Whether or not Hamas is a terrorist and/or humanitarian organization is a matter of perspective, don't you think?
I'm sure the Palestinians consider the missiles and mortars that are coming from Israel as inflicting terror. Therefore, the Palestinians consider the Israelis to be terrorists.
The founders of the USA were considered terrorists by England.
You see, trying to pass judgment by labeling one party of a conflict as terrorist, doesn't get you anywhere. You should look a little deeper. The world is not black/white, good/bad.
Maybe you should do a little research. Last time I checked, the Israelis don't send suicide bombers to bomb buses and murder civilians.
When Israel is murdering civilians... why is it better that they don't use suicide bombers to do so?
Is the murder of civilians less repugnant when it is done by a 1000 pound bomb lobbed from a naval vessel off shore?
You're a fucking idiot. Israel would just sit there and let terrorists fire missiles at them if you and TheGloveFS had your way. Hamas uses human shields. But I'm sure if terrorists were lobbing missiles at the community you live in, you would object to attacking them back with 1000 pound bombs lobbed from a naval vessel off shore, right?
In the last 100 years... who committed the first acts of terrorism in the lands today called Israel?
Sounds like you need to retake World History 101.
Your knowledge of history is like that of a small child... or somebody that only watches fox news or listens to rush & beck...
What does Howard Zinn's jizz taste like?
No idea. Never tasted Jizz.
Have you found that different men have different tasting jizz? Your question suggests as much.
Wow quook, those fortune 1000's must be proud of that response. Nice job of side stepping the topic of that huge creamy wad of Zinn sliding down your throat.
Is this really the best you've got? If you can't argue the topic directly... just give up.
Though you do seem to have a way with male on male imagery... I wonder why that is.
Your priority is jizz. We know. You seem to have trouble answering the question pertaining to the right of Native Americans to return to the land that you are currently occupying. Since there's room for us all, I assume you will be donating your property to them?
Who is we? You and the other handle you made up to make it look like more people agree with you?
I already answered the question about right of return. Learn to read.
Whether or not Hamas is a terrorist and/or humanitarian organization is a matter of perspective, don't you think?
I'm sure the Palestinians consider the missiles and mortars that are coming from Israel as inflicting terror. Therefore, the Palestinians consider the Israelis to be terrorists.
The founders of the USA were considered terrorists by England.
You see, trying to pass judgment by labeling one party of a conflict as terrorist, doesn't get you anywhere. You should look a little deeper. The world is not black/white, good/bad.
Maybe you should do a little research. Last time I checked, the Israelis don't send suicide bombers to bomb buses and murder civilians.
When Israel is murdering civilians... why is it better that they don't use suicide bombers to do so?
Is the murder of civilians less repugnant when it is done by a 1000 pound bomb lobbed from a naval vessel off shore?
You're a fucking idiot. Israel would just sit there and let terrorists fire missiles at them if you and TheGloveFS had your way. Hamas uses human shields. But I'm sure if terrorists were lobbing missiles at the community you live in, you would object to attacking them back with 1000 pound bombs lobbed from a naval vessel off shore, right?
In the last 100 years... who committed the first acts of terrorism in the lands today called Israel?
Sounds like you need to retake World History 101.
Your knowledge of history is like that of a small child... or somebody that only watches fox news or listens to rush & beck...
What does Howard Zinn's jizz taste like?
No idea. Never tasted Jizz.
Have you found that different men have different tasting jizz? Your question suggests as much.
Wow quook, those fortune 1000's must be proud of that response. Nice job of side stepping the topic of that huge creamy wad of Zinn sliding down your throat.
Is this really the best you've got? If you can't argue the topic directly... just give up.
Though you do seem to have a way with male on male imagery... I wonder why that is.
Your priority is jizz. We know. You seem to have trouble answering the question pertaining to the right of Native Americans to return to the land that you are currently occupying. Since there's room for us all, I assume you will be donating your property to them?
Who is we? You and the other handle you made up to make it look like more people agree with you?
I already answered the question about right of return. Learn to read.
No you didn't answer the question. The question was directed at you personally. Answer it or you're a pussy. Since you promote the idea of the right of return, you will also have to agree to vacate your land (if you own land) and give it back to the Native Americans, or you are betraying your own philosophy. You are occupying that land and they are refugees with the right to return to it. Will you hand over your land?
Whether or not Hamas is a terrorist and/or humanitarian organization is a matter of perspective, don't you think?
I'm sure the Palestinians consider the missiles and mortars that are coming from Israel as inflicting terror. Therefore, the Palestinians consider the Israelis to be terrorists.
The founders of the USA were considered terrorists by England.
You see, trying to pass judgment by labeling one party of a conflict as terrorist, doesn't get you anywhere. You should look a little deeper. The world is not black/white, good/bad.
Maybe you should do a little research. Last time I checked, the Israelis don't send suicide bombers to bomb buses and murder civilians.
When Israel is murdering civilians... why is it better that they don't use suicide bombers to do so?
Is the murder of civilians less repugnant when it is done by a 1000 pound bomb lobbed from a naval vessel off shore?
You're a fucking idiot. Israel would just sit there and let terrorists fire missiles at them if you and TheGloveFS had your way. Hamas uses human shields. But I'm sure if terrorists were lobbing missiles at the community you live in, you would object to attacking them back with 1000 pound bombs lobbed from a naval vessel off shore, right?
