Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
I’m for open boarders
Comments
-
We? would be a third world shit house if dopes like you were in charge. And while you and your people wouldn't mind that stadard of living, the rest us would. And there are more of us and than there are of you.oregonblitzkrieg said:You're not a libertarian, you're a corporatist stooge. Corporatist RINOs love open borders as much as radical regressives do. Two parties, same side, and you're on the same side they are.
-
The Constitution recognizes that there are Human Rights (which are inalienable) and there are Civil Rights (which can be limited through due process). The former are recognized by the government and the latter are granted by the government. Sounds like you lump them all into one category.MikeDamone said:
Sounds like you think rights come from the government. Great statist position.Sledog said:
No. people that are not citizens do not have the same rights and privileges as citizens. Freedom is for citizens not criminals. Same with our government programs.MikeDamone said:
No. But unjust laws are just that. Are you for liberty, freedom, capitalism and markets or not? You said “endorse the laws”. Why? Blankety enforce laws. Because laws. That’s what you said. It sounds like If you were around at the time, you’d have been all in on the fugitive slave act.Sledog said:
It's not 1860 HTH. Immigration is and will continue to be controlled by laws. They just need to be enforced after years of neglect. We don't have slaves anymore in America haven't for 159 years. Something contemporary might be helpful.MikeDamone said:
But you would have enforces the fugitive slave act be us it was the law, right?Sledog said:
Slavery is what conservatives fought to end HTH.MikeDamone said:
Sound like you’d have been in favor or the fugitive slave act. It was the law! Enforce it!Sledog said:
I'm anti criminal. Pretty simple. And I don't care where you're from!MikeDamone said:
So you’re also anti liberty, freedom and free markets and pro welfare state and state violence. Got it.Sledog said:Close the border and deport atl illegals ASAP. That's what I want. Immigration is a controlled process not an invasion.
Why the hell are you screwing around with this shit anyway? Not like you. I'm done with the chatter. -
Ummmm...no. I’m talking about the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. I didn’t mention civil rights at all.USMChawk said:
The Constitution recognizes that there are Human Rights (which are inalienable) and there are Civil Rights (which can be limited through due process). The former are recognized by the government and the latter are granted by the government. Sounds like you lump them all into one category.MikeDamone said:
Sounds like you think rights come from the government. Great statist position.Sledog said:
No. people that are not citizens do not have the same rights and privileges as citizens. Freedom is for citizens not criminals. Same with our government programs.MikeDamone said:
No. But unjust laws are just that. Are you for liberty, freedom, capitalism and markets or not? You said “endorse the laws”. Why? Blankety enforce laws. Because laws. That’s what you said. It sounds like If you were around at the time, you’d have been all in on the fugitive slave act.Sledog said:
It's not 1860 HTH. Immigration is and will continue to be controlled by laws. They just need to be enforced after years of neglect. We don't have slaves anymore in America haven't for 159 years. Something contemporary might be helpful.MikeDamone said:
But you would have enforces the fugitive slave act be us it was the law, right?Sledog said:
Slavery is what conservatives fought to end HTH.MikeDamone said:
Sound like you’d have been in favor or the fugitive slave act. It was the law! Enforce it!Sledog said:
I'm anti criminal. Pretty simple. And I don't care where you're from!MikeDamone said:
So you’re also anti liberty, freedom and free markets and pro welfare state and state violence. Got it.Sledog said:Close the border and deport atl illegals ASAP. That's what I want. Immigration is a controlled process not an invasion.
Why the hell are you screwing around with this shit anyway? Not like you. I'm done with the chatter. -
The conversation is about borders. Border control is a civil matter and is mandatory, per Article 4, section 4, of the Constitution.MikeDamone said:
Ummmm...no. I’m talking about the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. I didn’t mention civil rights at all.USMChawk said:
The Constitution recognizes that there are Human Rights (which are inalienable) and there are Civil Rights (which can be limited through due process). The former are recognized by the government and the latter are granted by the government. Sounds like you lump them all into one category.MikeDamone said:
Sounds like you think rights come from the government. Great statist position.Sledog said:
No. people that are not citizens do not have the same rights and privileges as citizens. Freedom is for citizens not criminals. Same with our government programs.MikeDamone said:
No. But unjust laws are just that. Are you for liberty, freedom, capitalism and markets or not? You said “endorse the laws”. Why? Blankety enforce laws. Because laws. That’s what you said. It sounds like If you were around at the time, you’d have been all in on the fugitive slave act.Sledog said:
It's not 1860 HTH. Immigration is and will continue to be controlled by laws. They just need to be enforced after years of neglect. We don't have slaves anymore in America haven't for 159 years. Something contemporary might be helpful.MikeDamone said:
But you would have enforces the fugitive slave act be us it was the law, right?Sledog said:
Slavery is what conservatives fought to end HTH.MikeDamone said:
Sound like you’d have been in favor or the fugitive slave act. It was the law! Enforce it!Sledog said:
I'm anti criminal. Pretty simple. And I don't care where you're from!MikeDamone said:
So you’re also anti liberty, freedom and free markets and pro welfare state and state violence. Got it.Sledog said:Close the border and deport atl illegals ASAP. That's what I want. Immigration is a controlled process not an invasion.
