Dominic Kirks to SC confirmed
Comments
-
Imagine if there were any accountability for publicly reporting false information instead of having journalistic integrity and digging into the matter yourself
When you get paid the same amount for the right or the wrong information, there's no incentive to put in any effort into reporting the information that matters most to football fans -
It also helps when you have subscribers who are a bunch of mouth breathing morons who couldn’t figure out how to cancel their subscriptions if their lives depended on it.whatshouldicareabout said:Imagine if there were any accountability for publicly reporting false information instead of having journalistic integrity and digging into the matter yourself
When you get paid the same amount for the right or the wrong information, there's no incentive to put in any effort into reporting the information that matters most to football fans -
TITTT?whatshouldicareabout said:Imagine if there were any accountability for publicly reporting false information instead of having journalistic integrity and digging into the matter yourself
When you get paid the same amount for the right or the wrong information, there's no incentive to put in any effort into reporting the information that matters most to football fans -
Rest assured that Eklund is compensated in a way that is commensurate with the accuracy and quality of his contributions.whatshouldicareabout said:Imagine if there were any accountability for publicly reporting false information instead of having journalistic integrity and digging into the matter yourself
When you get paid the same amount for the right or the wrong information, there's no incentive to put in any effort into reporting the information that matters most to football fans -
Curious, what does he make?GreenRiverGatorz said:
Rest assured that Eklund is compensated in a way that is commensurate with the accuracy and quality of his contributions.whatshouldicareabout said:Imagine if there were any accountability for publicly reporting false information instead of having journalistic integrity and digging into the matter yourself
When you get paid the same amount for the right or the wrong information, there's no incentive to put in any effort into reporting the information that matters most to football fans -
Queefs.Vegasdawg said:
Curious, what does he make?GreenRiverGatorz said:
Rest assured that Eklund is compensated in a way that is commensurate with the accuracy and quality of his contributions.whatshouldicareabout said:Imagine if there were any accountability for publicly reporting false information instead of having journalistic integrity and digging into the matter yourself
When you get paid the same amount for the right or the wrong information, there's no incentive to put in any effort into reporting the information that matters most to football fans -
I don't think that site makes much more than $300k in gross receipts. That assumes over 2,000 full paying subscribers at $120 a year, which if you've ever posted there is far more than the number of people you actually interacted with. We'll have to take Kim's word for it that most subscribers lurk and don't post. Outside of that, besides minimal ad sales, I can't think of any other revenue channels they may have.Vegasdawg said:
Curious, what does he make?GreenRiverGatorz said:
Rest assured that Eklund is compensated in a way that is commensurate with the accuracy and quality of his contributions.whatshouldicareabout said:Imagine if there were any accountability for publicly reporting false information instead of having journalistic integrity and digging into the matter yourself
When you get paid the same amount for the right or the wrong information, there's no incentive to put in any effort into reporting the information that matters most to football fans
The overhead is probably pretty low (besides their nacho cheese budget), and I'm guessing only Kim goes to away games, where he moonlights as a photographer to cover travel costs. For all the hot talk about lawyers though, they likely incur $0 in legal fees and haven't been able to afford more than a 30 minute consultation in years. It's a bare bones operation over there.
Who knows what their financing looks like, but I can't imagine they were able to secure much debt for such a small operation. Maybe one of them had a rich aunt die and the inheritance has been keeping the lights on while they hemorrhage cash.
Either way though, I can't see how any of them are taking a salary in excess of $100k (as "CEO" Kim probably takes distributions instead, but same fucking thing when it's just three jackasses at the company). Eklund is probably bottom of the totem pole and is getting far less than the other two. But the math is depressing no matter what - that is not nearly enough money to afford an even halfway comfortable lifestyle in one of the highest COL areas in the country. And it's not like they're getting a 401k match or even a mildly decent healthcare plan. I'm guessing they all have side gigs (does Kim still sell real estate?) to supplement the paltry earnings they're getting from the site. For their sakes I hope they bought their homes in the 90s so they're at least sitting on a pay day and can eventually retire to Sequim or some other cheaper shit hole. -
So you’re saying we shouldn’t make fun of them because they already live a sad existence?GreenRiverGatorz said:
I don't think that site makes much more than $300k in gross receipts. That assumes over 2,000 full paying subscribers at $120 a year, which if you've ever posted there is far more than the number of people you actually interacted with. We'll have to take Kim's word for it that most subscribers lurk and don't post. Outside of that, besides minimal ad sales, I can't think of any other revenue channels they may have.Vegasdawg said:
Curious, what does he make?GreenRiverGatorz said:
Rest assured that Eklund is compensated in a way that is commensurate with the accuracy and quality of his contributions.whatshouldicareabout said:Imagine if there were any accountability for publicly reporting false information instead of having journalistic integrity and digging into the matter yourself
When you get paid the same amount for the right or the wrong information, there's no incentive to put in any effort into reporting the information that matters most to football fans
The overhead is probably pretty low (besides their nacho cheese budget), and I'm guessing only Kim goes to away games, where he moonlights as a photographer to cover travel costs. For all the hot talk about lawyers though, they likely incur $0 in legal fees and haven't been able to afford more than a 30 minute consultation in years. It's a bare bones operation over there.
Who knows what their financing looks like, but I can't imagine they were able to secure much debt for such a small operation. Maybe one of them had a rich aunt die and the inheritance has been keeping the lights on while they hemorrhage cash.
Either way though, I can't see how any of them are taking a salary in excess of $100k (as "CEO" Kim probably takes distributions instead, but same fucking thing when it's just three jackasses at the company). Eklund is probably bottom of the totem pole and is getting far less than the other two. But the math is depressing no matter what - that is not nearly enough money to afford an even halfway comfortable lifestyle in one of the highest COL areas in the country. And it's not like they're getting a 401k match or even a mildly decent healthcare plan. I'm guessing they all have side gigs (does Kim still sell real estate?) to supplement the paltry earnings they're getting from the site. For their sakes I hope they bought their homes in the 90s so they're at least sitting on a pay day and can eventually retire to Sequim or some other cheaper shit hole. -
Kim has been an alleged realtor over one of the great housing booms in history. Some ups and downs but the last 20 years you should be able to print money
Renton isn't Los Angeles but still -
Kirks is so locked in that he’s not signing today. What do we pay Ektard for, anyway?