In the last 100 years... who committed the first acts of terrorism in the lands today called Israel?
Sounds like you need to retake World History 101.
Your knowledge of history is like that of a small child... or somebody that only watches fox news or listens to rush & beck...
What does Howard Zinn's jizz taste like?
No idea. Never tasted Jizz.
Have you found that different men have different tasting jizz? Your question suggests as much.
Wow quook, those fortune 1000's must be proud of that response. Nice job of side stepping the topic of that huge creamy wad of Zinn sliding down your throat.
Is this really the best you've got? If you can't argue the topic directly... just give up.
Though you do seem to have a way with male on male imagery... I wonder why that is.
You've tried to equate Israeli soldiers retaliating against terrorist attacks as terrorists themselves. What more do I need to add quook? Oh right, you're not seeing things in black and white like the rest of us. So Israeli Solder == Terrorist truly sees the complexity of the situation? Oh yeah, you cherry pick examples (like starting your argument in the 1940's, how many times did that area change hands before that?) in order to fit your agenda like....
Whether or not Hamas is a terrorist and/or humanitarian organization is a matter of perspective, don't you think?
I'm sure the Palestinians consider the missiles and mortars that are coming from Israel as inflicting terror. Therefore, the Palestinians consider the Israelis to be terrorists.
The founders of the USA were considered terrorists by England.
You see, trying to pass judgment by labeling one party of a conflict as terrorist, doesn't get you anywhere. You should look a little deeper. The world is not black/white, good/bad.
Maybe you should do a little research. Last time I checked, the Israelis don't send suicide bombers to bomb buses and murder civilians.
When Israel is murdering civilians... why is it better that they don't use suicide bombers to do so?
Is the murder of civilians less repugnant when it is done by a 1000 pound bomb lobbed from a naval vessel off shore?
You're a fucking idiot. Israel would just sit there and let terrorists fire missiles at them if you and TheGloveFS had your way. Hamas uses human shields. But I'm sure if terrorists were lobbing missiles at the community you live in, you would object to attacking them back with 1000 pound bombs lobbed from a naval vessel off shore, right?
In the last 100 years... who committed the first acts of terrorism in the lands today called Israel?
Sounds like you need to retake World History 101.
Your knowledge of history is like that of a small child... or somebody that only watches fox news or listens to rush & beck...
What does Howard Zinn's jizz taste like?
No idea. Never tasted Jizz.
Have you found that different men have different tasting jizz? Your question suggests as much.
Wow quook, those fortune 1000's must be proud of that response. Nice job of side stepping the topic of that huge creamy wad of Zinn sliding down your throat.
Is this really the best you've got? If you can't argue the topic directly... just give up.
Though you do seem to have a way with male on male imagery... I wonder why that is.
Your priority is jizz. We know. You seem to have trouble answering the question pertaining to the right of Native Americans to return to the land that you are currently occupying. Since there's room for us all, I assume you will be donating your property to them?
Who is we? You and the other handle you made up to make it look like more people agree with you?
I already answered the question about right of return. Learn to read.
No you didn't answer the question. The question was directed at you personally. Answer it or you're a pussy. Since you promote the idea of the right of return, you will also have to agree to vacate your land (if you own land) and give it back to the Native Americans, or you are betraying your own philosophy. You are occupying that land and they are refugees with the right to return to it. Will you hand over your land?
I know you're just trying to be a dumbshit (and if you aren't trying... then it comes naturally to you)... but if you can't see that in your analogy... the Native Americans would equate to the Israelites... since in both cases... according to you and your supporters they were the original inhabitants of their respective lands... then are you really sure you want to pursue this line of logic?
If anything, we would be like the arabs... the occupiers of the land after the original inhabitants... until such time as the UN comes along and gives a chunk of it back to the original inhabitants (as they did for the Jews).
Do you really not know why they are called the 12 Tribes of Israel?
So... smart guy... where do you really want to take this?
Whether or not Hamas is a terrorist and/or humanitarian organization is a matter of perspective, don't you think?
I'm sure the Palestinians consider the missiles and mortars that are coming from Israel as inflicting terror. Therefore, the Palestinians consider the Israelis to be terrorists.
The founders of the USA were considered terrorists by England.
You see, trying to pass judgment by labeling one party of a conflict as terrorist, doesn't get you anywhere. You should look a little deeper. The world is not black/white, good/bad.
Maybe you should do a little research. Last time I checked, the Israelis don't send suicide bombers to bomb buses and murder civilians.
When Israel is murdering civilians... why is it better that they don't use suicide bombers to do so?
Is the murder of civilians less repugnant when it is done by a 1000 pound bomb lobbed from a naval vessel off shore?
You're a fucking idiot. Israel would just sit there and let terrorists fire missiles at them if you and TheGloveFS had your way. Hamas uses human shields. But I'm sure if terrorists were lobbing missiles at the community you live in, you would object to attacking them back with 1000 pound bombs lobbed from a naval vessel off shore, right?
In the last 100 years... who committed the first acts of terrorism in the lands today called Israel?
Sounds like you need to retake World History 101.
Your knowledge of history is like that of a small child... or somebody that only watches fox news or listens to rush & beck...
What does Howard Zinn's jizz taste like?
No idea. Never tasted Jizz.
Have you found that different men have different tasting jizz? Your question suggests as much.
