Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Pete can't recruit or relate to inner city edgy kids..

where does this narrative come from?

Looking at he last two classes at BSU there are only 4 recruits from Idaho and most are from California with a good number from Texas.
«1

Comments

  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    It comes from assholes
    image
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,142
    He doesn't speak their lingo, brah. Dude. Brooo
  • CokeGreaterThanPepsi
    CokeGreaterThanPepsi Member Posts: 7,646

    where does this narrative come from?

    Looking at he last two classes at BSU there are only 4 recruits from Idaho and most are from California with a good number from Texas.

    Your eyes are as good as mine.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    "He's just going to recruit a bunch of white kids from Idaho"

    You mean like then 4 he got in his last two BSU classes? ;)
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    I love the underlined assumption that inner city edgy kids are the only ones who know how to play football.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    MakaDawg said:

    Fucktards see the top players are often black, and assume they're inner city and edgy. It doesn't even fucking matter. Not throwing punches at coach Lake or whoever, is what's fucking crucial.

    The assumption that Pete prefers a rural suburban white boy is just as ridiculous (sorry Millen), and I think simply comes from the fact he coached in Idaho.

    Sark relating to the "edgy" players is also laughable. Sark's way of handling Peters would be to run, hide, and lock his fat ass in his office. ignore it and head to Joeys.




  • Canard
    Canard Member Posts: 504
    MakaDawg said:

    Fucktards see the top players are often black, and assume they're inner city and edgy. It doesn't even fucking matter. Not throwing punches at coach Lake or whoever, is what's fucking crucial.

    The assumption that Pete prefers a rural suburban white boy is just as ridiculous (sorry Millen), and I think simply comes from the fact he coached in Idaho the Aryan Nation.

    Sark relating to the "edgy" players is also laughable. Sark's way of handling Peters would be to run, hide, and lock his fat ass in his office.




  • beelzebub
    beelzebub Member Posts: 361
    He's a lazy recruiter he wont fight for the higher ranked kid, he said he wasnt going to waist his time on recruiting kids who have other schools ranked above Huskies, he's going to see very shortly that he wont win in Pac 12 with that nonsense.
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,670 Swaye's Wigwam
    beelzebub said:

    He's a lazy recruiter he wont fight for the higher ranked kid, he said he wasnt going to waist his time on recruiting kids who have other schools ranked above Huskies, he's going to see very shortly that he wont win in Pac 12 with that nonsense.

    Twisting.

    He has said he won't put resources into recruiting kids who aren't genuinely interested in going to UW. He's not going to be fooled into thinking that a guy like Ruben Foster is genuinely interested just because he agreed to take a free trip.

    You're fighting a losing battle on this one dumb dumb. Petersen has already shown he will recruit similarly or higher rated classes to UW than Sarkisian. Simpletons who don't know how to read the the aspects of recruiting rankings that sort of matter won't get this, but the 2014 class was about as good as any that Sark and his highly paid recruiting mercenaries brought in. That was in the transition year.
  • beelzebub
    beelzebub Member Posts: 361
    chuck said:

    beelzebub said:

    He's a lazy recruiter he wont fight for the higher ranked kid, he said he wasnt going to waist his time on recruiting kids who have other schools ranked above Huskies, he's going to see very shortly that he wont win in Pac 12 with that nonsense.

    Twisting.

    He has said he won't put resources into recruiting kids who aren't genuinely interested in going to UW. He's not going to be fooled into thinking that a guy like Ruben Foster is genuinely interested just because he agreed to take a free trip.

    You're fighting a losing battle on this one dumb dumb. Petersen has already shown he will recruit similarly or higher rated classes to UW than Sarkisian. Simpletons who don't know how to read the the aspects of recruiting rankings that sort of matter won't get this, but the 2014 class was about as good as any that Sark and his highly paid recruiting mercenaries brought in. That was in the transition year.
    Who is twisting? U dude. U cant honestly convince anyone or urself that at the end of recruiting cycle this class is good, dont give me rankings ur going to have more commits from competing against lower level Pac 12 schools and mountain west teams than who u should be competing with Oregon, Sc, Ucla Asu and probably stanford.
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    beelzebub said:

    He's a lazy recruiter he wont fight for the higher ranked kid, he said he wasnt going to waist his time on recruiting kids who have other schools ranked above Huskies, he's going to see very shortly that he wont win in Pac 12 with that nonsense.

