IT'S HAPPENING! Liz Cheney To Come Under Federal Criminal Investigation!!!

DerekJohnson

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yj6PXekURtI

WestlinnDuck

Functional difference between Liz Cheney and the dazzler? Dazzler swallowed Hutchinson's "Trump tried to steal the Presidential Limo". So did Liz (supposedly). No wonder Liz wants a pardon.

https://ace.mu.nu/

The Many Lies of Madison Cornbread

—Ace

Madison Cornbread, aka "Cassidy Hutchinson," is a much more sinister operator that I'd thought she was.

I had thought she was just a silly, stupid social climber seeking to marry up who got scared into making up stories to avoid prosecution herself.

She is allegedly much worse than that:

Ben Williamson @_WilliamsonBen

I haven't spoken much about the below incident publicly due to ongoing investigations -- but given the good work of today's House Admin report on the J6 Committee and its revelations on possible "witness tampering," I'd like to share a relevant episode involving another fabrication from the Committee, Liz Cheney, and my former colleague Cassidy Hutchinson.

Almost three years ago, in early 2022, I got a phone call from Cassidy telling me her closed-door deposition with the J6 Committee (under subpoena) was approaching. Cassidy claimed to be worried that our old Trump WH colleagues, including our boss Mark Meadows, might think she was "disloyal" for following a subpoena and showing up to the deposition.

I cut her off mid-convo and responded: "No one will think you're disloyal just for following a subpoena. And Mark would never, ever ask you to do anything other than the right thing and tell the truth. He wouldn't think you're disloyal." She agreed, and the convo ended perfectly fine.

Months later, Cassidy appeared out of nowhere at her now infamous public J6 hearing, making completely outlandish claims untethered from reality -- many of which were rightly disputed or shot down within minutes. But you may also recall that after Cassidy's appearance, Liz Cheney put up a bizarre anonymous message on a big screen, allegedly received by Cassidy before her (aforementioned) private deposition. Cheney claimed it was evidence of "witness intimidation."

The anonymous message Cheney displayed read, partly: "He (Meadows) told me you have your deposition tomorrow. He knows you're loyal, and you're going to do the right thing when you go in for your deposition."

Via public news reports, I later learned this was in reference to me. It was a completely twisted, utterly nonsense re-telling of the phone convo where Cassidy had fretted to me about "loyalty." She (and the Committee) embellished parts of the exchange, made up others, and spun it into a lie that appeared like witness intimidation.

The J6 Committee presented this account as factual -- when it wasn't -- and then leaked my name to reporters to create the narrative that I was guilty.

In the weeks and months that followed, I faced accusations of criminal exposure over it -- all over nonsense. Members like Dan Goldman publicly accused me of "witness tampering." The FBI called me in for hours of questioning. Meanwhile, the J6 Committee never once followed up with me or my attorneys to ask me about this interaction before uncritically airing the dishonest version. It was all based on fabrications, yet the J6 Committee never even bothered to get the other side. It's one of many reasons why none of their claims about President Trump, or frankly anyone else, should ever be believed.

This is just one story in a long list, and relatively, I ended up one of the lucky ones. But I'm glad to see the report today take the J6 Committee and their 'star witness' to task. They spread an untold amount of falsehoods about my friends, colleagues, and bosses, and forced many good people to defend themselves in ways they should've never had to. I will never forget it.

Mark Hemingway @Heminator

Cassidy Hutchinson in her book also accused Meadows of setting up a clandestine meeting in Georgetown to leak sensitive info to my wife.

That absolutely never happened. She doesn't tell the truth. It's that simple.

Liz Cheney must be prosecuted, and her Witch's Apprentice Madison Cornbread must be prosecuted for perjury as well.

Criminal Senator Chris Murray is worried that justice is coming, and Mark Hemingway tells him Democrats brought it on themselves:

Goduckies

I'm overall not for going after politicians since they all lie, but Cheney earned this one... f her

WestlinnDuck

https://hardcorehusky.com/discussion/comment/2032414#Comment_2032414

The issue is witness interference. Hutchinson was represented by counsel and it is illegal to meet with her without her attorney present. Cheney did so to get Hutchinson to change her testimoney. Also lying under penalty of perjury is different than making a campaign promise. The dems had no problem going after Scooter Libby or any of Trump's guys for process crimes.

That won't stop unless the rules apply to everyone. Hell, Comey was the prosecutor in the Martha Stewart case and nailed her on a perjury charge and said the law applies to everyone rich and powerful or poor. On the other hand, he wouldn't prosecute PIPS even though she was guilty of violating the secrets statute because she didn't mean it.

UW_Doog_Bot

No way Biden pardons Liz. He's going to leave her out to dry bc the dems hate her too. Take the trash out.

HHusky

Seems the girls crying “Hearsay!” are too stupid to understand the significance of the term and don’t understand what Hutchinson testified to.

Looking at you, Gasbag.

RaceBannon

https://hardcorehusky.com/discussion/comment/2032527#Comment_2032527

Gee I don't see any screaming about hearsay. I thought no one was above the law?

The issue is witness interference. Hutchinson was represented by counsel and it is illegal to meet with her without her attorney present. Cheney did so to get Hutchinson to change her testimoney. Also lying under penalty of perjury is different than making a campaign promise. The dems had no problem going after Scooter Libby or any of Trump's guys for process crimes.

That won't stop unless the rules apply to everyone. Hell, Comey was the prosecutor in the Martha Stewart case and nailed her on a perjury charge and said the law applies to everyone rich and powerful or poor. On the other hand, he wouldn't prosecute PIPS even though she was guilty of violating the secrets statute because she didn't mean it.

HHusky

https://hardcorehusky.com/discussion/comment/2032566#Comment_2032566

I can remember all the way back to the January 6 hearings. Didn't mean to call you out on your dementia, Phyllis.

RaceBannon

So you were babbling nonsense that has nothing to do with the post as usual. Got it

PurpleJ

Liz? Worry bout u pal 😘😘😘

EverettChris

Seems the girls crying “Hearsay!” are too stupid to understand the significance of the term and don’t understand what Hutchinson testified to.

You’re the one who was getting a beatdown every day explaining to you what hearsay actually is while you were insisting it was factual information from Hutchinson and the Secret Service “wasn’t denying it.” Even though they did deny it it but your precious J6 Clown Show burned the denials, which of course was obvious at the time for smart people, a group that doesn’t include you.

How fucking dumb is this guy?