Wow quook, those fortune 1000's must be proud of that response. Nice job of side stepping the topic of that huge creamy wad of Zinn sliding down your throat.
Is this really the best you've got? If you can't argue the topic directly... just give up.
Though you do seem to have a way with male on male imagery... I wonder why that is.
Your priority is jizz. We know. You seem to have trouble answering the question pertaining to the right of Native Americans to return to the land that you are currently occupying. Since there's room for us all, I assume you will be donating your property to them?
Who is we? You and the other handle you made up to make it look like more people agree with you?
I already answered the question about right of return. Learn to read.
No you didn't answer the question. The question was directed at you personally. Answer it or you're a pussy. Since you promote the idea of the right of return, you will also have to agree to vacate your land (if you own land) and give it back to the Native Americans, or you are betraying your own philosophy. You are occupying that land and they are refugees with the right to return to it. Will you hand over your land?
I know you're just trying to be a dumbshit (and if you aren't trying... then it comes naturally to you)... but if you can't see that in your analogy... the Native Americans would equate to the Israelites... since in both cases... according to you and your supporters they were the original inhabitants of their respective lands... then are you really sure you want to pursue this line of logic?
If anything, we would be like the arabs... the occupiers of the land after the original inhabitants... until such time as the UN comes along and gives a chunk of it back to the original inhabitants (as they did for the Jews).
Do you really not know why they are called the 12 Tribes of Israel?
So... smart guy... where do you really want to take this?
You're still dodging the question because to answer it you will have to betray your line of logic and philosophy. Your silence is answer enough -- of course you won't give up your own fucking land. Your position has a foundation of sand because you refuse to apply it to yourself. Kind of like how Obama Care doesn't apply to the libtard senators and congressmen that shoved it down our throats.
Whether or not Hamas is a terrorist and/or humanitarian organization is a matter of perspective, don't you think?
I'm sure the Palestinians consider the missiles and mortars that are coming from Israel as inflicting terror. Therefore, the Palestinians consider the Israelis to be terrorists.
The founders of the USA were considered terrorists by England.
You see, trying to pass judgment by labeling one party of a conflict as terrorist, doesn't get you anywhere. You should look a little deeper. The world is not black/white, good/bad.
Maybe you should do a little research. Last time I checked, the Israelis don't send suicide bombers to bomb buses and murder civilians.
When Israel is murdering civilians... why is it better that they don't use suicide bombers to do so?
Is the murder of civilians less repugnant when it is done by a 1000 pound bomb lobbed from a naval vessel off shore?
You're a fucking idiot. Israel would just sit there and let terrorists fire missiles at them if you and TheGloveFS had your way. Hamas uses human shields. But I'm sure if terrorists were lobbing missiles at the community you live in, you would object to attacking them back with 1000 pound bombs lobbed from a naval vessel off shore, right?
In the last 100 years... who committed the first acts of terrorism in the lands today called Israel?
Sounds like you need to retake World History 101.
Your knowledge of history is like that of a small child... or somebody that only watches fox news or listens to rush & beck...
What does Howard Zinn's jizz taste like?
No idea. Never tasted Jizz.
Have you found that different men have different tasting jizz? Your question suggests as much.
Wow quook, those fortune 1000's must be proud of that response. Nice job of side stepping the topic of that huge creamy wad of Zinn sliding down your throat.
Is this really the best you've got? If you can't argue the topic directly... just give up.
Though you do seem to have a way with male on male imagery... I wonder why that is.
Your priority is jizz. We know. You seem to have trouble answering the question pertaining to the right of Native Americans to return to the land that you are currently occupying. Since there's room for us all, I assume you will be donating your property to them?
Who is we? You and the other handle you made up to make it look like more people agree with you?
I already answered the question about right of return. Learn to read.
No you didn't answer the question. The question was directed at you personally. Answer it or you're a pussy. Since you promote the idea of the right of return, you will also have to agree to vacate your land (if you own land) and give it back to the Native Americans, or you are betraying your own philosophy. You are occupying that land and they are refugees with the right to return to it. Will you hand over your land?
I know you're just trying to be a dumbshit (and if you aren't trying... then it comes naturally to you)... but if you can't see that in your analogy... the Native Americans would equate to the Israelites... since in both cases... according to you and your supporters they were the original inhabitants of their respective lands... then are you really sure you want to pursue this line of logic?
If anything, we would be like the arabs... the occupiers of the land after the original inhabitants... until such time as the UN comes along and gives a chunk of it back to the original inhabitants (as they did for the Jews).
Do you really not know why they are called the 12 Tribes of Israel?
So... smart guy... where do you really want to take this?
You're still dodging the question because to answer it you will have to betray your line of logic and philosophy. Your silence is answer enough -- of course you won't give up your own fucking land. Your position has a foundation of sand because you refuse to apply it to yourself. Kind of like how Obama Care doesn't apply to the libtard senators and congressmen that shoved it down our throats.
I answered it by pointing out your flaw. Why don't you answer your own question? If Jews had a right to return to their land, why don't native Americans?
Whether or not Hamas is a terrorist and/or humanitarian organization is a matter of perspective, don't you think?
I'm sure the Palestinians consider the missiles and mortars that are coming from Israel as inflicting terror. Therefore, the Palestinians consider the Israelis to be terrorists.
The founders of the USA were considered terrorists by England.
You see, trying to pass judgment by labeling one party of a conflict as terrorist, doesn't get you anywhere. You should look a little deeper. The world is not black/white, good/bad.
