Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

Don't buy the Quook propaganda!!!

Mosster47Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
edited January 2014 in College Football Forum
Last year Stanford beat Oregon, won the North, won the Pac-12, and won the Rose Bowl. Oregon lost to Stanford, didn't win the North, didn't win the Pac-12, and won the Fiesta. Quooks were all in unison saying Oregon has a better season because they finished the season ranked higher.

Head-to-head, division champion, conference champion, Rose Bowl champion > Fiesta Bowl champion and higher final ranking.

Quooks will tell you Oregon is better this year as well, even though we were massacred by Stanford, lost the division to them, and won a gas station bowl.

Head-to-head, division champion, conference champion, Rose Bowl appearance > Gas Station Bowl and higher final ranking.

Stanford is a better program than Oregon right now, trying to church that up is part of the problem.

Comments

  • Options
    blackmambablackmamba Member Posts: 184
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes Name Dropper 5 Awesomes
  • Options
    dncdnc Member Posts: 56,614
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Oregon should not finish this year ranked ahead of Stanford. If they do, that's just further proof that the rankings are FS.
  • Options
    Mosster47Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
    dnc said:

    Oregon should not finish this year ranked ahead of Stanford. If they do, that's just further proof that the rankings are FS.

    It's going to be a lot closer than it should be.

  • Options
    blackmambablackmamba Member Posts: 184
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes Name Dropper 5 Awesomes
  • Options
    creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 22,741
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes Photogenic
    Mosster47 said:

    Last year Stanford beat Oregon, won the North, won the Pac-12, and won the Rose Bowl. Oregon lost to Stanford, didn't win the North, didn't win the Pac-12, and won the Fiesta. Quooks were all in unison saying Oregon has a better season because they finished the season ranked higher.

    Head-to-head, division champion, conference champion, Rose Bowl champion > Fiesta Bowl champion and higher final ranking.

    Quooks will tell you Oregon is better this year as well, even though we were massacred by Stanford, lost the division to them, and won a gas station bowl.

    Head-to-head, division champion, conference champion, Rose Bowl appearance > Gas Station Bowl and higher final ranking.

    Stanford is a better program than Oregon right now, trying to church that up is part of the problem.

    As to your basic conclusion about which program is better, well, that's obvious because Kelly is gone.

    But you pose two wildly different scenarios. In the first, it's less clear. In the latter, it's obvious. This year, no question Furd had the better season. They'll be ranked higher and lost to a good Big 10 opponent in the Rose. The Alamo is the Alamo and Oregon finished the season miserably. Frankly, they didn't look that great against Texas either.

    But last year? Stanford barely beat them. That coming on the heels of two ass throttles going the other way when they had Harbaugh and Luck. And winning the Fiesta bowl like they did against a pretty good K State team ... I don't know man. Did Furd technically have the better season last year? Sure, the conference champhionship defines that. But at that point were they the better program? Hardly. The seasons were fairly comparable at that point and Kelly was still there. This year is altogether different.

  • Options
    ToiletSeatToiletSeat Member Posts: 150
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
    Didn't 'Bama win a national championship in the same year they failed to win the SEC West or the SEC Championship? Yeah, but LSU had the better season.

    The Quooks are totally wrong, but so are you Negaducks. Try to have some understanding of college football. There is no justice. Stanford lost three games, Oregon lost two. Shaw coached like an idiot in the Rose Bowl, and Helfrich wasn't Kelly in the Gas Station Bowl.

    JFLIFPTFO!
  • Options
    dncdnc Member Posts: 56,614
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes

    Didn't 'Bama win a national championship in the same year they failed to win the SEC West or the SEC Championship? Yeah, but LSU had the better season.

    The Quooks are totally wrong, but so are you Negaducks. Try to have some understanding of college football. There is no justice. Stanford lost three games, Oregon lost two. Shaw coached like an idiot in the Rose Bowl, and Helfrich wasn't Kelly in the Gas Station Bowl.

    JFLIFPTFO!

    Total losses is a terrible metric when one team faced the ghost of Mack Brown and the other faced a top 5 team in the bowels.

    Stanford beat Oregon head to head, had a better finish in the same division, and had a better non conference win.

    Stanford 13 >>>> Oregon 13, wiff a bullet.
  • Options
    Mosster47Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment

    Mosster47 said:

    Last year Stanford beat Oregon, won the North, won the Pac-12, and won the Rose Bowl. Oregon lost to Stanford, didn't win the North, didn't win the Pac-12, and won the Fiesta. Quooks were all in unison saying Oregon has a better season because they finished the season ranked higher.

    Head-to-head, division champion, conference champion, Rose Bowl champion > Fiesta Bowl champion and higher final ranking.

    Quooks will tell you Oregon is better this year as well, even though we were massacred by Stanford, lost the division to them, and won a gas station bowl.

