Why I'm voting for Trump

topdawgnc

Because he had the stones to call out McCain.

Because he is demonstrating what a shit show our election system has become.

American's are stupid. Primary voters are the most stupid.

I'm enjoying a rich man show how running for President can make him richer ... by saying what most people are already thinking.

He really is a true Half-Brain.

AZDuck

Awesome. Get ready for eight years of Hillary. Tell your friends!

PurpleJ

I'm voting for Phil Knight.

OZONE

I'm not a fan of Hillary, but I sure as hell don't want an (R) selecting any more supreme court justices for a while.

d2d

So nice to read Hipster Douche Bags' Poastes before Jimmy Kimmel cries on TV.

Swaye

OZONE said:

I'm not a fan of Hillary, but I sure as hell don't want an (R) selecting any more supreme court justices for a while.

Why not? Half of them vote with that flaming idiot Ginsberg anyway.

PurpleThrobber

I'm voting for Trump so that the first time he meets Putin he can stay "Scoreboard, bitch"

RaceBannon

OZONE said:

I'm not a fan of Hillary, but I sure as hell don't want an (R) selecting any more supreme court justices for a while.

The George W Bush appointee was the key to both Obamacare cases going your way

But still

doogsinparadise

RaceBannon said:

OZONE said:

I'm not a fan of Hillary, but I sure as hell don't want an (R) selecting any more supreme court justices for a while.

The George W Bush appointee was the key to both Obamacare cases going your way

But still

1 of 5 isn't bad.

2001400ex

RaceBannon said:

OZONE said:

I'm not a fan of Hillary, but I sure as hell don't want an (R) selecting any more supreme court justices for a while.

The George W Bush appointee was the key to both Obamacare cases going your way

But still

The problem is, 3 of the justices didn't look at the bill and said they were against it. 3 of the justices didn't look at the bill and said they were for it. That left one justice to sit and decide the fate of the bill. That's not how the justice system was set up in the constitution. They are there to be impartial and rule in accordance with the constitution.

OZONE

Swaye said:

OZONE said:

I'm not a fan of Hillary, but I sure as hell don't want an (R) selecting any more supreme court justices for a while.

Why not? Half of them vote with that flaming idiot Ginsberg anyway.

While a couple of cases have gone well (by one vote), some have not.

Such as giving corporates unlimited free and protected speech and dark money into campaigns. Or giving Bush the election and telling Florida to stop the recount.

So... still some work to do. And I"ll support any Democrat, even Hillary, to ensure we get more supreme court justices appointed by the Democrats.

RaceBannon

I like to complain about a court that legalized gay marriage and upheld Obamacare.

Soros and liberal causes take the same advantage of campaign finance as "corporations". Obama outspent Romney.

Obamacare was not upheld on legal grounds. It would have been overturned in both cases. Roberts ignored the law.

Stop whining about winning

sarktastic

... 12's.

OZONE

Just because Obama outspent Romney, doesn't mean the court go that right.

And there are other cases the court got wrong, even if they got a couple right.

You sound like a guy that would be content with a 3-8 season, because it included a few wins.

sarktastic

a lot of gays are content with 3-8 seasons... so?

RaceBannon

OZONE said:

Just because Obama outspent Romney, doesn't mean the court go that right.

And there are other cases the court got wrong, even if they got a couple right.

You sound like a guy that would be content with a 3-8 season, because it included a few wins.

GO HUSKIES!

GrundleStiltzkin

2001400ex said:

RaceBannon said:

OZONE said:

I'm not a fan of Hillary, but I sure as hell don't want an (R) selecting any more supreme court justices for a while.

The George W Bush appointee was the key to both Obamacare cases going your way

But still

The problem is, 3 of the justices didn't look at the bill and said they were against it. 3 of the justices didn't look at the bill and said they were for it. That left one justice to sit and decide the fate of the bill. That's not how the justice system was set up in the constitution. They are there to be impartial and rule in accordance with the constitution.

And the Speaker told legislators not to look at the bill and be for it.

2001400ex

RaceBannon said:

I like to complain about a court that legalized gay marriage and upheld Obamacare.

Soros and liberal causes take the same advantage of campaign finance as "corporations". Obama outspent Romney.

Obamacare was not upheld on legal grounds. It would have been overturned in both cases. Roberts ignored the law.

Stop whining about winning

I wouldn't say Obama outspent Romney. Obama raised a little more, Romney spent a little more. They were both essentially equal.

http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/campaign-finance

That being said, the citizens united decision was FS. The last thing politics needs is more money. I don't care if it's liberal or conservative, both sides are bought off, it's just different sources of money. Or sometimes the same source of money.

sarktastic

None of it is your money. Stop crying.

pawz

PurpleThrobber said:

I'm voting for Trump so that the first time he meets Putin he can stay "Scoreboard, bitch"

I'm going to need more evidence.

GrundleStiltzkin

2001400ex said:

RaceBannon said:

I like to complain about a court that legalized gay marriage and upheld Obamacare.

Soros and liberal causes take the same advantage of campaign finance as "corporations". Obama outspent Romney.

Obamacare was not upheld on legal grounds. It would have been overturned in both cases. Roberts ignored the law.

Stop whining about winning

I wouldn't say Obama outspent Romney. Obama raised a little more, Romney spent a little more. They were both essentially equal.

http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/campaign-finance

That being said, the citizens united decision was FS. The last thing politics needs is more money. I don't care if it's liberal or conservative, both sides are bought off, it's just different sources of money. Or sometimes the same source of money.

Which part of the First Amendment do you hate more, the freedom of speech, or the right to petition the government?