Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Let's hope SCOTUS applies some justice.

BendintheriverBendintheriver Member Posts: 6,030 Standard Supporter
What the rats have done to the Jan 6'ers is sinful and many of the judges and DOJ lawyers should themselves be prosecuted.

Lets hope SCOTUS makes this thing right. Rats can burn federal buildings and attempt to kill federal and local police officers and they get zero prosecution. As a matter of fact, rats bail them out of jail if they do happen to get arrested.

Rats are acting like the communist leadership of old. Support the thugs and jail the dissenters. Abuse the power and use it on those who don't think like you.

https://www.declassified.live/p/a-red-flag-is-scotus-poised-to-overturn

"A Red Flag": Is SCOTUS Poised to Overturn Key J6 Felony Count?
If the highest court determines the Department of Justice and judges misapplied a corporate fraud statute against hundreds of January 6 defendants, the repercussions will be felt for years to come.

In a nutshell, after more than two years of litigation before federal judges in Washington, SCOTUS will review the Department of Justice’s use of 1512(c)(2), obstruction of an official proceeding, in January 6 cases. A “splintered” 2-1 appellate court ruling issued in April just barely endorsed the DOJ’s unprecedented interpretation of the statute, passed in 2002 as part of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in the aftermath of the Enron/Arthur Anderson accounting scandal.

Justices will review the appellate court’s muddy decision during oral arguments expected to take place in March or April. A final opinion should be announced before the court’s term ends in June.

The political world now waits with bated breath for the outcome. Not only does the obstruction count represent the most frequently charged felony in what the DOJ considers an act of domestic terrorism, two of four counts in Special Counsel Jack Smith’s indictment against Donald Trump involve 1512(c)(2).

If a majority of the justices conclude the DOJ misused the law, the Biden regime’s ongoing prosecution of January 6 will suffer a death blow. (At least four of nine agreed to grant cert, sending a signal the appellate court order is at risk.) And federal judges in Washington who willfully endorsed such intentional prosecutorial abuse will suffer a collective black eye, justifying calls for mass resignations and retirements.

Comments

  • MelloDawgMelloDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 6,710 Swaye's Wigwam

    What the rats have done to the Jan 6'ers is sinful and many of the judges and DOJ lawyers should themselves be prosecuted.

    Lets hope SCOTUS makes this thing right. Rats can burn federal buildings and attempt to kill federal and local police officers and they get zero prosecution. As a matter of fact, rats bail them out of jail if they do happen to get arrested.

    Rats are acting like the communist leadership of old. Support the thugs and jail the dissenters. Abuse the power and use it on those who don't think like you.

    https://www.declassified.live/p/a-red-flag-is-scotus-poised-to-overturn

    "A Red Flag": Is SCOTUS Poised to Overturn Key J6 Felony Count?
    If the highest court determines the Department of Justice and judges misapplied a corporate fraud statute against hundreds of January 6 defendants, the repercussions will be felt for years to come.

    In a nutshell, after more than two years of litigation before federal judges in Washington, SCOTUS will review the Department of Justice’s use of 1512(c)(2), obstruction of an official proceeding, in January 6 cases. A “splintered” 2-1 appellate court ruling issued in April just barely endorsed the DOJ’s unprecedented interpretation of the statute, passed in 2002 as part of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in the aftermath of the Enron/Arthur Anderson accounting scandal.

    Justices will review the appellate court’s muddy decision during oral arguments expected to take place in March or April. A final opinion should be announced before the court’s term ends in June.

    The political world now waits with bated breath for the outcome. Not only does the obstruction count represent the most frequently charged felony in what the DOJ considers an act of domestic terrorism, two of four counts in Special Counsel Jack Smith’s indictment against Donald Trump involve 1512(c)(2).

    If a majority of the justices conclude the DOJ misused the law, the Biden regime’s ongoing prosecution of January 6 will suffer a death blow. (At least four of nine agreed to grant cert, sending a signal the appellate court order is at risk.) And federal judges in Washington who willfully endorsed such intentional prosecutorial abuse will suffer a collective black eye, justifying calls for mass resignations and retirements.

    What did they do to them?
  • Bob_CBob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 10,605 Swaye's Wigwam
    MelloDawg said:

    What the rats have done to the Jan 6'ers is sinful and many of the judges and DOJ lawyers should themselves be prosecuted.

    Lets hope SCOTUS makes this thing right. Rats can burn federal buildings and attempt to kill federal and local police officers and they get zero prosecution. As a matter of fact, rats bail them out of jail if they do happen to get arrested.

    Rats are acting like the communist leadership of old. Support the thugs and jail the dissenters. Abuse the power and use it on those who don't think like you.

    https://www.declassified.live/p/a-red-flag-is-scotus-poised-to-overturn

    "A Red Flag": Is SCOTUS Poised to Overturn Key J6 Felony Count?
    If the highest court determines the Department of Justice and judges misapplied a corporate fraud statute against hundreds of January 6 defendants, the repercussions will be felt for years to come.

    In a nutshell, after more than two years of litigation before federal judges in Washington, SCOTUS will review the Department of Justice’s use of 1512(c)(2), obstruction of an official proceeding, in January 6 cases. A “splintered” 2-1 appellate court ruling issued in April just barely endorsed the DOJ’s unprecedented interpretation of the statute, passed in 2002 as part of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in the aftermath of the Enron/Arthur Anderson accounting scandal.

    Justices will review the appellate court’s muddy decision during oral arguments expected to take place in March or April. A final opinion should be announced before the court’s term ends in June.

    The political world now waits with bated breath for the outcome. Not only does the obstruction count represent the most frequently charged felony in what the DOJ considers an act of domestic terrorism, two of four counts in Special Counsel Jack Smith’s indictment against Donald Trump involve 1512(c)(2).

    If a majority of the justices conclude the DOJ misused the law, the Biden regime’s ongoing prosecution of January 6 will suffer a death blow. (At least four of nine agreed to grant cert, sending a signal the appellate court order is at risk.) And federal judges in Washington who willfully endorsed such intentional prosecutorial abuse will suffer a collective black eye, justifying calls for mass resignations and retirements.

    What did they do to them?
    Sounds like they are trying to determine if they overcharged everyone.
  • MelloDawgMelloDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 6,710 Swaye's Wigwam
    Bob_C said:

    MelloDawg said:

    What the rats have done to the Jan 6'ers is sinful and many of the judges and DOJ lawyers should themselves be prosecuted.

    Lets hope SCOTUS makes this thing right. Rats can burn federal buildings and attempt to kill federal and local police officers and they get zero prosecution. As a matter of fact, rats bail them out of jail if they do happen to get arrested.

    Rats are acting like the communist leadership of old. Support the thugs and jail the dissenters. Abuse the power and use it on those who don't think like you.

    https://www.declassified.live/p/a-red-flag-is-scotus-poised-to-overturn

    "A Red Flag": Is SCOTUS Poised to Overturn Key J6 Felony Count?
    If the highest court determines the Department of Justice and judges misapplied a corporate fraud statute against hundreds of January 6 defendants, the repercussions will be felt for years to come.

    In a nutshell, after more than two years of litigation before federal judges in Washington, SCOTUS will review the Department of Justice’s use of 1512(c)(2), obstruction of an official proceeding, in January 6 cases. A “splintered” 2-1 appellate court ruling issued in April just barely endorsed the DOJ’s unprecedented interpretation of the statute, passed in 2002 as part of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in the aftermath of the Enron/Arthur Anderson accounting scandal.

    Justices will review the appellate court’s muddy decision during oral arguments expected to take place in March or April. A final opinion should be announced before the court’s term ends in June.

    The political world now waits with bated breath for the outcome. Not only does the obstruction count represent the most frequently charged felony in what the DOJ considers an act of domestic terrorism, two of four counts in Special Counsel Jack Smith’s indictment against Donald Trump involve 1512(c)(2).

    If a majority of the justices conclude the DOJ misused the law, the Biden regime’s ongoing prosecution of January 6 will suffer a death blow. (At least four of nine agreed to grant cert, sending a signal the appellate court order is at risk.) And federal judges in Washington who willfully endorsed such intentional prosecutorial abuse will suffer a collective black eye, justifying calls for mass resignations and retirements.

    What did they do to them?
    Sounds like they are trying to determine if they overcharged everyone.
    I have bad news for you.
  • Bob_CBob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 10,605 Swaye's Wigwam
    MelloDawg said:

    Bob_C said:

    MelloDawg said:

    What the rats have done to the Jan 6'ers is sinful and many of the judges and DOJ lawyers should themselves be prosecuted.

    Lets hope SCOTUS makes this thing right. Rats can burn federal buildings and attempt to kill federal and local police officers and they get zero prosecution. As a matter of fact, rats bail them out of jail if they do happen to get arrested.

    Rats are acting like the communist leadership of old. Support the thugs and jail the dissenters. Abuse the power and use it on those who don't think like you.

    https://www.declassified.live/p/a-red-flag-is-scotus-poised-to-overturn

    "A Red Flag": Is SCOTUS Poised to Overturn Key J6 Felony Count?
    If the highest court determines the Department of Justice and judges misapplied a corporate fraud statute against hundreds of January 6 defendants, the repercussions will be felt for years to come.

    In a nutshell, after more than two years of litigation before federal judges in Washington, SCOTUS will review the Department of Justice’s use of 1512(c)(2), obstruction of an official proceeding, in January 6 cases. A “splintered” 2-1 appellate court ruling issued in April just barely endorsed the DOJ’s unprecedented interpretation of the statute, passed in 2002 as part of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in the aftermath of the Enron/Arthur Anderson accounting scandal.

    Justices will review the appellate court’s muddy decision during oral arguments expected to take place in March or April. A final opinion should be announced before the court’s term ends in June.

    The political world now waits with bated breath for the outcome. Not only does the obstruction count represent the most frequently charged felony in what the DOJ considers an act of domestic terrorism, two of four counts in Special Counsel Jack Smith’s indictment against Donald Trump involve 1512(c)(2).

    If a majority of the justices conclude the DOJ misused the law, the Biden regime’s ongoing prosecution of January 6 will suffer a death blow. (At least four of nine agreed to grant cert, sending a signal the appellate court order is at risk.) And federal judges in Washington who willfully endorsed such intentional prosecutorial abuse will suffer a collective black eye, justifying calls for mass resignations and retirements.

    What did they do to them?
    Sounds like they are trying to determine if they overcharged everyone.
    I have bad news for you.
    Go ahead and explain what that bad news is.
Sign In or Register to comment.