    Head-to-head, division champion, conference champion, Rose Bowl appearance > Gas Station Bowl and higher final ranking.

    Stanford is a better program than Oregon right now, trying to church that up is part of the problem.

    As to your basic conclusion about which program is better, well, that's obvious because Kelly is gone.

    But you pose two wildly different scenarios. In the first, it's less clear. In the latter, it's obvious. This year, no question Furd had the better season. They'll be ranked higher and lost to a good Big 10 opponent in the Rose. The Alamo is the Alamo and Oregon finished the season miserably. Frankly, they didn't look that great against Texas either.

    But last year? Stanford barely beat them. That coming on the heels of two ass throttles going the other way when they had Harbaugh and Luck. And winning the Fiesta bowl like they did against a pretty good K State team ... I don't know man. Did Furd technically have the better season last year? Sure, the conference champhionship defines that. But at that point were they the better program? Hardly. The seasons were fairly comparable at that point and Kelly was still there. This year is altogether different.


    Head-to-head, division, conference, Rose Bowl > Fiesta Bowl. How you could even question this is CheswickFR.

  • Options
    ToiletSeatToiletSeat Member Posts: 150
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
    Saban turns Ferrari into Corolla. Discuss.
  • Options
    TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Combo Breaker 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Anniversary

    Saban turns Ferrari into Corolla. Discuss.

    Even puppylove_sugarsteelfuckingstupid thinks you are off your meds.
  • Options
    creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 22,741
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes Photogenic
    edited January 2014
    Mosster47 said:

    Mosster47 said:

    Last year Stanford beat Oregon, won the North, won the Pac-12, and won the Rose Bowl. Oregon lost to Stanford, didn't win the North, didn't win the Pac-12, and won the Fiesta. Quooks were all in unison saying Oregon has a better season because they finished the season ranked higher.

    Head-to-head, division champion, conference champion, Rose Bowl champion > Fiesta Bowl champion and higher final ranking.

    Quooks will tell you Oregon is better this year as well, even though we were massacred by Stanford, lost the division to them, and won a gas station bowl.

    Head-to-head, division champion, conference champion, Rose Bowl appearance > Gas Station Bowl and higher final ranking.

    Stanford is a better program than Oregon right now, trying to church that up is part of the problem.

    As to your basic conclusion about which program is better, well, that's obvious because Kelly is gone.

    But you pose two wildly different scenarios. In the first, it's less clear. In the latter, it's obvious. This year, no question Furd had the better season. They'll be ranked higher and lost to a good Big 10 opponent in the Rose. The Alamo is the Alamo and Oregon finished the season miserably. Frankly, they didn't look that great against Texas either.

    But last year? Stanford barely beat them. That coming on the heels of two ass throttles going the other way when they had Harbaugh and Luck. And winning the Fiesta bowl like they did against a pretty good K State team ... I don't know man. Did Furd technically have the better season last year? Sure, the conference champhionship defines that. But at that point were they the better program? Hardly. The seasons were fairly comparable at that point and Kelly was still there. This year is altogether different.


    Head-to-head, division, conference, Rose Bowl > Fiesta Bowl. How you could even question this is CheswickFR.

    Pleez re-reed my poast more closer. You are saying to things and you are saying them to interchangeably make too differnt poonts.

    Season or program? Oregon and Stanford were interchangeable last year. Oregon would've likely won the Rosebowl too. Furd won a nailbiter in Ugene and that's the difference. Minor.

    This year, much different.

    Are you saying 12 and 13 are the same? If you are you are Oregondawg stoopid. If you are not, then I love you.
  • Options
    ToiletSeatToiletSeat Member Posts: 150
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
    I have no argument with Stanford having the better resume over two years, one of which included Chip the God of Football at the helm of UO. The notion that the wheels have come off the program, however, is just f'd up. Oregon choked at Stanford and choked at Arizona. Stanford choked at Utah and SC, then threw away the Rose Bowl. It happens, and the records are what they are; they're both pretty decent.
  • Options
    TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Combo Breaker 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Anniversary

    I have no argument with Stanford having the better resume over two years, one of which included Chip the God of Football at the helm of UO. The notion that the wheels have come off the program, however, is just f'd up. Oregon choked at Stanford and choked at Arizona. Stanford choked at Utah and SC, then threw away the Rose Bowl. It happens, and the records are what they are; they're both just tall midgets.

  • Options
    haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 20,464
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    all you have to do is look at head to head. Yeah, Stanford barely won last year, but still pulled it off in Eugene. Then this year in Palo Alto the duck team bus drove them right past the stadium and behind the woodshed. Good news for duck fans though is that the program still comes off looking much sexier in their 500th jersey combination and a defensive throttling of texas.
Sign In or Register to comment.