Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

What percentage of posters' wives/girlfriends know they poast here?

2

Comments

  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 13,014
    No 81%?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    edited May 2014
    0.857%

    What's the significance of 81%? Seems to hold a special place in HH lore.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    15%
    oregonblitzkrieg said:


    What's the significance of 81%? Seems to hold a special place in HH lore.

    81% of the time, Eklund's confident the kid will commit to UW, everytime.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    5%
    Mine knows I post on a Husky site. She hasn't visited this site yet though thankfully.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    edited May 2014
    5%
    oregonblitzkrieg said:


    What's the significance of 81%? Seems to hold a special place in HH lore.

    Someone asked Ektard how confident he was that Mora would be our new head coach. I forget if this was 2008 or 2007 assuming 2007.

    Ektard originally goes 80% then goes actually 81%. Of course Mora never coached at UW.

    Plus who the fuck uses a number like 81% and then be fucking wrong? That's why it's so legendary. It's up there with Ben Ossai.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 13,014
    edited May 2014
    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:


    What's the significance of 81%? Seems to hold a special place in HH lore.

    Someone asked Ektard how confident he was that Mora would be our new head coach. I forget if this was 2008 or 2007 assuming 2007.

    Ektard originally goes 80% then goes actually 81%. Of course Mora never coached at UW.

    Plus who the fuck uses a number like 81% and then be fucking wrong? That's why it's so legendary. It's up there with Ben Ossai.
    Wasn't 81% (or something similar) also used in the Lorenzo Booker recruiting saga? I do remember Dawgman claiming we had a great shot of landing Booker in Jan 2002 but we weren't even in his top 3 at the time (FSU, USC, ND).

    Mods? Devs? DJs? Little help?

    Edit: Found the info on an Ask Dawgman article from 2002 where Samek said "However, Booker will chose UW because it is the best fit for him, not because of Tony Alford. Alford was a plus, but isn’t the entire equation. If he wants to leave home, Booker will come to Washington. If he wants to stay close to home, he’ll chose USC."
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    My wife posts on this site.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AZDuck
    AZDuck Member Posts: 15,381
    I'm a bitch
    Pics or its a lie.
    sarktastic said:

    My wife posts on this site.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    5%
    A lot of twisting in this thread about 81%. It's not from a recruiting story at all.

    It comes from Eklund's confidence on Mora being our next coach.

    Some of you really need to learn the difference.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter