Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

DM to good guys with guns

RedRocketRedRocket Member Posts: 1,526
First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
Some tips on identifying pre-attack behavior of active shooters. Sledog when your micro penis starts to tingle and trigger finger gets itchy keep these things in mind before you make your move.


1. The 63 active shooters examined in this study did not appear to be uniform in any way such that they
could be readily identified prior to attacking based on demographics alone.

2. Active shooters take time to plan and prepare for the attack, with 77% of the subjects spending a week
or longer planning their attack and 46% spending a week or longer actually preparing (procuring the
means) for the attack.

3. A majority of active shooters obtained their firearms legally, with only very small percentages obtaining a
firearm illegally.

4. The FBI could only verify that 25% of active shooters in the study had ever been diagnosed with a
mental illness. Of those diagnosed, only three had been diagnosed with a psychotic disorder.

5. Active shooters were typically experiencing multiple stressors (an average of 3.6 separate stressors) in the
year before they attacked.

6. On average, each active shooter displayed 4 to 5 concerning behaviors over time that were observable to
others around the shooter. The most frequently occurring concerning behaviors were related to the active
shooter’s mental health, problematic interpersonal interactions, and leakage of violent intent.

7. For active shooters under age 18, school peers and teachers were more likely to observe concerning
behaviors than family members. For active shooters 18 years old and over, spouses/domestic partners were
the most likely to observe concerning behaviors.

8. When concerning behavior was observed by others, the most common response was to communicate
directly to the active shooter (83%) or do nothing (54%). In 41% of the cases the concerning
behavior was reported to law enforcement. Therefore, just because concerning behavior was recognized
does not necessarily mean that it was reported to law enforcement.

9. In those cases where the active shooter’s primary grievance could be identified, the most common
grievances were related to an adverse interpersonal or employment action against the shooter (49%).

10. In the majority of cases (64%) at least one of the victims was specifically targeted by the active shooter.


https://www.fbi.gov/file-repository/pre-attack-behaviors-of-active-shooters-in-us-2000-2013.pdf/view
«1

Comments

  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Sledog needs concealed carry cause he'll take out the active shooter. All he needs is a gun and bullets.
  • pawzpawz Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,676
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Founders Club
    RedRocket said:

    Some tips on identifying pre-attack behavior of active shooters. Sledog when your micro penis starts to tingle and trigger finger gets itchy keep these things in mind before you make your move.


    1. The 63 active shooters examined in this study did not appear to be uniform in any way such that they
    could be readily identified prior to attacking based on demographics alone.

    2. Active shooters take time to plan and prepare for the attack, with 77% of the subjects spending a week
    or longer planning their attack and 46% spending a week or longer actually preparing (procuring the
    means) for the attack.

    3. A majority of active shooters obtained their firearms legally, with only very small percentages obtaining a
    firearm illegally.

    4. The FBI could only verify that 25% of active shooters in the study had ever been diagnosed with a
    mental illness. Of those diagnosed, only three had been diagnosed with a psychotic disorder.

    5. Active shooters were typically experiencing multiple stressors (an average of 3.6 separate stressors) in the
    year before they attacked.

    6. On average, each active shooter displayed 4 to 5 concerning behaviors over time that were observable to
    others around the shooter. The most frequently occurring concerning behaviors were related to the active
    shooter’s mental health, problematic interpersonal interactions, and leakage of violent intent.

    7. For active shooters under age 18, school peers and teachers were more likely to observe concerning
    behaviors than family members. For active shooters 18 years old and over, spouses/domestic partners were
    the most likely to observe concerning behaviors.

    8. When concerning behavior was observed by others, the most common response was to communicate
    directly to the active shooter (83%) or do nothing (54%). In 41% of the cases the concerning
    behavior was reported to law enforcement. Therefore, just because concerning behavior was recognized
    does not necessarily mean that it was reported to law enforcement.

