This isn't a coach that thinks he's going to win the Pac 12

haie

https://twitter.com/AaronJFentress/status/1693343689417036146?t=vUsHeI3wlq76RRK4JnsWRA&s=19

46XiJCAB

Aaron Fentress.

LOL…..

flatus

peterson_no.gif

Not similar at all.

Coaches who get annoyed by reporters' asinine questions must all be losers. I heard it on a message board so it must be true.

46XiJCAB

flatus said:

peterson_no.gif

Not similar at all.

Coaches who get annoyed by reporters' asinine questions must all be losers. I heard it on a message board so it must be true.

Bill B. is a loser.

Just ask Aaron #whatshisname.

greenblood

Fentress is making something over nothing. Who really gives a shit right now in what ways the defense improved? We’ll find out those improvements in a little over a week. A lot of these questions provide zero substance to the issue at hand. Plus, I’m indifferent in giving a bullshit answer. But if a reporter is having a fit because he wanted a bullshit answer then he should understand the value of people’s time.

SFGbob

greenblood said:

Fentress is making something over nothing. Who really gives a shit right now in what ways the defense improved? We’ll find out those improvements in a little over a week. A lot of these questions provide zero substance to the issue at hand. Plus, I’m indifferent in giving a bullshit answer. But if a reporter is having a fit because he wanted a bullshit answer then he should understand the value of people’s time.

Agreed, who gives a crap about what he says or doesn't say? You'll know how the Defense is when you see the product on the field, whatever he says or doesn't say is meaningless.

thechatch

Lol Fentress

haie

Not one single quook hit on the topic of the thread.

haie

greenblood said:

Fentress is making something over nothing. Who really gives a shit right now in what ways the defense improved? We’ll find out those improvements in a little over a week. A lot of these questions provide zero substance to the issue at hand. Plus, I’m indifferent in giving a bullshit answer. But if a reporter is having a fit because he wanted a bullshit answer then he should understand the value of people’s time.

Well it looks like you did.

Either he's just an asshole/tired of the media down there, or he knows the defense isn't ready with less than 2 weeks to play.

thechatch

haie said:

Not one single quook hit on the topic of the thread.

Head coach hates taking empty questions from Portland Oregon media? Is that the topic I need to hit on?

We had a couple of guys who loved talking to sportswriters….Helfrich(until he went 4-8) and Taggart(until he put 5 kids in a hospital).

Everyone else has had a lukewarm at best relationship with our Jay-vee level sports writers.

We care about this a lot less than you do.

HTH

haie

thechatch said:

haie said:

Not one single quook hit on the topic of the thread.

Head coach hates taking empty questions from Portland Oregon media? Is that the topic I need to hit on?

We had a couple of guys who loved talking to sportswriters….Helfrich(until he went 4-8) and Taggart(until he put 5 kids in a hospital).

Everyone else has had a lukewarm at best relationship with our Jay-vee level sports writers.

We care about this a lot less than you do.

HTH

I don't give a shit about the dumb fuck Eugene retard media.

A 36 year old is this easily agitated because he's come to the realization that developing a defense is a bit different when you can't just roll the ball out in Athens.

Talking about tackling. With less than 2 weeks to go. We already know the DC ain't fixing it.

We'll see.

46XiJCAB

Look at how hard the bored Retard is pressing today.

Fentress…….NOFC.

haie

Once again the thread isn't about Fentress.

greenblood

haie said:

greenblood said:

Fentress is making something over nothing. Who really gives a shit right now in what ways the defense improved? We’ll find out those improvements in a little over a week. A lot of these questions provide zero substance to the issue at hand. Plus, I’m indifferent in giving a bullshit answer. But if a reporter is having a fit because he wanted a bullshit answer then he should understand the value of people’s time.

Well it looks like you did.

Either he's just an asshole/tired of the media down there, or he knows the defense isn't ready with less than 2 weeks to play.

Who knows. But when you have to answer questions from guys like Fentress, Prehm, and Canzano, you’d be a little salty too. Think about Pete answering filler questions from the likes of Fetters and Griswald. That’s what this was. So given who’s asking the question, I don’t take much notice in giving a nothing answer.

If he acted this way with say Jerry Allen, then it would be somewhat telling, given how respected Jerry Allen is in that community.

haie

greenblood said:

haie said:

greenblood said:

Fentress is making something over nothing. Who really gives a shit right now in what ways the defense improved? We’ll find out those improvements in a little over a week. A lot of these questions provide zero substance to the issue at hand. Plus, I’m indifferent in giving a bullshit answer. But if a reporter is having a fit because he wanted a bullshit answer then he should understand the value of people’s time.

Well it looks like you did.

Either he's just an asshole/tired of the media down there, or he knows the defense isn't ready with less than 2 weeks to play.

Who knows. But when you have to answer questions from guys like Fentress, Prehm, and Canzano, you’d be a little salty too. Think about Pete answering filler questions from the likes of Fetters and Griswald. That’s what this was. So given who’s asking the question, I don’t take much notice in giving a nothing answer.

If he acted this way with say Jerry Allen, then it would be somewhat telling, given how respected Jerry Allen is in that community.

UO coaches gets softballs. It's always been that way.

He got cunty for no reason. Or some reason. Thank Christ the season is here.

