Why Boise st losing starters doesn't really matter

dhdawg

Looking through their depth chart their starters go like this
QB: RS SR
RB: RS JR
WR: they have experience but it doesn't really matter at WR
TE: RS SR
LT: RS SR
LG: RS SR
C: RS SR
RG: RS SO
RT: RS SO
DE: RS JR (their best player btw)
DT: RS SR
DT: JR
Stud end: RS SR
LB:
SAM: RS SR
MLB: JR
WILL: SO
CB: RS-JR
CB: SO
Rover: RS JR
FS RS SO
they are not losing anything, they are not young, they may even be a better football team

RaceBannon

I saw some fuck from Stanford saying they don't rebuild they reload. They said that about the recently retired Don James. Now we have eternal youth

[Deleted User]

RaceBannon said:

I saw some fuck from Stanford saying they don't rebuild they reload. They said that about the recently retired Don James. Now we have eternal youth

You want to talk young go look up that 1990 team that won a Rose Bowl. Mostly sophomores and juniors.

Fuck Oregon was young the last few years too.

Youth argument might be the lamest excuse in college sports. TUFF schedule is up there too I can't decide which one is worse. Doogs use them both way too much.

TierbsHsotBoobs

He_Needs_More_Time said:

RaceBannon said:

I saw some fuck from Stanford saying they don't rebuild they reload. They said that about the recently retired Don James. Now we have eternal youth

You want to talk young go look up that 1990 team that won a Rose Bowl. Mostly sophomores and juniors.

Fuck Oregon was young the last few years too.

Youth argument might be the lamest excuse in college sports. TUFF schedule is up there too I can't decide which one is worse. Doogs use them both way too much.

Alabama has 11 true freshmen on their two deeps.

End of discussion.

tracker

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

He_Needs_More_Time said:

RaceBannon said:

I saw some fuck from Stanford saying they don't rebuild they reload. They said that about the recently retired Don James. Now we have eternal youth

You want to talk young go look up that 1990 team that won a Rose Bowl. Mostly sophomores and juniors.

Fuck Oregon was young the last few years too.

Youth argument might be the lamest excuse in college sports. TUFF schedule is up there too I can't decide which one is worse. Doogs use them both way too much.

Alabama has 11 true freshmen on their two deeps.

End of discussion.

In spite of having highly ranked recruiting classes, why is it that the Huskies are always young and inexperienced while other teams are young and talented?

Fuck.

[Deleted User]

tracker said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

He_Needs_More_Time said:

RaceBannon said:

I saw some fuck from Stanford saying they don't rebuild they reload. They said that about the recently retired Don James. Now we have eternal youth

You want to talk young go look up that 1990 team that won a Rose Bowl. Mostly sophomores and juniors.

Fuck Oregon was young the last few years too.

Youth argument might be the lamest excuse in college sports. TUFF schedule is up there too I can't decide which one is worse. Doogs use them both way too much.

Alabama has 11 true freshmen on their two deeps.

End of discussion.

In spite of having highly ranked recruiting classes, why is it that the Huskies are always young and inexperienced while other teams are young and talented?

Fuck.

Coaching matters.

bananasnblondes

tracker said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

He_Needs_More_Time said:

RaceBannon said:

I saw some fuck from Stanford saying they don't rebuild they reload. They said that about the recently retired Don James. Now we have eternal youth

You want to talk young go look up that 1990 team that won a Rose Bowl. Mostly sophomores and juniors.

Fuck Oregon was young the last few years too.

Youth argument might be the lamest excuse in college sports. TUFF schedule is up there too I can't decide which one is worse. Doogs use them both way too much.

Alabama has 11 true freshmen on their two deeps.

End of discussion.

In spite of having highly ranked recruiting classes, why is it that the Huskies are always young and inexperienced while other teams are young and talented?

Fuck.

Because Willingham was here 6 years ago and incoming true freshmen are still affected by that. You don't know the damage he did. One kid even said that he sucked the fun out of the game for him.

dhdawg

He_Needs_More_Time said:

RaceBannon said:

I saw some fuck from Stanford saying they don't rebuild they reload. They said that about the recently retired Don James. Now we have eternal youth

You want to talk young go look up that 1990 team that won a Rose Bowl. Mostly sophomores and juniors.

