knowing weird shit happens. As it is, we! are a messy 0-1 team.
    I still think we are capable of beating any team left on the schedule. But that's certainly not going to happen and it's going to be a messy year.


    What what we know right now, I disagree. Not USC, Oregon, Utah, Stanford.

    Things change all the tim. LIPO, etc.
    I need more evidence before deciding if whether or not we are significant underdogs in all of those games. Sunday night was fucking weird man. We don't blame weather here at HH and I get that. It was still a bizarre setting.