As for Cal, it's either the love of the Telegraph hippies, the surveyed 2,000 football players are in the state of CA where that org is based or the CEO wanted the school he played for to be high in the rankings.
Looks like paying that Lyle guy to find and recruit future ducks prevented Nike U. from landing top five recruiting classes every year. Either that or the 2000 prep footballers surveyed weren't and still aren't on anybody's list of top no-star recruits.
that's what winning does for a school. 4 BCS appearances in a row makes a difference. NOBODY is watching a bowl game on Dec 30th. Oregon is so freaken far ahead of UW its sickening. Hard to catch up to a school that got a 10-year head start, with money, support from EVERYONE top-to-bottom, and killer facilities and uniforms
Too late! Sark is doing the right thing and with great effort. But pissing wins away and COMPLETELY ditching the only part of your offense that got your team to the red zone (the running game), TIME AND TIME AGAIN, is inexplicable. That's been the difference between 9-4 and 7-6. You also HAVE to win road games. Sarks squad did that, or looked better doing it, in 2009 (with Ty's recruits). With his recruits, his teams are d-2 quality on the road. Time to step up and beat teams on the road like Oregon does
that's what winning does for a school. 4 BCS appearances in a row makes a difference. NOBODY is watching a bowl game on Dec 30th. Oregon is so freaken far ahead of UW its sickening. Hard to catch up to a school that got a 10-year head start, with money, support from EVERYONE top-to-bottom, and killer facilities and uniforms
that's what winning does for a school. 4 BCS appearances in a row makes a difference. NOBODY is watching a bowl game on Dec 30th. Oregon is so freaken far ahead of UW its sickening. Hard to catch up to a school that got a 10-year head start, with money, support from EVERYONE top-to-bottom, and killer facilities and uniforms
Oregon managed to do it...
You realize that UW athletics had the money and support from everyone that counts, but the money collected from us under deceptions, lies, and false promises by those no-accounts who hate Husky Football was spent elsewhere. I understand that looking back over the past 20 years is unpopular amongst the young and considered the province of old people who lived and suffered through it, but Oregon did not by any measure get a 10-year head start.
MikeDamone
Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,781
Comments
#StToshsDayMassacre2014
(Even if there are only 3 of them.)
As for Cal, it's either the love of the Telegraph hippies, the surveyed 2,000 football players are in the state of CA where that org is based or the CEO wanted the school he played for to be high in the rankings.
Too late! Sark is doing the right thing and with great effort. But pissing wins away and COMPLETELY ditching the only part of your offense that got your team to the red zone (the running game), TIME AND TIME AGAIN, is inexplicable. That's been the difference between 9-4 and 7-6. You also HAVE to win road games. Sarks squad did that, or looked better doing it, in 2009 (with Ty's recruits). With his recruits, his teams are d-2 quality on the road. Time to step up and beat teams on the road like Oregon does
Oh wait, we didn't receive ANY votes? Okay....that is statistically significant.