Don't forget Stanford played like horseshit too but still came out with a W
Comments
-
She looks freshly fucked.BrickSquad said:
-
Best part of that game was all the UCLA players melting down on the sidelines at the end of it. Reminded me of oregon Boise st
-
I hate oregon but love blount for that punchphineas said:Best part of that game was all the UCLA players melting down on the sidelines at the end of it. Reminded me of oregon Boise st
-
phineas said:
Best part of that game was all the UCLA players melting down on the sidelines at the end of it. Reminded me of oregon Boise st
-
Skeet.BrickSquad said:
-
Free pub!Quietcowskee said: -
-
Teeth too sharp.BrickSquad said:
Mora seems to play crappy 4th Qs. I'm interested in what his record is in close games, especially when UCLA has a small lead. -
Who gives a fuck.priapism said:
Teeth too sharp.BrickSquad said:
Mora seems to play crappy 4th Qs. I'm interested in what his record is in close games, especially when UCLA has a small lead.
He isn't who we thought he was. -
Rosen put up a whopping 13 points. Seen laughing and prancing around after the game. Helped Stanford IMO
-
The chosen one isn't so chosen. Rosen is nowhere near his hype.
Stanford didn't play like shit but they didn't play like a top 10 team either, no one in the Dreck12™ did. Burns does deserve credit for being clutch at the end of the game, but they look like a beatable team.
-
uhh...stanford played ucla. A little different than our opponent.
-
I don't see a single team in this conference capable of finishing the season without 2 or more losses.
-
Shaw has a formula and sticks to it. He doesn't care what it looks like. He knows what works and wins.
-
Every year the conference says "Stanford is good, yes they can run it, but yada yada yada they aren't great, and we can beat them"Baseman said:Shaw has a formula and sticks to it. He doesn't care what it looks like. He knows what works and wins.
Shaw just smiles, quietly chuckles to himself and starts planning his post game press conference where he explains how they "miraculously" won another Pac-12 game with a basic 1940's gameplan
-
He is Les Miles without the natty.godawgst said:
Every year the conference says "Stanford is good, yes they can run it, but yada yada yada they aren't great, and we can beat them"Baseman said:Shaw has a formula and sticks to it. He doesn't care what it looks like. He knows what works and wins.
Shaw just smiles, quietly chuckles to himself and starts planning his post game press conference where he explains how they "miraculously" won another Pac-12 game with a basic 1940's gameplan
Wins in spite of his terrible game management. -
We*'re already there, FUCK YEAHTierbsHsotBoobs said:I don't see a single team in this conference capable of finishing the season without 2 or more losses.
-
Stanford got the shit knocked out of them. My broons just couldn't FINISH.
-
Most physical UCLA team I've seen in like forever. Mora sucks, but he's fixed that finesse bullshit.BallSacked said:Stanford got the shit knocked out of them. My broons just couldn't FINISH.
-
Stanford played like shit? Those are the two most physical football teams in the conference. They play great defense, hold onto the football and pound at you. Thats what wins championships.
Ucla is good. Could very well be undefeated. Stanford played good enough to beat them. They hardly played like horseshit dipshit! -
puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Stanford played like shit? Those are the two most physical football teams in the conference. They play great defense, hold onto the football and pound at you. Thats what wins championships.
Ucla is good. Could very well be undefeated. Stanford played good enough to beat them. They hardly played like horseshit dipshit!
-
El oh el, but puppy's right on this one.Gladstone said:puppylove_sugarsteel said:Stanford played like shit? Those are the two most physical football teams in the conference. They play great defense, hold onto the football and pound at you. Thats what wins championships.
Ucla is good. Could very well be undefeated. Stanford played good enough to beat them. They hardly played like horseshit dipshit! -
Pumpy good at football analysisSoutherndawg said:
El oh el, but puppy's right on this one.Gladstone said:puppylove_sugarsteel said:Stanford played like shit? Those are the two most physical football teams in the conference. They play great defense, hold onto the football and pound at you. Thats what wins championships.
Ucla is good. Could very well be undefeated. Stanford played good enough to beat them. They hardly played like horseshit dipshit! -
Guess who's the 3rd most physical team in the conference? Funny, Dildo's like J think Petersen is 'pass happy'.
-
SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SECpuppylove_sugarsteel said:Stanford played like shit? Those are the two most physical football teams in the conference. They play great defense, hold onto the football and pound at you. Thats what wins championships.
Ucla is good. Could very well be undefeated. Stanford played good enough to beat them. They hardly played like horseshit dipshit! -
That UCLA Pac 10 championship in 1998 was pretty special. Great program.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Stanford played like shit? Those are the two most physical football teams in the conference. They play great defense, hold onto the football and pound at you. Thats what wins championships.
Ucla is good. Could very well be undefeated. Stanford played good enough to beat them. They hardly played like horseshit dipshit!
