Doogman Natives Getting Restless

BiggusDickus

Fatters' "Burning Bridges" article not well recieved by the hoi polloi ( @Swaye - that's Latin for "fucktards")

https://northwestfootballfucktards.wordpress.com/2014/09/10/the-natives-are-getting-restless/

PM to everyone with a working account. This looks like a bumping and commenting opportunity. See if you can't get the Doogs talking about the appropriateness of Fatters' article, his article from the 2011 EWU game, and the heavyhanded deletion/banning tactics of the Citrus Three. Given tha the guy who started the thread is not a halfbrain and pretty much a Doog, they just might start eating their own

@FremontTroll‌ - this looks to be in your wheelhouse, but it might get you banned. Hell, commenting here might get you banned

topdawgnc

BiggusDickus said:

Fatters' "Burning Bridges" article not well recieved by the hoi polloi ( @Swaye - that's Latin for "fucktards")

https://northwestfootballfucktards.wordpress.com/2014/09/10/the-natives-are-getting-restless/

PM to everyone with a working account. This looks like a bumping and commenting opportunity. See if you can't get the Doogs talking about the appropriateness of Fatters' article, his article from the 2011 EWU game, and the heavyhanded deletion/banning tactics of the Citrus Three. Given tha the guy who started the thread is not a halfbrain and pretty much a Doog, they just might start eating their own

@FremontTroll‌ - this looks to be in your wheelhouse, but it might get you banned. Hell, commenting here might get you banned

True story ...

My ban date at Doogman.com is the day after my first poast hear.

CFetters_Nacho_Lover

This kind of situation could result in the Great Doogman Purge 2.0

fauxdawgman

Not in the middle of the store.

We never have banned people for differences of opinion. That's not what we're about. Name calling, personal attacks etc. are a different story. If there's an issue, shoot us a pm.

bananasnblondes

There's a new thread up now called "why is everyone saying that...(Petersen is blowing everything up)"

Of course the short, correct answer is "because Kim said so in an effort to rile people up against Petersen."

In that thread you have this one fucktard saying "what Petersen is doing (coaching the way he wants to coach) is not fair to the SRs who invested 4 years into Sark's system and now have to switch. It's also not fair to the fans who have been waiting 15 years to see a run at a pac-12 championship.". He goes on to say that Sark and co. had made UW an "it school" for top national recruits and now Petersen is purposefully undoing that.

Its becoming clear that some of these retards think it's well within Pete's power to take what Ssrk left behind and win a national championship this year. However, Petersen, in his arrogance, or perhaps a nefarious plot to bring down UW, is choosing to put a crap product on the field.

Dickus, you are needed in that thread

topdawgnc

bananasnblondes said:

There's a new thread up now called "why is everyone saying that...(Petersen is blowing everything up)"

Of course the short, correct answer is "because Kim said so in an effort to rile people up against Petersen."

In that thread you have this one fucktard saying "what Petersen is doing (coaching the way he wants to coach) is not fair to the SRs who invested 4 years into Sark's system and now have to switch. It's also not fair to the fans who have been waiting 15 years to see a run at a pac-12 championship.". He goes on to say that Sark and co. had made UW an "it school" for top national recruits and now Petersen is purposefully undoing that.

Its becoming clear that some of these retards think it's well within Pete's power to take what Ssrk left behind and win a national championship this year. However, Petersen, in his arrogance, or perhaps a nefarious plot to bring down UW, is choosing to put a crap product on the field.

Dickus, you are needed in that thread

Would be golden if Kim had forgotten to switch his SN before typing that.

Swaye

bananasnblondes said:

There's a new thread up now called "why is everyone saying that...(Petersen is blowing everything up)"

Of course the short, correct answer is "because Kim said so in an effort to rile people up against Petersen."

In that thread you have this one fucktard saying "what Petersen is doing (coaching the way he wants to coach) is not fair to the SRs who invested 4 years into Sark's system and now have to switch. It's also not fair to the fans who have been waiting 15 years to see a run at a pac-12 championship.". He goes on to say that Sark and co. had made UW an "it school" for top national recruits and now Petersen is purposefully undoing that.

Its becoming clear that some of these retards think it's well within Pete's power to take what Ssrk left behind and win a national championship this year. However, Petersen, in his arrogance, or perhaps a nefarious plot to bring down UW, is choosing to put a crap product on the field.

Dickus, you are needed in that thread

Swaye

BiggusDickus said:

Fatters' "Burning Bridges" article not well recieved by the hoi polloi ( @Swaye - that's Latin for "fucktards")

https://northwestfootballfucktards.wordpress.com/2014/09/10/the-natives-are-getting-restless/

PM to everyone with a working account. This looks like a bumping and commenting opportunity. See if you can't get the Doogs talking about the appropriateness of Fatters' article, his article from the 2011 EWU game, and the heavyhanded deletion/banning tactics of the Citrus Three. Given tha the guy who started the thread is not a halfbrain and pretty much a Doog, they just might start eating their own

@FremontTroll‌ - this looks to be in your wheelhouse, but it might get you banned. Hell, commenting here might get you banned

FREE PUB. Even when it's because I am too stupid to understand words.

FreeChavez

People do remember that for 4 years this team won 7 games, and with a 5th year senior qb, a stud RB, TE and WR we basically lost any game that mattered and won the rest of our duds on the schedule. Sark was really prepared to go to 11+ win territory with no CB's and essentially a brand new QB. Okay.........