Why the hell are you screwing around with this shit anyway? Not like you. I'm done with the chatter. -
Have you been following along or just came in here at the end? Good Christ.USMChawk said:
The conversation is about borders. Border control is a civil matter and is mandatory, per Article 4, section 4, of the Constitution.MikeDamone said:
Ummmm...no. I’m talking about the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. I didn’t mention civil rights at all.USMChawk said:
The Constitution recognizes that there are Human Rights (which are inalienable) and there are Civil Rights (which can be limited through due process). The former are recognized by the government and the latter are granted by the government. Sounds like you lump them all into one category.MikeDamone said:
Sounds like you think rights come from the government. Great statist position.Sledog said:
No. people that are not citizens do not have the same rights and privileges as citizens. Freedom is for citizens not criminals. Same with our government programs.MikeDamone said:
No. But unjust laws are just that. Are you for liberty, freedom, capitalism and markets or not? You said “endorse the laws”. Why? Blankety enforce laws. Because laws. That’s what you said. It sounds like If you were around at the time, you’d have been all in on the fugitive slave act.Sledog said:
It's not 1860 HTH. Immigration is and will continue to be controlled by laws. They just need to be enforced after years of neglect. We don't have slaves anymore in America haven't for 159 years. Something contemporary might be helpful.MikeDamone said:
But you would have enforces the fugitive slave act be us it was the law, right?Sledog said:
Slavery is what conservatives fought to end HTH.MikeDamone said:
Sound like you’d have been in favor or the fugitive slave act. It was the law! Enforce it!Sledog said:
I'm anti criminal. Pretty simple. And I don't care where you're from!MikeDamone said:
So you’re also anti liberty, freedom and free markets and pro welfare state and state violence. Got it.Sledog said:Close the border and deport atl illegals ASAP. That's what I want. Immigration is a controlled process not an invasion.
Why the hell are you screwing around with this shit anyway? Not like you. I'm done with the chatter. -
What’s the title of the thread? I’m not Hondo, I understand context. You believe that life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness = open borders. I don’t.MikeDamone said:
Have you been following along or just came in here at the end? Good Christ.USMChawk said:
The conversation is about borders. Border control is a civil matter and is mandatory, per Article 4, section 4, of the Constitution.MikeDamone said:
Ummmm...no. I’m talking about the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. I didn’t mention civil rights at all.USMChawk said:
The Constitution recognizes that there are Human Rights (which are inalienable) and there are Civil Rights (which can be limited through due process). The former are recognized by the government and the latter are granted by the government. Sounds like you lump them all into one category.MikeDamone said:
Sounds like you think rights come from the government. Great statist position.Sledog said:
No. people that are not citizens do not have the same rights and privileges as citizens. Freedom is for citizens not criminals. Same with our government programs.MikeDamone said:
No. But unjust laws are just that. Are you for liberty, freedom, capitalism and markets or not? You said “endorse the laws”. Why? Blankety enforce laws. Because laws. That’s what you said. It sounds like If you were around at the time, you’d have been all in on the fugitive slave act.Sledog said:
It's not 1860 HTH. Immigration is and will continue to be controlled by laws. They just need to be enforced after years of neglect. We don't have slaves anymore in America haven't for 159 years. Something contemporary might be helpful.MikeDamone said:
But you would have enforces the fugitive slave act be us it was the law, right?Sledog said:
Slavery is what conservatives fought to end HTH.MikeDamone said:
Sound like you’d have been in favor or the fugitive slave act. It was the law! Enforce it!Sledog said:
I'm anti criminal. Pretty simple. And I don't care where you're from!MikeDamone said:
So you’re also anti liberty, freedom and free markets and pro welfare state and state violence. Got it.Sledog said:Close the border and deport atl illegals ASAP. That's what I want. Immigration is a controlled process not an invasion.
Why the hell are you screwing around with this shit anyway? Not like you. I'm done with the chatter. -
What does open boarders mean to you?USMChawk said:
What’s the title of the thread? I’m not Hondo, I understand context. You believe that life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness = open borders. I don’t.MikeDamone said:
Have you been following along or just came in here at the end? Good Christ.USMChawk said:
The conversation is about borders. Border control is a civil matter and is mandatory, per Article 4, section 4, of the Constitution.MikeDamone said:
Ummmm...no. I’m talking about the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. I didn’t mention civil rights at all.USMChawk said:
The Constitution recognizes that there are Human Rights (which are inalienable) and there are Civil Rights (which can be limited through due process). The former are recognized by the government and the latter are granted by the government. Sounds like you lump them all into one category.MikeDamone said:
Sounds like you think rights come from the government. Great statist position.Sledog said:
No. people that are not citizens do not have the same rights and privileges as citizens. Freedom is for citizens not criminals. Same with our government programs.MikeDamone said:
No. But unjust laws are just that. Are you for liberty, freedom, capitalism and markets or not? You said “endorse the laws”. Why? Blankety enforce laws. Because laws. That’s what you said. It sounds like If you were around at the time, you’d have been all in on the fugitive slave act.Sledog said:
It's not 1860 HTH. Immigration is and will continue to be controlled by laws. They just need to be enforced after years of neglect. We don't have slaves anymore in America haven't for 159 years. Something contemporary might be helpful.MikeDamone said:
But you would have enforces the fugitive slave act be us it was the law, right?Sledog said:
Slavery is what conservatives fought to end HTH.MikeDamone said:
Sound like you’d have been in favor or the fugitive slave act. It was the law! Enforce it!Sledog said:
I'm anti criminal. Pretty simple. And I don't care where you're from!MikeDamone said:
So you’re also anti liberty, freedom and free markets and pro welfare state and state violence. Got it.Sledog said:Close the border and deport atl illegals ASAP. That's what I want. Immigration is a controlled process not an invasion.
