Was Trump smart when he said he didn't believe Russia was hacking America. Or was he smart when he said Russia was hacking America?
Did you know the FBI never examined the DNC servers? Seems odd doesn't it but the DNC wouldn't allow it. Even odder! But hey they had nothing to hide.
This is a fundamental misunderstanding of how Forensic Technology investigations work that has been completely misconstrued by some on the right. You don’t need the physical servers to examine them. They did receive the imaging and data on the servers which is a perfectly fine substitute for the physical thing.
Source: I work as a Forensic Investigator and have many friends in our Forensic Technology group who confirmed the above information.
Was Trump smart when he said he didn't believe Russia was hacking America. Or was he smart when he said Russia was hacking America?
Did you know the FBI never examined the DNC servers? Seems odd doesn't it but the DNC wouldn't allow it. Even odder! But hey they had nothing to hide.
This is a fundamental misunderstanding of how Forensic Technology investigations work that has been completely misconstrued by some on the right. You don’t need the physical servers to examine them. They did receive the imaging and data on the servers which is a perfectly fine substitute for the physical thing.
Source: I work as a Forensic Investigator and have many friends in our Forensic Technology group who confirmed the above information.
Was Trump smart when he said he didn't believe Russia was hacking America. Or was he smart when he said Russia was hacking America?
Did you know the FBI never examined the DNC servers? Seems odd doesn't it but the DNC wouldn't allow it. Even odder! But hey they had nothing to hide.
This is a fundamental misunderstanding of how Forensic Technology investigations work that has been completely misconstrued by some on the right. You don’t need the physical servers to examine them. They did receive the imaging and data on the servers which is a perfectly fine substitute for the physical thing.
Source: I work as a Forensic Investigator and have many friends in our Forensic Technology group who confirmed the above information.
Did you know the FBI never examined the DNC servers? Seems odd doesn't it but the DNC wouldn't allow it. Even odder! But hey they had nothing to hide.
This is a fundamental misunderstanding of how Forensic Technology investigations work that has been completely misconstrued by some on the right. You don’t need the physical servers to examine them. They did receive the imaging and data on the servers which is a perfectly fine substitute for the physical thing.
Source: I work as a Forensic Investigator and have many friends in our Forensic Technology group who confirmed the above information.
And for what it's worth, even the House Intelligence Committee's report concluded that the intelligence community's assessment was correct: Russia hacked DNC servers and passed the stolen emails to WikiLeaks.
Look at pages 22-31 of the report (PDF). The publicly available copy is heavily redacted because of the classified info that it supposedly contains, but the report's conclusions are still there for anyone to see.
I guess anybody could still claim that the DNC fabricated the Russian-hacking story and point to the DNC's handling of its servers as evidence of that claim. But you'd have to argue that both the intelligence community and House Republicans got it wrong. And you'd have to argue @Edwin_Bambino doesn't know what he's talking about. Pass.
Did you know the FBI never examined the DNC servers? Seems odd doesn't it but the DNC wouldn't allow it. Even odder! But hey they had nothing to hide.
This is a fundamental misunderstanding of how Forensic Technology investigations work that has been completely misconstrued by some on the right. You don’t need the physical servers to examine them. They did receive the imaging and data on the servers which is a perfectly fine substitute for the physical thing.
Source: I work as a Forensic Investigator and have many friends in our Forensic Technology group who confirmed the above information.
And for what it's worth, even the House Intelligence Committee's report concluded that the intelligence committee's assessment was correct: Russia hacked DNC servers and passed the stolen emails to WikiLeaks.
Look at pages 22-31 of the report (PDF). The publicly available copy is heavily redacted because of the classified info that it supposedly contains, but the report's conclusions are still there for anyone to see.
I guess anybody could still claim that the DNC fabricated the Russian-hacking story and point to the DNC's handling of its servers as evidence of that claim. But you'd have to argue that both the intelligence community and House Republicans got it wrong. And you'd have to argue @Edwin_Bambino doesn't know what he's talking about. Pass.
I never know what I’m talking about. But unfortunately on this stupid subject I do.
Did you know the FBI never examined the DNC servers? Seems odd doesn't it but the DNC wouldn't allow it. Even odder! But hey they had nothing to hide.
This is a fundamental misunderstanding of how Forensic Technology investigations work that has been completely misconstrued by some on the right. You don’t need the physical servers to examine them. They did receive the imaging and data on the servers which is a perfectly fine substitute for the physical thing.
Source: I work as a Forensic Investigator and have many friends in our Forensic Technology group who confirmed the above information.
And for what it's worth, even the House Intelligence Committee's report concluded that the intelligence committee's assessment was correct: Russia hacked DNC servers and passed the stolen emails to WikiLeaks.
Look at pages 22-31 of the report (PDF). The publicly available copy is heavily redacted because of the classified info that it supposedly contains, but the report's conclusions are still there for anyone to see.
I guess anybody could still claim that the DNC fabricated the Russian-hacking story and point to the DNC's handling of its servers as evidence of that claim. But you'd have to argue that both the intelligence community and House Republicans got it wrong. And you'd have to argue @Edwin_Bambino doesn't know what he's talking about. Pass.
I never know what I’m talking about. But unfortunately on this stupid subject I do.
That may be so, but you're a specialist so you can't be trusted.
Sledog
Member Posts: 30,695
Comments
I'd say it to his decomposed face.
See Lisa Page testimony.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/fact-check-trump-promoted-conspiracy-theories-here-s-truth-n891756
You're my bitch.
Source: I work as a Forensic Investigator and have many friends in our Forensic Technology group who confirmed the above information.
There was dissent within this VIPS group on the findings.
This is what it's about.
Look at pages 22-31 of the report (PDF). The publicly available copy is heavily redacted because of the classified info that it supposedly contains, but the report's conclusions are still there for anyone to see.
I guess anybody could still claim that the DNC fabricated the Russian-hacking story and point to the DNC's handling of its servers as evidence of that claim. But you'd have to argue that both the intelligence community and House Republicans got it wrong. And you'd have to argue @Edwin_Bambino doesn't know what he's talking about. Pass.