Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

PM to recruiting nerds

How the fuck can you have the #1 recruiting class in the conference when you only recruit 14 players?
«1

Comments

  • doogiedoogie Member Posts: 15,072
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    So, it’s like Michael Mann’s hockey stick bullshit?
  • doogiedoogie Member Posts: 15,072
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    Heat >>> Push?
  • FremontTrollFremontTroll Member Posts: 4,702
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
    edited February 2018
    doogie said:

    So, it’s like Michael Mann’s hockey stick bullshit?

    Yes, statistics are actually a liberal conspiracy. Great point.
  • doogiedoogie Member Posts: 15,072
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes

    doogie said:

    So, it’s like Michael Mann’s hockey stick bullshit?

    Yes, statistics are actually a liberal conspiracy. Great point.
    Statistics are not the same as opinions or fraudulent data.

    Hth
  • doogiedoogie Member Posts: 15,072
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    edited February 2018
    Not at all.

    Non-coaches put their opinions into a model. Great. Doesn’t explain how leaving 8 positions empty makes for the best recruiting class.

    Mann, well, snicker

    https://principia-scientific.org/breaking-key-un-climate-fraudster-makes-concessions-tim-ball-lawsuit/
  • Neighbor2972Neighbor2972 Member Posts: 4,287
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    11 Players are on the field at once. Quality > Quantity, luckily we have both this year
  • doogiedoogie Member Posts: 15,072
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    edited February 2018
    Yeah, “quality” as defined by non-coaches trying to sell subscriptions to fans like us. Kinda the point.


    Edit, they’re now #3 Makes more sense
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Combo Breaker 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Anniversary

    Not sure how you think a pending lawsuit for libel filed by Mann proves Mann is a fraud? Even if he doesn't win the libel case that doesn't mean his research was fraudulent, do you see why?

    Every climate reconstruction study since '98 has essentially confirmed Mann's study but that is neither here nor there.

    Are we really re-litigating ClimateGate in 2018? I thought you guys had moved on to attacking other institutional pillars of society from the NYT to the FBI.

    If you attack everything, nothing remains.
  • doogiedoogie Member Posts: 15,072
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    No. We were discussing 247 non -coaches selling subscriptions using opinions with flawed data, they try to fit into a scientific model.
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,480
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter

    Not sure how you think a pending lawsuit for libel filed by Mann proves Mann is a fraud? Even if he doesn't win the libel case that doesn't mean his research was fraudulent, do you see why?

    Every climate reconstruction study since '98 has essentially confirmed Mann's study but that is neither here nor there.

    Are we really re-litigating ClimateGate in 2018? I thought you guys had moved on to attacking other institutional pillars of society from the NYT to the FBI.

    If you annoy everything, nothing remains.
  • FremontTrollFremontTroll Member Posts: 4,702
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
    doogie said:

    No. We were discussing 247 non -coaches selling subscriptions using opinions with flawed data, they try to fit into a scientific model.

    SarkFan69 gave you an excellent explanation. Facts matter. Facts are real. Facts that go against our intuitions and preconceived beliefs matter even more.
  • Neighbor2972Neighbor2972 Member Posts: 4,287
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    doogie said:

    No. We were discussing 247 non -coaches selling subscriptions using opinions with flawed data, they try to fit into a scientific model.

    There is no way not to have opinions in recruiting rankings. I don't understand what you want them to do? Opinions + Scientific Model > Opinions. If you think their opinions are wrong then fine, but why do you care about recruiting rankings at all?
  • AIRWOLFAIRWOLF Member Posts: 1,840
    5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Anniversary First Comment
    doogie said:

    No. We were discussing 247 non -coaches selling subscriptions using opinions with flawed data, they try to fit into a scientific model.

    Is this shtick? If so, it is high quality satire.

    If not, then perhaps you should take a long walk for some perspective. Or drink bleach. Your option.
Sign In or Register to comment.