This isn't rocket surgery (LULZ)...

Swaye

My sources are telling me that some fuckasses think it is bullshit that when Sark losses a single game, we all put on the "we told you so" act, while if Peterman losses a game, we will give him the benefit of the doubt. These booftwats claim that is unfair. We have different standards for these two guys.

Guess what monkey nuts? 95-12 vs. 36-30. An .888 winning percentage buys you instant credibility. A barely over .500 record buys you a cup of coffee, if you have a buck to go with that useless shitstain of a record. I'm embarrassed I actually had to explain what the difference is between a two time BCS bowl winning coach, and a middling frat boy from SoCal.

If none of this makes sense to you, go back to Doogman, drink a gallon of kerosene, and deep throat a road flare.

MrsPetersen

Swaye said:

If none of this makes sense to you, go back to Doogman, drink a gallon of kerosene, and deep throat a road flare.

This might be one of the best lines ever. Nominated.

allpurpleallgold

Let me know when Peterman loses a fucking game.

AtomicPiss

Swaye said:

My sources are telling me that some fuckasses think it is bullshit that when Sark losses a single game, we all put on the "we told you so" act, while if Peterman losses a game, we will give him the benefit of the doubt. These booftwats claim that is unfair. We have different standards for these two guys.

Guess what monkey nuts? 95-12 vs. 36-30. An .888 winning percentage buys you instant credibility. A barely over .500 record buys you a cup of coffee, if you have a buck to go with that useless shitstain of a record. I'm embarrassed I actually had to explain what the difference is between a two time BCS bowl winning coach, and a middling frat boy from SoCal.

If none of this makes sense to you, go back to Doogman, drink a gallon of kerosene, and deep throat a road flare.

Should they also light the road flare? Or just as is? Thanks in advance.

H_D

DerekJohnson said:

Swaye said:

My sources are telling me that some fuckasses think it is bullshit that when Sark losses a single game, we all put on the "we told you so" act, while if Peterman losses a game, we will give him the benefit of the doubt. These booftwats claim that is unfair. We have different standards for these two guys.

Guess what monkey nuts? 95-12 vs. 36-30. An .888 winning percentage buys you instant credibility. A barely over .500 record buys you a cup of coffee, if you have a buck to go with that useless shitstain of a record. I'm embarrassed I actually had to explain what the difference is between a two time BCS bowl winning coach, and a middling frat boy from SoCal.

If none of this makes sense to you, go back to Doogman, drink a gallon of kerosene, and deep throat a road flare.

Should they also light the road flare? Or just as is? Thanks in advance.

If you are deep throating it right, the friction will ignite the kerosene.

PurpleReign

You have to work the shaft to get the flare to pop.

Doogles

H_D said:

DerekJohnson said:

Swaye said:

My sources are telling me that some fuckasses think it is bullshit that when Sark losses a single game, we all put on the "we told you so" act, while if Peterman losses a game, we will give him the benefit of the doubt. These booftwats claim that is unfair. We have different standards for these two guys.

Guess what monkey nuts? 95-12 vs. 36-30. An .888 winning percentage buys you instant credibility. A barely over .500 record buys you a cup of coffee, if you have a buck to go with that useless shitstain of a record. I'm embarrassed I actually had to explain what the difference is between a two time BCS bowl winning coach, and a middling frat boy from SoCal.

If none of this makes sense to you, go back to Doogman, drink a gallon of kerosene, and deep throat a road flare.

Should they also light the road flare? Or just as is? Thanks in advance.

If you are deep throating it right, the friction will ignite the kerosene.

H_D stop using your teeth.

Swaye

Only on HH will everyone key into the subtle nuances of how the road flare should be fellated to best induce combustion and doog death.

CFetters_Nacho_Lover

Swaye said:

Only on HH will everyone key into the subtle nuances of how the road flare should be fellated to best induce combustion and doog death.

We take this kind of shit very seriously.

CFetters_Nacho_Lover

Swaye said:

My sources are telling me that some fuckasses think it is bullshit that when Sark losses a single game, we all put on the "we told you so" act, while if Peterman losses a game, we will give him the benefit of the doubt. These booftwats claim that is unfair. We have different standards for these two guys.

Guess what monkey nuts? 95-12 vs. 36-30. An .888 winning percentage buys you instant credibility. A barely over .500 record gets you a job coaching one of the premier college football programs, if you have @PatHadenFS‌ as the AD. buys you a cup of coffee, if you have a buck to go with that useless shitstain of a record. I'm embarrassed I actually had to explain what the difference is between a two time BCS bowl winning coach, and a middling frat boy from SoCal.

If none of this makes sense to you, go back to Doogman, drink a gallon of kerosene, and deep throat a road flare.

dnc

This thread delivers

Swaye