Swaye

FreeChavez said:

People do remember that for 4 years this team won 7 games, and with a 5th year senior qb, a stud RB, TE and WR we basically lost any game that mattered and won the rest of our duds on the schedule. Sark was really prepared to go to 11+ win territory with no CB's and essentially a brand new QB. Okay.........

Sark would have won 8 games this year, even with that schedule. Guaranfuckingtee you Miles would have had trust issues by Stanford which would explain the three game slide this year.

I hate that Armenian mother fucker, but generally I think Armenians are okay. Just not him. Wait...Cher...the Kardashian train wrecks...Sark...there is a pattern emerging here...

RaceBannon

No doubt you will all be whining about that post in five years. Give it up,
take a Midol and go back to bed.

Hippopeteamus

FreeChavez said:

People do remember that for 4 years this team won 7 games, and with a 5th year senior qb, a stud RB, TE and WR we basically lost any game that mattered and won the rest of our duds on the schedule. Sark was really prepared to go to 11+ win territory with no CB's and essentially a brand new QB. Okay.........

I remember in 2012 many people over there saying that 2013 was the year UW would compete for a Pac-12 championship and 2014 would be a rebuilding year. But going 5-4 in conference and not being in the North race by November was okay because we beat an OSU team on the road that lost to Eastern Washington. As with all Sark teams, they could beat teams worse than them by playing fast and loose (because of better talent), but this means they got crushed by teams with equal or greater talent (and sometimes less talent) who were better prepared and more disciplined. That is what a lot of people there (all 4 of them) don't understand. Petersen does do more with less talent, but it is not simply because of "scheme" but of the entire system. It is like Bellevue (Doogman's favorite TB Squad). Certainly Bellevue has good talent, but Butch could not just make some team with better talent as good as Bellevue overnight. He would need to implement his system. Petersen could just let the players play fast and loose, but then they would get killed by the same teams and be 5-4 in the conference again.

Homebrew_Dawg

fauxdawgman said:

Not in the middle of the store.

We never have banned people for differences of opinion. That's not what we're about. Name calling, personal attacks etc. are a different story. If there's an issue, shoot us a pm.

We would prefer to just shoot you, but we're not interested in becoming convicted felons. Just un-indicted ones, like we all are really.

BiggusDickus

bananasnblondes said:

There's a new thread up now called "why is everyone saying that...(Petersen is blowing everything up)"

Of course the short, correct answer is "because Kim said so in an effort to rile people up against Petersen."

In that thread you have this one fucktard saying "what Petersen is doing (coaching the way he wants to coach) is not fair to the SRs who invested 4 years into Sark's system and now have to switch. It's also not fair to the fans who have been waiting 15 years to see a run at a pac-12 championship.". He goes on to say that Sark and co. had made UW an "it school" for top national recruits and now Petersen is purposefully undoing that.

Its becoming clear that some of these retards think it's well within Pete's power to take what Ssrk left behind and win a national championship this year. However, Petersen, in his arrogance, or perhaps a nefarious plot to bring down UW, is choosing to put a crap product on the field.

Dickus, you are needed in that thread

http://northwestfootballfucktards.wordpress.com/2014/09/10/kent-griswold-not-a-hater/

79smoothdawg

Swaye said:

bananasnblondes said:

There's a new thread up now called "why is everyone saying that...(Petersen is blowing everything up)"

Of course the short, correct answer is "because Kim said so in an effort to rile people up against Petersen."

In that thread you have this one fucktard saying "what Petersen is doing (coaching the way he wants to coach) is not fair to the SRs who invested 4 years into Sark's system and now have to switch. It's also not fair to the fans who have been waiting 15 years to see a run at a pac-12 championship.". He goes on to say that Sark and co. had made UW an "it school" for top national recruits and now Petersen is purposefully undoing that.

Its becoming clear that some of these retards think it's well within Pete's power to take what Ssrk left behind and win a national championship this year. However, Petersen, in his arrogance, or perhaps a nefarious plot to bring down UW, is choosing to put a crap product on the field.

Dickus, you are needed in that thread

I fucking lol everytime I see that! Hysterical

Tequilla

topdawgnc said:

BiggusDickus said:

Fatters' "Burning Bridges" article not well recieved by the hoi polloi ( @Swaye - that's Latin for "fucktards")

https://northwestfootballfucktards.wordpress.com/2014/09/10/the-natives-are-getting-restless/

PM to everyone with a working account. This looks like a bumping and commenting opportunity. See if you can't get the Doogs talking about the appropriateness of Fatters' article, his article from the 2011 EWU game, and the heavyhanded deletion/banning tactics of the Citrus Three. Given tha the guy who started the thread is not a halfbrain and pretty much a Doog, they just might start eating their own

@FremontTroll‌ - this looks to be in your wheelhouse, but it might get you banned. Hell, commenting here might get you banned

True story ...

My ban date at Doogman.com is the day after my first poast hear.

You are also a well known trouble maker (hardy har har) ...

I still laugh at the fact that I got a PM from KJV one night after posting here saying that someone informed him that I was mocking him here ... then when I pressed him on showing me one instance where I mocked him or used their content on another site he went back to his bunker (Fetters' basement???) without ever answering the said question.

PurpleReign

Female version of Kim?