Bleenor once said he didn't count Sark's first three years because he didn't have Wilcox. He was mocked for it. This is kind of similar.
We're going to compete for the PAC 12 title every year under Pete. You get playoff appearances by winning the conference. Some years will be better than others.
Pete passed the league champ by year three test. Despite the despair and no one wanting to hear it - ITS NOT OVER OR 2018
If he gets a second title in year 5 we certainly are not the type of program that is going to pretend that isn't good enough for us. It will make the maddening losses go down a tad easier
Having to start from scratch in year 5 can be considered a bad thing if we don't FINISH this year. But if you go on the saintly Don James scale Petersen is in the mix
Won the league in 77 year 3. 7-4 year 4. Sun Bowl year 5. Next league titles years 6 and 7
It really doesn't matter because he isn't going anywhere regardless.
Its not GREAT but its not OVER
The recruiting HAS to be great every year. This is a black eye for Washington
Better look at some off season staff changes then. Almost half our staff are shit recruiters.
Bleenor once said he didn't count Sark's first three years because he didn't have Wilcox. He was mocked for it. This is kind of similar.
We're going to compete for the PAC 12 title every year under Pete. You get playoff appearances by winning the conference. Some years will be better than others.
It's similar, but its more fundamental than one coach.
Pete passed the league champ by year three test. Despite the despair and no one wanting to hear it - ITS NOT OVER OR 2018
If he gets a second title in year 5 we certainly are not the type of program that is going to pretend that isn't good enough for us. It will make the maddening losses go down a tad easier
Having to start from scratch in year 5 can be considered a bad thing if we don't FINISH this year. But if you go on the saintly Don James scale Petersen is in the mix
Won the league in 77 year 3. 7-4 year 4. Sun Bowl year 5. Next league titles years 6 and 7
It really doesn't matter because he isn't going anywhere regardless.
Its not GREAT but its not OVER
The recruiting HAS to be great every year. This is a black eye for Washington
Was it over when the Russians Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? We still much alive and need to win the PAC.
As much as I hate Dennis and Coker, they were right. It took Pete 3 years to figure out what a contending team should look like and right now we're seeing the outcome of that 3 year lag. When walkons are subbing in to goal line packages, you're fucked. This season is essentially the tail end of "Washington 1.0" under Pete, which was never going to go anywhere significant.
I'm willing to see what 2.0 looks like under Pete with classes we all agree are leveled up and, most importantly, a change of leadership at the QB position. Pete's first iteration of a big time program is dying a sad and necessary death. His real coaching job begins next year.
Pete passed the league champ by year three test. Despite the despair and no one wanting to hear it - ITS NOT OVER OR 2018
If he gets a second title in year 5 we certainly are not the type of program that is going to pretend that isn't good enough for us. It will make the maddening losses go down a tad easier
Having to start from scratch in year 5 can be considered a bad thing if we don't FINISH this year. But if you go on the saintly Don James scale Petersen is in the mix
Won the league in 77 year 3. 7-4 year 4. Sun Bowl year 5. Next league titles years 6 and 7
It really doesn't matter because he isn't going anywhere regardless.
Its not GREAT but its not OVER
The recruiting HAS to be great every year. This is a black eye for Washington
Was it over when the Russians Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? We still much alive and need to win the PAC.
Pete passed the league champ by year three test. Despite the despair and no one wanting to hear it - ITS NOT OVER OR 2018
If he gets a second title in year 5 we certainly are not the type of program that is going to pretend that isn't good enough for us. It will make the maddening losses go down a tad easier
Having to start from scratch in year 5 can be considered a bad thing if we don't FINISH this year. But if you go on the saintly Don James scale Petersen is in the mix
Won the league in 77 year 3. 7-4 year 4. Sun Bowl year 5. Next league titles years 6 and 7
It really doesn't matter because he isn't going anywhere regardless.
Its not GREAT but its not OVER
The recruiting HAS to be great every year. This is a black eye for Washington
Was it over when the Russians Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? We still much alive and need to win the PAC.
Bleenor once said he didn't count Sark's first three years because he didn't have Wilcox. He was mocked for it. This is kind of similar.
We're going to compete for the PAC 12 title every year under Pete. You get playoff appearances by winning the conference. Some years will be better than others.
You can’t get to the playoffs without winning your conference ...
If we win out at 11-2 losing 2 road games by 8 points that’s far from a terrible year ... particularly if you believe this is as rough as our roster looks going forward
It’s one thing to think you are doing it right ... then you stand across from Bama and realize that you aren’t good enough
EVERYTHING has changed in recruiting from that moment forward
It could also slightly be due to the fact that Petersen was now recruiting to a conference champ/ play off team rather than a team that hadn't been close to relevant in 15 years.
It’s one thing to think you are doing it right ... then you stand across from Bama and realize that you aren’t good enough
EVERYTHING has changed in recruiting from that moment forward
It could also slightly be due to the fact that Petersen was now recruiting to a conference champ/ play off team rather than a team that hadn't been close to relevant in 15 years.
Why do you have to ruin the narrative?
There’s something to be said to that but you can see it in certain positions ... we are recruiting bigger WRs and less Chico-sized guys ... you can see it with the general size of our LBs
It’s one thing to think you are doing it right ... then you stand across from Bama and realize that you aren’t good enough
EVERYTHING has changed in recruiting from that moment forward
It could also slightly be due to the fact that Petersen was now recruiting to a conference champ/ play off team rather than a team that hadn't been close to relevant in 15 years.
Why do you have to ruin the narrative?
There’s something to be said to that but you can see it in certain positions ... we are recruiting bigger WRs and less Chico-sized guys ... you can see it with the general size of our LBs
I agree with you but this is clearly a case of whynotboth.gif
Comments
Anything less and I'll be disappointed.
We're going to compete for the PAC 12 title every year under Pete. You get playoff appearances by winning the conference. Some years will be better than others.
If we win out at 11-2 losing 2 road games by 8 points that’s far from a terrible year ... particularly if you believe this is as rough as our roster looks going forward
EVERYTHING has changed in recruiting from that moment forward
There’s something to be said to that but you can see it in certain positions ... we are recruiting bigger WRs and less Chico-sized guys ... you can see it with the general size of our LBs