    9. In those cases where the active shooter’s primary grievance could be identified, the most common
    grievances were related to an adverse interpersonal or employment action against the shooter (49%).

    10. In the majority of cases (64%) at least one of the victims was specifically targeted by the active shooter.


    https://www.fbi.gov/file-repository/pre-attack-behaviors-of-active-shooters-in-us-2000-2013.pdf/view
    3 thoughts:

    One, it would be really interesting to see if those metrics held for the 5 recent years missing from the study.

    Two, those findings confirm the idea that more laws won't do shit to keep guns out of the hands of shooters. As we already knew, there are institutionalized societal pressures causing people to 'break'.

    Three, HondoFS is, and will always be, part of the problem.


  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 30,463
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog needs concealed carry cause he'll take out the active shooter. All he needs is a gun and bullets.

    You wouldn't find me hiding. I'd actively be doing all I could to stop it.

    How about the rest of you?
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    pawz said:

    RedRocket said:

    Some tips on identifying pre-attack behavior of active shooters. Sledog when your micro penis starts to tingle and trigger finger gets itchy keep these things in mind before you make your move.


    1. The 63 active shooters examined in this study did not appear to be uniform in any way such that they
    could be readily identified prior to attacking based on demographics alone.

    2. Active shooters take time to plan and prepare for the attack, with 77% of the subjects spending a week
    or longer planning their attack and 46% spending a week or longer actually preparing (procuring the
    means) for the attack.

    3. A majority of active shooters obtained their firearms legally, with only very small percentages obtaining a
    firearm illegally.

    4. The FBI could only verify that 25% of active shooters in the study had ever been diagnosed with a
    mental illness. Of those diagnosed, only three had been diagnosed with a psychotic disorder.

    5. Active shooters were typically experiencing multiple stressors (an average of 3.6 separate stressors) in the
    year before they attacked.

    6. On average, each active shooter displayed 4 to 5 concerning behaviors over time that were observable to
    others around the shooter. The most frequently occurring concerning behaviors were related to the active
    shooter’s mental health, problematic interpersonal interactions, and leakage of violent intent.

    7. For active shooters under age 18, school peers and teachers were more likely to observe concerning
    behaviors than family members. For active shooters 18 years old and over, spouses/domestic partners were
    the most likely to observe concerning behaviors.

    8. When concerning behavior was observed by others, the most common response was to communicate
    directly to the active shooter (83%) or do nothing (54%). In 41% of the cases the concerning
    behavior was reported to law enforcement. Therefore, just because concerning behavior was recognized
    does not necessarily mean that it was reported to law enforcement.

    9. In those cases where the active shooter’s primary grievance could be identified, the most common
    grievances were related to an adverse interpersonal or employment action against the shooter (49%).

    10. In the majority of cases (64%) at least one of the victims was specifically targeted by the active shooter.


    https://www.fbi.gov/file-repository/pre-attack-behaviors-of-active-shooters-in-us-2000-2013.pdf/view
    3 thoughts:

    One, it would be really interesting to see if those metrics held for the 5 recent years missing from the study.

    Two, those findings confirm the idea that more laws won't do shit to keep guns out of the hands of shooters. As we already knew, there are institutionalized societal pressures causing people to 'break'.

    Three, HondoFS is, and will always be, part of the problem.


    You've clearly never read my thoughts on the issue.

    The real issue is gun nuts like you and the NRA refuse to do anything. Except tell lies about how Democrats want to confiscate your guns.
  • DeepSeaZDeepSeaZ Member Posts: 3,901
    5 Awesomes First Anniversary First Answer First Comment
    2001400ex said:

    pawz said:

    RedRocket said:

    Some tips on identifying pre-attack behavior of active shooters. Sledog when your micro penis starts to tingle and trigger finger gets itchy keep these things in mind before you make your move.


    1. The 63 active shooters examined in this study did not appear to be uniform in any way such that they
    could be readily identified prior to attacking based on demographics alone.

    2. Active shooters take time to plan and prepare for the attack, with 77% of the subjects spending a week
    or longer planning their attack and 46% spending a week or longer actually preparing (procuring the
    means) for the attack.

    3. A majority of active shooters obtained their firearms legally, with only very small percentages obtaining a
    firearm illegally.

    4. The FBI could only verify that 25% of active shooters in the study had ever been diagnosed with a
    mental illness. Of those diagnosed, only three had been diagnosed with a psychotic disorder.

    5. Active shooters were typically experiencing multiple stressors (an average of 3.6 separate stressors) in the
    year before they attacked.

    6. On average, each active shooter displayed 4 to 5 concerning behaviors over time that were observable to
    others around the shooter. The most frequently occurring concerning behaviors were related to the active
    shooter’s mental health, problematic interpersonal interactions, and leakage of violent intent.

    7. For active shooters under age 18, school peers and teachers were more likely to observe concerning
    behaviors than family members. For active shooters 18 years old and over, spouses/domestic partners were
    the most likely to observe concerning behaviors.

    8. When concerning behavior was observed by others, the most common response was to communicate
    directly to the active shooter (83%) or do nothing (54%). In 41% of the cases the concerning
    behavior was reported to law enforcement. Therefore, just because concerning behavior was recognized
    does not necessarily mean that it was reported to law enforcement.

    9. In those cases where the active shooter’s primary grievance could be identified, the most common
    grievances were related to an adverse interpersonal or employment action against the shooter (49%).

    10. In the majority of cases (64%) at least one of the victims was specifically targeted by the active shooter.


    https://www.fbi.gov/file-repository/pre-attack-behaviors-of-active-shooters-in-us-2000-2013.pdf/view
    3 thoughts:

    One, it would be really interesting to see if those metrics held for the 5 recent years missing from the study.

    Two, those findings confirm the idea that more laws won't do shit to keep guns out of the hands of shooters. As we already knew, there are institutionalized societal pressures causing people to 'break'.

    Three, HondoFS is, and will always be, part of the problem.


    You've clearly never read my thoughts on the issue.

    The real issue is gun nuts like you and the NRA refuse to do anything. Except tell lies about how Democrats want to confiscate your guns.
    What are your thoughts?
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    DeepSeaZ said:

    2001400ex said:

    pawz said:

    RedRocket said:

    Some tips on identifying pre-attack behavior of active shooters. Sledog when your micro penis starts to tingle and trigger finger gets itchy keep these things in mind before you make your move.


    1. The 63 active shooters examined in this study did not appear to be uniform in any way such that they
    could be readily identified prior to attacking based on demographics alone.

    2. Active shooters take time to plan and prepare for the attack, with 77% of the subjects spending a week
    or longer planning their attack and 46% spending a week or longer actually preparing (procuring the
    means) for the attack.

    3. A majority of active shooters obtained their firearms legally, with only very small percentages obtaining a
    firearm illegally.

    4. The FBI could only verify that 25% of active shooters in the study had ever been diagnosed with a
    mental illness. Of those diagnosed, only three had been diagnosed with a psychotic disorder.

    5. Active shooters were typically experiencing multiple stressors (an average of 3.6 separate stressors) in the
    year before they attacked.

    6. On average, each active shooter displayed 4 to 5 concerning behaviors over time that were observable to
    others around the shooter. The most frequently occurring concerning behaviors were related to the active
    shooter’s mental health, problematic interpersonal interactions, and leakage of violent intent.

    7. For active shooters under age 18, school peers and teachers were more likely to observe concerning
    behaviors than family members. For active shooters 18 years old and over, spouses/domestic partners were
    the most likely to observe concerning behaviors.

    8. When concerning behavior was observed by others, the most common response was to communicate
    directly to the active shooter (83%) or do nothing (54%). In 41% of the cases the concerning
    behavior was reported to law enforcement. Therefore, just because concerning behavior was recognized
    does not necessarily mean that it was reported to law enforcement.

    9. In those cases where the active shooter’s primary grievance could be identified, the most common
    grievances were related to an adverse interpersonal or employment action against the shooter (49%).

    10. In the majority of cases (64%) at least one of the victims was specifically targeted by the active shooter.


    https://www.fbi.gov/file-repository/pre-attack-behaviors-of-active-shooters-in-us-2000-2013.pdf/view
    3 thoughts:

    One, it would be really interesting to see if those metrics held for the 5 recent years missing from the study.

    Two, those findings confirm the idea that more laws won't do shit to keep guns out of the hands of shooters. As we already knew, there are institutionalized societal pressures causing people to 'break'.

    Three, HondoFS is, and will always be, part of the problem.


    You've clearly never read my thoughts on the issue.

    The real issue is gun nuts like you and the NRA refuse to do anything. Except tell lies about how Democrats want to confiscate your guns.
    What are your thoughts?
    Ultimately that the NRA should come up with meaningful regulations that protect legal gun owners yet keep guns out of criminals hands. It's not an easy task given many shooters aren't criminals until they decide to kill someone. These can be one or more of these ideas:

    - background checks on all sales.
    - Better education for gun owners, such as required Hunter safety classes.
    - Stronger penalties for not legally possessing guns
    - This one most here won't like, but a registry of certain guns (such as what the media calls assualt rifles)
    - Use technology on new guns to ensure only the legal gun owner can fire it. Such as a fingerprint reader.
    - Limit size of magazines except to owners who pass a certain test.
    - Better tracking by the government to spot the people who are stockpiling firearms such as the Vegas shooter.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 30,463
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    edited June 2018
    2001400ex said:

    DeepSeaZ said:

    2001400ex said:

    pawz said:

    RedRocket said:

    Some tips on identifying pre-attack behavior of active shooters. Sledog when your micro penis starts to tingle and trigger finger gets itchy keep these things in mind before you make your move.


    1. The 63 active shooters examined in this study did not appear to be uniform in any way such that they
    could be readily identified prior to attacking based on demographics alone.

    2. Active shooters take time to plan and prepare for the attack, with 77% of the subjects spending a week
    or longer planning their attack and 46% spending a week or longer actually preparing (procuring the
    means) for the attack.

    3. A majority of active shooters obtained their firearms legally, with only very small percentages obtaining a
    firearm illegally.

    4. The FBI could only verify that 25% of active shooters in the study had ever been diagnosed with a
    mental illness. Of those diagnosed, only three had been diagnosed with a psychotic disorder.

    5. Active shooters were typically experiencing multiple stressors (an average of 3.6 separate stressors) in the
    year before they attacked.

    6. On average, each active shooter displayed 4 to 5 concerning behaviors over time that were observable to
    others around the shooter. The most frequently occurring concerning behaviors were related to the active
    shooter’s mental health, problematic interpersonal interactions, and leakage of violent intent.

    7. For active shooters under age 18, school peers and teachers were more likely to observe concerning
    behaviors than family members. For active shooters 18 years old and over, spouses/domestic partners were
    the most likely to observe concerning behaviors.

    8. When concerning behavior was observed by others, the most common response was to communicate
    directly to the active shooter (83%) or do nothing (54%). In 41% of the cases the concerning
    behavior was reported to law enforcement. Therefore, just because concerning behavior was recognized
    does not necessarily mean that it was reported to law enforcement.

    9. In those cases where the active shooter’s primary grievance could be identified, the most common
    grievances were related to an adverse interpersonal or employment action against the shooter (49%).

    10. In the majority of cases (64%) at least one of the victims was specifically targeted by the active shooter.


    https://www.fbi.gov/file-repository/pre-attack-behaviors-of-active-shooters-in-us-2000-2013.pdf/view
    3 thoughts:

    One, it would be really interesting to see if those metrics held for the 5 recent years missing from the study.

