Husky Jacks open thread [2023]
Comments
-
The more we see teams like Bama and UGA struggle without bonafide QB's, the more I think this year is completely wide open and UW can actually win the Natty. Yes, I am dooging. We? can afford to drop one game, probably USC on the road, win the PAC and be in the playoff rather easily. Offense is what wins these days.
-
1) just win all the gamesBleachedAnusDawg said:The more we see teams like Bama and UGA struggle without bonafide QB's, the more I think this year is completely wide open and UW can actually win the Natty. Yes, I am dooging. We? can afford to drop one game, probably USC on the road, win the PAC and be in the playoff rather easily. Offense is what wins these days.
2) loose 1 to either quook or Trooj and win the PAC championship
3) 12-0, loose the championship game to a once beaten (by UW) SC or Oregon, *we? both get in.
Those are the three routes to the playoffs I can think of. #3 probably wouldn't ever happen for a non SEC team.
Get there and get there healthy. Unlike 2016, this team has a punchers chance against anyone. -
I might catch the first half before my old ass falls asleep.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
FMLGrundleStiltzkin said:
Yes.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
Has anyone seen game time and network info for the Arizona game yet? FBS Schedules websites shows 10pm EST on Pac12 but I’ve not seen it elsewhere. -
USC getting a 9am PT kickoff is infinitely worse than UW getting a 7pm kickoffGrundleStiltzkin said:
Yes.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
Has anyone seen game time and network info for the Arizona game yet? FBS Schedules websites shows 10pm EST on Pac12 but I’ve not seen it elsewhere. -
Ratings for that game are going to be ridiculous.NEsnake12 said:
USC getting a 9am PT kickoff is infinitely worse than UW getting a 7pm kickoffGrundleStiltzkin said:
Yes.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
Has anyone seen game time and network info for the Arizona game yet? FBS Schedules websites shows 10pm EST on Pac12 but I’ve not seen it elsewhere. -
They will be for the first hour until USC is up 3 TDsdirtysouwfdawg said:
Ratings for that game are going to be ridiculous.NEsnake12 said:
USC getting a 9am PT kickoff is infinitely worse than UW getting a 7pm kickoffGrundleStiltzkin said:
Yes.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
Has anyone seen game time and network info for the Arizona game yet? FBS Schedules websites shows 10pm EST on Pac12 but I’ve not seen it elsewhere. -
-
Shit. Mele has been a pretty good player for like a decade and a half now.NEsnake12 said:
That said, Parker @PapaBrailsford and the younger Hatchett might represent upgrades over the older guys on the inside.
Still, #firehuff same as ever. -
In order of chance of losing I'd put OSU first then SC and Duckchuck said:
1) just win all the gamesBleachedAnusDawg said:The more we see teams like Bama and UGA struggle without bonafide QB's, the more I think this year is completely wide open and UW can actually win the Natty. Yes, I am dooging. We? can afford to drop one game, probably USC on the road, win the PAC and be in the playoff rather easily. Offense is what wins these days.
2) loose 1 to either quook or Trooj and win the PAC championship
3) 12-0, loose the championship game to a once beaten (by UW) SC or Oregon, *we? both get in.
Those are the three routes to the playoffs I can think of. #3 probably wouldn't ever happen for a non SEC team.
Get there and get there healthy. Unlike 2016, this team has a punchers chance against anyone.
Deboer and the leaders on the team got that "I want to blow out the other contenders on national television" mentality and they have the team to do it. Reeser with defense seems like the tweener that they don't crank it up to 100% for and let slip. Probably a better team than Oregon straight up.
Still think they go 15-0 though don't twist