Maybe you should do a little research. Last time I checked, the Israelis don't send suicide bombers to bomb buses and murder civilians.
When Israel is murdering civilians... why is it better that they don't use suicide bombers to do so?
Is the murder of civilians less repugnant when it is done by a 1000 pound bomb lobbed from a naval vessel off shore?
You're a fucking idiot. Israel would just sit there and let terrorists fire missiles at them if you and TheGloveFS had your way. Hamas uses human shields. But I'm sure if terrorists were lobbing missiles at the community you live in, you would object to attacking them back with 1000 pound bombs lobbed from a naval vessel off shore, right?
In the last 100 years... who committed the first acts of terrorism in the lands today called Israel?
Sounds like you need to retake World History 101.
Your knowledge of history is like that of a small child... or somebody that only watches fox news or listens to rush & beck...
What does Howard Zinn's jizz taste like?
No idea. Never tasted Jizz.
Have you found that different men have different tasting jizz? Your question suggests as much.
Wow quook, those fortune 1000's must be proud of that response. Nice job of side stepping the topic of that huge creamy wad of Zinn sliding down your throat.
Is this really the best you've got? If you can't argue the topic directly... just give up.
Though you do seem to have a way with male on male imagery... I wonder why that is.
Your priority is jizz. We know. You seem to have trouble answering the question pertaining to the right of Native Americans to return to the land that you are currently occupying. Since there's room for us all, I assume you will be donating your property to them?
Who is we? You and the other handle you made up to make it look like more people agree with you?
I already answered the question about right of return. Learn to read.
No you didn't answer the question. The question was directed at you personally. Answer it or you're a pussy. Since you promote the idea of the right of return, you will also have to agree to vacate your land (if you own land) and give it back to the Native Americans, or you are betraying your own philosophy. You are occupying that land and they are refugees with the right to return to it. Will you hand over your land?
I know you're just trying to be a dumbshit (and if you aren't trying... then it comes naturally to you)... but if you can't see that in your analogy... the Native Americans would equate to the Israelites... since in both cases... according to you and your supporters they were the original inhabitants of their respective lands... then are you really sure you want to pursue this line of logic?
If anything, we would be like the arabs... the occupiers of the land after the original inhabitants... until such time as the UN comes along and gives a chunk of it back to the original inhabitants (as they did for the Jews).
Do you really not know why they are called the 12 Tribes of Israel?
So... smart guy... where do you really want to take this?
You're still dodging the question because to answer it you will have to betray your line of logic and philosophy. Your silence is answer enough -- of course you won't give up your own fucking land. Your position has a foundation of sand because you refuse to apply it to yourself. Kind of like how Obama Care doesn't apply to the libtard senators and congressmen that shoved it down our throats.
I answered it by pointing out your flaw. Why don't you answer your own question? If Jews had a right to return to their land, why don't native Americans?
Anyone with half a brain can see that you are dodging the question. If Native Americans have the right to return to their land, do they also have the right to return to your land? I'm done with you if you dodge it once more.
Whether or not Hamas is a terrorist and/or humanitarian organization is a matter of perspective, don't you think?
I'm sure the Palestinians consider the missiles and mortars that are coming from Israel as inflicting terror. Therefore, the Palestinians consider the Israelis to be terrorists.
The founders of the USA were considered terrorists by England.
You see, trying to pass judgment by labeling one party of a conflict as terrorist, doesn't get you anywhere. You should look a little deeper. The world is not black/white, good/bad.
Maybe you should do a little research. Last time I checked, the Israelis don't send suicide bombers to bomb buses and murder civilians.
When Israel is murdering civilians... why is it better that they don't use suicide bombers to do so?
Is the murder of civilians less repugnant when it is done by a 1000 pound bomb lobbed from a naval vessel off shore?
You're a fucking idiot. Israel would just sit there and let terrorists fire missiles at them if you and TheGloveFS had your way. Hamas uses human shields. But I'm sure if terrorists were lobbing missiles at the community you live in, you would object to attacking them back with 1000 pound bombs lobbed from a naval vessel off shore, right?
In the last 100 years... who committed the first acts of terrorism in the lands today called Israel?
Sounds like you need to retake World History 101.
Your knowledge of history is like that of a small child... or somebody that only watches fox news or listens to rush & beck...
What does Howard Zinn's jizz taste like?
No idea. Never tasted Jizz.
Have you found that different men have different tasting jizz? Your question suggests as much.
Wow quook, those fortune 1000's must be proud of that response. Nice job of side stepping the topic of that huge creamy wad of Zinn sliding down your throat.
Is this really the best you've got? If you can't argue the topic directly... just give up.
Though you do seem to have a way with male on male imagery... I wonder why that is.
Your priority is jizz. We know. You seem to have trouble answering the question pertaining to the right of Native Americans to return to the land that you are currently occupying. Since there's room for us all, I assume you will be donating your property to them?
Who is we? You and the other handle you made up to make it look like more people agree with you?
I already answered the question about right of return. Learn to read.
No you didn't answer the question. The question was directed at you personally. Answer it or you're a pussy. Since you promote the idea of the right of return, you will also have to agree to vacate your land (if you own land) and give it back to the Native Americans, or you are betraying your own philosophy. You are occupying that land and they are refugees with the right to return to it. Will you hand over your land?