    Two, those findings confirm the idea that more laws won't do shit to keep guns out of the hands of shooters. As we already knew, there are institutionalized societal pressures causing people to 'break'.

    Three, HondoFS is, and will always be, part of the problem.


    You've clearly never read my thoughts on the issue.

    The real issue is gun nuts like you and the NRA refuse to do anything. Except tell lies about how Democrats want to confiscate your guns.
    What are your thoughts?
    Ultimately that the NRA should come up with meaningful regulations that protect legal gun owners yet keep guns out of criminals hands. It's not an easy task given many shooters aren't criminals until they decide to kill someone. These can be one or more of these ideas:

    - background checks on all sales.
    - Better education for gun owners, such as required Hunter safety classes.
    - Stronger penalties for not legally possessing guns
    - This one most here won't like, but a registry of certain guns (such as what the media calls assualt rifles)
    - Use technology on new guns to ensure only the legal gun owner can fire it. Such as a fingerprint reader.
    - Limit size of magazines except to owners who pass a certain test.
    - Better tracking by the government to spot the people who are stockpiling firearms such as the Vegas shooter.
    Yeah we should have some tests and background checks for the 1st amendment too. Especially if people use certain words.....

    Oh and fuck off with most that shit you posted.
  • haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 20,348
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    2001400ex said:

    DeepSeaZ said:

    2001400ex said:

    pawz said:

    RedRocket said:

    Some tips on identifying pre-attack behavior of active shooters. Sledog when your micro penis starts to tingle and trigger finger gets itchy keep these things in mind before you make your move.


    1. The 63 active shooters examined in this study did not appear to be uniform in any way such that they
    could be readily identified prior to attacking based on demographics alone.

    2. Active shooters take time to plan and prepare for the attack, with 77% of the subjects spending a week
    or longer planning their attack and 46% spending a week or longer actually preparing (procuring the
    means) for the attack.

    3. A majority of active shooters obtained their firearms legally, with only very small percentages obtaining a
    firearm illegally.

    4. The FBI could only verify that 25% of active shooters in the study had ever been diagnosed with a
    mental illness. Of those diagnosed, only three had been diagnosed with a psychotic disorder.

    5. Active shooters were typically experiencing multiple stressors (an average of 3.6 separate stressors) in the
    year before they attacked.

    6. On average, each active shooter displayed 4 to 5 concerning behaviors over time that were observable to
    others around the shooter. The most frequently occurring concerning behaviors were related to the active
    shooter’s mental health, problematic interpersonal interactions, and leakage of violent intent.

    7. For active shooters under age 18, school peers and teachers were more likely to observe concerning
    behaviors than family members. For active shooters 18 years old and over, spouses/domestic partners were
    the most likely to observe concerning behaviors.

    8. When concerning behavior was observed by others, the most common response was to communicate
    directly to the active shooter (83%) or do nothing (54%). In 41% of the cases the concerning
    behavior was reported to law enforcement. Therefore, just because concerning behavior was recognized
    does not necessarily mean that it was reported to law enforcement.

    9. In those cases where the active shooter’s primary grievance could be identified, the most common
    grievances were related to an adverse interpersonal or employment action against the shooter (49%).

    10. In the majority of cases (64%) at least one of the victims was specifically targeted by the active shooter.


    https://www.fbi.gov/file-repository/pre-attack-behaviors-of-active-shooters-in-us-2000-2013.pdf/view
    3 thoughts:

    One, it would be really interesting to see if those metrics held for the 5 recent years missing from the study.

    Two, those findings confirm the idea that more laws won't do shit to keep guns out of the hands of shooters. As we already knew, there are institutionalized societal pressures causing people to 'break'.

    Three, HondoFS is, and will always be, part of the problem.


    You've clearly never read my thoughts on the issue.