SFGbob

haie said:

Not one single quook hit on the topic of the thread.

Look at the dipshit not picking up on the fact that most people. including his fellow Huskies, ignore this dumbfuck.

haie

SFGbob said:

haie said:

Not one single quook hit on the topic of the thread.

Look at the dipshit not picking up on the fact that most people. including his fellow Huskies, ignore this dumbfuck.

You have a lot of hate in your life.

trublue

haie said:

SFGbob said:

haie said:

Not one single quook hit on the topic of the thread.

Look at the dipshit not picking up on the fact that most people. including his fellow Huskies, ignore this dumbfuck.

You have a lot of hate in your life.

lulz

greenblood

haie said:

greenblood said:

haie said:

greenblood said:

Fentress is making something over nothing. Who really gives a shit right now in what ways the defense improved? We’ll find out those improvements in a little over a week. A lot of these questions provide zero substance to the issue at hand. Plus, I’m indifferent in giving a bullshit answer. But if a reporter is having a fit because he wanted a bullshit answer then he should understand the value of people’s time.

Well it looks like you did.

Either he's just an asshole/tired of the media down there, or he knows the defense isn't ready with less than 2 weeks to play.

Who knows. But when you have to answer questions from guys like Fentress, Prehm, and Canzano, you’d be a little salty too. Think about Pete answering filler questions from the likes of Fetters and Griswald. That’s what this was. So given who’s asking the question, I don’t take much notice in giving a nothing answer.

If he acted this way with say Jerry Allen, then it would be somewhat telling, given how respected Jerry Allen is in that community.

UO coaches gets softballs. It's always been that way.

He got cunty for no reason. Or some reason. Thank Christ the season is here.

This isn’t any different than what Chip did. Not comparing the two. The Eugene beat media couldn’t stand Chip, because he always left them out. Then Helfrich sucked them off (how well did that work out for him?) Meat wasn’t really smart enough to play games. Is this kind of what Smart does? If so, then we know where Lanning got it. I think we will learn week 2, what this defense can and can’t do.

haie

greenblood said:

haie said:

greenblood said:

haie said:

greenblood said:

Fentress is making something over nothing. Who really gives a shit right now in what ways the defense improved? We’ll find out those improvements in a little over a week. A lot of these questions provide zero substance to the issue at hand. Plus, I’m indifferent in giving a bullshit answer. But if a reporter is having a fit because he wanted a bullshit answer then he should understand the value of people’s time.

Well it looks like you did.

Either he's just an asshole/tired of the media down there, or he knows the defense isn't ready with less than 2 weeks to play.

Who knows. But when you have to answer questions from guys like Fentress, Prehm, and Canzano, you’d be a little salty too. Think about Pete answering filler questions from the likes of Fetters and Griswald. That’s what this was. So given who’s asking the question, I don’t take much notice in giving a nothing answer.

If he acted this way with say Jerry Allen, then it would be somewhat telling, given how respected Jerry Allen is in that community.

UO coaches gets softballs. It's always been that way.

He got cunty for no reason. Or some reason. Thank Christ the season is here.

This isn’t any different than what Chip did. Not comparing the two. The Eugene beat media couldn’t stand Chip, because he always left them out. Then Helfrich sucked them off (how well did that work out for him?) Meat wasn’t really smart enough to play games. Is this kind of what Smart does? If so, then we know where Lanning got it. I think we will learn week 2, what this defense can and can’t do.

Chip earned that right.

Petersen thought he did until he realized that Seattle doesn't care about Boise and is questioning why he's kicking an NFL Pro bowler off team.

Lanning is all hat, no cattle so far.

greenblood

haie said:

greenblood said:

haie said:

greenblood said:

haie said:

greenblood said:

Fentress is making something over nothing. Who really gives a shit right now in what ways the defense improved? We’ll find out those improvements in a little over a week. A lot of these questions provide zero substance to the issue at hand. Plus, I’m indifferent in giving a bullshit answer. But if a reporter is having a fit because he wanted a bullshit answer then he should understand the value of people’s time.

Well it looks like you did.

Either he's just an asshole/tired of the media down there, or he knows the defense isn't ready with less than 2 weeks to play.

Who knows. But when you have to answer questions from guys like Fentress, Prehm, and Canzano, you’d be a little salty too. Think about Pete answering filler questions from the likes of Fetters and Griswald. That’s what this was. So given who’s asking the question, I don’t take much notice in giving a nothing answer.

If he acted this way with say Jerry Allen, then it would be somewhat telling, given how respected Jerry Allen is in that community.

UO coaches gets softballs. It's always been that way.

He got cunty for no reason. Or some reason. Thank Christ the season is here.

This isn’t any different than what Chip did. Not comparing the two. The Eugene beat media couldn’t stand Chip, because he always left them out. Then Helfrich sucked them off (how well did that work out for him?) Meat wasn’t really smart enough to play games. Is this kind of what Smart does? If so, then we know where Lanning got it. I think we will learn week 2, what this defense can and can’t do.

Chip earned that right.

Petersen thought he did until he realized that Seattle doesn't care about Boise and is questioning why he's kicking an NFL Pro bowler off team.

Lanning is all hat, no cattle so far.

Chip was doing this from day one. As Blount’s right hand showed, Chip didn’t earn it right away.