Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

Wanna be sick?

2

Comments

  • Options
    MeekMeek Member Posts: 7,031
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    Passion said:

    It still cracks me up that willingham announced his "retirement from coaching." Funny how getting ZERO job offers can serve as a motivator.

    Paging Jake Heaps
  • Options
    doogvilledoogville Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 1,183
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    it's infuriating that our? coach lost to this dweeb. fucking coach pete should forfeit some of his salary each year -- the esteemed "coaches who lost to ty" fee.
  • Options
    PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 41,915
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes

    I'd like to know what TW is looking at on that laptop.

    blackgayporn.gif
  • Options
    LoneStarDawgLoneStarDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,122
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Founders Club
    thinking about it more, there is literally no scenario where Ty supports UW.

    he will shit on us to come across as a classy unbiased voter, when in reality he's a vengeful bitter fuck.

    Honestly no one on that committee wants to see us succeed outside of maybe Condoleezza. hopefully Condoleezza calls him out @DeLarry style, and we dont get fuckeddddd over. if we lose there's no way we get into the playoff
  • Options
    AZDuckAZDuck Member Posts: 15,381
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Answer

    AZDuck said:

    One of those guys gave Mark Fucking Helfrich a $6.8 million buyout on his contract and is still employed. And you're complaining about Ty?

    SI.Com says Helfrich is gone. No warning. Just gone
    If Pete Thamel is right, then praise Allah
  • Options
    RoadTripRoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,279
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Founders Club
    CaptainPJ said:

    I'd like to know what TW is looking at on that laptop.

    image
    I'd like to know who opened it and turned it on for him
    Why hasn't he filed a complaint with the NAACP yet?
  • Options
    GreenRiverGatorzGreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,147
    First Comment First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    AZDuck said:

    One of those guys gave Mark Fucking Helfrich a $6.8 million buyout on his contract and is still employed. And you're complaining about Ty?

    Rob Mullens is a hero around here, second only to Pat Haden.
  • Options
    LoneStarDawgLoneStarDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,122
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Founders Club
    Ty will fuck us if there's any chance he can
  • Options
    TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,753
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment

    Swaye said:

    What a bunch of douche canoes. I count at least ten laptops for five old white guys? They have no clue what they are doing without Saint Haden. Willingham is either watching Golf porn or repeated highlights of the 96 Sun Bowl.

    FYI, Ty is black.
    Why you gotta bring the black man down
    Let the ascension begin by whacking that fucker.
  • Options
    DooglesDoogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,476
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    It's crazy he has a voice on the committee, but I think there is a rule that anyone associated with the team being discussed has to leave.

    Can you imagine how awkward? "TY we need you to leave so we can express our thoughts on the program you ran into the ground. Come back in 5".

    If Notre Dame didn't shit the bed this year and Stanford was still Stanford he'd have to leave 3 times. LOL.
  • Options
    GladstoneGladstone Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 16,417
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes Combo Breaker
    Founders Club
    Doogles said:

    It's crazy he has a voice on the committee, but I think there is a rule that anyone associated with the team being discussed has to leave.

    Can you imagine how awkward? "TY we need you to leave so we can express our thoughts on the program you ran into the ground. Come back in 5".

    If Notre Dame didn't shit the bed this year and Stanford was still Stanford he'd have to leave 3 times. LOL.

    This is incorrect. He does not recuse himself when discussing UW.
  • Options
    DooglesDoogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,476
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    Gladstone said:

    Doogles said:

    It's crazy he has a voice on the committee, but I think there is a rule that anyone associated with the team being discussed has to leave.

    Can you imagine how awkward? "TY we need you to leave so we can express our thoughts on the program you ran into the ground. Come back in 5".

    If Notre Dame didn't shit the bed this year and Stanford was still Stanford he'd have to leave 3 times. LOL.

    This is incorrect. He does not recuse himself when discussing UW.
    http://www.collegefootballplayoff.com/selection-committee-protocol

    You are right and that is a huge oversight. He is recused from Stanford but not UW. Wow.
  • Options
    BrickSquadBrickSquad Member Posts: 1,658
    5 Awesomes First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes
    edited November 2016
    Doogles said:

    Gladstone said:

    Doogles said:

    It's crazy he has a voice on the committee, but I think there is a rule that anyone associated with the team being discussed has to leave.

    Can you imagine how awkward? "TY we need you to leave so we can express our thoughts on the program you ran into the ground. Come back in 5".

    If Notre Dame didn't shit the bed this year and Stanford was still Stanford he'd have to leave 3 times. LOL.

    This is incorrect. He does not recuse himself when discussing UW.
    http://www.collegefootballplayoff.com/selection-committee-protocol

    You are right and that is a huge oversight. He is recused from Stanford but not UW. Wow.
    The bigger question, why is Condoleezza Rice part of the committee?
  • Options
    LoneStarDawgLoneStarDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,122
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Founders Club
    so has any of the other members been criticized, fired, and had Bow Down to Willingham written about them by a school considered for the playoff?
  • Options
    Miley_CyrusMiley_Cyrus Member Posts: 794
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
    Tyrone Willingham is recused from discussing Duke, but not UW. Huh?
  • Options
    CFetters_Nacho_LoverCFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 28,956
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker
    Founders Club
    Doogles said:

    Gladstone said:

    Doogles said:

    It's crazy he has a voice on the committee, but I think there is a rule that anyone associated with the team being discussed has to leave.

    Can you imagine how awkward? "TY we need you to leave so we can express our thoughts on the program you ran into the ground. Come back in 5".

    If Notre Dame didn't shit the bed this year and Stanford was still Stanford he'd have to leave 3 times. LOL.

    This is incorrect. He does not recuse himself when discussing UW.
    http://www.collegefootballplayoff.com/selection-committee-protocol

    You are right and that is a huge oversight. He is recused from Stanford but not UW. Wow.
    Even if he was recused from UW, I think he's a spiteful enough person to do the math and figure out who to advocate for to get in front of UW.
  • Options
    TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,753
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    Not only spiteful, but a completely passive-aggressive dick. Also dumb as a fucking fence post. Didn't anyone watch his press conferences before putting him on the committee?
Sign In or Register to comment.