    Buddha baker says hi
  • FreeChavez
    FreeChavez Member Posts: 3,223
    I remember something from when baker was on his recruiting visit. He said he had a blast playing ping pong with peterson for hours. Someone who can't relate to players doesn't spend a long time hanging out.

    I think what peterson lacks is a bullshit meter. Whether that equals success at a place like UW could get interesting. He doesn't have the used car salesman attitude to sell some top 5* guys or tell a kid he'll play a position when they know he won't. We will lose recruits for this, but I also think we gain far more that are willing to bleed purple. Dissly is going to be that guy, baker is already that guy.

    He will have more and more and more like this, but we will never win the February national championship with Pete.
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,670 Swaye's Wigwam
    beelzebub said:

    chuck said:

    beelzebub said:

    He's a lazy recruiter he wont fight for the higher ranked kid, he said he wasnt going to waist his time on recruiting kids who have other schools ranked above Huskies, he's going to see very shortly that he wont win in Pac 12 with that nonsense.

    Twisting.

    He has said he won't put resources into recruiting kids who aren't genuinely interested in going to UW. He's not going to be fooled into thinking that a guy like Ruben Foster is genuinely interested just because he agreed to take a free trip.

    You're fighting a losing battle on this one dumb dumb. Petersen has already shown he will recruit similarly or higher rated classes to UW than Sarkisian. Simpletons who don't know how to read the the aspects of recruiting rankings that sort of matter won't get this, but the 2014 class was about as good as any that Sark and his highly paid recruiting mercenaries brought in. That was in the transition year.
    Who is twisting? U dude. U cant honestly convince anyone or urself that at the end of recruiting cycle this class is good, dont give me rankings ur going to have more commits from competing against lower level Pac 12 schools and mountain west teams than who u should be competing with Oregon, Sc, Ucla Asu and probably stanford.
    Did you even pay attention to Sark's recruiting? Go take a look at offer lists. His classes were loaded with guys he stole from Mtn West schools and the basement dwellers of the Pac 10/12.

    You suck. You're just touting doog myths with a lot of aggression and expecting it to have an impact because you're so tuff when you do it.
  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 12,990
    dhdawg said:

    beelzebub said:

    He's a lazy recruiter he wont fight for the higher ranked kid, he said he wasnt going to waist his time on recruiting kids who have other schools ranked above Huskies, he's going to see very shortly that he wont win in Pac 12 with that nonsense.

    Buddha baker says hi
    and the 14 other guys he flipped from other schools (like Wazzu, Oregon State, Utah, Arizona, Vanderbilt, etc) echo that "Hi"
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,670 Swaye's Wigwam

    dhdawg said:

    beelzebub said:

    He's a lazy recruiter he wont fight for the higher ranked kid, he said he wasnt going to waist his time on recruiting kids who have other schools ranked above Huskies, he's going to see very shortly that he wont win in Pac 12 with that nonsense.

    Buddha baker says hi
    and the 14 other guys he flipped from other schools (like Wazzu, Oregon State, Utah, Arizona, Vanderbilt, etc) echo that "Hi"
    And McGary who wasn't committed but wasn't giving Sark the time of day.
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,670 Swaye's Wigwam

    beelzebub said:

    chuck said:

    beelzebub said:

    He's a lazy recruiter he wont fight for the higher ranked kid, he said he wasnt going to waist his time on recruiting kids who have other schools ranked above Huskies, he's going to see very shortly that he wont win in Pac 12 with that nonsense.

    Twisting.

    He has said he won't put resources into recruiting kids who aren't genuinely interested in going to UW. He's not going to be fooled into thinking that a guy like Ruben Foster is genuinely interested just because he agreed to take a free trip.

    You're fighting a losing battle on this one dumb dumb. Petersen has already shown he will recruit similarly or higher rated classes to UW than Sarkisian. Simpletons who don't know how to read the the aspects of recruiting rankings that sort of matter won't get this, but the 2014 class was about as good as any that Sark and his highly paid recruiting mercenaries brought in. That was in the transition year.
    Who is twisting? U dude. U cant honestly convince anyone or urself that at the end of recruiting cycle this class is good, dont give me rankings ur going to have more commits from competing against lower level Pac 12 schools and mountain west teams than who u should be competing with Oregon, Sc, Ucla Asu and probably stanford.
    I doubt Miss State beat out Alabama, LSU, Auburn, and Georgia for very many guys. Michigan State isn't beating out Ohio State and Michigan. TCU and Baylor aren't beating Texas, A&M, and Oklahoma. If Petersen is the coach people think he is, he will win. If/when he wins, more four and five star guys will look into going to UW.