    The real issue is gun nuts like you and the NRA refuse to do anything. Except tell lies about how Democrats want to confiscate your guns.
    What are your thoughts?
    Ultimately that the NRA should come up with meaningful regulations that protect legal gun owners yet keep guns out of criminals hands. It's not an easy task given many shooters aren't criminals until they decide to kill someone. These can be one or more of these ideas:

    - background checks on all sales.
    - Better education for gun owners, such as required Hunter safety classes.
    - Stronger penalties for not legally possessing guns
    - This one most here won't like, but a registry of certain guns (such as what the media calls assualt rifles)
    - Use technology on new guns to ensure only the legal gun owner can fire it. Such as a fingerprint reader.
    - Limit size of magazines except to owners who pass a certain test.
    - Better tracking by the government to spot the people who are stockpiling firearms such as the Vegas shooter.
    - Me buying a gun legally and then shooting myself in the head with it.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Both of you are exactly my point. You both have an irrational fear of shit like background checks. Da fuq? We have an issue. But you want to do absolutely nothing to solve it.

    Idiots.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 30,463
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    2001400ex said:

    Both of you are exactly my point. You both have an irrational fear of shit like background checks. Da fuq? We have an issue. But you want to do absolutely nothing to solve it.

    Idiots.

    Odd you think it's wrong to show ID to vote but it's perfectly OK to gut the second amendment to the constitution. Why should people have to pay fees and have their constitutional right restricted? How about you pay to have free speech? How a test before you may speak in public? Or to have coverage under the 4th amendment? Or maybe the 5th?

    How about if we simply say members of certain races or classes are more prone to criminal activity and should be denied most constitutional rights?

    You commies are funny.

    Fingerprint locks? When You need a gun it positively has to work right now. No waiting for a lock to ID and and allow you to use the item. How about if your hand is bloody? When you need a gun really bad shit is happening and you may often already be in a fight or injured. How's that print reader work covered in blood or mud or dirt? How about the damn battery? When life and death is on the line count on a brain dead liberal to make rules only for the non-criminal.

    Your crappy list illustrates that you want to outlaw all guns. Right now it's this certain type of gun. When that's gone it'll be another type of gun that's the problem and that would go on until nothing was left. Then it would be knives and pretty soon you tards would try and outlaw rocks. It's the person not the object. Place the blame where it belongs. None of your suggestions would have prevented any of the mass shootings you speak of, but here you are.

  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Both of you are exactly my point. You both have an irrational fear of shit like background checks. Da fuq? We have an issue. But you want to do absolutely nothing to solve it.

    Idiots.

    Odd you think it's wrong to show ID to vote but it's perfectly OK to gut the second amendment to the constitution. Why should people have to pay fees and have their constitutional right restricted? How about you pay to have free speech? How a test before you may speak in public? Or to have coverage under the 4th amendment? Or maybe the 5th?

    How about if we simply say members of certain races or classes are more prone to criminal activity and should be denied most constitutional rights?

    You commies are funny.

    Fingerprint locks? When You need a gun it positively has to work right now. No waiting for a lock to ID and and allow you to use the item. How about if your hand is bloody? When you need a gun really bad shit is happening and you may often already be in a fight or injured. How's that print reader work covered in blood or mud or dirt? How about the damn battery? When life and death is on the line count on a brain dead liberal to make rules only for the non-criminal.

    Your crappy list illustrates that you want to outlaw all guns. Right now it's this certain type of gun. When that's gone it'll be another type of gun that's the problem and that would go on until nothing was left. Then it would be knives and pretty soon you tards would try and outlaw rocks. It's the person not the object. Place the blame where it belongs. None of your suggestions would have prevented any of the mass shootings you speak of, but here you are.

    You are a special kind of stupid. And this line of thinking will get guns banned.