I know you're just trying to be a dumbshit (and if you aren't trying... then it comes naturally to you)... but if you can't see that in your analogy... the Native Americans would equate to the Israelites... since in both cases... according to you and your supporters they were the original inhabitants of their respective lands... then are you really sure you want to pursue this line of logic?
If anything, we would be like the arabs... the occupiers of the land after the original inhabitants... until such time as the UN comes along and gives a chunk of it back to the original inhabitants (as they did for the Jews).
Do you really not know why they are called the 12 Tribes of Israel?
So... smart guy... where do you really want to take this?
You're still dodging the question because to answer it you will have to betray your line of logic and philosophy. Your silence is answer enough -- of course you won't give up your own fucking land. Your position has a foundation of sand because you refuse to apply it to yourself. Kind of like how Obama Care doesn't apply to the libtard senators and congressmen that shoved it down our throats.
I answered it by pointing out your flaw. Why don't you answer your own question? If Jews had a right to return to their land, why don't native Americans?
Because the native americans don't understand that before they were nearly wiped out by disease (cue OZONE's disease blankets argument), their lands changed hands by other tribes who had no problem killing them over it. You can go ahead and paint some picture of them all standing together smoking pipe but the reality is that often they didn't even want peace when it was offered to them. A warrior culture was prevalent in almost all of these tribes. I have a gun and a disease you have a tomahawk and you don't want to have a peaceful coexistence? GTFO
With the Jews we saw a CALCULATED, PROCEDURAL way of eradicating a group of people who were victimized largely by their standing in society in Germany. You can argue whatever you want, but that was absolutely brutal finding those camps. The shear planning, the imagery of marching a group of people into a gas chamber, should immediately cause you to stfu about this whole debate. With the indians it was sad, we do have the Trail of Tears, etc. but it was also chaotic. I don't see you giving a fuck about victims of the European plagues.
The nature of the situations as well as their respective times in history (so context, which I'm not going to get into at length here) is what makes them fundamentally different and acceptable for them to have different outcomes IMO.
It's 75% Ozone and OBK, so nuff said on that. It does have an interesting side of the Coog Sven says is Harv taking the conservative position, so either I'm being whooshed or Sven's Harvdar is a bit off or perhaps abundance.
It's 75%81% Ozone and OBK, so nuff said on that. It does have an interesting side of the Coog Sven says is Harv taking the conservative position, so either I'm being whooshed or Sven's Harvdar is a bit off or perhaps abundance.
Whether or not Hamas is a terrorist and/or humanitarian organization is a matter of perspective, don't you think?
I'm sure the Palestinians consider the missiles and mortars that are coming from Israel as inflicting terror. Therefore, the Palestinians consider the Israelis to be terrorists.
The founders of the USA were considered terrorists by England.
You see, trying to pass judgment by labeling one party of a conflict as terrorist, doesn't get you anywhere. You should look a little deeper. The world is not black/white, good/bad.
Maybe you should do a little research. Last time I checked, the Israelis don't send suicide bombers to bomb buses and murder civilians.
When Israel is murdering civilians... why is it better that they don't use suicide bombers to do so?
Is the murder of civilians less repugnant when it is done by a 1000 pound bomb lobbed from a naval vessel off shore?
You're a fucking idiot. Israel would just sit there and let terrorists fire missiles at them if you and TheGloveFS had your way. Hamas uses human shields. But I'm sure if terrorists were lobbing missiles at the community you live in, you would object to attacking them back with 1000 pound bombs lobbed from a naval vessel off shore, right?
In the last 100 years... who committed the first acts of terrorism in the lands today called Israel?
Sounds like you need to retake World History 101.
Your knowledge of history is like that of a small child... or somebody that only watches fox news or listens to rush & beck...
What does Howard Zinn's jizz taste like?
No idea. Never tasted Jizz.
Have you found that different men have different tasting jizz? Your question suggests as much.
Wow quook, those fortune 1000's must be proud of that response. Nice job of side stepping the topic of that huge creamy wad of Zinn sliding down your throat.
Is this really the best you've got? If you can't argue the topic directly... just give up.
Though you do seem to have a way with male on male imagery... I wonder why that is.
Your priority is jizz. We know. You seem to have trouble answering the question pertaining to the right of Native Americans to return to the land that you are currently occupying. Since there's room for us all, I assume you will be donating your property to them?
Who is we? You and the other handle you made up to make it look like more people agree with you?
I already answered the question about right of return. Learn to read.
No you didn't answer the question. The question was directed at you personally. Answer it or you're a pussy. Since you promote the idea of the right of return, you will also have to agree to vacate your land (if you own land) and give it back to the Native Americans, or you are betraying your own philosophy. You are occupying that land and they are refugees with the right to return to it. Will you hand over your land?
I know you're just trying to be a dumbshit (and if you aren't trying... then it comes naturally to you)... but if you can't see that in your analogy... the Native Americans would equate to the Israelites... since in both cases... according to you and your supporters they were the original inhabitants of their respective lands... then are you really sure you want to pursue this line of logic?
If anything, we would be like the arabs... the occupiers of the land after the original inhabitants... until such time as the UN comes along and gives a chunk of it back to the original inhabitants (as they did for the Jews).
Do you really not know why they are called the 12 Tribes of Israel?
So... smart guy... where do you really want to take this?
