New building in initial development in Seattle would be city's tallest

PostGameOrangeSlices

bizjournals.com/seattle/blog/2014/03/here-s-what-seattle-s-tallest-tower-could-look.html?page=all






Reason #100000000 Seattle > Portland (Hi Sven)

Mad_Son

What is that? A building for ants? How can we expect people to work if they can't even fit in the building? The building has to be at least three times bigger than this!

DerekJohnson

That's what Seattle needs — more traffic.

PurpleJ

I invented the piano key neck tie!!!!1

PostGameOrangeSlices

DerekJohnson said:

That's what Seattle needs — more traffic.

...

not sure if srs. traffic itself is good: it means people going about business, spending money, improving the economy, etc. traffic without the infrastructure to keep it moving at a reasonable pace is bad.

Seattle definitely needs to upgrade its infrastructure and public transportation, no argument there. But that doesn't mean the city can't continue to develop.

PostGameOrangeSlices

Mad_Son said:

What is that? A building for ants? How can we expect people to work if they can't even fit in the building? The building has to be at least three times bigger than this!

they should make it more ovular. it's too phallic at the moment, it's sexist!11!!!!1

DerekJohnson

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

Mad_Son said:

What is that? A building for ants? How can we expect people to work if they can't even fit in the building? The building has to be at least three times bigger than this!

they should make it more ovular. it's too phallic at the moment, it's sexist!11!!!!1

They actually had to tone it down from earlier designs...