Auburndawg's Official PAC-12 Power Rankings
Comments
-
anyone who thinks Stanford is still top tier needs to watch a replay of the army game and get back to me.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Stanford isn't the dominant team from the past three years anymore. They've been outplayed by mediocre Pac-12 teams two weeks in a row.Auburndawg said:
You are just wrong about Stanford.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Stanford has been exposed badly as a fraud the past two weeks, as has Washington.Auburndawg said:UW has lost to the two teams most people consider the two best in the league. Lost to Stanford on the last play of the game. Only down 7 to Oregon starting the 4th quarter.
Oregon State lost to a D2 team
Utah lost to Oregon State
Stanford barely lost to a decent team on the road.
Who you lose to and how is what matters.
Oregon State hasn't lost to anyone in the league yet...a fact you conveniently keep ignoring.
And Oregon State has yet to play anyone with top 25 talent: Oregon, Stanford, UCLA, or UW.
-
You don't think most people consider Oregon and Stanford to be 1 and 2? Maybe fewer think that now, but that was certainly the conventional wisdom.dhdawg said:I want an answer as to why u think people consider Stanford and Oregon the 2 best teams when u have UCLA at 2
-
My rankings
Oregon
UCLA
Big dropoff here
Oregon State
Stanford
Utah
Washington
ASU
then the fucking dreckfest
USC
Arizona
WSU
Colorado
Kal -
Utah is mediocre, but upsets happen.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Stanford isn't the dominant team from the past three years anymore. They've been outplayed by mediocre Pac-12 teams two weeks in a row.Auburndawg said:
You are just wrong about Stanford.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Stanford has been exposed badly as a fraud the past two weeks, as has Washington.Auburndawg said:UW has lost to the two teams most people consider the two best in the league. Lost to Stanford on the last play of the game. Only down 7 to Oregon starting the 4th quarter.
Oregon State lost to a D2 team
Utah lost to Oregon State
Stanford barely lost to a decent team on the road.
Who you lose to and how is what matters.
Oregon State hasn't lost to anyone in the league yet...a fact you conveniently keep ignoring.
And Oregon State has yet to play anyone with top 25 talent: Oregon, Stanford, UCLA, or UW.
We don't know yet if UW is mediocre.
In fact, the only teams in the league you can be certain of are at the top and bottom. -
UW isn't at the top and it isn't at the bottom, therefore it is mediocre.Auburndawg said:
Utah is mediocre, but upsets happen.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Stanford isn't the dominant team from the past three years anymore. They've been outplayed by mediocre Pac-12 teams two weeks in a row.Auburndawg said:
You are just wrong about Stanford.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Stanford has been exposed badly as a fraud the past two weeks, as has Washington.Auburndawg said:UW has lost to the two teams most people consider the two best in the league. Lost to Stanford on the last play of the game. Only down 7 to Oregon starting the 4th quarter.
Oregon State lost to a D2 team
Utah lost to Oregon State
Stanford barely lost to a decent team on the road.
Who you lose to and how is what matters.
Oregon State hasn't lost to anyone in the league yet...a fact you conveniently keep ignoring.
And Oregon State has yet to play anyone with top 25 talent: Oregon, Stanford, UCLA, or UW.
We don't know yet if UW is mediocre.
In fact, the only teams in the league you can be certain of are at the top and bottom.
-
Conventional wisdom said Gilby, Ty, and Sark needed more time.Auburndawg said:
You don't think most people consider Oregon and Stanford to be 1 and 2? Maybe fewer think that now, but that was certainly the conventional wisdom.dhdawg said:I want an answer as to why u think people consider Stanford and Oregon the 2 best teams when u have UCLA at 2
Conventional wisdom is fucktarded, as are any attempts to rank teams before mid to late October.
We're just now learning who the pretenders are.
-
Anyone who isn't a fucktard Doog knows UW is mediocre. This is year five and Sark is 27-27 vs D-1 teams.Auburndawg said:
Utah is mediocre, but upsets happen.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Stanford isn't the dominant team from the past three years anymore. They've been outplayed by mediocre Pac-12 teams two weeks in a row.Auburndawg said:
You are just wrong about Stanford.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Stanford has been exposed badly as a fraud the past two weeks, as has Washington.Auburndawg said:UW has lost to the two teams most people consider the two best in the league. Lost to Stanford on the last play of the game. Only down 7 to Oregon starting the 4th quarter.
Oregon State lost to a D2 team
Utah lost to Oregon State
Stanford barely lost to a decent team on the road.
Who you lose to and how is what matters.
Oregon State hasn't lost to anyone in the league yet...a fact you conveniently keep ignoring.
And Oregon State has yet to play anyone with top 25 talent: Oregon, Stanford, UCLA, or UW.
We don't know yet if UW is mediocre.
In fact, the only teams in the league you can be certain of are at the top and bottom.
This team at BEST is winning 8 games despite having 10 win talent. -
Am I the only one who watched UCLA average 2 yards a rush at home vs a CAL team missing half a dozen starters on defense?
-
Going through the motions.dtd said:Am I the only one who watched UCLA average 2 yards a rush at home vs a CAL team missing half a dozen starters on defense?
Your silence about Hundley's performance speaks volumes.
-
I didn't actually watch the game.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Going through the motions.dtd said:Am I the only one who watched UCLA average 2 yards a rush at home vs a CAL team missing half a dozen starters on defense?
Your silence about Hundley's performance speaks volumes.



