Sark got 13 games a year with a bowl and never got to 9 wins
People vastly underestimate what it takes to get to 10 or 11 and then to get to elite bowl winning natty contender 12-15 wins
Its why I always calm down and rehire Petersen. He's like Billy Martin and I'm like George Steinbrenner
I am skeptical on the cult of recruiting because that's what losers talk about (Hi Oregon) but these numbers have been working so far
Stay at 10 or above and keep winning this shitty conference while we wait impatiently
THIS. I think it's fine to be skeptical of the cult of recruiting, but it's not like Urban, Dabo and Nick Satan himself are winning big every year with classes ranked, say, 20 to 30. Those guys are elite coaches and they have elite playmakers across their roster.
I for one am glad Race is our GM because you don't fire the guy that win 10 plus games, wins the league and goes to big time bowls. We need to stay the course and let the 2017- 19 classes mature. Dabo is now the second best Corch in the country and took him 7.5 years to win a semi final game and 8.5 for the whole enchilada. This is the current gold standard.
I agree.
PS: Mark Richt won 10 games last year and almost won the Orange.
So long as UW's overall talent level continues to rise, these numbers look good. A few sexy home-and-homes with OOC bluebloods would really help.
You want to start every other year with a guaranteed loss?
Since coming to Seattle, Pete is 27-7 at home. Including 19-1 over the last three years. I want to host some bluebloods in Husky Stadium.
This is a really excellent poont. Obviously the most likely way to start winning some “big games”. Take the step, build the confidence, keep moving forward.
Sark got 13 games a year with a bowl and never got to 9 wins
People vastly underestimate what it takes to get to 10 or 11 and then to get to elite bowl winning natty contender 12-15 wins
Its why I always calm down and rehire Petersen. He's like Billy Martin and I'm like George Steinbrenner
I am skeptical on the cult of recruiting because that's what losers talk about (Hi Oregon) but these numbers have been working so far
Stay at 10 or above and keep winning this shitty conference while we wait impatiently
You definitely have not visited Bama, Clemson, Georgia, Oklahoma or Ohio State sites recently.
I will never say shit teams don't think recruiting will fix everything, they do. They lie to themselves that the problem is 'just talent' and they justify retaining Clay Helton (when the fucking EVIDENCE is the opposite) because of it.
Still, this skepticism is like saying 'I'm skeptical more money makes you hotter to women, you just need more game!'
DO MORE WITH MORE.
That's what Bammer, Climp, Boockeyes, Soooooooonurz etc all want to do. No one on Bama's sites are saying 'hey we can take second tier guys as long as we have good coaching!!!' - turns out they have good coaching. Turns out those coaches do everything in their fucking power to get good players.
Same with Georgia, Oklahoma, tOSU, Florida, LSU, Texas, Michigan, Penn State... ETC.
All schools recruit same guys...they're just magically better when they commit to SEC schools. Their 6-3 300lb Dlinemen are better than other conferences because they're 'SEC' d-linemen. Comical, and people buy it.
Bama's 5-star db's sure looked good. UW's db starters better than theirs accross the board.
Seems the SEC dlinemen werent better than the ACC's dlinemen. You buttfucks swallow everything ESPN squirts in your mouth.
Sark got 13 games a year with a bowl and never got to 9 wins
People vastly underestimate what it takes to get to 10 or 11 and then to get to elite bowl winning natty contender 12-15 wins
Its why I always calm down and rehire Petersen. He's like Billy Martin and I'm like George Steinbrenner
I am skeptical on the cult of recruiting because that's what losers talk about (Hi Oregon) but these numbers have been working so far
Stay at 10 or above and keep winning this shitty conference while we wait impatiently
You definitely have not visited Bama, Clemson, Georgia, Oklahoma or Ohio State sites recently.
I will never say shit teams don't think recruiting will fix everything, they do. They lie to themselves that the problem is 'just talent' and they justify retaining Clay Helton (when the fucking EVIDENCE is the opposite) because of it.
Still, this skepticism is like saying 'I'm skeptical more money makes you hotter to women, you just need more game!'
DO MORE WITH MORE.
That's what Bammer, Climp, Boockeyes, Soooooooonurz etc all want to do. No one on Bama's sites are saying 'hey we can take second tier guys as long as we have good coaching!!!' - turns out they have good coaching. Turns out those coaches do everything in their fucking power to get good players.
Same with Georgia, Oklahoma, tOSU, Florida, LSU, Texas, Michigan, Penn State... ETC.
*NO MUTUAL EXCLUSIVITY ON GOOD CORCHING AND CROOTING.
Comments
PS: Mark Richt won 10 games last year and almost won the Orange.
I will never say shit teams don't think recruiting will fix everything, they do. They lie to themselves that the problem is 'just talent' and they justify retaining Clay Helton (when the fucking EVIDENCE is the opposite) because of it.
Still, this skepticism is like saying 'I'm skeptical more money makes you hotter to women, you just need more game!'
DO MORE WITH MORE.
That's what Bammer, Climp, Boockeyes, Soooooooonurz etc all want to do. No one on Bama's sites are saying 'hey we can take second tier guys as long as we have good coaching!!!' - turns out they have good coaching. Turns out those coaches do everything in their fucking power to get good players.
Same with Georgia, Oklahoma, tOSU, Florida, LSU, Texas, Michigan, Penn State... ETC.
Bama's 5-star db's sure looked good. UW's db starters better than theirs accross the board.
Seems the SEC dlinemen werent better than the ACC's dlinemen. You buttfucks swallow everything ESPN squirts in your mouth.
Holy fuck.