    Idiot.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 30,463
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    edited June 2018
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Both of you are exactly my point. You both have an irrational fear of shit like background checks. Da fuq? We have an issue. But you want to do absolutely nothing to solve it.

    Idiots.

    Odd you think it's wrong to show ID to vote but it's perfectly OK to gut the second amendment to the constitution. Why should people have to pay fees and have their constitutional right restricted? How about you pay to have free speech? How a test before you may speak in public? Or to have coverage under the 4th amendment? Or maybe the 5th?

    How about if we simply say members of certain races or classes are more prone to criminal activity and should be denied most constitutional rights?

    You commies are funny.

    Fingerprint locks? When You need a gun it positively has to work right now. No waiting for a lock to ID and and allow you to use the item. How about if your hand is bloody? When you need a gun really bad shit is happening and you may often already be in a fight or injured. How's that print reader work covered in blood or mud or dirt? How about the damn battery? When life and death is on the line count on a brain dead liberal to make rules only for the non-criminal.

    Your crappy list illustrates that you want to outlaw all guns. Right now it's this certain type of gun. When that's gone it'll be another type of gun that's the problem and that would go on until nothing was left. Then it would be knives and pretty soon you tards would try and outlaw rocks. It's the person not the object. Place the blame where it belongs. None of your suggestions would have prevented any of the mass shootings you speak of, but here you are.

    You are a special kind of stupid. And this line of thinking will get guns banned.

    Idiot.
    No idiots like you will get guns banned. I doubt you'll be the commie coming to take them away.

    You wouldn't know shit from Shinola.
  • Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 26,538
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker
    Democrats.

    Always too fucking afraid to just say they want to amend the Constitution.
  • WilburHooksHandsWilburHooksHands Member Posts: 6,740
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes

    Democrats.

    Always too fucking afraid to just say they want to amend the Constitution.

    The constitution was intended to be amended.
  • Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 26,538
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker

    Democrats.

    Always too fucking afraid to just say they want to amend the Constitution.

    The constitution was intended to be amended.

    Yeah.

    Which is why the only legit way to change anything gun wise is to amend the constitution.

    Yet they are always proposing some pussy ass halfway measure.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 30,463
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    edited June 2018

    Democrats.

    Always too fucking afraid to just say they want to amend the Constitution.

    The constitution was intended to be amended.

    Yeah.

    Which is why the only legit way to change anything gun wise is to amend the constitution.

    Yet they are always proposing some pussy ass halfway measure.
    The first ten amendments are not amendable. Those were specifically singaled out as rights that preexisted the constitution and were granted by the creator. HTH

    http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/12/27/repeal-of-the-second-amendment-would-not-abolish-any-right/

    I'm so glad this was immediately turned into a gun control thread when I asked you pussbags what YOU would do to stop a mass shooting.

    Hondo of course went full faggot.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes

    Democrats.

    Always too fucking afraid to just say they want to amend the Constitution.

    Read some supreme court decisions.
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,123
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker
    Swaye's Wigwam
    edited June 2018
    This argument never ends. I will say I hate the Country folk who post about how they teach gun responsibility to their inbred 11 year old and how guns are so great. The 11 year old can take apart and clean the guns too. It teaches the kids about safety, discipline, and responsibility!

    They are so oblivious and stupid that most rational people could give a flying fuck about the guns on their property or that the inbred 11 year old from Arkansas knowing how to use them.

    The problem is psychos getting their hands on guns. It could get fixed, but it won't.
  • RedRocketRedRocket Member Posts: 1,526
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog needs concealed carry cause he'll take out the active shooter. All he needs is a gun and bullets.

    You wouldn't find me hiding. I'd actively be doing all I could to stop it.

    How about the rest of you?
    TYFYS. Morally I just can't bring myself to own a gun but I keep my body in peak physical condition. Herd animal mentality. Just have to be faster than the slowest person around you. In confined spaces strong enough to force the weaklings into being human shields.
Sign In or Register to comment.