Fuck Oregon was young the last few years too.

Youth argument might be the lamest excuse in college sports. TUFF schedule is up there too I can't decide which one is worse. Doogs use them both way too much.

go ahead and add altitude to that list. Doogs use that one a lot as well

RoadDawg55

Sark is building a foundation so that UW is good for the long haul, not just once every five years. #HiKimGrinoldsFuckingStupidPieceofDoogShit

[Deleted User]

RoadDawg55 said:

Sark is building a foundation so that UW is good for the long haul, not just once every five years. #HiKimGrinoldsFuckingStupidPieceofDawgShit

You misspelled Doog there.

RoadDawg55

He_Needs_More_Time said:

RoadDawg55 said:

Sark is building a foundation so that UW is good for the long haul, not just once every five years. #HiKimGrinoldsFuckingStupidPieceofDawgShit

You misspelled Doog there.

Thanks. You inspired me to go and correct it.

CaptainPJ

blockquote>
go ahead and add altitude to that list. Doogs use that one a lot as well


Staff, TRUE?!!!

ThomasFremont

CaptainPJ said:

blockquote>
go ahead and add altitude to that list. Doogs use that one a lot as well

Staff, TRUE?!!!

There is no staff. HTH.

puppylove_sugarsteel

He_Needs_More_Time said:

RaceBannon said:

I saw some fuck from Stanford saying they don't rebuild they reload. They said that about the recently retired Don James. Now we have eternal youth

You want to talk young go look up that 1990 team that won a Rose Bowl. Mostly sophomores and juniors.

Fuck Oregon was young the last few years too.

Youth argument might be the lamest excuse in college sports. TUFF schedule is up there too I can't decide which one is worse. Doogs use them both way too much.

Youth is never a good fucking thing. And isn't a lame excuse. Especially on the oline. Teams win with youth yes, but those teams recruit top5 classes, or elite players at skill positions (Oregon), or just good at developing players for a system (Boise st)

Sark does none of the above!

CuntWaffle

Certain positions like RB/WR/K/P are fine with a younger players. OL and and defense is where you NEED experience while feeding the younger players into the games slowly and at smart times. So when those guys are gone the players who were young are now RS SO/Jr./Sr. and replacing them.

Of course you will always have some studs who defy these normal circumstances (Shaq Thompson) or you just do a super shitty job at recruitng and one of your positions are so incredibly thin you are forced to use the younger players (Sark's OL last year).

IrishDawg22

CuntWaffle said:

Certain positions like RB/WR/K/P are fine with a younger players. OL and and defense is where you NEED experience while feeding the younger players into the games slowly and at smart times. So when those guys are gone the players who were young are now RS SO/Jr./Sr. and replacing them.

Of course you will always have some studs who defy these normal circumstances (Shaq Thompson) or you just do a super shitty job at recruitng and one of your positions are so incredibly thin you are forced to use the younger players (Sark's OL last year).

Am I getting Whooshed or did you just make a post that made sense?

CuntWaffle

IrishDawg22 said:

CuntWaffle said:

Certain positions like RB/WR/K/P are fine with a younger players. OL and and defense is where you NEED experience while feeding the younger players into the games slowly and at smart times. So when those guys are gone the players who were young are now RS SO/Jr./Sr. and replacing them.

Of course you will always have some studs who defy these normal circumstances (Shaq Thompson) or you just do a super shitty job at recruitng and one of your positions are so incredibly thin you are forced to use the younger players (Sark's OL last year).

Am I getting Whooshed or did you just make a post that made sense?

Neither. You are just terrible at the Internet.

HTH.

IrishDawg22

CuntWaffle said:

IrishDawg22 said:

CuntWaffle said:

Certain positions like RB/WR/K/P are fine with a younger players. OL and and defense is where you NEED experience while feeding the younger players into the games slowly and at smart times. So when those guys are gone the players who were young are now RS SO/Jr./Sr. and replacing them.

Of course you will always have some studs who defy these normal circumstances (Shaq Thompson) or you just do a super shitty job at recruitng and one of your positions are so incredibly thin you are forced to use the younger players (Sark's OL last year).

Am I getting Whooshed or did you just make a post that made sense?

Neither. You are just terrible at the Internet.

HTH.

Burn...that one never gets old.

Glad to see you are back to your normal programming.