You're still dodging the question because to answer it you will have to betray your line of logic and philosophy. Your silence is answer enough -- of course you won't give up your own fucking land. Your position has a foundation of sand because you refuse to apply it to yourself. Kind of like how Obama Care doesn't apply to the libtard senators and congressmen that shoved it down our throats.
I answered it by pointing out your flaw. Why don't you answer your own question? If Jews had a right to return to their land, why don't native Americans?
Because the native americans don't understand that before they were nearly wiped out by disease (cue OZONE's disease blankets argument), their lands changed hands by other tribes who had no problem killing them over it. You can go ahead and paint some picture of them all standing together smoking pipe but the reality is that often they didn't even want peace when it was offered to them. A warrior culture was prevalent in almost all of these tribes. I have a gun and a disease you have a tomahawk and you don't want to have a peaceful coexistence? GTFO
With the Jews we saw a CALCULATED, PROCEDURAL way of eradicating a group of people who were victimized largely by their standing in society in Germany. You can argue whatever you want, but that was absolutely brutal finding those camps. The shear planning, the imagery of marching a group of people into a gas chamber, should immediately cause you to stfu about this whole debate. With the indians it was sad, we do have the Trail of Tears, etc. but it was also chaotic. I don't see you giving a fuck about victims of the European plagues.
The nature of the situations as well as their respective times in history (so context, which I'm not going to get into at length here) is what makes them fundamentally different and acceptable for them to have different outcomes IMO.
Agreed, different situations, which is why I'm not giving back any land, but the Jews should.
Whether or not Hamas is a terrorist and/or humanitarian organization is a matter of perspective, don't you think?
I'm sure the Palestinians consider the missiles and mortars that are coming from Israel as inflicting terror. Therefore, the Palestinians consider the Israelis to be terrorists.
The founders of the USA were considered terrorists by England.
You see, trying to pass judgment by labeling one party of a conflict as terrorist, doesn't get you anywhere. You should look a little deeper. The world is not black/white, good/bad.
Maybe you should do a little research. Last time I checked, the Israelis don't send suicide bombers to bomb buses and murder civilians.
When Israel is murdering civilians... why is it better that they don't use suicide bombers to do so?
Is the murder of civilians less repugnant when it is done by a 1000 pound bomb lobbed from a naval vessel off shore?
You're a fucking idiot. Israel would just sit there and let terrorists fire missiles at them if you and TheGloveFS had your way. Hamas uses human shields. But I'm sure if terrorists were lobbing missiles at the community you live in, you would object to attacking them back with 1000 pound bombs lobbed from a naval vessel off shore, right?
In the last 100 years... who committed the first acts of terrorism in the lands today called Israel?
Sounds like you need to retake World History 101.
Your knowledge of history is like that of a small child... or somebody that only watches fox news or listens to rush & beck...
What does Howard Zinn's jizz taste like?
No idea. Never tasted Jizz.
Have you found that different men have different tasting jizz? Your question suggests as much.
Wow quook, those fortune 1000's must be proud of that response. Nice job of side stepping the topic of that huge creamy wad of Zinn sliding down your throat.
Is this really the best you've got? If you can't argue the topic directly... just give up.
Though you do seem to have a way with male on male imagery... I wonder why that is.
Your priority is jizz. We know. You seem to have trouble answering the question pertaining to the right of Native Americans to return to the land that you are currently occupying. Since there's room for us all, I assume you will be donating your property to them?
Who is we? You and the other handle you made up to make it look like more people agree with you?
I already answered the question about right of return. Learn to read.
No you didn't answer the question. The question was directed at you personally. Answer it or you're a pussy. Since you promote the idea of the right of return, you will also have to agree to vacate your land (if you own land) and give it back to the Native Americans, or you are betraying your own philosophy. You are occupying that land and they are refugees with the right to return to it. Will you hand over your land?
I know you're just trying to be a dumbshit (and if you aren't trying... then it comes naturally to you)... but if you can't see that in your analogy... the Native Americans would equate to the Israelites... since in both cases... according to you and your supporters they were the original inhabitants of their respective lands... then are you really sure you want to pursue this line of logic?
If anything, we would be like the arabs... the occupiers of the land after the original inhabitants... until such time as the UN comes along and gives a chunk of it back to the original inhabitants (as they did for the Jews).
Do you really not know why they are called the 12 Tribes of Israel?
So... smart guy... where do you really want to take this?
You're still dodging the question because to answer it you will have to betray your line of logic and philosophy. Your silence is answer enough -- of course you won't give up your own fucking land. Your position has a foundation of sand because you refuse to apply it to yourself. Kind of like how Obama Care doesn't apply to the libtard senators and congressmen that shoved it down our throats.
I answered it by pointing out your flaw. Why don't you answer your own question? If Jews had a right to return to their land, why don't native Americans?
Because the native americans don't understand that before they were nearly wiped out by disease (cue OZONE's disease blankets argument), their lands changed hands by other tribes who had no problem killing them over it. You can go ahead and paint some picture of them all standing together smoking pipe but the reality is that often they didn't even want peace when it was offered to them. A warrior culture was prevalent in almost all of these tribes. I have a gun and a disease you have a tomahawk and you don't want to have a peaceful coexistence? GTFO
With the Jews we saw a CALCULATED, PROCEDURAL way of eradicating a group of people who were victimized largely by their standing in society in Germany. You can argue whatever you want, but that was absolutely brutal finding those camps. The shear planning, the imagery of marching a group of people into a gas chamber, should immediately cause you to stfu about this whole debate. With the indians it was sad, we do have the Trail of Tears, etc. but it was also chaotic. I don't see you giving a fuck about victims of the European plagues.