Why the hell are you screwing around with this shit anyway? Not like you. I'm done with the chatter. -
It’s your thread, what does it mean to you?MikeDamone said:
What does open boarders mean to you?USMChawk said:
What’s the title of the thread? I’m not Hondo, I understand context. You believe that life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness = open borders. I don’t.MikeDamone said:
Have you been following along or just came in here at the end? Good Christ.USMChawk said:
The conversation is about borders. Border control is a civil matter and is mandatory, per Article 4, section 4, of the Constitution.MikeDamone said:
Ummmm...no. I’m talking about the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. I didn’t mention civil rights at all.USMChawk said:
The Constitution recognizes that there are Human Rights (which are inalienable) and there are Civil Rights (which can be limited through due process). The former are recognized by the government and the latter are granted by the government. Sounds like you lump them all into one category.MikeDamone said:
Sounds like you think rights come from the government. Great statist position.Sledog said:
No. people that are not citizens do not have the same rights and privileges as citizens. Freedom is for citizens not criminals. Same with our government programs.MikeDamone said:
No. But unjust laws are just that. Are you for liberty, freedom, capitalism and markets or not? You said “endorse the laws”. Why? Blankety enforce laws. Because laws. That’s what you said. It sounds like If you were around at the time, you’d have been all in on the fugitive slave act.Sledog said:
It's not 1860 HTH. Immigration is and will continue to be controlled by laws. They just need to be enforced after years of neglect. We don't have slaves anymore in America haven't for 159 years. Something contemporary might be helpful.MikeDamone said:
But you would have enforces the fugitive slave act be us it was the law, right?Sledog said:
Slavery is what conservatives fought to end HTH.MikeDamone said:
Sound like you’d have been in favor or the fugitive slave act. It was the law! Enforce it!Sledog said:
I'm anti criminal. Pretty simple. And I don't care where you're from!MikeDamone said:
So you’re also anti liberty, freedom and free markets and pro welfare state and state violence. Got it.Sledog said:Close the border and deport atl illegals ASAP. That's what I want. Immigration is a controlled process not an invasion.
Why the hell are you screwing around with this shit anyway? Not like you. I'm done with the chatter. -
I’ve already answered that. Like I said, you must have just jumped in here at the end.USMChawk said:
It’s your thread, what does it mean to you?MikeDamone said:
What does open boarders mean to you?USMChawk said:
What’s the title of the thread? I’m not Hondo, I understand context. You believe that life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness = open borders. I don’t.MikeDamone said:
Have you been following along or just came in here at the end? Good Christ.USMChawk said:
The conversation is about borders. Border control is a civil matter and is mandatory, per Article 4, section 4, of the Constitution.MikeDamone said:
Ummmm...no. I’m talking about the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. I didn’t mention civil rights at all.USMChawk said:
The Constitution recognizes that there are Human Rights (which are inalienable) and there are Civil Rights (which can be limited through due process). The former are recognized by the government and the latter are granted by the government. Sounds like you lump them all into one category.MikeDamone said:
Sounds like you think rights come from the government. Great statist position.Sledog said:
No. people that are not citizens do not have the same rights and privileges as citizens. Freedom is for citizens not criminals. Same with our government programs.MikeDamone said:
No. But unjust laws are just that. Are you for liberty, freedom, capitalism and markets or not? You said “endorse the laws”. Why? Blankety enforce laws. Because laws. That’s what you said. It sounds like If you were around at the time, you’d have been all in on the fugitive slave act.Sledog said:
It's not 1860 HTH. Immigration is and will continue to be controlled by laws. They just need to be enforced after years of neglect. We don't have slaves anymore in America haven't for 159 years. Something contemporary might be helpful.MikeDamone said:
But you would have enforces the fugitive slave act be us it was the law, right?Sledog said:
Slavery is what conservatives fought to end HTH.MikeDamone said:
Sound like you’d have been in favor or the fugitive slave act. It was the law! Enforce it!Sledog said:
I'm anti criminal. Pretty simple. And I don't care where you're from!MikeDamone said:
So you’re also anti liberty, freedom and free markets and pro welfare state and state violence. Got it.Sledog said:Close the border and deport atl illegals ASAP. That's what I want. Immigration is a controlled process not an invasion.
Why the hell are you screwing around with this shit anyway? Not like you. I'm done with the chatter. -
I’m only for open borders if I can have my imperialism back.
