Fleenor's Sound Logic on Why UW Must Keep Romar

bananasnblondes

1) Romar is 3-time Pac-12 Coach of the Year.
2) UW would not be able to hire another coach to replace Romar who has been 3-time coach of the year in a Power 5 conference
3) Romar must stay because UW can do no better
4) ??????????
5) Profit

Go ahead and try to punch holes in the rock solid, steel-reinforced foundation.

HuskyInAZ

Sounds like Bleenor = KJV. It has nothing to do with results. It's all about the access.

Anyone who knows anything about basketball has seen over the past 5+ years that Romar has no clue how to coach basketball.

DHD

A quick rebuttal to Butler Cabin's pitch that you can only get quality coaching if you steal a coach from another power 5 conference team:

Wayne Tinkle (came from Montana)
Larry Krystkowiak (came from Montana)
Sean Miller (came from Xavier pre-Big East)

When the top 3 coaches in your league for the past season demonstrate that your argument is FS, perhaps it's time to put that argument back in your pocket and return to your habit of "predicting" things after they have already happened.

bananasnblondes

Wasn't sendek the only coach in the PAC who actually came from a power 5 conference?

PurpleThrobber

bananasnblondes said:

Wasn't sendek the only coach in the PAC who actually came from a power 5 conference?

Ole!

Gladstone

Not surprised at all. Fleenor being an unambiguous, black-and-white enemy of the UW program is old news.

bananasnblondes

Here's what I don't get:

Wasn't Bleenor one of the big UW boosters who pulled his donations after willingham was kept for a 4th year?

So why is he arguing for a lifetime contract for a guy who is, at this point in time, the worst coach in the conference?

section8

Fleens seems to think that Pac12 Titles >>>>NCAA 1st round wins.

DerekJohnson

Maybe Romar golfs with him?

TTJ

"Jim Owens has taken the Huskies to three Rose Bowls. Where are we gonna find another coach with those credentials? We'd be crazy to get rid of him."