The nature of the situations as well as their respective times in history (so context, which I'm not going to get into at length here) is what makes them fundamentally different and acceptable for them to have different outcomes IMO.
Agreed, different situations, which is why I'm not giving back any land, but the Jews should.
Good of you to finally answer the question and admit that your libtard philosophy applies only to others but not to yourself. The exit is that way --------->
Whether or not Hamas is a terrorist and/or humanitarian organization is a matter of perspective, don't you think?
I'm sure the Palestinians consider the missiles and mortars that are coming from Israel as inflicting terror. Therefore, the Palestinians consider the Israelis to be terrorists.
The founders of the USA were considered terrorists by England.
You see, trying to pass judgment by labeling one party of a conflict as terrorist, doesn't get you anywhere. You should look a little deeper. The world is not black/white, good/bad.
Maybe you should do a little research. Last time I checked, the Israelis don't send suicide bombers to bomb buses and murder civilians.
When Israel is murdering civilians... why is it better that they don't use suicide bombers to do so?
Is the murder of civilians less repugnant when it is done by a 1000 pound bomb lobbed from a naval vessel off shore?
You're a fucking idiot. Israel would just sit there and let terrorists fire missiles at them if you and TheGloveFS had your way. Hamas uses human shields. But I'm sure if terrorists were lobbing missiles at the community you live in, you would object to attacking them back with 1000 pound bombs lobbed from a naval vessel off shore, right?
In the last 100 years... who committed the first acts of terrorism in the lands today called Israel?
Sounds like you need to retake World History 101.
Your knowledge of history is like that of a small child... or somebody that only watches fox news or listens to rush & beck...
What does Howard Zinn's jizz taste like?
No idea. Never tasted Jizz.
Have you found that different men have different tasting jizz? Your question suggests as much.
Wow quook, those fortune 1000's must be proud of that response. Nice job of side stepping the topic of that huge creamy wad of Zinn sliding down your throat.
Is this really the best you've got? If you can't argue the topic directly... just give up.
Though you do seem to have a way with male on male imagery... I wonder why that is.
Your priority is jizz. We know. You seem to have trouble answering the question pertaining to the right of Native Americans to return to the land that you are currently occupying. Since there's room for us all, I assume you will be donating your property to them?
Who is we? You and the other handle you made up to make it look like more people agree with you?
I already answered the question about right of return. Learn to read.
No you didn't answer the question. The question was directed at you personally. Answer it or you're a pussy. Since you promote the idea of the right of return, you will also have to agree to vacate your land (if you own land) and give it back to the Native Americans, or you are betraying your own philosophy. You are occupying that land and they are refugees with the right to return to it. Will you hand over your land?
I know you're just trying to be a dumbshit (and if you aren't trying... then it comes naturally to you)... but if you can't see that in your analogy... the Native Americans would equate to the Israelites... since in both cases... according to you and your supporters they were the original inhabitants of their respective lands... then are you really sure you want to pursue this line of logic?
If anything, we would be like the arabs... the occupiers of the land after the original inhabitants... until such time as the UN comes along and gives a chunk of it back to the original inhabitants (as they did for the Jews).
Do you really not know why they are called the 12 Tribes of Israel?
So... smart guy... where do you really want to take this?
You're still dodging the question because to answer it you will have to betray your line of logic and philosophy. Your silence is answer enough -- of course you won't give up your own fucking land. Your position has a foundation of sand because you refuse to apply it to yourself. Kind of like how Obama Care doesn't apply to the libtard senators and congressmen that shoved it down our throats.
I answered it by pointing out your flaw. Why don't you answer your own question? If Jews had a right to return to their land, why don't native Americans?
Because the native americans don't understand that before they were nearly wiped out by disease (cue OZONE's disease blankets argument), their lands changed hands by other tribes who had no problem killing them over it. You can go ahead and paint some picture of them all standing together smoking pipe but the reality is that often they didn't even want peace when it was offered to them. A warrior culture was prevalent in almost all of these tribes. I have a gun and a disease you have a tomahawk and you don't want to have a peaceful coexistence? GTFO
With the Jews we saw a CALCULATED, PROCEDURAL way of eradicating a group of people who were victimized largely by their standing in society in Germany. You can argue whatever you want, but that was absolutely brutal finding those camps. The shear planning, the imagery of marching a group of people into a gas chamber, should immediately cause you to stfu about this whole debate. With the indians it was sad, we do have the Trail of Tears, etc. but it was also chaotic. I don't see you giving a fuck about victims of the European plagues.
The nature of the situations as well as their respective times in history (so context, which I'm not going to get into at length here) is what makes them fundamentally different and acceptable for them to have different outcomes IMO.
Agreed, different situations, which is why I'm not giving back any land, but the Jews should.
Good of you to finally answer the question and admit that your libtard philosophy applies only to others but not yourself. The exit is that way --------->
Way to miss the point so many times that one has to wonder if you ever get it?
Whether or not Hamas is a terrorist and/or humanitarian organization is a matter of perspective, don't you think?
I'm sure the Palestinians consider the missiles and mortars that are coming from Israel as inflicting terror. Therefore, the Palestinians consider the Israelis to be terrorists.