    It's a stupid argument anyways. Peterman's current class is as highly rated as most of Sark's. It might even have a higher average star rating.
    Which, if you do care about the recruiting garbage that Scout and Rivals peddle, is the only rating that matters when evaluating a class.
  • beelzebub
    beelzebub Member Posts: 361
    dhdawg said:

    beelzebub said:

    He's a lazy recruiter he wont fight for the higher ranked kid, he said he wasnt going to waist his time on recruiting kids who have other schools ranked above Huskies, he's going to see very shortly that he wont win in Pac 12 with that nonsense.

    Buddha baker says hi
    Wow 1 out of a class of 25 local kid no less.
  • beelzebub
    beelzebub Member Posts: 361
    chuck said:

    beelzebub said:

    chuck said:

    beelzebub said:

    He's a lazy recruiter he wont fight for the higher ranked kid, he said he wasnt going to waist his time on recruiting kids who have other schools ranked above Huskies, he's going to see very shortly that he wont win in Pac 12 with that nonsense.

    Twisting.

    He has said he won't put resources into recruiting kids who aren't genuinely interested in going to UW. He's not going to be fooled into thinking that a guy like Ruben Foster is genuinely interested just because he agreed to take a free trip.

    You're fighting a losing battle on this one dumb dumb. Petersen has already shown he will recruit similarly or higher rated classes to UW than Sarkisian. Simpletons who don't know how to read the the aspects of recruiting rankings that sort of matter won't get this, but the 2014 class was about as good as any that Sark and his highly paid recruiting mercenaries brought in. That was in the transition year.
    Who is twisting? U dude. U cant honestly convince anyone or urself that at the end of recruiting cycle this class is good, dont give me rankings ur going to have more commits from competing against lower level Pac 12 schools and mountain west teams than who u should be competing with Oregon, Sc, Ucla Asu and probably stanford.
    Did you even pay attention to Sark's recruiting? Go take a look at offer lists. His classes were loaded with guys he stole from Mtn West schools and the basement dwellers of the Pac 10/12.

    You suck. You're just touting doog myths with a lot of aggression and expecting it to have an impact because you're so tuff when you do it.
    U get a psychology degree dude and deciding to use it on this board?
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 25,566 Standard Supporter
    beelzebub said:

    chuck said:

    beelzebub said:

    He's a lazy recruiter he wont fight for the higher ranked kid, he said he wasnt going to waist his time on recruiting kids who have other schools ranked above Huskies, he's going to see very shortly that he wont win in Pac 12 with that nonsense.

    Twisting.

    He has said he won't put resources into recruiting kids who aren't genuinely interested in going to UW. He's not going to be fooled into thinking that a guy like Ruben Foster is genuinely interested just because he agreed to take a free trip.

    You're fighting a losing battle on this one dumb dumb. Petersen has already shown he will recruit similarly or higher rated classes to UW than Sarkisian. Simpletons who don't know how to read the the aspects of recruiting rankings that sort of matter won't get this, but the 2014 class was about as good as any that Sark and his highly paid recruiting mercenaries brought in. That was in the transition year.
    Who is twisting? U dude. U cant honestly convince anyone or urself that at the end of recruiting cycle this class is good, dont give me rankings ur going to have more commits from competing against lower level Pac 12 schools and mountain west teams than who u should be competing with Oregon, Sc, Ucla Asu and probably stanford.
    Awfully warm for February
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    beelzebub said:

    dhdawg said:

    beelzebub said:

    He's a lazy recruiter he wont fight for the higher ranked kid, he said he wasnt going to waist his time on recruiting kids who have other schools ranked above Huskies, he's going to see very shortly that he wont win in Pac 12 with that nonsense.

    Buddha baker says hi
    Wow 1 out of a class of 25 local kid no less.
    One example, clearly not the only one.
    http://washington.scout.com/a.z?s=147&p=8&c=1&nid=6568661
    http://washington.scout.com/a.z?s=147&p=8&c=1&nid=678458
    http://washington.scout.com/a.z?s=147&p=8&c=1&nid=6344251
    http://washington.scout.com/a.z?s=147&p=8&c=1&nid=6857412
    http://washington.scout.com/a.z?s=147&p=8&c=1&nid=6657071

    There's more than that. You're ignorance is really evident in this thread