The founders of the USA were considered terrorists by England.
You see, trying to pass judgment by labeling one party of a conflict as terrorist, doesn't get you anywhere. You should look a little deeper. The world is not black/white, good/bad.
Maybe you should do a little research. Last time I checked, the Israelis don't send suicide bombers to bomb buses and murder civilians.
When Israel is murdering civilians... why is it better that they don't use suicide bombers to do so?
Is the murder of civilians less repugnant when it is done by a 1000 pound bomb lobbed from a naval vessel off shore?
You're a fucking idiot. Israel would just sit there and let terrorists fire missiles at them if you and TheGloveFS had your way. Hamas uses human shields. But I'm sure if terrorists were lobbing missiles at the community you live in, you would object to attacking them back with 1000 pound bombs lobbed from a naval vessel off shore, right?
In the last 100 years... who committed the first acts of terrorism in the lands today called Israel?
Sounds like you need to retake World History 101.
Your knowledge of history is like that of a small child... or somebody that only watches fox news or listens to rush & beck...
What does Howard Zinn's jizz taste like?
No idea. Never tasted Jizz.
Have you found that different men have different tasting jizz? Your question suggests as much.
Wow quook, those fortune 1000's must be proud of that response. Nice job of side stepping the topic of that huge creamy wad of Zinn sliding down your throat.
Is this really the best you've got? If you can't argue the topic directly... just give up.
Though you do seem to have a way with male on male imagery... I wonder why that is.
Your priority is jizz. We know. You seem to have trouble answering the question pertaining to the right of Native Americans to return to the land that you are currently occupying. Since there's room for us all, I assume you will be donating your property to them?
Who is we? You and the other handle you made up to make it look like more people agree with you?
I already answered the question about right of return. Learn to read.
No you didn't answer the question. The question was directed at you personally. Answer it or you're a pussy. Since you promote the idea of the right of return, you will also have to agree to vacate your land (if you own land) and give it back to the Native Americans, or you are betraying your own philosophy. You are occupying that land and they are refugees with the right to return to it. Will you hand over your land?
I know you're just trying to be a dumbshit (and if you aren't trying... then it comes naturally to you)... but if you can't see that in your analogy... the Native Americans would equate to the Israelites... since in both cases... according to you and your supporters they were the original inhabitants of their respective lands... then are you really sure you want to pursue this line of logic?
If anything, we would be like the arabs... the occupiers of the land after the original inhabitants... until such time as the UN comes along and gives a chunk of it back to the original inhabitants (as they did for the Jews).
Do you really not know why they are called the 12 Tribes of Israel?
So... smart guy... where do you really want to take this?
You're still dodging the question because to answer it you will have to betray your line of logic and philosophy. Your silence is answer enough -- of course you won't give up your own fucking land. Your position has a foundation of sand because you refuse to apply it to yourself. Kind of like how Obama Care doesn't apply to the libtard senators and congressmen that shoved it down our throats.
I answered it by pointing out your flaw. Why don't you answer your own question? If Jews had a right to return to their land, why don't native Americans?
Because the native americans don't understand that before they were nearly wiped out by disease (cue OZONE's disease blankets argument), their lands changed hands by other tribes who had no problem killing them over it. You can go ahead and paint some picture of them all standing together smoking pipe but the reality is that often they didn't even want peace when it was offered to them. A warrior culture was prevalent in almost all of these tribes. I have a gun and a disease you have a tomahawk and you don't want to have a peaceful coexistence? GTFO
With the Jews we saw a CALCULATED, PROCEDURAL way of eradicating a group of people who were victimized largely by their standing in society in Germany. You can argue whatever you want, but that was absolutely brutal finding those camps. The shear planning, the imagery of marching a group of people into a gas chamber, should immediately cause you to stfu about this whole debate. With the indians it was sad, we do have the Trail of Tears, etc. but it was also chaotic. I don't see you giving a fuck about victims of the European plagues.
The nature of the situations as well as their respective times in history (so context, which I'm not going to get into at length here) is what makes them fundamentally different and acceptable for them to have different outcomes IMO.
Agreed, different situations, which is why I'm not giving back any land, but the Jews should.
Good of you to finally answer the question and admit that your libtard philosophy applies only to others but not yourself. The exit is that way --------->
Way to miss the point so many times that one has to wonder if you ever get it?
Comments
I already answered the question about right of return. Learn to read.
....HOWARD FUCKING ZINN
If anything, we would be like the arabs... the occupiers of the land after the original inhabitants... until such time as the UN comes along and gives a chunk of it back to the original inhabitants (as they did for the Jews).
Do you really not know why they are called the 12 Tribes of Israel?
So... smart guy... where do you really want to take this?
If Jews had a right to return to their land, why don't native Americans?
With the Jews we saw a CALCULATED, PROCEDURAL way of eradicating a group of people who were victimized largely by their standing in society in Germany. You can argue whatever you want, but that was absolutely brutal finding those camps. The shear planning, the imagery of marching a group of people into a gas chamber, should immediately cause you to stfu about this whole debate. With the indians it was sad, we do have the Trail of Tears, etc. but it was also chaotic. I don't see you giving a fuck about victims of the European plagues.
The nature of the situations as well as their respective times in history (so context, which I'm not going to get into at length here) is what makes them fundamentally different and acceptable for them to have different outcomes IMO.
Wish I hadn't read it.